The supply chain is the process of getting materials and parts needed to make cars from one place to another. It includes everything from getting raw materials to building and selling the cars.
Formula One is a type of car racing where specially designed cars race on tracks. It's very popular and features some of the fastest cars in the world.
Automotive manufacturing is the process of making cars and other vehicles. It involves designing, building, and testing vehicles to make sure they are safe and work well.
Unleaded fuel is a cleaner type of gasoline that doesn't have lead in it. Lead was used in older fuels but was banned because it can be harmful to people and the environment. Most cars today run on unleaded fuel.
A lithium-ion battery is a battery that can be recharged and is often found in things like electric cars and smartphones. If these batteries get damaged, they can catch fire or even explode.
Solid state batteries are a newer type of battery that use solid materials instead of liquids. They can store more energy and are generally safer than regular batteries.
Battery stacks are groups of battery cells piled together to make a stronger battery. This helps electric cars get more power and drive longer distances.
NMC is a type of battery used in electric cars that combines nickel, manganese, and cobalt. It's popular because it provides a good mix of power and safety.
Lithium batteries are a type of battery that can be recharged and are commonly found in electric cars. They are popular because they store a lot of energy and last a long time.
The gray market is where products are sold through unofficial channels, which can be risky. For cars and parts, this might mean buying something that isn't guaranteed to be safe or reliable.
Nickel manganese cobalt batteries are a type of battery that helps electric cars go further and perform better. They use a mix of metals to achieve this balance.
F1 stands for Formula 1, which is a very fast and exciting type of car racing. It has special cars that are built for speed and performance, racing on tracks all over the world.
LIVE
Hi, I'm Gary, and this is EV Musings, a podcast about renewables, electric vehicles, and things
that are interesting to electric vehicle owners.
And on the show today, we'll be looking at battery recycling.
The EV Musings podcast is sponsored by Zatmap, the go-to app for EV drivers, helping you
find and pay for public charging with confidence.
Our main topic of discussion today is battery recycling, and this is the second in a short
series on batteries I'm running this season.
These episodes should be listened to in partnership with episode 264 from last season, which is
the battery repair episode.
Now I put out a call last season to see if anyone would be interested in an episode
on battery recycling, including a discussion on black mass, which is like the concentrated
mix of critical battery metals, which is reintroduced in the EV battery supply chain, and supports
compliance with EU regulations, mandating recycled content to new batteries from 2030.
Now it's not necessarily a topic that a lot of my audience would find interesting, so
I thought I'd ask and see.
Well, the response was quite overwhelming.
An email flooded in saying they thought this would be a good idea.
Actually, there were several emails all thinking this was what they wanted, but more than I imagined.
So here we are.
So let's chat to someone who works in the sector.
I'm Robin Brundle.
I'm Executive Chairman of Technology Minerals PLC, Executive Chairman of Recyclist Group
Limited, and also on the Board of Trustees of the Faraday Institution.
So essentially for the last six years, I've been focused on the lithium ion battery vertical
and the full circularity of exploration of raw minerals all the way through recycling
and reuse back into lithium ion batteries.
Let's move on and talk a little bit about Recyclist.
What does it do as a company?
So we set off on our journey about seven years ago now, my business partner,
Alex Stambry and I, and we could see that there was going to be a big gap in the lithium
ion battery space, both for the raw minerals, given the hold that China had on global and
still has on global supply of raw materials, and secondly, then on the recycling to recapture
those minerals so that we can keep them in the supply chain and thus from our point
of view, helping to the UK resilience for these raw minerals.
And so Recyclist has got some novel technology at industrial scale that's been processing
since July 2023, described by academia as world-leading.
And at the start of the journey, we knew that we had to be chemistry agnostic so that we're
able to process anything from a button cell in a vape through electric toothbrush, mobile
phone, laptops, e-bikes, cars, trains, forklift trucks, and of course energy storage systems.
And we set about doing this and quickly realized that we had got to create and design our
own plant.
So using the West Midlands capabilities, traditional recycling capabilities along with the very
latest knowledge and understanding of chemistry, we designed and built our own 22,000
ton per year plant, which is operational in Wolverhampton and still operating at scale
today and growing, which is great.
