00:01
Hello friends, the podcast is back.
00:03
We're back. It's another uh what is it?
00:04
Tuesday. Yes. Welcome to Tuesday. We
00:06
have so much news, all the normal
00:08
things, the car debates, the car
00:10
conclusions, your questions. I have
00:12
something I want to talk about TV
00:13
show-wise in the did you see this that
00:15
just kind of struck me recently about a
00:17
couple of TV shows I watched. So, we'll
00:18
talk about that as well. I like most of
00:20
your did you see this so far have been
00:22
movies and TV shows.
00:23
>> That's all it's going to be. That's all
00:24
it's going to be. Absolutely. You're
00:26
going to talk about designed. I mean,
00:27
I'm trying to mix it up because I don't
00:28
want to bring in watches because I know
00:31
>> Well, I mean, I'll just
00:32
>> face plant onto your keyboard.
00:34
>> I'll just snooze on the back of my
00:36
computer for a while. So, that'll
00:38
happen. Uh, by the way, for those of you
00:39
that somehow thought there was some
00:40
massive conspiracy theory,
00:43
>> I put a new sticker on my computer. Are
00:46
>> It rubbed off in my bag by being put in
00:48
my bag and taken places. So, the Y
00:50
rubbed off. There was no big conspiracy
00:52
theory. The CIA was not involved. The
00:53
NSA has not been here. But I put a new
00:58
>> There we go. So, that's happened.
01:00
>> Solved the problem.
01:01
>> The world is better now. So, yeah.
01:02
Anyway, speaking of ways the world is, I
01:04
don't know, changing better. I don't
01:05
know which way we want to go. We should
01:06
dive right into news.
01:08
>> Mercedes, have you heard?
01:11
>> Uh, Mercedes cannot give away the EQ
01:15
>> So, just in California and we saw some I
01:17
saw some on the freeway. I thought you
01:19
bought that. I also saw that Lexus RX
01:25
>> the thing that is the and the whatever
01:28
>> terrible I'm like you paid money for
01:30
>> apparently big deals are available for
01:31
those and it is it is a Lexus product so
01:33
you get that service but Mercedes has
01:35
decided to stop selling all the EQ
01:37
models here in the US which is part of
01:39
the news but the secondary news is uh
01:42
they're going to aim big
01:44
yeah they are I like this news from
01:46
Mercedes because they are teasing the
01:49
biggest product launch in history of
01:52
Mercedes 15 vehicles of the 30 they're
01:56
promising are slated to be EVs, which is
01:59
all fine, but they are going to
02:02
inundate us. I think
02:04
>> they're talking like 30 cars in the next
02:07
>> So, on a recent trip, we were just
02:09
filming in California and we stayed near
02:14
>> in Pleasanton, California. So, we were
02:17
>> This dealership is enormous.
02:19
>> Massive. And just looking at the
02:21
vehicles on the lot, I'm thinking
02:22
Mercedes already has a lot of products.
02:25
Totally agree. We also have seen all the
02:28
coupe versions of all the SUVs.
02:31
Wondering when are those going to die?
02:33
>> So, does that mean for Mercedes,
02:36
>> you know, the SUV and the coupe version
02:38
of that? I don't think so. I think
02:40
>> the manufacturers are done with that.
02:42
We've we've gotten over ourselves, even
02:44
though I still see some versions of
02:46
those coming out. But this this is an
02:49
onslaught of new cars from Mercedes.
02:52
>> I don't understand how they're going to
02:53
do 30 cars in two years. That is that is
02:55
almost too much. Frankly,
02:57
>> the problem I have with it is that it
03:00
indicates a lot of platform sharing. It
03:02
just indicates, especially with the EVs,
03:04
it's going to drive the same. It's a
03:06
different model, but no, it's not. It's
03:08
just new styling with pretty much all
03:11
the same switch gear, electronics,
03:13
everything in there. probably same
03:14
seats, interior materials, and it's
03:17
different shapes to meet different
03:18
people's needs. How many people do you
03:21
have to cart around? And how much stuff
03:23
do you have to cart around? And that's
03:25
going to be the determining the shape
03:28
>> scope of every vehicle coming out.
03:29
>> To your point though, some of that is
03:31
they're going to get away with some of
03:32
that by doing things like the GLC and
03:34
the GLC coupe, and it'll be two models.
03:37
>> I think we're over that. I hope.
03:39
>> Can we be done with that? And like to be
03:41
done, but I think put that in our past.
03:43
I think those are going to happen. I
03:44
think there will be doubling up there
03:46
which is pretty interesting. Uh I also
03:48
saw this bit of news. I have we have to
03:49
talk about this. We have to talk about
03:51
the fact that the uh the cyber truck
03:55
I'm going to show you here a photo for
03:57
those of you that can't see it. This is
03:59
a photo of a parking lot full of
04:00
dumpsters. I mean a parking lot full of
04:02
cyber trucks is dumpsters.
04:04
>> A bunch of cyber trucks. Now, I will
04:05
admit this photo isn't necessarily the
04:07
photo related to what I'm going to talk
04:09
about, but that is Cybert trucks
04:11
awaiting delivery, which speaks to the
04:13
fact that Tesla, who thought they were
04:15
going to sell a quarter million Cyber
04:17
Trucks a year, that was what they
04:19
thought, has sold 50,000 to date. I was
04:23
actually reading this morning, 6,000 so
04:25
far in 2025. So, that means they sold
04:28
just over 40,000 when The Thing finally
04:30
came out and was the thing. And and you
04:33
said we were just in Cali. It was
04:34
interesting to see how many of them are
04:35
in Cali. There's a lot of them in
04:37
>> Yeah, we saw a lot.
04:38
>> There's still a few here. All the ones
04:39
here, I feel like, are now billboards
04:40
for some business. They're just a
04:43
>> It's a write-off for sure.
04:45
>> The the reality is these are piling up
04:49
unsold. But the bit of news is the US
04:52
Air Force uses vehicles for target
04:54
practice. This is a known thing, okay?
04:57
They want 30 new vehicles to shoot at to
05:03
in New Mexico. And they have insisted
05:06
that two of them be cyber trucks.
05:09
>> I'm all about this. I'm all about this
05:12
>> because because here here's what this
05:14
this has layers. Okay. They've insisted
05:16
that two of them are cyber trucks. Now,
05:18
on first blush, this looks like one of
05:19
those government programs. Let's figure
05:22
out a way for Tesla to get full price
05:24
for its extra Cybert trucks. And that
05:26
concerns me because the other thing you
05:27
have to keep in mind is it's that same
05:29
thing you always hear about in the US
05:32
government like many businesses. If you
05:34
don't use your budget, you don't get
05:36
that much budget next year, right? You
05:37
got to use it up leads to $500 hammers
05:39
because we got to use our budget. I'm
05:40
very concerned about the US government
05:43
paying full price for Tesla Cyber Trucks
05:46
that they can't actually get to sell at
05:49
>> But I don't think that's as much as
05:51
what's going on here as the other part
05:52
of this article that we both read. And
05:54
that is they want two of them to be
05:58
>> because they are genuinely concerned
06:01
that cybert trucks are going to wind up
06:02
elsewhere in the world
06:05
essentially armored as mini tank
06:08
vehicles and they want to make sure
06:09
their munitions properly work against
06:14
>> they're also stainless but that
06:15
>> Shouldn't matter. They we know they
06:17
aren't bulletproof but I'm sure they're
06:18
not missproof. But here's
06:20
>> here's what's happened. The vehicles
06:22
that normally end up there are beat down
06:25
Toyota trucks we don't want anymore,
06:28
>> These trucks are theoretically going to
06:30
miss the first, second, third buyer and
06:33
just go straight to four corners of the
06:35
globe as the beatdown truck and then
06:38
what kind of carnage, ecological
06:42
natural carnage is caused by blowing up
06:45
a cyber truck. You take a munition that
06:48
already is going to scar the land beyond
06:50
belief and you throw a missile at a
06:52
cyber truck. What kind of don't come
06:54
near here for a hundred years carnage
06:56
does that leave on the globe?
06:59
>> Seriously, I just I there are layers of
07:02
this that make me laugh so hard.
07:04
>> You know, I've been seeing commentary
07:05
about people saying because this is
07:08
stealth fighteresque with it services,
07:11
>> they're saying they want these four
07:16
understand their, you know, how will the
07:17
targeting systems react to the material
07:19
and of course the faceted surfaces which
07:22
might have a a bit of validity. I'm
07:26
reading the same article everyone else
07:29
>> it's funny. We don't know if they're
07:31
getting them for or if they're paying
07:33
full price MSRP. I kind of doubt it.
07:37
>> I hope not. Even though I don't think
07:38
the US government typically when you get
07:40
a government pay full price. That's the
07:42
thing. They don't they don't worry about
07:43
it. So they pay full don't worry about
07:44
it. And with the cost of munitions,
07:47
>> too concerned about spending a little
07:48
bit extra for target practice. So,
07:50
whatever. But, you know, it had to be
07:52
done. So, now we've got at least one
07:54
Tesla Roadster in space,
07:56
>> and now we're shooting at other Teslas.
07:59
>> Not only are they not bulletproof, we're
08:00
going to really prove it.
08:02
>> Here's, you know, here's my
08:03
recommendation for the US military. If
08:04
you're going to blow up a cybert truck
08:06
with a munition, put that on your
08:09
YouTube channel and then also release
08:11
the explosion moment as a short because
08:13
you'll probably make a good amount of
08:14
money back on the fact that that's just
08:17
out there to the general public to watch
08:18
a Cybertruck getting absolutely
08:21
decimated by I don't even know what, but
08:23
they're going to throw a lot of things
08:24
at it. But, uh, we're blowing up Cybert
08:26
trucks now, everybody. That's that's
08:27
what we've reached.
08:30
>> More news from GM and Hyundai talking
08:32
about co-developing vehicles. And I did
08:34
not see that the first time around. They
08:36
actually announced they were working
08:38
together. And this does not necessarily
08:40
mean it's for the North American market.
08:41
They are talking about two different
08:44
segments, actually three different
08:45
segments of co-developing vehicles to
08:48
make more than 800,000 vehicles in a
08:50
year once production is fully scaled. GM
08:52
apparently is leading the development of
08:55
a midsize truck platform because GM is
08:57
good at building trucks.
08:58
>> They are. Yes. Mhm. Hyundai is leading
09:00
the compact vehicle and electric van
09:02
segments and so they're sharing common
09:04
plat platforms because of course
09:06
developing unique interiors and
09:08
exteriors consistent with the respective
09:10
brands according to the Hyundai press
09:12
release. Design engineering work
09:14
underway on the new vehicles for the
09:15
Central and South American markets
09:18
launching in 2028. They've got this
09:20
commercial van to be manufactured in the
09:22
US as early as 2028. GM has kind of
09:25
partnered with Korean companies before
09:27
Dau in particular. So
09:29
>> Working with Korean companies is not
09:31
something that's new to them. Gives them
09:34
>> Agree. It gives them opportunity. I
09:35
think there's an interesting thing going
09:37
on here. There is a photo that was
09:38
released with this that I think I'm
09:40
going to read into it. I I'm going to
09:41
read a bunch of stuff into this photo
09:43
that I don't think was necessarily
09:44
thought about, but I'm going to put it
09:45
out there anyway. And that is a photo of
09:48
the two CEOs shaking hands. Okay,
09:51
>> fine. Of course, it's what you want. But
09:53
the reality is, you've probably heard
09:55
this before. The Hyundai H. The Hyundai
09:58
H is described as it's supposed to be
10:01
two people shaking hands. That's the
10:04
shape. And I don't know how smart this
10:07
photographer was. The Hyundai logo is
10:10
above where they're shaking hands. And
10:12
the shape of their shaking hands does
10:13
align with the Hyundai logo. Look, I
10:16
think this is a power play and GM lost.
10:19
>> Oh, you think so?
10:20
>> GM was the big dog here, but GM signing
10:23
with Hyundai. I do not think GM looks
10:25
like the big dog. I think they look like
10:27
the retreating brand and Hyundai looks
10:29
like look where we are now. And the fact
10:32
that their logo is two CEOs shaking
10:34
hands and here's just below their logo,
10:37
two CEOs shaking hands.
10:39
>> I think this is a power play that GM is
10:43
the little dog now despite their
10:45
investment in EVs and their own Ultium
10:48
platform and their their existing
10:51
>> Well, GM But that's the thing. GM jumped
10:53
head first more than probably any other
10:55
brand. They did a like 180 pivot. The
10:58
world's going EV. GM's going to be all
11:00
>> Volkswagen was slightly ahead of them, I
11:02
>> possibly. But GM went so far down the
11:05
road and now that there is a big retreat
11:07
in EV takeup. GM's caught they're caught
11:11
in a place where they didn't develop the
11:14
non-EV stuff. They spent billions on
11:16
EVs. I mean, you've mentioned before
11:18
they kept their V8 plants open and that
11:20
kind of stuff, but they spent most of
11:21
their R&D and most of their big spend
11:23
was all toward EVs and now the market is
11:26
turning away from that, which means GM
11:28
has to be on a retreat path and find
11:30
other ways back to other markets and
11:32
they partner with Hyundai who Okay, 20
11:36
>> Hyundai partners with GM. Who's Hyundai?
11:39
Hyundai partners with any true
11:41
>> right now. This is at least equals and
11:43
possibly Hyundai's got the oneup and the
11:46
I just I couldn't help but see their
11:49
logo and their company description of
11:51
the logo when I saw this photo of the
11:52
two cos shaking hands. I'm reading in
11:55
none of that is official, but I just
11:57
thought, huh, I don't think GM is the
12:00
power move here. So that will I will use
12:03
that as a transition to an actual GM
12:05
power move and that is the ZR1 at the
12:10
ring. This happened a little while ago.
12:13
It's very impressive. They've got the
12:15
ZR1 and the ZR1X. So the rear wheel
12:17
drive and the all-wheel drive version.
12:21
>> The ZR1X, the all-wheel drive version
12:25
And both of those, if memory serves, is
12:27
slightly faster than the Mustang GTD,
12:29
which was the point. The Mustang did I
12:31
think 652 something or so something like
12:34
that. Yeah. So, both of these beat the
12:36
Mustang and of course Ford has now said,
12:38
"All right, it's on and we're coming
12:39
back or whatever." But we had heard
12:40
already that Chevy was going to try to
12:43
take the GTD Americanmade car record at
12:47
the ring and they clearly went and did
12:49
and it's very impressive. One of the
12:51
other things that's impressive about
12:52
this, but this is the place I want to
12:53
actually dig in. These guys in the
12:56
photo, these guys in all the photos and
12:57
on all the press stuff,
12:59
>> these are the GM Corvette engineers.
13:03
>> This is not a hired gun driver.
13:05
>> Yeah. None of them are pro drivers.
13:07
>> So now these there's two ways to look at
13:09
this. On one level, these guys are good
13:12
>> I'm not going but it's just GM drivers.
13:15
Doesn't matter. No, these guys are
13:16
excellent drivers. But the thing I think
13:18
is interesting here is the fact that I
13:20
watched some of the incar.
