AI Self-Driving Cars Might Simply Be Robots That Drive
About this episode
The discussion explores a long-term alternative to built-in autonomy: a robot that can physically enter a conventional car and drive it. That idea is framed as backward compatible with ordinary vehicles, but only if the robot can move on its own, fit the driver’s space, and use standard controls. The speaker also notes that the cost would shift from the car to the driving robot, while acknowledging that today’s research is still far from practical.
Dr. Eliot explains how AI self-driving cars could simply be based on using robots that can drive. See his Forbes column for further info: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/
conventional human-driven car
"One approach to achieving a self-driving or driverless car would be to make a robot that could drive a conventional human-driven car."
A conventional human-driven car is a regular car meant for people to drive. The episode is comparing that to cars that are built or upgraded to drive themselves.
This refers to a normal, everyday vehicle that was designed to be driven by a person, not built from the ground up with autonomous driving hardware. The episode contrasts this with adding self-driving technology directly into the vehicle.
self-driving or driverless car
"One approach to achieving a self-driving or driverless car would be to make a robot that could drive a conventional human-driven car."
A self-driving (or driverless) car is a car that can drive itself. Instead of a person doing the steering and pedals, the car uses sensors and software to control the vehicle.
A “self-driving” or “driverless” car is a vehicle that can perform the driving task—steering, accelerating, and braking—using automation instead of a human driver. In practice, many systems are “driver-assist” rather than fully driverless, but the idea here is full automation.
infusing the self-driving tech into the vehicle itself
"In the near term, the more viable route to a true self-driving car is going to involve infusing the self-driving tech into the vehicle itself."
This means putting the self-driving system directly into the car. Instead of using an external robot, the car itself would have the sensors and computer needed to drive.
“Infusing” self-driving technology into the vehicle itself means installing the autonomy hardware and software directly on the car—so it can operate without an external robot. This is the more traditional approach compared to using a separate driving robot that can be moved between cars.
driving robot
"Any conventional car could instantly become a so-called driverless or self-driving car, albeit being driven by a robot, and not requiring a human driver."
Here, a driving robot is a device that can control a regular car so it can drive itself. The idea is that the same robot could potentially be used with different cars.
A “driving robot” in this context is an external or modular robotic system that can control a normal car to make it behave like a self-driving vehicle. The episode’s key idea is that you could move the robot from one conventional car to another rather than building autonomy into each car.
driverless or self-driving car
"Any conventional car could instantly become a so-called driverless or self-driving car, albeit being driven by a robot, and not requiring a human driver."
The episode is talking about cars that can drive without a person in charge. In this approach, the ability comes from a robot that controls the car.
The phrase is used to describe a vehicle that can operate without a human driver, but the episode frames it as being enabled by a “driving robot” rather than built-in autonomy. It’s essentially the same autonomy goal, just achieved through a different architecture.
false dichotomy
"Another quick point is do not fall into the classic mental trap of thinking that there are two mutually exclusive approaches of either a self-driving car versus a robot-driven conventional car. That's a false dichotomy."
Sometimes people act like there are only two choices, but that’s not really true. The point here is that self-driving cars and robot-driven cars could both be real options at the same time.
A false dichotomy is a reasoning mistake where people present two options as if they’re the only possibilities. Here, the host argues you don’t have to choose between “self-driving cars” and “robot-driven conventional cars”—both approaches could exist.
steering wheel
"This ground rule is the driving robot must be able to use conventional steering wheel, brake pedal, accelerator pedal, and so on, just as a human would be able to do so. No need to somehow alter or change up a conventional car to accommodate the driving robot."
The steering wheel is what you turn to make the car go left or right. The host is saying the robot should be able to use the normal steering wheel like a person would.
A steering wheel is the driver’s primary control for changing the vehicle’s direction. The host’s rule is that the robot should be able to use the same steering wheel humans use, rather than requiring a redesigned control system.
brake pedal
"This ground rule is the driving robot must be able to use conventional steering wheel, brake pedal, accelerator pedal, and so on, just as a human would be able to do so. No need to somehow alter or change up a conventional car to accommodate the driving robot."
The brake pedal is the part you press to slow down or stop the car. The episode says the robot should be able to use the regular brake pedal like a human driver would.
The brake pedal is the control that activates the vehicle’s braking system to slow or stop. The host’s point is that the robot should use the existing human-style brake pedal rather than needing a special new setup.
accelerator pedal
"This ground rule is the driving robot must be able to use conventional steering wheel, brake pedal, accelerator pedal, and so on, just as a human would be able to do so. No need to somehow alter or change up a conventional car to accommodate the driving robot."
The accelerator pedal is what you press to make the car go faster. The host is saying the robot should use the normal gas pedal instead of needing a modified car.
The accelerator pedal controls engine power delivery, which determines how quickly the car accelerates. The host’s rule requires the robot to operate the conventional accelerator pedal, keeping the robot compatible with standard cars.
blue screen of death
"If the driving robot sometimes hiccups and is going to freeze up with a blue screen of death, well that's certainly not the kind of driving system that anyone would want."
A “blue screen of death” is what people see when a computer crashes badly and stops working. The point is that a robot driving a car can’t afford to crash like that.
“Blue screen of death” (BSOD) is a well-known computer crash screen, typically indicating a critical system failure. The host uses it as an example of unacceptable reliability problems for a driving robot performing a safety-critical task.
backward compatible
"Now you might have realized that the key underlying theme about each of these rules is that a driving robot is essentially supposed to be backward compatible with the conventions of human drivers."
It means the robot should be able to work with regular cars the way human drivers do. So you wouldn’t need to redesign every car from scratch for it to function.
The idea is that a self-driving “driving robot” should work with the existing way cars are designed and operated by humans. In practice, it means the system can plug into today’s vehicle controls and still behave safely and predictably.
backward compatibility
"In the computer field we refer to backward compatibility as the previsio that any new hardware is fully compatible with prior hardware."
In simple terms, it means new tech still works with older stuff. The host is saying self-driving tech should fit into today’s cars without breaking how they work.
Backward compatibility is a computer-industry term meaning new technology can work with older technology. Here, the host applies it to self-driving systems so they can operate within the existing “rules” and interfaces of human-driven cars.
self-driving cars
"As mentioned, you'll likely begin to see self-driving cars before you see robots driving cars. Nonetheless, do not be surprised in the future if you're driving along in your car and next to you is a self-driving car with an empty driver seat."
These are cars that can drive themselves using computers and sensors. The host is describing a future where you might see a self-driving car next to you with no human driver in the seat.
Self-driving cars are vehicles that use sensors, software, and control systems to drive without a human actively steering or controlling the car. The episode frames an early transition where self-driving cars appear before fully “robot driver” concepts become common.
Request an Explanation
Heard something you'd like explained? We'll add it to this episode.
Sign in to request explanations for terms you heard.
Want to learn more?
Browse our glossary for plain-English explanations of automotive terms, jargon, and concepts.
Help improve this episode
See something that's not quite right? Our annotations are AI-generated and can sometimes miss the mark. Click the flag icon on any annotation to suggest a correction.