So we are a solution provider to every sector that's using lithium ion batteries.
And more importantly, the work that we've done over the last five or six years that
we have now created that circle.
So using partners abroad at the moment, and we'll perhaps touch on this in a moment,
having to send up some of our raw material abroad, we can now do the final separation to
get the battery material back into purity that will go into making a new battery.
So we've achieved that.
And where we go from here is to take costs out of that process and to take carbon
footprint by not having to ship it abroad.
So we're working hard to give this full circularity capability to the UK.
And that has a huge and a much wider impact because the automotive space is tasked with
using recycled material in the manufacturer of their batteries effectively for the
automotive space.
And I use automotive because clearly they're the biggest by volume user of
lithium ion batteries.
But if they can't get their raw materials here in the UK, they will, of course,
go to where they can, which means that they will go into Europe or into Asia to
do their production and manufacturing.
And the economic impact of the supply chain, of the technology, of academia links with
Formula One with automotive will potentially be broken if we lose this capability.
And that's the flow chain.
But of course, the economics of that, of those people not working, for example,
in the taxation that comes from the automotive space.
So we play a really critical role in producing recycled material to help
attract and retain automotive manufacturing in the UK.
And of course, our big push over the next two to three years is to get
cost out of those programs to make sure that we can at least compete with China
on the supply of raw materials because it's no good us getting this process
going and then presenting the UK Gigafactories with material that's three
times the price of that that they can buy from China.
So we've come an awfully long way on the journey in six years that we've been
working and within the next two years, you'll see those final parts of the
circular economy being cost out and effective here in the UK.
Well, you pretty much answered all the questions that I was going to ask.
So thank you for that.
No, I'm under joking.
We'll come back and talk about some of those things in detail.
But I just want to pose.
Sure.
It's almost a philosophical question.
There is a perception in certain parts of the media and amongst a lot of
the electrical vehicle naysayers that EV batteries are a kind of a disposable
thing. I mean, the number of times I've heard people talk about this
mythical Schrodinger's battery, it's both too expensive to replace, but
it's cheap enough to throw into landfill after three years.
Do you have any idea where that myth came from?
In commerce, you will always have those that will have
the advantage by not supporting a latest technology.
And so, you know, and we've seen it in all of our lifetimes, you know,
when we, those of us that are old enough to remember when we even
transitioned in the 80s from leaded to unleaded fuel, you know,
there were the naysayers there, but they were probably those whose
engines wouldn't run on unleaded fuel, for example.
So you will always find that.
And I think to pick up on a couple of nuances in your question,
the first is that we must all avoid at all costs putting any of this
material back into landfill.
Firstly, there's harm to humans and harm to environment is the first
priority there to stop that from happening.
And then, of course, there is the recycled element of this,
as I've just said, is the carbon footprint of a recycled
battery that can be retained here in the UK to make new.
We believe is around 60% less carbon footprint than extracting
virgin material from the DRC, shipping it to China, processing
it, shipping it back around the world to assemble batteries for
propulsion effectively.
We don't support that theory.
And because we are evidencing that we've got this circularity,
you know, those that are in the camp that you mentioned should
really have a look at the advances that have been made.
And one great example is that, you know, if you look at those
early EV vehicles, the way in which we recycle their batteries
now, academia are reporting to government that it's better to
recycle than to second life them.
Because the way in which we can recycle them and recover,
and the way in which the new batteries now are being
made, you can almost get five new from one old.
And so why would you landfill that material when also it's
volatile over a period of time?
So, you know, for those that are having those sorts of comments,
there's either a political or an industrial comment to be made.
Just have a look at the facts around why it's best not to go
into landfill.
And, you know, we work closely with government agencies
and input regularly into government white papers and
panels to actually help with consumer responsibility.
Because if you look at the consumer responsibility over the
last three years or so, it's plateaued.
And so those that will make the effort to take their batteries
to the correct recycling point or collection point has
actually plateaued now.
So we know that government, for example, about 18 months
ago did a limited program to put to pay for an additional bin
as a pilot in certain postcodes and make it easy for consumers
by giving them, if you like, a fourth bin to put
their small electrical waste into.