13:23
>> And I am not claiming by any shape or
13:26
form that I am as fast a driver as these
13:27
cars. No part of me thinks I could touch
13:29
these times in these cars. I'm not
13:31
pretending that at all.
13:32
>> But we've seen a lot of incar.
13:35
>> And we know the track well.
13:37
>> I know the track pretty well at this
13:39
point. And I've watched a lot of incar.
13:41
The thing I'm noting when I watch these
13:43
end cars is in places these guys are
13:49
In places these guys are not optimal.
13:51
And why should they be? Their purpose is
13:53
not to know the ring. Their purpose is
13:55
to drive these cars. And I'm sure they
13:57
knew the ring well enough. But I kept
13:59
thinking about our friend David
14:00
>> Petard. Okay. Okay.
14:02
>> David is a master of the ring.
14:04
>> He's won the 24 hours of of
14:06
>> Nurburgring. He drove that uh Chinese
14:10
car, whatever it was called that got the
14:12
the X7 or whatever. He drove the X7 and
14:15
when they drove it in nonoptimal weather
14:18
conditions, he did a 640 something. He
14:20
went back in optimal conditions and did
14:22
a 622. Now that is a 202
14:25
cut off his lap time. The point I want
14:28
>> the ring is not like other tracks in the
14:31
world in one major way when it relates
14:33
to time. Your typical racetrack, you can
14:36
get offline in a corner, it'll add a
14:37
half second to a second to your lap very
14:40
easily. You're like a second slower and
14:41
you made one little mistake. The ring is
14:43
so long that time compounds.
14:47
>> And you start missing a corner here or
14:49
not being optimal there. And it's not
14:51
like, oh, David Petard's an example.
14:54
It's not like we can go find a second or
14:56
two. You can go find 10
14:59
>> simply because of the language.
15:00
>> The difference between Yeah. The
15:01
difference between we got that corner
15:03
perfect and we got it right, that
15:05
compounds over time. 10 seconds are
15:06
available here. I think while this is
15:09
very impressive and I'm very impressed
15:11
that Chevy took this car and beat the
15:13
GTD, I think there's more in it.
15:16
>> What's David Petard do in this car?
15:18
>> While I'm very impressed with these
15:20
numbers, people have been saying, "Well,
15:22
there's other cars that have gone
15:23
faster." And my question is, those other
15:25
cars have gone faster things like the
15:26
Mercedes 1 and the Manti Racing GT2. And
15:30
most of the time those were driven by
15:32
guys that the ring is their thing.
15:36
>> David Petard in this car. I bet you
15:39
money there is a low 640 or something in
15:42
the 630s in these cars with a ring
15:45
master behind the wheel. That shows you
15:48
just how impressive these are. And I
15:49
think there is more time here. And Ford
15:52
has its work cut out for it.
15:53
>> Well, I think the same thing could be
15:55
said for the GTD. I think if you put
15:57
that same driver in the Mustang, there's
15:59
a whole heck of a lot more in that car
16:01
because I also watched that Chris Harris
16:04
with Max Versstappen Max taking it out
16:07
and starting to explore the edges
16:11
>> very I mean right away very early and
16:14
impressing Chris. Now I don't know if
16:16
Chris was feigning a little bit how
16:19
impressed he was or if it truly he was
16:21
blown away. I think I probably would be
16:23
blown away by the talent of
16:24
>> Max. Pretty impressed. Yeah. So Max was
16:26
already getting close to the edges of
16:28
the GTD. So that could you could say the
16:30
same thing about this car or or that
16:32
that Mustang and put the same pro
16:35
driver. So I think at this point the
16:38
only way to really know is to have the
16:41
>> I agree with you.
16:43
>> three drivers, let's say, and they each
16:46
drive the same car. They're each prepped
16:48
the same way, optimal conditions, same
16:51
>> Because I think this can keep going back
16:54
and forth. As much as I am I respect the
16:56
GTD, this appeals to me far more.
16:58
>> I agree with you. Yeah.
16:59
>> But also, what do you do with this
17:02
>> other than drive it to Cars & Coffee and
17:03
say, "This is the American Ring Record
17:08
>> Don't you want to take a photo?
17:10
>> Yeah, you're right.
17:11
>> Really? I mean, incredibly impressive.
17:13
>> Well, and and it Corvette.
17:14
>> So, what's next, though?
17:16
>> Totally. And this is Corvette doing the
17:18
Corvette thing. Corvette has just beat
17:20
the GTD, and that's it's like almost a
17:22
third of the cost of the GTD, which is
17:24
even crazier. Yes. I mean, I I hate to
17:27
say this, as impressive as the GTD is,
17:30
and as much as I want to drive it,
17:33
>> the Mustang doesn't need to be the end
17:35
all beall. Let's make This was where the
17:38
Ford GT was great, and I know they made
17:40
a Ford GT in a couple different
17:41
variations, and they were phenomenal
17:43
cars, okay? But I I really personally,
17:46
and I'm not a Mustang guy, clearly, but
17:49
>> I struggle with we made a nearly
17:51
$400,000 Mustang. I know it's not all
17:53
Mustang, but we made a $400,000 Mustang
17:55
that's super heavy. And I have no doubt
17:57
it's super impressive, and I'm
17:58
incredibly excited to drive it.
18:00
>> But if you're going to make a hypercar,
18:03
>> just make a hypercar.
18:05
>> You don't have to take a car you have
18:06
and turn it into a hypercar. The
18:08
Corvette is on the border. The only
18:09
reason the Corvette's working here is
18:11
because they went mid-engine with it.
18:12
>> Correct. and Mustang still being having
18:16
that swath between the base rental
18:23
There's a lot of models in there, but I
18:25
think still the base car kind of
18:28
>> tears it down a little bit. It's the
18:30
wrong shape. It It has that linkage all
18:33
the way back here. Whereas
18:34
>> I suppose you could say the same thing
18:36
about the Corvette, but the Corvette
18:37
still seems a little bit more
18:38
supercar-ish now having gone mid-enine
18:42
with its shape. It's It's like the
18:43
Mustang is the wrong shape to do this
18:45
>> It's almost more impressive that it's
18:47
even close to this time than this
18:49
actually beating the Mustang.
18:50
>> The Mustang GT is fantastic that it's as
18:54
heavy as it is and works as well as it
18:55
does and gets the times that it does. I
18:57
literally I am fascinated to drive that
18:58
car and this car. But I I actually
19:01
wonder, maybe one of you knows this
19:03
better than we we do, but is the Mustang
19:05
now the car with the largest swath ever
19:09
between base and top end? We're talking
19:13
10 times price difference. You can get a
19:16
base one in the 30s. You can get a GTD
19:18
for nearly $400,000. It's more than 10
19:21
times the price of the base model. That
19:23
has to be the widest swath ever.
19:26
>> Even in world of 911s, the 911 swath
19:28
isn't that big. The base 911 is 100
19:30
grand and the top one is like 300,000. I
19:33
just I am I am utterly fascinated by
19:35
this battle here. And I also think it's
19:37
funny that the cars that are above this
19:40
>> aren't mass- prodduced cars.
19:43
>> The GT uh GT2 is as close as we get to
19:46
mass-produced and it isn't.
19:48
>> So, you know, that's the thing. These
19:50
are cars that are built in quantity and
19:53
they've turned them into monsters like
19:54
this. That's amazing.
19:55
>> They're monsters, but they're not good
19:56
for any race series. Oh, true. The
19:58
Mustang GTD is like the perfect IMSA car
20:01
except they already have GT3 Mustangs
20:03
>> and this one doesn't regulates
20:06
the rule book. Yeah.
20:07
>> And this one is good for I'm still not
20:10
sure what, but as impressive as these
20:12
times are, look at the lap time
20:14
difference. You would think a car with
20:16
200 extra horsepower and the front-wheel
20:20
drive uh electric motor pulling it
20:23
through corners ostensibly. Yeah, this
20:26
>> would actually be more that's just over
20:30
>> Just over a second on the ring.
20:32
>> You'd think with your what you've noted
20:35
>> over that length that this would be five
20:38
10 seconds faster and that would justify
20:40
the X to me because now
20:43
>> the times are so close again in the
20:46
>> pro-Aam drivers.
20:48
>> They're too close to justif they don't
20:51
justify each other's existence. Well,
20:52
it's either just have one or the other.
20:54
>> But back to what you said before, and
20:56
that is that they were different
20:58
drivers, too. This is the fastest time
21:00
of each car with different drivers. If
21:01
the same driver was in it, and the same
21:03
driver ran the same lap, would they get
21:05
the same time? Would they be even
21:07
closer? I don't know.
21:08
>> But they might have, but they're not
21:09
going to post a slower time for the X.
21:12
Of course, because that doesn't sell
21:13
>> Yes. Exactly. But at the end of the day,
21:16
I have to say the big takeaway here is
21:20
>> Yes. And I am astounded by these
21:23
engineers who without being ring masters
21:26
went and did this. And I still think
21:29
let's get David Petard or Yord
21:31
Bergmeister or somebody that everybody
21:33
can agree on that knows the ring and
21:36
they're throwing them down or maybe two
21:38
or three like these are your certified
21:40
ring record drivers
21:43
>> and because that's the only way that
21:45
this is going to make any kind of sense
21:46
when you're getting into a second or two
21:49
over a track as long as that. Well,
21:51
yeah, Max just went out under a
21:53
pseudonym and set the fast lap.
21:56
>> A super fast lap for the full
21:58
>> having never driven it actually and only
22:00
driving that day. Yeah.
22:02
>> Can we just ask Max? Max, will you
22:05
>> He's not busy. He's got nothing going
22:06
on. It's You know what? Honestly, I I
22:08
can't believe that I can't believe he's
22:11
still in I think I can't believe he's
22:13
>> I think he is bored. And I think he has
22:16
>> I don't think he's in F1 for a long time
22:20
What if Max and Lewis both left? Would
22:23
Formula 1 be as interesting? I think it
22:25
would take a while for it to ramp back
22:27
up and be as interesting.
22:28
>> I think there'd be a couple seasons
22:29
where it really is a bit of a
22:31
free-for-all. And that's kind of what F1
22:33
needs. Sorry, I didn't expect that the
22:34
ZR1 thing would go to You're not busy.
22:38
>> Can you drive Mustang? You've already
22:40
driven. You kind of know it already. And
22:41
jump in these two and we'll see what's
22:45
>> Speaking of American manufacturers, we
22:47
should also jump to this news. Have you
22:48
seen this? Dodge has decided engines
22:51
sell. Dodge has decid this. This This
22:53
actually was announced the day we do
22:55
this podcast. We knew it was coming, but
22:56
it's official now. The new Dodge
22:59
Charger, or it's actually not that new
23:00
cuz it's been out for a year, but just
23:01
hasn't sold as an EV in two-door and
23:04
four-door is getting the RHO, the
23:06
straight six 3 L twinturbo engine that
23:09
was recently in the Ram RO that you and
23:12
I drove, which was the replacement
23:13
engine for the big TRX uh Hemi
23:16
essentially. So, it's not a Hemi V8, but
23:19
it is a 500 and something horsepower and
23:22
500 and something torque turbocharged
23:26
twin turbo straight six engine that we
23:28
actually like that engine a lot in this.
23:31
So, I'm very curious to see do we think
23:34
does this do it for Dodge? Does this
23:35
vehicle start selling now?
23:37
>> They're posting numbers already. 550
23:39
horsepower, 531 pound- feet of torque on
23:41
91 octane, standard all-wheel drive.
23:45
>> Yes, I think it will work. Okay.
23:47
>> My big problem is they're still too big.
23:51
They're still too big and heavy. I
23:54
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
23:55
>> Just don't understand. The Mustang is
23:57
>> The Corvette is slightly too big. If
24:00
that if that were like
24:06
yes. Yes, if it was 80% scale and
24:10
>> 3,200 lb, 3,100 lb. All
24:13
>> do is remove the golf element out of the
24:15
design brief and it would have been 75%
24:19
scale of what it is.
24:20
>> I'm sorry your golf bags don't fit, but
24:22
have you seen this car?
24:23
>> That was the real buzz kill. But again,
24:25
people want to take their vet to go
24:27
>> We've done a video on that, by the way.
24:29
Still, I think this is still too big. It
24:31
feels and looks even bigger than the
24:34
>> It does. It does. Challenger and
24:37
>> I feel like it's still too big. Even
24:39
though that kind of power
24:40
>> is going to make it dance for sure.
24:43
That's what people want. But the other
24:45
thing that's going to hold it back is
24:46
noise. Sound sells. We've identified
24:48
this constantly. Whenever you buy a car
24:51
and especially the comments we see on
24:55
Imagine paying blank amount. You only
24:57
got six cylinders. Imagine how much.
25:00
Yeah. Or Yeah. Or four cylinders.
25:03
People say that all the time. They're
25:05
now equating dollar amount to number of
25:07
cylinders. And it almost doesn't matter
25:10
>> It matters how many cylinders you have.
25:13
But they had that engine teed up. It's
25:15
in production. So that's the easy way
25:17
out. So it'll help, but we're still not
25:21
quite back to where they need to be. And
25:22
I think they're going to continue to
25:24
>> Well, yes, but they also are pivoting
25:25
and they know it already because there's
25:27
also been news that the 392 is going to
25:29
stay in the Wrangler and find its way
25:30
into the Gladiator. and they're talking
25:32
about doing the 392 and the Wrangler and
25:34
Gladiator indefinitely. So, they've
25:36
they've drawn the line off the board,
25:37
the planning board, which is
25:39
>> And there is a lot of rumor right now
25:42
that the TRX, which we loved with the
25:44
Hemi, and then it got this RHO, which we
25:47
actually still liked it in that and in
25:48
some ways I think was the better daily,
25:50
even though that's not a daily truck,
25:51
but anyway, better daily with that
25:54
engine. But we're fully expecting the
25:56
TRX with the Hemi motor to come back.
25:59
Yes. Apparently, Stalantis has realized
26:01
that that's really what their customers
26:03
want from that vehicle. So, that
26:04
engine's working its way back around
26:06
into reality somewhere. It's they're
26:07
going to dust off the how they made
26:09
them. Maybe they got a bunch from the
26:10
back. I don't know. They probably still
26:12
>> But this time around, the 2.0 has to be
26:18
>> Yeah, we were at 700 horsepower. All of
26:21
our minds were blown. 700 horsepower
26:23
supercharged with a warranty. What kind
26:25
of metallurgy sorcery is going on in
26:27
that engine? We don't care. We'll buy
26:30
it. Right. Everybody bought it.
26:31
>> So now John Hennessy gets a hold of
26:33
those things. Does drag races with
26:38
>> So do they need to go consult with John
26:40
to actually make something the 800
26:43
horsepower that cuz there already was
26:45
the TRX mammoth for a 1000 horsepower?
26:48
>> Yeah, he always does that stuff.
26:49
>> Start dropping crate motors into these
26:51
trucks and go crazy. It's got to have
26:54
more though. It's always got to the next
26:56
gen has to have more. But here's the
26:57
thing though. Even if it doesn't have
26:59
more, the marketing can be it's back,
27:01
everybody. Even if it's exactly the same
27:04
was, it can be. It's You know what it
27:08
>> New Coke comes out.