And it will come as no surprise that the consumer
responsibility was hockey stick curve improvement.
So we know that if we can make it easier for people
that we can actually recover this, we as a company
call this urban mining.
And we think that there's a big part to play
by the consumer and that our job as commerce is to make it
cost effective to be able to do these collections
and to safely transport this material through our communities
to the places like our facilities at Wolverhampton,
where we can then end of life and recycle safely
do all of those processes.
So we've worked hard along with many, many others,
of course, looking at how we do the packaging,
how we do the logistics.
And even in our case, we're looking
at shrinking our industrial scale plan
to make it into a mobile 40 foot container.
So where we've got problematic material
or fire damaged material, we can actually,
the theory being is that once it's finished,
we can take this module to where the problem is
so that we don't then have to carry this material
on the highways and through the communities effectively.
There's so much good work going on and it's real.
It's real time.
This isn't an enthusiastic future tense conversation.
These things are all happening
and have been happening successfully for quite some time.
Let me pick up on that because recycling batteries,
it has had a bit of a reputation of,
yeah, it's coming in a few years,
it's going to be really, really good.
And that's kind of been there for quite a while.
But given what you've just said
in answer to the last question,
what is the actual state of battery recycling in the UK?
Do we know what percentage of quote unquote
dead batteries are actually being recycling?
How many different organizations are there
in this particular sphere?
Do we know?
The short answer is no, we don't.
And there's a lot of good work going on
to try and identify where the material and its quantum is.
One of the slight issues that's clouding
the statistics on this is that a number of organizations
and companies that use lithium-ion batteries
have actually taken old material off
and have put it into store.
And so we know that there are warehouses full
and even as a company,
we occasionally get surprised by how much material we find
that's been stored over a period of up to 10 years
in some cases.
So those stats are still being flushed out.
The actual robustness of the industry,
we are pretty unique in what we do
because and described as world leading
because we actually shred our batteries
under liquid nitrogen.
And the relevance of this is there are competitors in America
who have had two to three billion dollars
of government money now.
They're shredding underwater under salt water.
So if you've got a lithium-ion battery,
if you damage it, it will go bang flash
and the energy will be released
in the form of an explosion and fire.
And we've all seen these pictures
on one form or another on the news or social media.
However, if you shred under water
as they're doing in America and others around the world,
you actually wash away the liquid in the battery
called the electrolyte
and you also wash away the lithium.
So the recovery rates are well below 90%
and before you even start the process,
there's then high energy usage needed
to dry the material.
So that's our competitors.
But what we're actually doing here in the UK
is we shred under liquid nitrogen
and we've got a novel shredding process
that guarantees the destruction
and controls any form of bang or flash inside the machine
by replacing any oxygen immediately with liquid nitrogen.
And that enables us then to immediately take the liquid
out of the electrolyte out of the battery
which makes the process a lot safer
but also a lot drier.
So we need an awful lot less energy
our whole site runs on less than 250 KVA
of electricity, for example.
And it makes it so much greener
and our recovery rates are in the high 99%
where you'll never capture everything.
There's always gonna be a tiny, tiny, tiny amount
that's able but as best you can
everything we've got going in the front end
we collect out of the back end
and zero to land pool.
So that's given us a whole ESG narrative
with everybody from the automotive space,
the Ministry of Defense to Accardo,
Halfords, high street names that you would recognize.
And what we have with that is as the industry is moving
because you'll know the space is so fast moving
and the race for chemistry is not yet settled.
So one of the beauties we have is agility
because if suddenly, as we have with automotive
we've done all the initial trials
on solid state batteries, for example,
successfully done those.
And also the fact that the battery stacks
are getting wider, they're going the full width of cars now.
So when we first started looking at this,
we only needed an aperture on the machine,
a mouth on the machine, of a meter wide
to accommodate batteries and so on.
Now to be able to put a full stack in
we're now developing and about to start
manufacturing a new mouth.
Well, we can have that done in three months,
whereas if you have to buy it through a third party
from around the world and it's bespoke,
we all know the pain and the cost that that creates.
So we've got business agility
with what we're doing as well.
Yeah, I think that's a very long answer
to a short question, sorry.
Let's just pick up on a couple of the things
that you've mentioned already.
In terms of the actual batteries that have been recycled,
I think early on you said that you'll pick anything
from the ones that you'll find in vapes
and any sort of electronic item
right up to electric vehicle batteries.
Do you have a breakdown of what percentage
of the batteries you're recycling
are actually coming from electric vehicles
versus other sources for those batteries?
Yes, we do and it's a very good question
and we do a monthly and yearly comparison.
And this time last year, for example,
our top three clients were from the W category,
W-E-E-E, waste electrical category effectively.
So this would be your laptop, your mobiles,
your toothbrushes, your vapes,
the children's toy cars, e-bikes and so on.
But in the last 12 months,
it's been overtaken by automotive
and we also are unique in that we can take damage
to effective and burnt batteries
and process them and get full recovery from them
of what's left, full recovery of whatever we've been handled.
And so what we are now seeing is that automotive
is our, by the end of this year,
we'll become our biggest operator,
currently running in second place
behind the WEE collection systems.
And, but you know, if you think about
how small a vape battery is, for example,
and then some of the batteries
that we're getting from automotive,
you know, a three quarters of a ton.
So you have to have an awful lot of vapes
to match a getting full batteries in from automotive.
You know, and we've also done a lot of work
on next-gen as well.
And some of the next-gen that we've processed,
we've trialed with the manufacturers,
yeah, they're coming at us with a thousand volts in them.
So, you know, these are serious, serious batteries
that are going to propel four by fours
in the same way as large petrol or diesel turbo
and fossil-fueled vehicles will be propelled.
You know, they're very, very next-gen,
gen four, gen five batteries.
They're incredibly powerful
and the technology to rapidly recharge them
now makes them comparable, in my opinion, with fossil fuels.
But somebody somewhere has got to handle them
if they go wrong.
And that is our role,
is to make sure that those materials
are properly dealt with, end of life,
don't end up in a grey market
where much harm can be done.
And we certify for our clients,
we certify every battery is certified
that it's been end of life as well.
In terms of the, actually, on this briefly,
in terms of the chemistry of the batteries,
if we look at electric vehicles,
the two main ones are the NMC and the LFP,
are you able to deal with both of those
or are you focused just on one in preference to the other?
Yes, we do both.
We've recently submitted papers
for consideration to government.
We have opted to batch process those two chemistry.
So LFP is dealt with differently to the NMC family.
And I say NMC family because it may be a surprise,
but vape batteries are NMC as well.
So despite being a relatively cheap product,
they've actually got the highest grade batteries in.
So we can process those along with automotive
and not get any corrupted back-end material.
LFP is very much a commercial concern.
I mean, it's easy to process.
And we do several thousands of tons of material.
But the slight issue we have is that
when it comes to what is the off-take for those,
there is virtually no value at all of the back-end of LFP.
So if we don't charge a gate fee for the LFP,
we will then have to stop processing.
So we've written to government too,
and it's been well received to say,
look, we need to have a producer responsibility scheme
that brings in a levy for LFP chemistry batteries.
This will help to protect recycling because without it,
you don't have to be a business person to realize
that if you don't get a gate fee at the front end,
no revenue at the front end,
and there's no real benefit and revenue at the back end,
you've still got operating costs in the middle,
you will not be viable and without government support,
the whole system of recycling LFP will be finished.
Then you're into exporting it back to China
where they will government subsidize and recycle
and retain international economic and commercial benefit
from it or your landfill,
which is just completely unacceptable.
So, yes, there are challenges,
thankfully being an island as we are here in the UK
and not wishing to reopen debates on Brexit,
but one of the upsides,
and there are many debates on either side, I accept that,
but one of the upsides is that we're able to look
at European policy in the areas that we have here
and either accept them and mirror them
or we can mirror them and add or mirror them
and subtract from them around how we deal with these materials
and how we keep them on shore here
and dissuade people from actually exporting these minerals,
but we're not mining and that's a critical pathway here,
the UK has virtually no mining of lithium at all
in any quantity and certainly not enough to support
up to six gigafactories,
which would be the ideal in the next 10 years.