27:10
>> Oh, you're right.
27:10
>> New Coke comes out and it's like the new
27:13
greatest, latest, and greatest. And
27:14
there were all these I'm going way back,
27:16
but it happened. It was there was a time
27:17
in there was a time in life when Coke
27:21
>> and then they made new Coke. And there
27:23
were all of these news stories. I was a
27:24
kid. There were all these news stories
27:25
about the people that were like filling
27:27
the back of their cars and buying
27:28
trailers verse of of current Coke cuz
27:30
they didn't like New Coke and it was
27:32
just new Coke on the shelves for a while
27:33
and then they went to Coke classic
27:36
meaning the prior and all of a sudden it
27:38
was it's back everybody. They can do
27:40
that with a Hellcat motor in the TRX.
27:43
It's back everyone. I know you didn't
27:45
like new TRX, new Coke. Old Coke is
27:47
back. It's it can be the same
27:50
supercharger wine with 700 horsepower.
27:51
It's just the fact that it's back and
27:53
we're burning gas again that will sell.
27:58
>> will these big engines
28:01
sell these cars well enough for these
28:04
companies and brands to survive? And I
28:06
just don't know because I
28:09
the the heavy horsepower big motor is on
28:13
one level every bit as politicized as
28:17
>> For sure. For sure. Yeah.
28:19
>> And they just need to sell cars. I think
28:20
the all-wheel drive is the fascinating
28:22
part of that that they're all going to
28:23
be all-wheel drive, but you can turn off
28:25
all-wheel drive to do a burnout. It's
28:28
like, can we just have it be rear wheel?
28:30
Anyway, whatever. I know all-wheel
28:31
drive, there's an equal sign in people's
28:33
mind to safer, but we're talking about a
28:36
4,000 lb plus 500 horsepower plus
28:40
monster. It's It's going to be dangerous
28:42
no matter what you do.
28:43
>> The Dodge Apology Tour is coming soon.
28:46
That's Sorry, we messed up. Will you buy
28:49
one now? cuz we brought it back and it's
28:51
got even more power. Maybe 750 or
28:54
>> Is the band shirt, the the the co-op
28:57
tour, the Volkswagen and Dodge apology
28:59
tour with like dual dates all across the
29:03
>> Oh, coming soon to a dealer near you.
29:06
The Dodge Apology Tour. And
29:08
>> we're sorry. The V8's back. Goodbody.
29:12
>> And I I don't think Dodge can build a
29:14
small car. I don't think Stalantis can
29:17
build a small, compact, fun,
29:19
lightweight, interesting.
29:21
>> The Dart and the 200 Chrysler were dead
29:25
>> They were dead on when they dropped.
29:27
>> Everything has to be big and heavy. So,
29:28
let's bolt the biggest engine we can
29:33
>> Since you're listening to us, you'll end
29:35
up shopping for your next car very soon.
29:37
And when you do, you need
29:40
>> Any car, anywhere, at any price.
29:42
Autotempus searches all the major car
29:44
listing sites on the web, local or
29:46
nationwide. And AutoTempest has recently
29:48
added price history for every car
29:49
listed, so you can see how prices are
29:51
trending and know if you found a good
29:53
deal. You can also create search alerts
29:55
and lists of saved searches so you can
29:56
find your perfect spec even easier next
29:59
time. Search on any device, in your
30:01
browser, or as an app for Apple, iOS,
30:03
and Android. New, used, or unexpected,
30:36
AutoTempest is how we search for cars.
30:38
Go to autotempest.com/ everyyday so they
30:41
know we sent you autotempest all the
30:46
for our topic Tuesday today we're
30:48
talking lists I know you like lists we
30:50
actually wanted to talk about
30:52
>> used cars under 50k more importantly our
30:56
top five each of us our top five sports
30:58
cars so that means two seats only
31:00
dedicated sports cars available right
31:02
now under $50,000 I gave myself an extra
31:05
parameter I only broke for one car and
31:08
They they can't be more than 20 years
31:10
old. We could go back. We could just
31:11
keep going back. We could keep back and
31:13
back and back and back and we could
31:15
argue, okay, but this was a better
31:16
sports car because of what the original
31:18
sports car name and you know, I don't
31:20
mind driving something 40 years old. We
31:22
could do that, but I stayed with the
31:25
exception of one car. I stayed
31:27
essentially 20 years old and newer.
31:30
>> And I got more than five because I think
31:33
uh you're going to bring some of the
31:34
ones I do. I made sure I had at least a
31:37
>> I think there's going to be some overlap
31:39
in our list, but this list got me
31:41
thinking. So, top five sports cars we
31:43
recommend under 50K.
31:46
>> I could have gone in many different
31:48
directions. And so what we're looking
31:49
for from you listener and viewer,
31:53
>> we're looking for your spin on these
31:56
lists on these top five or top 10s
31:59
>> because we've driven so many things now
32:01
and I think there's such a der of
32:04
lightweight, fun, interesting offerings.
32:06
I want to cover SUVs. I do want to cover
32:08
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We're going to cover
32:09
lots of market segments. There's
32:12
>> I think for a future podcast I'm toying
32:15
with this idea and that is
32:18
>> is everybody sick of the new stuff
32:20
>> and we're starting to get emails to this
32:22
effect. Are you starting to get
32:24
>> just tired of the new tech? You've had
32:28
>> and old cars are suddenly kind of
32:31
appealing. Therefore, validating
32:33
auctions and validating mechanics and
32:37
tribal knowledge and knowledge of how to
32:39
repair cars and keep them around and
32:40
keep them running and old cars should
32:42
never disappear. And that's a different
32:43
discussion, but it does spawn other
32:45
lists because we could do top five
32:47
sports cars and go 20 years and older
32:51
>> let's go cheaper and older.
32:53
>> And you know what? That is still
32:54
appealing to this day.
32:56
>> Do you want to keep it running? But but
32:58
look how cool it is. Yeah, I hear that.
32:59
Yeah. But for now, we're going to stick
33:01
to these top five. Do you want to jump
33:03
in, please, if you want to jump in?
33:05
>> Uh, I'll jump in, but then I guess
33:06
you're gonna have to to tell me where
33:08
I've overlapped with you. But I'm happy
33:10
to jump in. I also have a wild card that
33:11
breaks one of the rules.
33:13
>> First one for me, you're not surprised.
33:16
Uh, the Mazda Miata, the current Mazda
33:18
Miata, and and yes, you could buy an
33:19
older one, but we're talking under 50K.
33:21
The key thing about the current Miata,
33:26
is with $50,000, you could buy any one
33:30
>> You could buy older, you could buy
33:31
newer, but you could buy the RF loaded
33:33
out hard top retractable roof, or you
33:36
can buy the classic.
33:38
Nobody has still figured out how to make
33:41
a convertible top as good as Mazda
33:43
Miatas. An actual cloth convertible top.
33:46
The fact that you can actually un
33:48
unattach it and pull it back with one
33:51
arm. Well, it's because the car is so
33:53
small. It just works. Everything is
33:56
>> when my when my dad had Jaguar E types
33:58
growing up, it was a okay, we need to
34:01
deal with the top park on the side of
34:03
the road. Twoman operation to do it
34:05
right so that it folded right. We didn't
34:06
get weird creases and that's not going
34:08
to catch. I understand it was a car from
34:10
>> like that. Not like that.
34:11
>> Oh, I had that conversation many many
34:14
>> cuz I was the kid trying to help with on
34:16
my side of the car. Yeah, exactly. This
34:18
is so easy and they have maintained that
34:21
for essentially the better part of 40
34:23
years now. Oh, it's crazy to say that.
34:25
>> So, Mazda Miata has to be on this list,
34:28
but I I I think it's amazing that the
34:32
>> loaded. You won't break 50.
34:34
>> Yeah, absolutely.
34:34
>> That is very impressive.
34:35
>> You may not break 40.
34:37
>> Yeah, true. The the next one on the list
34:39
is going to be no surprise to anyone.
34:40
So, I even used my car, the Lotus Elise.
34:44
>> $50,000 in your pocket, you can go buy a
34:46
Lotus Elise. And I and I realize this is
34:49
barely inside the 20-year mark because
34:51
they started selling them here in '05
34:52
and they sold them till 2011. This is my
34:55
'06 in the photo, which is bright
34:57
yellow. Actually has the hard top on it
34:59
in the photo, but it obviously is a
35:01
target top that you can roll the top
35:02
away. But if we're talking dedicated two
35:08
you have to include the Lotus Elise.
35:10
Even if you you don't buy anything I've
35:12
ever said about the car, you think the
35:14
car can't possibly be good. Does it come
35:17
off the list? I don't think it's
35:18
possible for come off the list. $50,000
35:22
>> and and most of the ones you want out
35:24
there right now are priced between about
35:26
35 and 45. You can get them 50. You can
35:29
get some special super duper ones where
35:31
people are selling for 60 and above. And
35:32
I don't think you should buy those, but
35:34
>> Okay. All right.
35:35
>> Rear wheel drive, lightweight. This is
35:37
sports car hierarchy here.
35:41
>> I It's way up there. It's way way up
35:44
there. So, I have to include that one.
35:46
As I move on, I know you're not
35:48
surprised, Paul. I'm sure it's on your
35:49
list. The Cayman and Boxster pair. Now,
35:52
this is 718s in this photo.
35:55
>> You might not get a 718 for this money.
35:58
You might not get a 50. You might get
35:59
the very early ones with the 2 L, the
36:01
the just base 2 L at 50, but I'm just
36:04
using the latest picture to go, which
36:06
one can you buy and which one do you
36:08
want? These have been on top 10 lists
36:13
Since they started making the Boxster
36:15
and Cayman, it's been on top 10 lists.
36:17
These are enjoyable sports cars. Full
36:19
stop. Whether you like Porsche, whether
36:20
you don't like Porsche, whether you have
36:22
nuance about is it 987 or 981, it
36:25
doesn't matter. These are honestly,
36:28
having just talked about the Elise, the
36:31
Elise is much harder to drive than
36:33
these, and it's much less forgiving than
36:35
these. Even though it's great to drive,
36:36
the Cayman and Boxster can be your
36:38
daily. So can the Miata, by the way,
36:40
they can be your daily. And they It is
36:42
very hard to get these cars to bite.
36:46
>> They You can be stupid and you can make
36:48
>> But you've got to really be a bonehead
36:51
>> to make these cars bite. And that is a
36:53
real victory on the on the behalf of
36:54
Porsche. And the fact that
36:56
>> used ones now are down in the 30s
37:00
>> is astonishing. It's a lot of car for
37:02
>> Yeah. Yeah. It's great news. It's great
37:06
>> I I imagine that that's
37:07
>> We do have some overlap. Okay, we do
37:08
have There's that one. I I'm sure no
37:11
one's surprised that there's overlap
37:12
there. I'm moving on to the C7 Corvette.
37:16
This happens to be a Grand Sport on this
37:18
photo. C7 Corvette is way up there for
37:22
two seat sports car. And you may be
37:24
saying, I'd never get a Corvette. But
37:25
then there's alternate people that are
37:26
going, I'd never buy a Porsche. Who?
37:28
Where are you, Pepsi or Coke here? I
37:30
don't know if this is new or old Coke,
37:31
but this the C7 is available under 50
37:34
grand. Now, you may not get the Z06, but
37:38
you could probably get a Grand Sport
37:39
under 50 grand of the C7. I've noticed
37:42
>> I looked and yes, you can.
37:44
>> Uh, which the Grand Sport? Okay, good.
37:46
>> All of them are under 50 grand.
37:47
>> Excellent. So, there you go. So, Grand
37:48
Sport for sure, which is a phenomenal
37:50
version, but I have to go on a tangent
37:52
off of Corvette real quick.
37:53
>> Okay. Okay. because we did this review a
37:57
while back of the three generations, the
37:59
C7, C6, and C5. That takes you all the
38:02
way back to the early 2000s of the Z06.
38:05
All of these are great. I'm I'm cheating
38:07
the rules of top five by just saying
38:09
which Corvette do you like.
38:12
>> So, you could do the the C7 Z06 is hard
38:16
at 50. It's it's difficult. You possibly
38:19
find one, but it might not be one you
38:22
>> So, that Z06 is good. But the C6 Z06 has
38:26
that uh big old 7 L engine in it with an
38:29
awful lot of horsepower and a lot of
38:31
personality. That thing is crazy.
38:32
>> That was a good day.
38:33
>> And the C5 Z06 is a much better
38:37
allaround ageless sports car than people
38:39
realize. That is a really good car to
38:42
>> So all of those Z06s or at least
38:45
Corvettes are at least available. Which
38:47
Corvette intrigues you? Why does it
38:49
intrigue you? The C7 is a truly modern
38:51
car. Prior to that, the C6 and C5
38:54
generations, it's old Chevrolet interior
38:58
thinking and you just kind of have to
38:59
look past some stuff. Yeah.
39:01
>> The C7 actually pulls it off with good
39:03
seats and stuff. And that got me even
39:05
further down the rabbit hole.
39:07
>> Because I have to bring up there's my
39:08
car that breaks my rule of 20 years.
39:11
>> But I have to bring it up. Under 50
39:13
grand. When we start walking our way
39:15
down Corvette history, you know where we
39:19
The C4 ZR1. I love that car
39:23
>> with the Lotus built V8.
39:26
>> This was the biggest surprise to us when
39:28
we did our American original film
39:30
>> is we happened to find somebody in Utah
39:32
with a black version of this, the ZR1.
39:35
We actually drove two different versions
39:37
of the C4 so we could drive a normal C4,
39:40
which is the '90s Corvette essentially,
39:42
and then drive this big old ZR1 with the
39:44
crazy crazy Lotusbuilt V8. This is
39:48
unlike anything else GM was making at
39:51
And it was a revelation to drive. It is
39:54
a phenomenal car to drive.
39:56
>> It's an old car,
39:58
>> but they are cheap.
40:00
>> And you have a very unique car in the
40:03
ZR1. And we've driven it more than I
40:05
think a lot of people, and it's very,
40:07
>> Before you change photos, the way you
40:10
tell this C4 ZR1, the way you can spot
40:13
it is, of course, the badge, but if
40:15
you're looking at the back, and I'm glad
40:16
you you've got a rear shot here. The
40:19
bodywork on the ZR1 is three inches
40:21
wider than the regular Stingray, the
40:23
regular car. And you can see that in the
40:25
license plate cutout. It's an extra inch
40:28
and a half on each side of the license
40:30
plate. That is the dead giveaway where
40:32
you're dealing with a wider car because
40:34
they they look so similar. You're not
40:35
going to really see it at first and then
40:37
you walk around to the back and it is
40:38
truly a much wider car and it does the
40:42
proportions for this styling even
40:44
better. I I love it even more. And and
40:46
the thing that surprised us the most
40:47
when we drove this, and I know I'm I'm a
40:49
little bit off book here, but this was
40:51
the car that kind of drove timeless. I
40:53
mean, the interior was old. You were
40:54
like, "Oh, this era, okay, got it. Yeah,
40:57
C4, got it." But plunger, push button,
41:00
but the driving dynamics were timeless.