And so we have to either buy the material in
or as academia have reported,
depending on the number of gigafactories,
recycling in the way in which we're doing it would recycle us.
We may be able to supply up to around 40%
of the requirements of the gigafactories going forward
by using recycled material and urban mining.
So that's really where we're at.
So let's talk a little bit about your,
I'm gonna use the phrase supply chain.
Now we've already talked about the WEEE batteries
that you're getting and we've talked about the electric vehicles.
Now I wanna focus a little bit
on the electric vehicle batteries that are coming in.
Where are they coming from?
Are these mostly EVs that have been in accidents
or something like that?
What's the actual source?
Where are they coming from?
This is three key sources really.
One is accident vehicles, as you rightly say.
The second are warranty issues
for automotive companies from around the world.
And the third is material that goes to test centers
and what would be classed as production scrap, effectively.
And is there contention between companies
such as yourselves and companies that want to,
for example, repair a damaged battery?
Because obviously there are batteries
which because of the way the technology works,
there are a lot of people who will see a damaged battery
and go, right, that needs to be replaced.
They'll ship that out and you'll get that.
Versus there are companies that will come in and say,
well, actually we've got 20 or 30 packs in here.
There's only one of them that's actually wrong.
We can take that out, replace it
and keep that battery there.
So how are you dealing with that contention?
We're strong of opinion on this
and listening to others report to government
like insurance, for example, like academia.
And we believe that the recycling of these batteries
is the preferred route and the recovery of the minerals
and reuse of the minerals.
So we're very firm in that.
We know that right now there is a strong market
for this second use.
The issue we have and we're seeing,
yeah, we carry a hundred tons of material as feedstock
ready to feed to the plant effectively.
So we're seeing and dealing with these lithium batteries
on mass every day from automotive.
We also for automotive do discharge and dismantle.
So we get to see the insides
of most automotive batteries as well.
Our opinion is that the gray market is a dangerous place
and let's separate this into two tracks here.
It's you've got the gray market
where you've got untrained folks
that are buying from an internet system, let's say,
and then doing a repair to a vehicle
that they're not 100% familiar with.
There's, we believe there's already been
experiences of lots of life to those
when the cars have gone home and been charging.
If you take the other track
where you've got an automotive company
that has got producer responsibilities
that are saying, actually,
we've got all of the correct test equipment
and actually we've designed the battery
in the first instance to be repairable
because right now they're not
and we the car company or battery manufacturer,
gigafactory will actually continue to warrant
as if it's to new performance effectively.
Once we've done the repair,
then I think that's a very different argument
and because if it's to manufacturers
original specification,
then I don't think anybody can have a problem with that
but it's not for the faint hearted to be a producer
and have producer responsibilities
because there are levies, there are liabilities
that all have to be considered.
So the slight worry is that we've got
non-gigafactory or car company, if you like,
second life going into things like energy storage
of which some of them can be going into domestic use,
for example, and they're the things
that make us extremely nervous.
And if we start to put these energy storage systems
under tower blocks, for example,
then we all know where the potential hazard there could lead.
So until you've experienced one of these batteries
going pop and the energy and the force
in which it happens, you won't fully really understand
the risk of getting it wrong with second life.
So there is a big market at the moment.
It's profitable here in the UK,
but it's only profitable because the batteries
are being shipped abroad.
And so we're shipping, in our opinion,
batteries that could be vulnerable
on the high seas in the first instance
and then secondly to countries where, let's say,
the standards may not be as rigorous
as they are here in the UK.
So we're very firm of opinion on that,
but driven by experience of what we see happen
to the batteries that we deal with.
Right, so let me see if I can clarify things
because the general consensus, and I think I agree with it,
is that the incidence of an electric vehicle battery
igniting and causing thermal runaway is very,
I mean, it's not zero, but it's very, very small
and it's much smaller than the incidence
of internal combustion engines are going on fire.
But what you're saying is that once those batteries
have reached a point where they've been taken out
of that vehicle and then passed on to a third party
who may or may not know in detail the minutiae
about how to process that battery
and make it into a second life,
there is the possibility that the risk
of thermal runaway will increase
with the second life battery.
Is that what I'm hearing you say, or have I misunderstood you?
No, you've understood, it's slightly wider than that as well,
but you've understood correctly.
And my point is this, if the manufacturer of the cell
has tested it and deemed it to be
within specification of that of a new cell,
then there should be no additional risk.
Where you've got people on the outside
who have not tested to original specification.
The risk, in my opinion, is too great and shouldn't be allowed.
And the reason is this, that we see in our everyday world
that batteries that can be, you can put handheld devices
on them to test the energy storage and so on and so forth.
But in reality, what you've got is a whole bunch
of chemistry that's traveling from your negative
to your positive or your positive to your negative,
depending on whether you're charging or discharged, okay?
And there are certain channels for these materials, let's say.
And the batteries themselves have got all
of the raw ingredients to explode.
So they also contain oxygen, okay?
And this thermal runaway, it only needs to have one piece
of, let me call it a membrane, separation membrane
that enables any of the chemistries
to mix that should not mix.
And there is the perfect fire triangle
with calorific liquid called electrolyte.
So what you've actually got is fire
and high energy for explosion.
So you end up with extreme temperatures
and molten aluminium, whatever it is, copper aluminium
and so on, that's actually flying through the air
along with flames and it spits, and it spits badly.
So propagation is highly likely at that point.
So that's really the whole emphasis that we've got here
is you just don't know.
If you look at a battery, and we've had automotive batteries
come into sight, been properly checked through
and we put them on the conveyor belt
and they then will go to thermal runaway
on the 22 seconds that it takes for them
to go on the conveyor belt into the liquid nitrogen
which is the safest point is in the liquid nitrogen.
And we've actually had over the last 12 months,
we've had three new belts on our infeed
because batteries have actually gone pop at that point
and they looked and tested
to make sure that they were discharged effectively,
looked perfectly fine and adequate to go into the system
and they still exploded on the conveyor belt.
And when you see that and live that
and we spend 24 hours a day
making sure the whole yard is controlled in that way,
it then makes you worry for people putting them
into places where they shouldn't really be
if they haven't been properly validated.
Yeah, no, that makes sense.
But we're coming towards the end of our time.
So what I wanna do is just ask a couple of quick questions
of recyclers themselves.
What, I mean, we've talked about what you do,
but I don't think that you've defined specifically,
what is your end product?
Do you create new batteries or do you sell black mass
or do you split out the different elements
and sell them separately?
But what do you sell out
and who is your market?
Who do you sell to?
Okay, so very good question.
So anything that's non-ferrous for example
in the liquid called the electrolyte.
So we've got copper, we've got aluminium,
we've got plastics, we've got high calorific liquids.
All of those elements stay here in the UK.
At the moment, you may have heard
of an international company called Glencore
who are probably the biggest mining and commodities
company in the world.
They take our black mass product
and they then ship it to certain places around the world
to make it back into pure enough materials
to go into batteries.
Now what is black mass?
Black mass essentially, if you look at it,
it looks like a talcum powder
that contains the nickel, the cobalt,
the manganese and the lithium.
So it has those four salts in it
and at the moment the UK does not have
industrial scale capability to separate this.
And this is why we use Glencore
who may then it goes initially to Germany
for a certain process
and then it can either then go off to India
or to South Korea before it then goes back to China.
So that's the circle
but all roads lead to and from China effectively.
So that is what we are as a company
working hard to break.
So we announced back in October, I think it was,
that we're working with Jaguar Land Rover,
Warwick University
and a New Zealand mining company called Mint Innovation.
We've won an 8.1 million pound bid,
government bid to set up and bring
that black mass separation here to the UK.
Now that process uses an alkali process.
So it's one way of getting the separation of the four salts
and the critical pathway of course
is to make sure that you recover all four salts
because for years people have been able to get one or two
but we're now able to get four through this process.
However, with the work that we've been doing
over the last two and a half years
through government and on the
government to government India program,
we've been working with a company there
that's been processing and separating the black mass
for the last 12 months using an acid process.