41:02
>> It was so well done. So, I I'm way off
41:06
book here, but I wanted to bring up the
41:07
ZR1 while we're talking Corvettes. I'm
41:09
moving off of Corvettes finally to the
41:12
MR2 Spider. I had to put this list. I
41:14
that is an overlooked fantastic sports
41:17
>> You could get five of these for $50.
41:19
>> You could get at least at least maybe
41:21
more. You might be able to get a full 10
41:23
>> Maybe a week's worth of driving.
41:25
>> You certainly could. You You could have
41:27
one for each day of the week. Buy all
41:30
>> These are inexpensive.
41:31
>> Get the most recent one you can find.
41:32
They made them until ' 07, which puts it
41:34
inside the commentary, but they made
41:36
them from the early 2000s to07. The
41:39
early ones, especially the early ones
41:40
with the quote unquote automatic
41:42
gearbox, it was terrible. do not get
41:44
>> But manual transmission. This has a
41:46
lesser version of kind of the engine
41:48
that's in my Elise. Many people talk
41:50
about this being the poor man's Elise
41:52
and they will put the Elise engine in
41:53
it, but in its stock form.
41:56
>> This is not a greatlooking car. It is
41:59
clearly trying to be the cheap Toyota
42:01
alternative to the Boxster.
42:02
>> It's not trying.
42:05
>> You think it's okay. All right. Well,
42:07
>> it doesn't have to try.
42:08
>> But but that's a that's an endorsement
42:09
in its own way. I mean, that is
42:11
definitely what they're aiming for.
42:12
These are inexpensive. They're not that
42:15
usable. There's very little storage in
42:16
them, but they are phenomenal to drive.
42:18
I am a big fan of these. And I think if
42:22
you're talking a cheap used sports car,
42:27
I this has to be on the list. This is
42:29
inex inexpensive. And this is Porsche
42:32
style driving for a lot less. The
42:35
interior is not great.
42:37
>> I think you described it as having Home
42:38
Depot plumbing parts. I mean like the
42:41
>> plumbing section was consulted.
42:43
>> Yeah, it it Yeah, there's some piping
42:44
there that was not highend.
42:46
>> There might be the HVAC vents and
42:47
possibly you know exposed sheet metal
42:50
>> but these drive so very well.
42:54
>> And then I have to go another one.
42:56
>> I brought up the Z4 coupe BMW. Now this
43:00
is the same era of Z4 that I actually
43:01
owned in convertible form. But I say
43:04
look at the Z4 and look at the Z4 that
43:07
meets your price point because this has
43:09
always been the Boxster Alt.
43:13
>> Most of the time, objectively, the
43:14
Boxster drives better than the Z4,
43:18
>> but these are less expensive and they're
43:20
unique comparatively. And these Z4
43:23
coups, I think, is one of BMW's best
43:25
looking recent designs. And I actually
43:27
like the convertible. I own the
43:28
convertible and I fit in the
43:29
convertible. I don't fit in Miatas. I
43:31
barely fit in Boxers. the Z4. I'm like,
43:33
look at all this space.
43:35
>> So, I have to say Z4 as well.
43:38
>> I I'm gonna stop there. Oh, wait. No,
43:40
sorry. I do have one more. How many? My
43:42
list is like 12 things long. I'm sorry.
43:43
That's a lot of cards. That's a lot of
43:44
>> I have to bring up one more and then
43:46
I'll save my wild card because it does
43:48
break some rules. But my one more
43:51
>> because I'd be remiss to not bring it
43:55
>> Oh, that's good. Yeah.
43:56
>> Honda S2000 is one of those timeless
43:59
things. I think I'm I'm going to make a
44:01
prediction here. I think in 20 more
44:04
years, this is going to be looked at
44:06
like the E- Type is looked at now.
44:09
>> That's high praise.
44:10
>> I think it's just
44:11
>> it's a big statement.
44:12
>> It's a timeless design. It was a
44:15
throwdown when it came out.
44:17
>> It still looks good. We saw a bright
44:19
blue one on our shoot this weekend in in
44:22
California and went by and I was just
44:24
like, that's a spectacular car. And the
44:26
one that they had was clean enough that
44:28
I just thought that could have been sold
44:33
>> It's just it's goodlooking. It's clean.
44:36
It drives well there. Look, some of the
44:39
technology in the interior is old, but
44:41
it doesn't feel ancient.
44:43
>> These cars are there's just they're good
44:45
across the board. You can buy newer,
44:48
more powerful, better looking. You can
44:50
get better in any category, but this is
44:52
so good in every category. And when you
44:55
get them in a color and a late model
44:57
version, a Honda S2000 is a superb car.
44:59
And with $50,000 in your pocket, you can
45:02
get a gorgeous one, a fantastic one.
45:05
>> You don't need to bring 50K,
45:08
>> to get a gorgeous one. You can bring 30
45:11
>> Yes, you can get so much S2000
45:13
>> and you'll feel like you overspent.
45:14
>> Yes, it they are excellent cars and they
45:17
are worth being on this list. I have to
45:19
stop. I' I've overstayed my welcome, but
45:22
>> It's totally fine. And I think by now,
45:25
dear listeners, dear viewers, you are
45:27
probably wondering about our lists and
45:30
the overlap on our lists. I went very
45:33
>> And yes, there's overlap and there's
45:35
other cars that are good that are out
45:36
there, but it's like we always talk
45:38
about, they might be sevens or eights to
45:40
cars that are nines and tens for us. And
45:43
while we acknowledge them, Audi TTS and
45:47
>> Focus STS, you know, all that kind of
45:49
>> they're good, but they didn't go far
45:51
enough for us. So again, we're sticking
45:53
to two seat rear wheel drive.
45:55
>> That's key. Oh, two seat
45:56
>> ideally manual. We're recommending some
45:59
older cars. For OEMs
46:03
to capture this same kind of feeling and
46:07
desire in enthusiasts,
46:10
they're going to have to do similar
46:11
things. I don't know that
46:13
>> there will be EV versions of of small
46:16
sports cars. There will
46:18
>> I guarantee it. They're they're coming
46:19
>> for sure. Yeah. Yeah. Are they going to
46:21
capture that same soul? And what I think
46:23
you and I are picking are
46:25
>> top five because of character and soul.
46:28
And the more we drive, the more I'm
46:31
after lightweing things. And the
46:34
>> I'm interested in more and more
46:37
lightweight things. And I just think
46:39
>> Camaros and Mustangs and Challengers and
46:42
Chargers, they're cool and they have
46:44
their place. They're just all too heavy.
46:46
And so none of those are on my list.
46:47
>> Yeah. So for Cayman's, I'm starting
46:50
there, but I want to select the 987,
46:53
>> whether it's 1 or2. I think this
46:57
version, this generation,
46:59
>> was the the most lively of all the
47:01
Cayman's short of going to a GT4 like I
47:04
now have, which I I can't believe it.
47:08
>> That liveless is back for me at an even
47:10
grander scale, and that's what I love
47:12
about it. But the lively, the buzz, the
47:15
engagement, the steering quality on the
47:18
>> I kind of want a 987. Again, you know,
47:21
in addition, if I were to have two
47:22
Cayman's, I want the GT4 and the Cayman
47:25
>> You want to figure out your second
47:27
because they're different. They're kind
47:31
>> This is the most analog version of the
47:34
>> Absolutely. Hydraulic steering and its
47:36
era is very analog.
47:37
>> Exactly. Right. Before it went to 981,
47:39
which they're great cars. In 718, they
47:41
kind of realized, all right, let's make
47:42
it great once more. But
47:44
>> this one is just so superb. The styling
47:47
is really timeless now, and you can get
47:50
them well under 50.
47:52
>> The problem with the car that I really
47:56
>> is not 50. It is the Cayman R from the
48:00
987 generation built in 2012, which is
48:05
>> Bumped up the horsepower, changed the
48:06
suspension, better brakes. Yeah,
48:08
>> this one is so engaging to drive. Do you
48:11
know how much these cost nowadays?
48:12
>> They've got to be 70, aren't they?
48:14
>> They're not 50, 60, or 70 anymore.
48:16
>> They're 84 to 119,000 depending on your
48:20
uh mileage and condition.
48:21
>> Oh, man. Well, that shows you how
48:23
desirable they are, but that's that's
48:24
that's a little bit too bad. I mean, a
48:26
few years ago they were all 65 and we
48:28
should have all bought them.
48:31
>> And that's what we say about, you know,
48:35
>> it's a great car. Really? What? But it's
48:37
really good. Yeah. Yeah.
48:38
>> What is good news is you can get most of
48:40
the feeling of a Cayman R in a Cayman S
48:42
in a 987 generation. I think those are
48:44
superb. And I almost recommend starting
48:46
at 987 and working your way through the
48:48
generations as you mature as a driver,
48:50
as you want something bigger, faster,
48:53
but they're they're just so lively. But
48:55
going back is no bad thing. You know, I
48:58
imagine the GT4 718 because it's the
49:01
last of the breed. I hate to say it.
49:03
>> It's going to be the last of the breed.
49:04
going back to like a Cayman R and having
49:07
>> Interesting, huh?
49:09
>> Of course you are. I I have to say while
49:11
we are here, your 981, your second gen
49:14
2015 Cayman is currently for sale. For
49:16
those of you watching this podcast right
49:18
now, currently as it drops, that is for
49:20
sale, that is available. And and
49:22
honestly, if you're in the market for a
49:24
Cayman, you could only do worse than
49:26
buying a car that Paul has owned. And I
49:28
say that because I do not keep my cars
49:30
up as well as Paul does. His cars are
49:32
pristine and that car has been very well
49:34
taken care of. Whoever buys your 981 is
49:37
going to get an incredible car.
49:39
>> It's really sorted right now. Brand new
49:41
TPMS, brakes, rotors, new tires. It's
49:45
fully sorted with all the service.
49:47
>> You are the rare owner who was like,
49:49
"How do I make it perfect before I list
49:50
it for sale?" You're also that rare.
49:52
>> Well, I don't want anybody to to say,
49:54
"Well, it it needs this or it needs
49:57
absolutely nothing. It's perfect to
49:59
drive. I'm going to miss that car, but I
50:01
do want it to go to a real enthusiast, a
50:03
really great home. You're going to get a
50:05
fantastic car. So, yes, everyday
50:06
drivergmail.com for
50:08
>> a used 981 or sorry, yeah, 981 GT.
50:12
>> Unfortunately, it's above 50, but those
50:13
cars are worth above 50. So, yeah.
50:15
>> So, moving on to second on my list here
50:18
is cheating a little bit because it's
50:21
not really a two-seater, but I think
50:23
it's a two-seater. It's in my mind. I
50:25
always think of this as a two-seater
50:27
because who uses the the back seats
50:30
>> Except for little tiny kids or your race
50:31
tires. It's funny. This means I don't
50:33
have to go back because this was my wild
50:35
card because it was 2 plus two. Yeah,
50:37
this is phenomenal. It's great. It's
50:38
>> And now in its latest iteration, this is
50:40
the Yuzu edition that is coming out
50:42
later in 2025. We are all about it. We
50:44
got a chance to drive it. It's not any
50:46
different than the Hakonei edition or
50:48
>> Yeah, it's essentially the same car with
50:50
a body kit and different exhaust. does
50:51
have quad pipes and it's never looked
50:53
better, especially in this color. What a
50:56
superb car. It's just I think of it as a
50:59
two-seater and so I put it on my list
51:01
>> I'm breaking the rules a little bit, but
51:03
I think we all think of them as
51:04
two-seaters, right?
51:05
>> Yeah. I mean, it's two seat sports car
51:07
is its premise even though technically
51:08
it's two plus two. Yeah, I had it for
51:11
>> Never looked better. I really love this
51:13
car. They're great.
51:14
>> The price of fun that we did was so it
51:18
sticks in my mind so much.
51:20
Are you having 82% more fun by driving a
51:23
McLaren? Are you having 36% less fun?
51:27
No, you're not. They're just fun. And
51:28
so, highly, highly recommend. I am
51:31
looking at the second generation here.
51:33
That is the GR86. The GT86 would be
51:36
first gen. And those, as fun as they
51:39
are, of course, the torque dip, the lack
51:41
of power, all of that stuff was solved
51:44
in the GR86. And I like it so much
51:46
better. More comfortable for straight
51:48
line driving and long trips. It's all
51:51
>> they they fixed or or refined the stuff
51:52
that we didn't like and they didn't
51:54
screw up anything we did like when they
51:55
went to the second generation. It's a
51:58
>> Easily under 50K. And then what
52:00
surprised me was sticking with the
52:02
Toyota product lineup is the GR Supra of
52:05
any era. I love the manual. I love what
52:09
>> The manual's really good to take that
52:10
BMW gearbox and make it theirs. It's
52:13
>> Are there any manuals available used for
52:15
under 50? I mean, I know. I'm sure you
52:17
could get a 3 L early one. going to be
52:18
pushing it. It's going to be pushing it.
52:20
And so I'm hoping the podcast this
52:22
episode ages just a little bit so then
52:27
>> 50k is right on the cusp of
52:28
>> you can find 3 lers though.
52:30
>> You can find three liters correct with
52:31
the auto. It's just such a superb car.
52:34
And you of course see the through line
52:35
at 94.2 in wheelbase. So
52:38
>> Cayman wheelbase. You're just obsessed
52:40
with that wheelbase.
52:41
>> That's right. It's it's the magic
52:43
number. and Toyota acknowledging it and
52:45
building a car to match that wheelbase
52:48
of the Cayman is the best endorsement I
52:52
>> Yeah. Ridiculous, but funny that they
52:54
>> So, I suggest uh two GR cars. Okay.
52:56
>> The GR Supra GR86. And moving on, I also
53:00
have the C7 Corvette Grand Sport because
53:02
I wanted a Corvette and I instantly put
53:06
>> Wait, they're not 50 grand.
53:07
>> Yeah. So, what in the prior generation
53:10
of all the C7s is the most interesting,
53:13
engaging, and value of all the
53:16
>> Corvettes are valued to begin with?
53:18
>> Sure. Yeah. Yeah.
53:19
>> It is the Grand Sport.
53:21
>> What a superb car.
53:22
>> Very hard to find a Z06 at this price
53:24
point, but the Grand Sports are out
53:25
there and C7s in general are great great
53:27
>> Just say stick stick with it. Grand
53:30
Sport. I love that car. It's just a cool
53:32
car. And you know what? The styling on
53:34
the C7 is looking pretty cool to my eye
53:36
these days. It's aged really well and
53:38
and it really is in many ways it feels
53:40
like the peak of what the Corvette was
53:42
obviously versus what it is now. Yeah.
53:45
>> All right. So, moving on to the last car
53:46
on my list. This is our photo from our
53:49
Mazda MX5 RF ND3 shoot and we put that
53:54
against the BMW Z4 M40i. But this car
53:57
really stuck out in my mind. If you
53:59
haven't seen that piece, that is a
54:00
direct comparison. Obviously, the price
54:02
is much different than the
54:05
>> Yeah. But I fell in love with the ND3.