So we're looking at ways to how we can work
with that company and I had the pleasure of going
whilst we're politically agnostic,
I got invited to go with the Prime Minister
back in November to go as part of the delegation
to sign the trade agreement with India
and where we can start to further trust each other
with IP effectively.
So they've got something there using acid.
So at this point we've got a twin track strategy
with acid and alkaline and we are looking at a third track
which may use a closed water system
without using water and wasting water,
it uses water in a process but recycles it
and the reason that we're running all three
of those tracks is very simple.
We know that the science is there to do the separation
because we've already got that through Glenport.
What we now need is what is the most cost effective way
to do the industrialization piece
to bring this black mass separation to the UK.
So to be clear, we're dealing with minerals
and our whole raison d'etre is to recover them,
separate them, reuse them,
but we will then be a supplier of material,
two gigafactory.
So we have no intention of starting battery manufacturing.
That is a whole new world of expertise
that we don't currently have in our business
and wouldn't want to chase.
You know, it's into the billions of investment
over a long period.
Now I once heard that in future, in time,
we will have enough batteries being recycled
into new batteries that we'll be able to cut down
on the amount of mining that we do for raw minerals.
It depends, sorry, let me give you a direct answer.
The direct answer is we will never be able to recycle
enough to supply the gigafactories.
Okay, so virgin material will still be required.
So we will be, as a nation,
we will be a buyer of raw material.
However, depending on the number of gigafactories
will depend on the percentage,
will depend on how many we have.
So if we had six gigafactories,
academia are saying that recycling in the way
in which we do it by 2035 could produce
up to 42% of the raw material needed
to feed up to six gigafactories.
Now clearly, if we only end up with four,
then we're gonna get a higher percentage
and if we have eight, we're gonna have a lower percentage.
So, and even if it was 25%,
it's still significant
because of the carbon footprint reduction.
And that's a critical pathway for automotive, as you know,
is that they've got hockey stick targets
to take carbon footprint out of production.
So if you think that a car battery roughly weighs
half of the car, you know,
if we can help reduce the carbon footprint of that battery,
then we've helped the automotive space
get down to the carbon targets
for each vehicle that goes along the production line.
So we are an important part.
There will be a gigafactory strategies document
coming out around the 22nd onward of this month
that I can't talk about,
but you'll see that there's a lot of really good information
in that policy paper of which we've had the pleasure
of having our input into.
And in fact, our company is named.
Good.
Now, this podcast will come out
after that deadline that you just said.
So I will have read the document by then
and I'll see whether I can put anything
into the podcast about it.
Is there anything else that you'd like to say
to the listeners about recyclers
and about the work that you're doing before we close?
No, I think we've covered it all, Gary, to be honest, thank you.
Wonderful.
Robin Brundle, I appreciate your time.
I think it's been a fascinating conversation.
I think a lot of it will have made a sense
to a lot of people.
Absolutely. I think it's been a great conversation
and I appreciate it. Thanks for your time.
My pleasure.
Nice to meet you and thanks for yours.
So a couple of takeaways from this discussion.
Battery recycling is far more widespread
than people originally think it is.
It's bolstered of course by the massive amount of batteries
that are coming from things such as laptops and vapes
and electric toothbrushes.
But as Robin mentioned, it doesn't take too many
of these large EV batteries to outweigh the much smaller batteries
that they're also recycling.
I was interested to hear his comments about LFP
not being financially viable for recycling
without a producer levy,
i.e. people who make the battery
paying for the recycling upfront.
Badass battery electrochemist Dr. Ewan McTurk
told us on a recent episode LFP batteries
are basically lithium fertilizer and rust
so it makes sense that the recycling value
is much lower than something like
nickel manganese cobalt battery.
Finally, if anyone was wondering and I did ask,
Robin Brundle is former F1 driver
and current commentator Martin Brundle's brother.
How about that?
So what do you think?
Was it worth the wait for this discussion?
I found the discussion to be quite fascinating.
Learned quite a lot.
Who knew that second life batteries from EVs
are potentially more dangerous than new ones
under the right slash wrong circumstances?
Well, any thoughts or comments,
drop a comment on the YouTube video
or email me at the address below.
I hope you enjoyed listening to today's show.
It was put together this week
with the help of Robin Brundle from Recyclus Group.