54:08
>> I didn't realize that the minute changes
54:11
that Mazda made to the ND3 generation.
54:14
Not to say that all of the other Miatas
54:18
>> What do you do after the ND3 RF? I don't
54:21
know what Mazda does.
54:22
>> It's going to be hard. It's probably
54:23
going to be hybrid. What's going to
54:24
>> They're going to I mean, handling and
54:26
chassis development. They're going to
54:28
have to impress themselves
54:30
>> to make something that's going to really
54:33
stand out. I mean, what an incredible
54:35
car. The passenger space sucks.
54:39
>> It's terrible. This is almost a
54:41
oneperson car, which is terrible to say.
54:44
>> It's kind of a one-seater, but that's
54:46
okay. And what a fantastic car. This
54:49
would be on my list. For the first time
54:51
ever, a Miata truly is on my list of top
54:55
five sports cars I would absolutely own.
54:58
It's just so cool and fun. I would have
55:00
it in NC the prior gen because I can fit
55:02
in that one and I do like it and I do
55:04
really like the NC quite a bit. But the
55:06
it's interesting if you watch our Miata
55:08
Generations piece it's quite a few years
55:09
old now because it was made right when
55:11
the ND first came out
55:13
>> and we weren't big fans of the first ND
55:17
>> and the one to two was when they did an
55:18
engine change and it revolutionized the
55:21
car and then they tweaked that further
55:23
for the ND3. We're way down in the
55:25
minutiae here, but it is really
55:27
impressive how great that car is to
55:29
drive. Too bad it's a one-seater.
55:31
>> It's a one-seater. Well, break
55:32
>> the BAC Mono and the and the Miata. Same
55:35
thing. One-seaters.
55:35
>> True. They are. They truly are. All
55:37
right. Two cars left on my list here,
55:39
and they are the extras. They do not
55:43
but they are worth a mention.
55:46
>> The M2 Competition.
55:48
>> I really wanted to recommend the CS of
55:51
the first uh F82. Was it the F82?
55:54
>> Sure. Yeah. Yeah. F87, but those are too
55:56
>> F87, but they're too expensive. I The CS
56:00
>> It's very good. It's very, very good. We
56:01
put it with a with a Lotus Euphora, and
56:03
it actually held its own. Yeah. It's
56:04
pretty interesting. That was a mismatch,
56:07
>> So, I have to step back a little bit,
56:09
but that's no bad thing to competition.
56:12
And then, of course,
56:14
>> my only front-wheel drive car. See, I
56:17
Okay. All right. I think you're I think
56:19
you're off book at this point. I don't
56:20
think that works, but keep going. I
56:21
think Tell me anyway.
56:23
Despite what Max has just proclaimed
56:25
that frontwheel drive sucks the joy or
56:27
whatever he said about frontwheel drive,
56:32
>> I don't care what he says.
56:33
>> This is a superb fun car to drive.
56:36
>> Excellent car to drive.
56:37
>> Proves, I think,
56:39
>> that front-wheel drive makes you an
56:41
enthusiast, too. Frontwheel drive can
56:42
absolutely be Honda has proven it to the
56:44
world. Frontwheel drive can be an
56:46
amazing, fun car to drive. The end. Full
56:48
stop. That's it. Honda Civic Type R. the
56:52
new 11th generation. Despite what Max
56:54
says, well, Max and I can disagree.
56:57
>> There are there are there certainly fun
57:00
to drive frontwheel drives, and we'll
57:01
talk through those at some point, and
57:03
this is definitely among them. But but I
57:04
I would say the thing on this car on the
57:06
Type R is that you don't care what the
57:10
>> that's the interesting thing. It It's
57:11
irrelevant because it drives so well. It
57:13
is Honda really throwing down everything
57:14
they can do. I mean, I It's Yes, you can
57:17
get them at 50. Yes, it it's great to
57:20
drive, but it isn't rear wheel drive or
57:22
two seat. But at the same time, I I I
57:24
the fact that you acknowledge it is
57:25
worthion. It's worth a cool fun car to
57:28
>> It's very good. Bravo.
57:31
>> Go garage is our official car care
57:33
partner and one of the first ever
57:34
sponsors of our show. They don't just
57:36
make great car care products. They want
57:38
you to get out and drive. Go is a
57:41
family-owned company, and they've been a
57:42
part of every one of our road trips. We
57:44
always take Speed Shine on every shoot,
57:45
helping us spot clean cars in a moment's
57:47
notice. Grio's foaming glass cleaner is
57:50
the quickest and best way we've ever
57:52
found to get windows clean before a big
57:54
day of driving. Grio is always releasing
57:56
new and improved products like their
57:57
updated wash bucket 2. Plus, all of Go's
58:00
liquid products are 100% guaranteed and
58:02
made right here in the US. The Grio's
58:05
folks are always happy to answer any
58:06
questions you have and make sure you get
58:08
the right product and the right results.
58:10
So, get the best quality car care
58:12
products out there from a company that
58:14
has always supported this show. Our
58:16
audience can always get at least 10% off
58:18
by using the code driver10 at
58:23
>> Our first car debate is Michael writing
58:25
from LA. He's writing in about his first
58:27
sports car ever. He's been listening to
58:28
the podcast for eight or nine years.
58:30
Man, Michael, thank you. That's
58:31
incredible. Thanks for doing that. We
58:34
>> He is a 29-year-old clinical pharmacist
58:36
and works from home in LA. He drives to
58:38
San Diego on weekends, see family a
58:40
couple times a month, otherwise doesn't
58:42
drive extensively during the week. He's
58:44
getting married shortly, but they're
58:45
likely to not have kids. And the fiance
58:48
will probably have, I hate to say it
58:51
this way, the real car, the big car, the
58:53
SUV, whatever it is, cuz he currently
58:55
has a QX30 Sport Infiniti that he both
58:58
loves and loathes. He says it's it's the
59:01
rare hot trim CUV, and he kind of thinks
59:04
it's a hot hatch, but it's built on the
59:05
Mercedes GLA platform. So, it sounds
59:07
like what it's inherited is little
59:09
issues from both brands. Like some
59:12
little Infiniti issues here, some
59:14
Mercedes issues there. And so, yeah,
59:16
he's he said it it luckily it's under
59:19
warranty, but he'd otherwise he'd be out
59:20
about $10,000 already and unforeseen
59:23
maintenance. Warranty expires soon, so
59:25
he doesn't want to own it outside of
59:27
warranty. So the fact that he is getting
59:29
wants to get rid of this little SUV
59:31
>> and the wife to be the future is going
59:34
to have an SUV really kind of frees him
59:37
>> I love the way Michael you described it
59:39
as Infinity Skin on a Mercedes GLA.
59:41
You're absolutely right. And we like
59:43
parts cars. That's what I love about the
59:45
GT4. It's a parts car.
59:47
>> Couldn't have sold that many. That was a
59:49
>> I mean, it's a partnership and they they
59:51
got an extra car out of it. And again,
59:53
Mercedes is doing 30 cars in the next
59:54
two years. What are they bringing out?
59:56
My gosh. Hopefully not a bunch of
59:58
partnerships with everybody. It seems
00:00
everybody's shacking up with everybody,
00:02
>> GM, Hyundai, and Mercedes bring you the
00:04
Yeah, that's going to happen, too.
00:05
>> Everybody merges. What if all the
00:07
world's car makers merged to make one
00:11
>> and it the brand is just called car.
00:15
>> Somebody said it's that logo. It's a C
00:17
and an A and an R making a making a
00:19
little roundell and it's just car.
00:22
>> Every manufacturer
00:24
>> contributed. What a great idea.
00:26
>> I'm going to buy a new car. What car are
00:28
you going to buy? I don't know, but I'm
00:29
going to go down to the car dealership.
00:30
>> Go down to a car dealership. I'm going
00:32
to buy a car. What brand is that? Car.
00:35
>> Anyway, Michael is looking for no dogs,
00:38
no kids, no bulky sports equipment to to
00:40
carry. A fun weekend driver. Doesn't
00:42
think he needs four seats because his
00:44
fiance likes big cars. Will likely, as
00:46
Todd, as you said, will likely get the
00:47
SUV soon. Living in LA, Michael thinks
00:50
convertibles is the preference. Though
00:51
traditional he tra traditionally favors
00:53
wagons, hatches, sportbacks,
00:55
>> he can could be convinced on a coupe and
00:58
something relatively reliable, though
01:00
he's open to purchasing a warranty if
01:02
>> For the budget, hard stop at $55,000,
01:06
assuming he can currently get 18 to 20
01:08
grand for his car. All right.
01:10
>> For the Infiniti skinned Mercedes,
01:13
>> the QX30, we've driven it. Yeah, it's
01:16
Michael is currently eyeing BMW Z4
01:21
>> I love this choice for you. He says,
01:23
"Certified used ones with less than
01:24
20,000 miles are around 55 grand. That
01:27
means the $75,000 version that we drove,
01:30
they're now 55 grand."
01:31
>> That's crazy that they've come down that
01:32
far. I mean, sadly, Michael, the reality
01:35
is the one you want is the manual, but
01:36
you're not gonna be able to get a manual
01:38
>> Is it really a hard stop?
01:40
>> Probably is a hard stop. I'll I'll take
01:41
his word for it here. He said he'd
01:42
actually like to have a Boxster, but the
01:44
boxers that he wants, none of them he
01:46
can get for under 55. So, I mean, we
01:50
just talked about cars under 50 grand.
01:51
You could get a Boxster under 50. You
01:54
definitely could. But the problem is you
01:56
you said you really want a 981 Boxster
01:58
S. Really? You can't find one of those
02:00
under 50? That surprises me. The 718
02:03
styling he doesn't actually like as
02:05
>> see the 981 is prettier. I think I think
02:08
dig nationwide cuz I think Boxster for
02:11
under 55. You might surprise yourself,
02:13
but I'm getting ahead of it.
02:15
>> Michael's considered Volvo V60
02:17
Polestars, Audi S5 Sportbacks, BMW M850
02:21
Grand Coupes. Those are too expensive.
02:24
>> What's weird though is all of a sudden
02:25
we went to big cars. Big
02:27
non-convertibles are the other things
02:29
he's considering. I I Michael, let's go
02:31
smaller. Like, yeah, Mercedes C-Class,
02:33
CLA class, AMGs, it's a little bit
02:35
smaller. So, what is he missing? Michael
02:37
asks if it would be terribly
02:39
inconvenient to have a two-seater
02:40
convertible even though his fiance will
02:43
have a practical car. I think you just
02:44
answer your question. No, because of
02:47
your situation. I think totally agree.
02:48
>> Yeah, the SUV will take care of all
02:51
those duties and then I think you'll
02:53
actually enjoy having the two seat
02:55
especially a convertible.
02:57
>> I always take the budget as a
03:02
>> You take it under advisement. That's
03:04
really you've take you'll take the
03:05
budget under advisement and then you
03:07
>> I say quietly rip up the paper and keep
03:10
>> I say yes noted and sure your budget is
03:14
what you put on a piece of paper there.
03:16
We've written it down. You do the car
03:17
dealer thing like okay sure.
03:20
>> 55 is where we're starting.
03:22
>> And uh what's your monthly payment
03:25
>> Yeah. They and then and then they're
03:28
bound to say to you, well that's just a
03:29
cup of coffee difference. What if you
03:31
had one less coffee every morning? They
03:32
they forget about the fact that those of
03:34
you my my great co-host included that
03:36
want your coffee for morning there's no
03:38
>> There is no skipping coffee nor food
03:40
breakfast has to I have to have
03:47
manual transmission
03:48
>> really like that car if you can pull
03:50
that off. I do really like it.
03:54
>> The difference with the Z4 M40i
03:56
especially with the manual transmission
03:57
is that that rear suspension got revised
03:59
a little bit. So we liked it a lot
04:01
better. suggest manual
04:04
>> and it is worth it at that point. So,
04:06
yes to the Z4. Yes, shop. Yes, go look
04:08
at those. I think those are great. I'm
04:10
going to take you in a very strange
04:13
>> I debated this. I like this.
04:16
>> Because I thought if what you're looking
04:18
for, what you described was simply a
04:19
Miata, Michael. You just described a fun
04:23
two seat convertible. Well, it's just
04:24
the two of you. The Miata we have
04:26
determined as a one-seater.
04:30
>> Yes. and you just want top down fun
04:32
cruising around LA. You want to slice
04:33
through traffic. A Miata is your answer
04:35
there. But I'm sensing and we understand
04:39
this with LA. There's something about
04:42
perception. There's something about the
04:44
badge. There's something about pulling
04:46
up or being seen or any reason
04:49
>> is it's more important and is magnified
04:52
more in Los Angeles than anywhere else I
04:55
think on the planet.
04:55
>> To some degree, you're right. So you're
04:56
talking Aston Martin Vantage. This is
04:58
the the V8 Vantage Eric.
05:00
>> So, I suggest the V8 Vantage Cabriolet.
05:04
>> If you can get manual, you're and this
05:06
is why again I I note your budget.
05:10
>> You're right. I do take it under
05:11
adisement. Under advisement I see that
05:12
on the piece of paper. Thank you for
05:14
submitting your budget. Yes.
05:19
acid, the sound, the perception is right
05:23
in line with what I think you're looking
05:24
for. Cuz if you're thinking newer Z4
05:29
>> I I sensed a perception thing going on.
05:32
Little bit more substantial car. That's
05:34
exactly what this is.
05:36
>> But they're good on a back road. And
05:37
honestly, I don't Look, the manuals on
05:39
these are amazing. I really like that
05:41
when you you can actually find one that
05:42
is manual. It's really cool. But I'm I'm
05:44
going to say it. You don't have to have
05:45
a manual for this car to be great.
05:47
>> No, you don't. It's very hard to find
05:49
the manuals on this car. And you can get
05:51
it with automatic. And it is still a
05:53
fantastic place to be. And if you're
05:54
just driving for fun, then I I think the
06:00
where this loses in fun, it gains in
06:03
experience. So it might be a watch. You
06:06
>> That's good. Well, speaking of
06:07
experience, I note your budget and I
06:11
discard it to offer you a wild card just
06:13
to get you thinking. I'm I'm only
06:15
discarding just simply to get you
06:17
thinking a little bit differently that
06:20
we're talking now perception. We're
06:22
talking open air fun.
06:24
>> Perception is big here.
06:26
>> And we're talking power and sound and
06:29
the looks, all of that wrapped into
06:35
>> an Audi R8 Cabriolet. Go back two
06:41
to get yourself the V8. And it doesn't
06:43
have to be manual. Although
06:46
>> if you can, I would, but they're going
06:48
to be super expensive.
06:49
>> Yeah, they're more expensive,
06:50
unfortunately. Yeah. But if you're
06:55
>> what? That is such a different level.
06:58
You can commute in this. But 5060 is the
07:01
bottom of the R8 market.
07:04
>> So you're you're it's not Here's the
07:05
thing. As much as you're blowing his
07:07
budget, it's not like you're doubling
07:09
>> The the for manual maybe, but
07:12
>> the market for these is roughly you want
07:14
to walk in the door with 70
07:17
>> and you can find either side of 70. So,
07:19
so look, it's over your budget. You said
07:21
hard stop at 55. Paul has blown past the
07:23
hard stop. You're in the grass at the
07:25
end of the runway, but you're not But
07:27
you haven't doubled. I will defend you
07:29
because you haven't doubled his budget.
07:31
This sounds like you just blew it out.
07:32
The bottom of the market is the top of
07:36
>> Yes, that's good. And if you go back to
07:38
the first generation here, I actually
07:39
like the styling the best.
07:41
>> I never liked the the V10s and and the
07:44
subsequent generations. I feel like they
07:46
really got away from that pure RH shape
07:49
and go back to the first gen, find a
07:51
Cabriolet, find something. There have
07:54
been owners that put a lot of miles on
07:56
these. So, I don't think it's in the
07:59
>> exotic car class where you have to be
08:01
afraid. Just think that 4.2 V8 existed
08:06
>> it existed as just cars you would just
08:08
>> It was in the faton that I had. And what
08:10
was funny is we would have conversations
08:12
with my mechanic because sometimes parts
08:14
that needed to be replaced on the
08:15
Fatton, you couldn't get to them on the
08:16
Faton, but if only I'd had an R8, we
08:18
could just reach in and grab it. And
08:19
vice versa. So invariably, whichever one
08:21
you have, the opposite thing is going to
08:23
go wrong. The reality about these R8s is
08:25
they've been around long enough people
08:26
put enough miles on them. They haven't
08:28
been garage queens that the known issues
08:30
exist and you can defend for known
08:33
>> It is merely food for thought. It's just
08:36
a suggestion, but I'm just throwing it
08:38
out there just in case it appeals or you
08:42
might want to go investigate at least.
08:43
Maybe worth a test drive and
08:46
>> No, just investigate a little bit. See
08:47
what you find. I think it could be a
08:50
>> interesting different choice because of
08:56
>> Those are my choices.
08:56
>> Those are good. That's very good stuff.
08:58
I have to jump to a couple of things,
09:00
but one of the things that I didn't have
09:02
a picture of, I'll start here with the
09:04
BMW Z4 you already mentioned, and I'll
09:07
use that as a launching pad for
09:08
something I just thought up when you
09:09
mentioned the Aston Martin.
09:12
>> There is another one in here that that I
09:14
just this minute thought of, and that is
09:17
>> Yeah, that's good.
09:18
>> That is the cheaper version of the Aston
09:20
Martin that you could get into, no
09:22
question for your budget, probably with
09:23
money left over. If you could find a V6
09:26
F-Type manual convertible, does that
09:29
even exist? Where are those in the
09:30
world? Those are those are only hard
09:32
>> I think they may only be hard top
09:33
manuals now that we're talking about it.
09:35
But either way, the convertible F-Type
09:37
is a car that gets overlooked and it
09:39
could be absolutely an option here. Of
09:40
course, the BMW Z4 you already are
09:42
looking at. You would enjoy this car.
09:44
It's very, very good.
09:46
>> The manual's better. So, can you spring
09:48
for the because it's not just a
09:49
transmission change. That's the key
09:51
thing. So, the manual is better if you
09:52
can do it. I have to say Miata again. I
09:57
>> We're talking about the Miata a lot in
09:58
this episode, but if you're buying a fun
10:01
car and you have a budget of $55,000 and
10:05
you say, "I'd like to have a fun car
10:06
convertible." Didn't we all just hear
10:09
Miata in that sentence? Isn't that just
10:12
>> what happened? So I, you know,
10:14
>> but it's more than his budget and so we
10:17
>> He's already allowing.
10:18
>> Uhhuh. I We do have more budget than a
10:21
>> Said no Miatas. That's very funny.
10:23
Exactly. The question The question I
10:25
have for you here, Michael, is how big
10:27
are you and how big is your fiance?
10:28
Because if you're small people, the
10:29
Miata is great. Paul and I are not small
10:31
people. I've never fit in a Miata well
10:33
ever, unfortunately. And the passenger
10:36
side space in the current ND Miata is
10:40
>> So, if you're not big people, this might
10:41
be great. But it is it is really hard to
10:43
argue that you bought a convertible and
10:46
you had more fun than you did top down
10:49
on great winding LA roads in a
10:52
convertible Miata. I think you'd have a
10:54
lot of trouble fighting that. But I have
10:55
to go somewhere else. And we've also
10:57
talked about this in this episode.
10:59
>> Get yourself a Corvette C7 because you
11:01
can get a convertible. But the thing you
11:03
have to remember is every other Corvette
11:07
has a removable top.
11:09
>> Yeah. That's the one thing that gets
11:10
forgotten about the Corvette a lot.
11:11
They're all target tops.
11:13
>> That centerpiece just lifts out and goes
11:15
in the trunk or stays at the house or
11:16
whatever. So, every Corvette you look
11:19
at, you could have a topless driving
11:21
experience in that Corvette.
11:23
>> So, that styling you can do convertible,
11:26
but I am a big believer in the fact that
11:29
every Corvette you have a removable top.
11:31
So, I think the C7 can't be overlooked
11:33
here. That is a great option. $55,000
11:36
you can get a very nice Corvette, a C7,
11:39
and enjoy it. And here's the thing, you
11:41
guys could drive cross country, San
11:43
Diego, wherever you want with plenty of
11:44
space in the Corvette, including the
11:46
fact that the back hatch has gobs of
11:50
>> This is a cross country Grand Tour, but
11:51
if you get on a tight road in LA, you
11:53
will also love it. You're talking about
11:55
fun car you actually can get some
11:57
usability out of. It's hard to argue
11:59
against the Corvette. I know we've
12:00
talked about Miatas and Corvettes a lot
12:02
this episode, but they just work here.
12:03
They just work. I liked that. Across the
12:06
country or San Diego? I mean, for as
12:08
long as it takes you to get from LA to
12:09
San Diego, it might as well be across
12:10
>> Might be very similar in in time. You're
12:13
right. If you hit the wrong traffic on
12:15
>> Michael, thank you for writing. If
12:16
you've got a debate like Michael's,
12:18
write to us. Everydayd driver
12:19
tvgmail.com. Topic Tuesdays, Carlusions,
12:24
Nerval writes to us with an aging car
12:27
fleet. The current fleet consists of a
12:30
2016 Honda Pilot with 162,000 miles.
12:33
>> Okay. a 2021 Ram ProMaster City with
12:38
>> and a Honda S2000 with 172,000 m which
12:43
equates to Nirval's math here is 8,000
12:47
>> I love it that you have that car and
12:49
it's still running great. That's
12:50
awesome. I love it.
12:50
>> Nirval has listened to our originally
12:53
aired podcast and found it lacking.
12:57
>> It's It's funny when you get an email
12:59
where somebody just says, "I don't know
13:00
that I like what you do." That happens
13:02
here. But apparently he's found it since
13:03
then. In the last year and a half he's
13:05
found it, listened to all the episodes,
13:06
watched the videos. So apparently he
13:08
didn't like it originally and I will
13:10
>> we've come a bit. Things have improved
13:12
just a bit since episode one. He wasn't
13:14
a fan of episode one or the first few
13:15
but he's found it in the last year and a
13:17
half and likes it a lot so he wrote in.
13:18
I just I love that. That was a nice
13:19
reality check like, huh, you're right.
13:52
Things have changed a bit. Okay. Uh-huh.
13:54
Good. The past vehicles in his life were
13:56
an '04 Honda Accord, 2000 Honda Accord,
13:58
a 2011 Honda Element, 96 Nissan Maxima,
14:01
heavily modified. Those 90s Maximas just
14:04
ran forever. You could sports car with
14:06
>> The four-door sports cars,
14:07
>> and a 92 Honda Accord.
14:09
>> He's also driven the following cars. 93
14:11
Prelude Si, Mustang Foxbody, 81 Firebird
14:16
>> Interesting. Okay.
14:17
>> And a 2024 Cayman GT4 RS on track.
14:21
>> Good for you. Yes. It's different than a
14:24
>> Yes, it's about the same.
14:26
>> Nerval has always had a love for
14:27
Porsches and that last car has lit the
14:29
fuse. I have also subconsciously pointed
14:31
out his vitamin P deficiency. I'm going
14:34
to use that sometime on a license tag or
14:38
>> it is vitamin P.
14:39
>> Yes, it has. It exists out there.
14:40
>> He says this has been rectified. He was
14:42
looking to replace his fleet because the
14:43
ProMaster City is a company vehicle. His
14:45
budget is 50K with a Paul limiter of
14:47
60K. What does he get? So, the Ram
14:51
stays. So, we're talking about the Pilot
14:53
andor the S2000. And he has most of his
14:57
car history is Hondas,
14:59
>> which is fascinating. I actually used
15:01
that in my conversation here. But we're
15:02
looking for a replacement. $60,000 for
15:05
the top end. Okay. So, how many Porsches
15:08
are you selling him, Paul?
15:10
>> Well, I am going to not just sell you a
15:13
Porsche, but I'm going to sell you a
15:15
very specific Porsche here. Nerval, I
15:18
have decided that you need to go after
15:22
the Cayman or Boxster T, the lightweight
15:27
>> And that is because you've already
15:29
driven a very specific Porsche.
15:32
>> And this one, strangely, is kind of
15:35
close to a GT4 with the nylon pull
15:37
straps, for example. But what I like
15:40
about it so much is even though I have
15:42
not driven the T version of the Cayman
15:44
is that it's very focused on the fun of
15:47
driving even more so than everything
15:49
else. It's it's the Carrer and we have
15:51
driven Carrera T's.
15:53
>> It is different. It does actually. It's
15:55
just a little bit more. So, it's a
15:57
special edition. So, it's got the
15:58
Porsche active suspension management. It
16:01
does have the 2 L flat 4.
16:05
>> base engine with the six-speed manual
16:06
transmission. But when you start to ring
16:09
that out, I think the manual
16:11
transmission paired with that engine is
16:12
the better solution for the
16:16
>> The PDK with that motor wants to upshift
16:19
very quickly and it doesn't allow you to
16:21
get to where the power is in that
16:22
engine. It just wants to
16:24
>> sure up and so you're down in the the
16:27
low RPMs. So, it's also got the Sport
16:29
Chrono LSD, smaller diameter GT steering
16:32
wheel, those straps, the nylon pull
16:35
straps, and the best part.
16:37
>> See, I see nylon pull straps as we
16:39
didn't give you parts, and yet you're
16:41
making it a selling point. You are you
16:42
are Porsche guy through and through.
16:44
>> But the whole point is it's very
16:47
slightly over 3,000. It's like you've
16:50
gone back to that original Cayman S, the
16:52
1971. That's true. That's true.
16:54
>> So, that's what I'm suggesting for you.
16:55
Cayman or Boxster T. And those are
16:58
within budget. Actually, I went
16:59
shopping. They're not the Cayman R,
17:01
which isn't, but these Cayman T's,
17:04
they're harder to find. It's a
17:06
deliberate choice. It's a very specific
17:09
lightweight choice. I had GR Supermanual
17:11
on here as well for you, which I'm
17:14
putting up on screen now. So, that's
17:16
another consideration only because of
17:18
the Cayman wheelbase numbers. The But
17:20
you're right, vitamin D deficiency. And
17:24
uh I'm hoping the Boxster T or Cayman T
17:28
will solve that. I mean, why did Porsche
17:33
>> extra special and short-lived version?
17:37
That's why I'm pointing you very
17:39
specifically to this to this very
17:41
>> Okay. I think that's a really good one.
17:43
He's got $50 to $60,000. It's really
17:45
hard to argue against that. I do
17:46
understand that and I can't argue
17:48
against it either. Uh but I'm going to
17:50
come up with a couple of other options.
17:52
If you aren't going to do Boxster, and
17:53
you could for 50 60 grand, he could get
17:56
himself a used 987 Boxster or Cayman and
18:01
a used Cayenne. And for 50 to 60 grand,
18:05
you could have two Porsches in the
18:07
garage from none. Now, this involves
18:09
this involves you selling the S2000 and
18:11
the and the Pilot. And then you keep the
18:13
Ram for for business duty. And you have
18:16
now you go from two Hondas in the
18:17
garage, the Pilot and the S2000 to a
18:21
Boxster cuz there's your convertible and
18:23
a Cayenne. You could go full Porsche
18:25
with this budget. It is very possible.
18:28
>> But I have to bring up two others and
18:31
it's going to be fairly obvious because
18:33
one of them we've talked about too much
18:34
on this podcast and that's the Miata of
18:37
course would definitely work here. But I
18:39
have something you're not going to see
18:40
coming and comes entirely because you
18:43
are a person who likes Honda product. I
18:46
think you could keep the S2000 and
18:48
probably have money left over and that
18:49
is the Acura MDX Type S.
18:53
>> That is a sweet.
18:55
>> It's everything you like about the Pilot
18:58
with uh a Porsche style to it. It's
19:01
faster, it's better, it the dynamics are
19:03
excellent, the engine is very good, the
19:05
superhanding all all-wheel drive is
19:06
wonderful. You rarely ever see these.
19:09
New, they're like 70 grand. So, get a
19:12
couple old one. Get this as your new
19:15
bang around high mile SUV, but it's
19:17
going to have performance. It taps right
19:20
back into your Honda love.
19:22
>> This brand new or almost brand new MDX
19:26
Type S in your garage next to your
19:32
selective Honda buyer. I like that
19:35
you're going very specific with models,
19:37
too. It's interesting to me. I think
19:38
Type S, the MDX Type S and your S2000 is
19:42
a fantastic twocar garage that stays in
19:45
the lineage of the stuff you'd like.
19:46
Now, again, I gave you the all Porsche
19:47
garage. You could go all Porsche. It's
19:49
possible with your budget and you could
19:51
be very happy. I've had incredibly good
19:52
luck with used Cayens. So, they're out
19:55
there for your budget. Spend 25 to 30,
19:58
half your budget on that on the Cayenne
20:00
and get the other half for the Boxster.
20:02
You could stay Honda with the MDX Type
20:05
S. Phenomenal SUV. It is a Cayenne
20:09
performance Cayenne alternative for less
20:11
money. It's a very, very good SUV.
20:14
>> Keep your S2000. Drive your Ram. Be
20:17
happy. I have to bring it up because I
20:18
think the MDX is going to get overlooked
20:20
here and it shouldn't. That's excellent.
20:21
Nerval, thank you so much for writing.
20:23
Really appreciate it. Send us your
20:24
debates. We're looking forward to
20:27
For our first car conclusion, Jordan L
20:29
writes to us about the Bahrain saga.
20:33
>> It's a car conclusion for the overseas
20:35
tour, and it's a bit lengthy, but rather
20:40
Jordan, I really appreciate you writing.
20:42
He's following up from podcast episodes
20:44
697 and 871, where he and his family
20:48
opted to sell the 2014 Audi S8 and
20:50
rehome their truck and Jeep with family.
20:53
At the time of their decision, the
20:54
healthy rebels in Yemen were shooting at
20:56
all vessels remotely related to US or
20:59
Israel merchant shipping.
21:00
>> That's a sentence we've never said on
21:01
this podcast. In over a thousand
21:02
episodes, we have never talked about the
21:04
rebels shooting at ships in Yemen.