The EV Musings podcast is sponsored by Zatmap,
the go-to app for EV drivers,
helping you find and pay for public charging
with confidence.
Zatmap is free to download and use
with subscription plans for enhanced features
such as using Zatmap in car,
on car play or Android Auto,
and discounted charging across thousands of charge points.
If you have any thoughts, comments, criticisms,
or other general messages,
to pass on to me, I can be reached at info
at evmusings.com.
And on the socials, I'm on Blue Sky
at evmusings.besky.social.
I'm also on Instagram
at evmusings where I post short videos
and podcast extracts regularly.
So why not follow me there?
Thanks to everyone who supports me through Patreon
on the monthly basis
and through coffee.com on an ad hoc one.
If you enjoyed this episode,
why not buy me coffee?
Go to coffee.com slash evmusings
and you can do just that.
KO-FI.com slash evmusings.
Takes Apple Pay too.
Now regular listeners will know about my two ebooks.
So you've gone electric
and so you've gone renewable.
First one of those has had a recent update.
You'll see with a bright red image on the front
just like I'm showing on the screen here.
Both of those are at 99p each or equivalent
and you can get them on the Amazon Kindle Store.
Check out the links in the show notes
for more information,
as well as a link to my regular
evmusings newsletter and associated articles.
Now I know you're probably driving
or walking or jogging
or in the shower or washing the car
but if you can remember
and you enjoyed this episode,
proper review in iTunes, please.
Really helps me out.
I did go out and go in
and have a look recently
as some of the most recent reviews.
Thank you very much
for those who took time to do that for me.
If you've reached this part of the podcast
and are still listening, thank you.
Why not let me know you've got to this point
by messaging me at evmusings.beastguide.social
with the words mineral circularity.
Hashtag if you know, you know, nothing else.
And thanks as always to my co-founder Simon.
You know, I often wondered if you're considering
trying to do one of those really long distance journeys
on his electric unicycle
like Edinburgh to Athens or London to Cairo.
But I imagine there's so many logistical issues
such as maybe keep his cheese sandwiches
if he has to carry everything in a backpack
or would he need a complete support team
or even would he actually have to stop to pee
or just slow down?
Or had I misunderstood things?
No, you've understood.
It's certainly wider than that as well,
but you've understood correctly.
Thanks for listening.
Bye.
About this episode
Exploring the critical topic of battery recycling, this episode features Robin Brundle, Executive Chairman of Technology Minerals PLC. The discussion covers the importance of recycling lithium-ion batteries to ensure a sustainable supply chain in the UK, especially in light of upcoming EU regulations. Brundle explains the innovative processes at Recyclist, including their world-leading technology for recycling various battery types. The episode also tackles misconceptions about battery disposability and highlights the environmental benefits of recycling over landfill disposal, emphasizing the need for consumer responsibility and effective logistics.
In this conversation, Robin Brundle, executive chairman of Technology Minerals and Recyclus Group, discusses the critical role of battery recycling in the circular economy, particularly in the context of electric vehicles.
He shares insights on the journey of battery recycling, debunks myths surrounding EV batteries, and highlights the current state of battery recycling in the UK.
Robin emphasizes the importance of consumer responsibility, the risks associated with second-life batteries, and the future of battery recycling in relation to the automotive industry and gigafactories.
Guest Details:
Robin Brundle is Executive Chairman and Co-Founder of Recyclus Group, leading the rollout of proven, industrial-scale lithium-ion battery recycling technology. Since July 2023, Recyclus has demonstrated safe, effective, and sustainable battery processing and now focuses on scaling operations and advancing next-generation recycling. He is also Executive Chairman of Technology Minerals PLC and played a key role in its 2021 London Stock Exchange listing. A recognised policy voice, Robin sits on UK government battery and critical minerals taskforces and is a Trustee of The Faraday Institution, bringing over 30 years’ senior leadership across automotive, motorsport, and clean energy.
The EV Musings Podcast is sponsored by Zapmap, the go-to app for EV drivers, helping you find and pay for public charging with confidence. Zapmap is free to download and use, with subscription plans for enhanced features such as using Zapmap in-car on