21:06
>> But that would have put anything they
21:10
>> Their intent, the intent was to ensure
21:12
the harsh heat, sand, and terrible roads
21:14
of Bahrain did not destroy their
21:16
recently paid off fleet. He said it's
21:18
worth noting the dash clocked the
21:19
temperature at 118 Fahrenheit in the
21:22
shade just 2 days ago when he wrote this
21:25
email to us which was recent.
21:27
>> He said buying an island beater and
21:28
commuting in it for up to 22 months
21:30
seemed like the best course of action
21:32
giving their given their experience with
21:34
the region and renting and leasing for 2
21:36
years did not come out to be cost
21:38
effective compared to just the outright
21:40
cost of buying a vehicle. When they were
21:42
last in Bahrain, they had work furnished
21:45
vehicles and lived within walking
21:47
distance of the base. They were also
21:49
there in 2020 during the initial co
21:51
lockdowns with no kids and they didn't
21:53
consider what they didn't know or what
21:55
>> So you remember when used car prices
21:57
were through the roof during co of
21:59
course we all do. He said some re
22:01
regions of the world found that it made
22:03
more sense for them to stay there since
22:06
they haven't come down at all. Yeah.
22:07
>> Since people paid them. If you're going
22:10
to pay this much, we'll just leave the
22:11
price this much. Yeah.
22:12
>> Getting a new vehicle in a country that
22:14
only had imports was too much to justify
22:16
the cost. And on average, used cars and
22:19
SUVs that should cost six grand hovered
22:25
>> On average, he said, they're also not
22:27
>> So, it's not money well spent at all.
22:30
>> They found Jordan and his family found
22:31
the local populace does not take care of
22:33
their cars. The Middle East may be known
22:35
for extravagant cars and luxury, he
22:37
writes, but they do not take care of
22:39
them. Preventative maintenance, none.
22:42
Pride in the basic condition of the
22:43
vehicle, nowhere to be found.
22:45
>> Oh my gosh. Okay.
22:46
>> He test drove standard SUVs like the
22:48
Pajaro, Mitsubishi Pajaro, G Wagons, FJ
22:51
Cruisers, all not a decade old that had
22:54
air vents that were broken and punched
22:55
out, screen smashed to inoperability. He
22:58
said, "You would rather have purchased a
23:00
10-year-old Ultima from an American
23:03
>> than a 4-year-old Macan in Bahrain."
23:08
>> He said, "We'd be horrified if we saw
23:10
some Cayens and Macans driving around
23:12
>> Vehicles are treated like appliances,
23:14
yet the status symbol culture for
23:16
vehicles is still present.
23:18
>> It's very confusing, right?
23:19
>> So, buy it. Don't take care of it. When
23:21
it's, I guess, beat up, buy another one.
23:24
Use it as disposable thing.
23:26
>> Wow. Okay. He says the drivers are
23:28
outright terrifying.
23:30
>> He had a colleague state jokingly that
23:32
at first glance he thought driving
23:34
without looking at your cell phone was
23:36
>> You have to look at your phone.
23:38
>> Basic traffic laws are not enforced. Car
23:40
seats for children are non-existent and
23:42
are not required. They regularly see
23:44
young children hanging waste up out of
23:47
the window or a sunroof of a moving car.
23:49
Now I will admit that was us growing up.
23:52
>> it's just we survived and that was my
23:55
>> Totally. We survived and now we wrap
23:57
kids in bubble wrap in, you know, a a
23:59
chair with missiles. But that is not
24:00
happening there at all. Yes.
24:02
>> He said becoming parents to their second
24:03
child only 2 months after arriving in
24:05
country might have had something to do
24:08
>> So they rushed into purchasing only a
24:10
mildly molested 2012 Grand Cherokee
24:12
Limited for $9,000 US. It's got that 5.7
24:16
L V8 solid air conditioning and creature
24:19
>> Okay. But after a week of ownership,
24:22
they ended up having to replace the
24:24
entire cooling system and a rear main
24:26
seal after being discovering it was
24:29
botched. The repairs were botched by the
24:31
>> He says it makes the same noises his
24:33
brother's 25-year-old Toyota makes, but
24:35
it soldiers on apparently.
24:40
>> He and his wife found that they worked
24:43
in buildings next to each other and
24:45
daycare is only a short walk away. So
24:46
commuting together in one vehicle had
24:50
>> uh until recently. Other geopolitical
24:53
event events have made for insane
24:55
working hours and conditions. No family
24:57
should ever have to go through.
24:59
>> All of you are actually just you're
25:01
rolling the dice and guessing what
25:02
Jordan does and guessing which agency he
25:04
works for and things he can't tell us or
25:06
he'd have to kill us. Moving on. Yeah,
25:07
>> that's good. He says to maximize
25:09
flexibility and practicality, they
25:11
decided to again hastily purchase a
25:13
second car. Buying a car under pressure
25:15
is never a good thing. Jordan's doing it
25:17
in Bahrain. Yes. Excellent. Good choice.
25:20
It's going to end up very well. Yeah.
25:21
>> They both wanted something sporty or
25:23
luxurious they could escape in after
25:24
work. The kids in their amenities always
25:26
have a say, though.
25:27
>> So, because of this podcast, Jordan was
25:30
hunting for an early 2000s Suburban or
25:32
Tahoe with good air conditioning. Yes,
25:34
that's a given. Yes,
25:35
>> Suburban Tahoe just equals good.
25:37
>> GM makes V8s that are designed to power
25:40
the air conditioning system. It also
25:41
moves the car, but it empowers the AC.
25:43
That's the purpose.
25:44
>> Limited budget of $10,000 US was not
25:46
enough to buy one that did not need the
25:49
same amount of budget for work for
25:52
>> And the allotted parking spaces in their
25:53
complex garage limited to some Taho in
25:57
>> So, what did they buy? They got a
25:59
family-owned 2016 Chrysler Grand Caravan
26:02
that was owned by their local mechanic.
26:04
The transmission hunts around for gears
26:06
and the AC takes about 15 minutes to get
26:08
cold, but it's in budget.
26:11
and commutes the entire family
26:13
>> It's charcoal gray, slow, and very
26:15
boring, and they have to remind
26:16
themselves it's only for one more year,
26:18
and then they'll see where the wind
26:22
>> He says he hates this because 7 months
26:24
ago, he had the idea of buying an old
26:26
Chevy SUV stateside, fixing it, putting
26:29
quality tires on it. Apparently, it's
26:31
diff difficult to get reliable tires in
26:33
the Middle East, and then selling it for
26:35
a profit. It would have been a great
26:37
project for practical use, but now the
26:39
juice is not worth the squeeze. He
26:41
writes, "Wow, he's kicking himself, but
26:43
he says he's got a crazy life." And uh
26:45
that's understandable, but wow, Jordan
26:49
>> That really is incredible. We love that
26:50
you that you wrote in with all of this.
26:52
The fascinating thing about this car
26:53
conclusion is less the cars you got than
26:56
the culture that you're dealing with.
26:57
And that's what's really cool is just
26:59
the world that you're in and that kind
27:00
of stuff is really wild.
27:01
>> Do you see his post script here? He
27:03
writes, "Buying any vehicle while in
27:05
postpartum does not help the
27:09
>> True. Yeah. You're not going to get out
27:10
of it because you bought a car. You you
27:12
you appreciate the fact that I say buy
27:13
the car for now, but obviously they've
27:15
also realized that maybe more sleep
27:18
would be helpful before they went out
27:20
and bought something. So, we're glad you
27:21
found stuff that currently meets your
27:23
needs, but we also appreciate the fact
27:24
that you're a little frustrated by your
27:26
current situation. We appreciate you
27:27
sharing it with us.
27:30
Car conclusion number two is from Thomas
27:32
B. He's in the UK. We covered his car
27:35
conclusion just recently, episode 101,
27:37
where he bought a manual BMW M2 after a
27:41
difficult period in his life, in his
27:43
>> they were expecting a baby in June of
27:45
this year, and they're pleased to
27:46
announce their son was born July 1st,
27:50
>> That means they had to get a different
27:53
>> They did. Yes. Well, but he was
27:54
expecting that because see, they had
27:55
they had lost they had lost a child, and
27:57
that was the problem. And so that the
27:58
reality is he bought this M2 as part
28:01
part of his kind of coping and knowing
28:04
if I have if we have a second child that
28:06
is safe and well then I'm happy to get
28:09
rid of this M2. Well, baby is safe and
28:12
well and he was like the M2 is going.
28:14
>> So glad. So what did they get? A
28:17
certified pre-owned 2016 Audi S5
28:21
>> The massive hatch makes loading pram
28:23
easy. Love that. We don't say pram.
28:25
>> We don't say pram. It's a good word. It
28:26
>> It's a good word. Rear seat room was
28:28
good enough for rearfacing seat without
28:30
crushing the front seat passenger.
28:32
>> 3.0 supercharged V6 met the more than
28:35
four-cylinder requirement. You remember
28:38
>> And he says the auto only was the
28:40
compromise, but it is the DSG 7-speed,
28:42
so quick shifting, responsive, and makes
28:44
running errands easy. He's been for a
28:47
drive with friends in the Peak District
28:49
near where they live, and it does
28:50
surprisingly well for being such a big
28:53
>> Yeah, he's that is I mean, those are
28:55
good cars. They drive well, especially
28:57
when you consider what they are. But it
28:58
works great for family, which is
29:00
fantastic. I love that.
29:01
>> He says he's not sure it's a long-term
29:03
car, but none of his cars have hung
29:05
around longer than 2 years anyway, no
29:06
matter how much he loves them, but it is
29:09
black. He says it's impossible to keep
29:11
clean. Too big to fit in the garage, so
29:14
>> And then when we come to the UK, he and
29:16
his friends have done the North Coast
29:18
500 in Scotland about half a dozen
29:20
>> I want to do that so badly. Yes, we need
29:23
>> the top of my list of road trips I would
29:25
like to take. I don't know if it's going
29:26
to be the first one we take in Europe,
29:28
but it is top of my list of ones I want
29:29
to take. The problem with the North
29:31
Coast 500 in Scotland is that I want to
29:33
do that with my wife without having to
29:36
film it. And that's even harder to
29:38
justify because you and I are able to
29:39
justify a lot of road trips by taking
29:41
them and filming them. I just want to
29:43
have like a few weeks to do North Coast
29:45
500. problem is, will my wife tolerate
29:47
me driving roads and ooling roads for
29:49
that long while we stay in random
29:51
places? And there's a lot of stuff.
29:52
>> Yeah, I have a solution. Okay. Why don't
29:55
>> go on vacation? You guys go do that.
29:58
>> And don't film it.
30:00
>> Go enjoy. Just the two of you go enjoy.
30:04
>> You'll be you'll be mentally scouting.
30:06
>> I will be mentally filming it anyway.
30:08
>> Because by the way, Todd has a
30:09
photographic memory. So, he will be able
30:11
to tell you exactly where he wants to
30:13
put the camera. I will be able to do
30:16
>> I'll be like, "Okay, two miles this way,
30:17
there's going to be a turnout on the
30:18
>> That a lot. It's amazing. It's amazing.
30:20
>> So, go have a vacation. Go enjoy and do
30:23
it without filming.
30:24
>> Then I'll fly over.
30:29
>> get out. She's going to be like, "I have
30:30
done. I'm very done." She can hang out.
30:32
>> I love you, but I'm very done.
30:34
>> See friends, hang out at a nice hotel or
30:37
resort or do whatever. You and I will go
30:40
>> She'll hang with my sister that lives in
30:41
London. That's what she'll do. She can
30:44
>> then we'll shoot because by then you
30:46
will have done first a scouting lab.
30:47
>> I will have. Yes. Uhhuh.
30:49
>> And then I'll fly over. We'll shoot it.
30:50
We'll do whatever cars. I'll nab some
30:52
cars. We'll we'll get some cars from
30:54
>> Apparently we need to lean on Tom for
30:55
all of the insider info. I would love
30:57
that, Tom. We would love to do it. It is
30:58
so on my short list. I can't even tell
31:01
>> Tom, thank you for writing. Really
31:02
appreciate it. Car conclusions. Everyday
31:06
>> I'm going to jump into Did You See This
31:08
because I want to talk about story in
31:10
film, in TV, that kind of stuff. I just
31:12
finished watching a TV show with my wife
31:14
and then I started reflecting on how it
31:16
was similar to another show with almost
31:19
the exact same premise. I'm going to
31:20
talk about two shows. One is on Apple TV
31:23
>> which is called Silo. And Silo has
31:26
actually gotten some good press. It is a
31:28
superb show. Very, very good.
31:31
>> It is based on a great book series by a
31:34
guy named Hugh Howie that wrote about
31:36
essentially an apocalyptic event in the
31:38
world. And so people throughout the US
31:41
move underground into underground silos
31:44
and that's how they're surviving
31:45
essentially what is nuclear holocaust is
31:47
what's going on. And so it is the
31:49
dynamics and the politics and all of the
31:51
drama of people living in a confined
31:53
space as underground silo.
31:55
>> Then over on Hulu you have Paradise.
31:58
Guess what? The premise is surprisingly
32:00
similar, but it actually is through the
32:02
eyes of a Secret Service agent who is in
32:04
charge of protecting the president as
32:37
everybody goes underground.
32:40
Fascinating to watch both these shows.
32:42
So, Paradise on Hulu and Silo on Apple
32:45
uh TV Plus. I recommend them both. I
32:47
prefer Silo. Silo is
32:50
>> deeper. It's based on a book. Of course,
32:51
most things based on a book are they're
32:54
just more intricate than you can get
32:56
even doing a multi-season TV show. But
32:59
Paradise is excellent as well. And they
33:02
both have different mysteries. But I
33:03
thought it was funny because both of
33:05
them have two major things in the
33:08
premise that are identical.
33:10
It's a an important person
33:16
Nobody can figure out why they died in
33:20
the first episode of a series that is
33:23
about people living underground in a
33:24
confined space. And the confined space
33:26
is all about I mean let's be honest
33:29
because you have limited resources
33:30
you're living underground it's all these
33:32
people everything has to be regulated
33:34
restricted food water procreation
33:36
everything's got to be controlled so to
33:39
have someone of power that dies in that
33:43
controlled environment throws everything
33:45
off. It's like why why did that possibly
33:48
happen? And that is essentially and they
33:51
take it two very different places but
33:52
it's the core of both of these shows.
33:54
So, if you're looking for the show to
33:56
binge, I recommend both of these. I will
33:58
admit, I prefer Silo. Silo is setting up
34:00
for its third season because there are
34:04
>> I've read them. They're excellent books.
34:05
Paradise was made for television, made
34:07
for streaming, and they will who knows
34:09
if they'll do a second season or not. I
34:10
haven't heard that yet. I think they're
34:12
going to, but both are excellent. Both
34:15
have interesting commentary about
34:17
current social realities,
34:19
>> but they go down very different
34:20
pathways. So there's discussion of
34:23
billionaires, who gets the the rights to
34:26
more things than other people and should
34:28
that exist? How do we grow food, deal
34:30
with waste? All the kind of stuff. We've
34:32
moved underground. What do we do?
34:34
>> So they're both underground.
34:35
>> They both are. Now, here's the thing.
34:37
Silo, here's the big difference between
34:38
the two. Silo happens hundreds of years
34:41
after people have gone underground.
34:43
Paradise happens like we just did this.
34:46
>> We're moving underground.
34:46
>> So it's they're different in that
34:48
regard. So, Paradise is a lot more shiny
34:50
and new, and Silo is is old, rundown.
34:53
It's like Mad Max underground. It's
34:56
crazy. But I highly recommend them both.
34:58
So, that's my Did You See This for the
34:59
day. I'm way away from Cars, but I just
35:01
like talking about TV and film. It's
35:03
just fun for me to talk about story. But
35:04
when I watched both of these, I've seen
35:06
Silo before. I just finished watching
35:08
Paradise, and I was suddenly struck by
35:12
>> in premise while they go different
35:15
>> So, you're saying, is there any driving
35:17
at all? Is there any
35:18
>> These are driving free worlds. They
35:20
really are. Yeah. Paradise has a little
35:22
bit of driving cuz we just moved
35:23
underground. But silo there there's not
35:25
>> cuz that would cause all of us to do car
35:27
shopping even more. We'd be shopping
35:30
>> like we all shopping.
35:32
>> We all did at CO where we just we had to
35:34
go buy a car. Everybody got a bought a
35:36
car they're never going to drive and a
35:37
dog they're never going to feed. It's
35:38
terrible. But anyway, yeah, we're all
35:39
resetting from that.
35:43
>> Jumping to social media questions. Thank
35:44
you guys. Over on IG and Facebook, we've
35:47
got one from Kirk M asking, "Based on
35:49
the 12:1 ratio, the 12 lb per horsepower
35:55
>> ratio, fun ratio, what's the proper
35:58
>> for a new driver?"
36:01
>> I mean, we we have assumed we're all
36:03
great at driving. We're all excellent
36:05
>> Superb drivers, excellent drivers.
36:07
>> Max is here and we're like just a notch.
36:09
>> You and I are going to start being the
36:10
ring record, guys. That's exactly who we
36:12
are. Totally. Yes. Everybody's the same.
36:14
just ask us amazing drivers. But about
36:16
new drivers, Kirk is saying, is 18 to1
36:19
too slow? Is that too slow of a car?
36:22
>> Is something close to 14 to1 a little
36:25
bit better? He doesn't want people to be
36:27
bored, new drivers to be bored while
36:29
driving. But Kirk is looking for safety,
36:32
affordability, and maintenance first,
36:34
but wants to pass on car symbiosis as
36:38
>> I'm going to shift the measuring
36:41
category to answer this question. Okay?
36:43
because I haven't actually sat down to
36:45
figure out what car has fallen to 14 to1
36:47
or 18 to1 or whatever. I I don't know.
36:49
But I will say this. Every time you and
36:51
I drive a new car and it's 0 to 60 is 9
36:57
>> We talk about the fact that we're not
36:58
sure that's safe anymore.
37:00
>> So think about it in those terms. If
37:02
you're if you're looking to buy a car
37:03
for your loved one that has just started
37:06
driving and the 0 to 60 is slower than
37:11
you're now you're a rolling roadblock.
37:13
everything is faster than you. And that
37:16
that is an issue. I mean, I I understand
37:18
you don't want a a powerful car for your
37:20
new driver, but if it's slower than 9
37:24
seconds, 0 to 60, you're practically
37:27
paddling like open up the windows and
37:28
like trying to help the car. That is
37:30
very slow. Everything else is so much
37:32
faster at that point that I think that
37:34
is the danger zone.
37:36
>> I'm doing math on my
37:39
>> I'm always very impressed when you take
37:42
>> I just calculated the GR86 and it came
37:47
>> So that would be right on the cusp of
37:49
sports cars that are just slightly
37:52
>> out of the range.
37:53
>> And the Miata is in that range too. It's
37:56
>> I was just thinking about Kirk cars that
37:59
you, as you talk about, Todd, you have
38:02
to use all of the pedal travel. Let's
38:05
say for both brakes and for throttle
38:07
application. So, you're using or
38:10
teaching new drivers to use all of the
38:12
cars capabilities because most cars were
38:15
just lightly pushing on the brakes
38:17
coming to a complete stop. Brakes are
38:20
>> And then to get going again, you don't
38:22
have to barely press
38:24
>> for a turbocharged engine. You're just
38:25
you're gone. You're you're zinging away.
38:27
So using a momentum car and finding a
38:31
car that might be slower, but then that
38:33
new driver can understand
38:35
>> using momentum up hills and you know
38:38
what, the brakes are not quite as
38:40
powerful and so I need to start breaking
38:41
a little bit earlier and using cars that
38:43
are under that threshold. I mean the
38:46
problem is modern Camry and Accords are
38:50
>> They're they're very fast. They're very
38:52
powerful for what they can do. So, I
38:54
think we're going to have to go older
38:56
naturally aspirated cars
38:59
>> and more economical. I think all the
39:00
economical cars that you can think of
39:03
three and four cylinder whatevers that
39:05
just didn't have a lot of power. Great
39:07
for commuting. I think that is something
39:09
great for a new driver. I mean, they're
39:10
of course within budget and for
39:12
insurance costs too, but I think those
39:14
are the sweet spot because you have to
39:16
>> I can't get up this hill. I can't I
39:18
can't keep up with traffic. So, they're
39:20
not bored necessarily, but they're
39:22
realizing, I got to get good tires on
39:24
this so I can take a corner and
39:26
understand hanging on to a corner so I
39:28
can get on the throttle earlier. And
39:29
>> I love the idea of using everything, but
39:31
at the same time, you you want to be
39:33
using everything and knowing that you're
39:35
not being a roadblock because that's I
39:37
don't want to create that level of
39:38
stress in a driver. There's a trade-off
39:40
there for sure. Damn it. Patton is
39:42
asking about car colors. Should people
39:44
be able to spec their car in whatever
39:46
color they would like or should there be
39:49
some level of buyer protection, meaning
39:51
certain manufacturers have certain
39:53
colors only available?
39:55
>> We put the inflatable bumpers down the
39:56
bowling alley for you so you can just
39:59
We're just going to kind of guide you,
40:03
Mrs. Customer. I you know, look, I think
40:05
I think it should be a pallet available
40:07
to everybody. I really do. I mean, you
40:10
know, obviously Porsche does paint a
40:12
sample and you can spend money and you
40:13
if you spend money at the very high end
40:15
of pretty much any car maker, you can
40:17
get crazy paint colors. I feel like this
40:20
should be a lot more available to all. I
40:23
mean, not with not not to the place
40:25
where it's paint to sample where you
40:26
bring in, you know, whatever the swath
40:27
is and go make it match this. I don't
40:29
mean that far, but I mean
40:31
>> so many manufacturers like this is only
40:33
our color. Like it's a yellow. It's a
40:36
red. Let's I I the Mazda Miata is the
40:40
biggest problem here.
40:42
Mazda and Toyota right now have somewhat
40:44
of a partnership on various things to
40:47
the point that Mazda is using Toyota's
40:49
red and that kind of stuff. Why isn't
40:51
Mazda using all of the colors that are
40:53
available on the 86? Where's the yellow
40:55
Miata? Where's that uh light blue Miata
40:57
like we first bought? I I think there
41:00
should be a lot more transition here
41:02
where when a car manufacturer, and I'm
41:04
talking normal manufacturers, I'm not
41:06
talking crazy stuff. When a car
41:07
manufacturer kind of cracks a paint
41:09
color, like, oh, that's a good paint
41:11
>> then all the manufacturers of that level
41:14
should be able to share that color
41:16
>> and it should be like a blanket
41:17
upcharge, okay? Because what happens
41:19
here is you see like white is included
41:22
at $0, but then every other paint color
41:24
is like 600. Let's make it 1,500, two
41:27
grand. Let's make it an up price, but as
41:30
a result, you get an availability of
41:32
pallet. Like, I would like one in this
41:35
color and it's across lots of
41:37
manufacturers. And then if you really
41:38
want to go crazy, you can do paint to
41:39
sample and that kind of stuff. But I we
41:41
this Mercedes dealer we just drove
41:45
>> There wasn't one colorful car on the
41:48
>> White, gray, black, silver.
41:52
>> A couple of dark blues. Done. If the
41:55
world's car manufacturers build one car
41:58
>> car paint color.
42:00
>> Wait. Here's the pallet for your car.
42:04
>> New from the car company. The new car.
42:07
From the car company offered in the
42:10
>> The car in the color. Buy it now.
42:14
>> Eric P says, "On Tuesday's show, we were
42:16
talking about reliability. Do we think
42:18
user error causes more cases of lower
42:21
reliability rates than actual
42:23
reliability issues?
42:24
>> When Eric worked for Dodge, Chrysler,
42:26
Jeep, Ram dealers, he says there was a
42:29
focus on explaining the features to
42:30
customers before they left with their
42:33
>> Because the dealer found people came
42:35
back saying the radio's broken when nine
42:36
out of 10 times they just didn't know
42:41
But people treat cars like phones.
42:46
>> Uhhuh. I got I don't don't tell me how
42:48
to I can do this. I can figure out a
42:50
car. I know exactly what to do.
42:52
>> Now, where's the button for that and
42:54
what it I didn't even know this car had
42:56
that feature. And that happens a lot.
42:58
So, I understand education, but people
42:59
don't like to be told they nobody likes
43:04
>> Do you like to sit through an education
43:05
process of now let me tell you how to
43:09
>> Well, and what happens also is people
43:11
sit I agree with you. People sit through
43:12
that talk and honestly we absorb only
43:15
the stuff we're going to need or
43:16
interested in immediately and the rest
43:17
of the conversation doesn't stick until
43:19
you need that feature and you go how was
43:21
I supposed to do that again and Eric
43:23
I'll go you one further this has
43:24
actually been quantified because those
43:27
JD power ratings and the reliability
43:29
ratings that come out for the first year
43:32
>> most car manufacturers have gone down in
43:35
rating over the last 1015 years and they
43:38
have looked at it in reverse and found
43:40
that most of it has to do with people's
43:41
frustration with UI. The number of
43:44
problems, quote unquote, they're having
43:45
with their car is not a problem. It's an
43:48
issue that they can't solve. So, they
43:50
mark it as a problem. But the reality is
43:52
it has something to do with the UI being
43:54
now buried in the screen. They don't
43:55
know how to find the thing. And so, it
43:58
doesn't work or it was a source of a
44:00
problem, so they mark a problem down.
44:02
It's not reliability and it broke. To
44:04
your point, Eric, it's people not
44:05
knowing how to do it. But, it's so hard
44:07
to educate people on this. And you and I
44:09
struggle with this because this is a car
44:11
Car journalist disease problem. We climb
44:13
into so many cars. You get another one.
44:14
You go, "Wait, where is the Okay. Um,
44:18
I'll give you a perfect one. The start
44:19
stop button, the automatic start stop."
44:22
Cuz we desperately are always wanting to
44:23
turn it off. You sit in every car and
44:25
the first time it dies the light, you
44:26
sit there light like looking all
44:27
directions like head on a swivel like
44:29
where is that button in this car?
44:31
Because it's different than the last car
44:33
>> And some cars defaulted on, some cars
44:35
don't, and some cars don't have it. and
44:37
and my my parents currently have a brand
44:40
new it's like a year old now brand new
44:42
current gen Hyundai Sonata and they love
44:45
>> but my parents' history was only ever
44:48
buying GM vehicles. So, what's happened
44:51
is, yes, it's got a lot of new tech in
44:53
it, but they've seen Apple CarPlay and
44:54
that kind of stuff. But what's happened
44:55
is every manufacturer, Mercedes is the
44:58
king of this, but every manufacturer has
44:59
their own ways of setting up your center
45:02
console and the stalks on your steering
45:04
wheel. And my parents are defaulted into
45:07
the way GM works. So, I would bet you
45:10
half of the issues they've had with this
45:12
car, many of which I have solved for
45:14
them, is they are looking at the car and
45:16
expecting the things to work like a GM
45:18
product, and it doesn't. and it works
45:20
like a Hyundai product. Hyundai does
45:22
that stalk differently. Hyundai puts
45:24
that button over here instead of over
45:26
there. And their first impression was,
45:29
why is this so frustrating? But the
45:31
answer was, you just got to learn where
45:33
the button is. And and I'm not coming
45:34
down to my parents regard. This is
45:35
exactly what Eric's saying, and this is
45:37
common now. It's a problem.
45:40
Again, if the world's car manufacturers
45:42
made one car with one user interface,
45:46
>> I love how we started this podcast
45:48
talking about best sports car up with
45:54
>> That's what Apple is trying to do with
45:55
Apple CarPlay Ultra. You saw our last
45:57
episode, but who gets to decide who is
46:00
the arbiter of universal interfaces? So,
46:02
we just learn one. All buttons work like
46:04
this. Do we want the Tesla Cybertruck
46:06
model of the turn buttons, the turn
46:08
signal buttons right next to each other?
46:10
No. Even though every Cybertruck owner
46:13
would tell you this is the best way
46:14
>> It's fine. It works great.
46:16
>> It's built in. It's ingrained. The
46:18
stocks, you can actually retrofit your
46:20
Teslas with stocks to solve this problem
46:23
because stocks are better. They just
46:25
>> So, it's almost like you're saying cars
46:28
need to get a little bit less reliable.
46:32
So, you're forcing customers to remember
46:35
to service something.
46:37
>> But the only way we can get there is to
46:40
increase the amount of tech. If cars are
46:43
so great and work so well and we can go
46:45
like 3 years between oil changes and 10
46:48
years between service and we can't don't
46:51
>> Don't do that. That's all bad. But if we
46:53
can do if cars continually get more
46:55
reliable because of manufacturing
46:56
techniques and everything is so
46:59
consolidated, the tech needs to remind
47:02
customers and also remind the dealership
47:05
to continually reach out, I guess, to
47:07
the customer and it hits your phone
47:09
saying, "Hey, stupid. Bring in your car
47:12
>> Nobody wants more phone notifications."
47:13
That's all, man. No, you don't. And and
47:14
the UX should be easier.
47:15
>> I'm trying to solve it with tech,
47:17
though. If we're so far down the road of
47:19
tech again, if car manufacturers just
47:21
all combined forces,
47:22
>> see that's this is the salt. I didn't
47:23
think we did that here today
47:26
on today's episode.
47:27
>> One truck, one SUV.
47:28
>> It's just for the rest of
47:30
>> from the brand car.
47:32
>> The new car from car. That's what we've
47:34
done. We've just gone to unicar. We're
47:36
all going to wear the same suits, you
47:38
know, the same suits to go to space.
47:40
We're all going to drive the car.
47:41
>> The future is just the future.
47:43
>> It's three. It's three different box
47:44
shapes. I guess it is the people mover
47:46
pickup truck. You're
47:47
>> right. The car, van, and pickup. Car
47:50
>> fun is outlawed. No more sports cars.
47:53
>> Yeah. New from car. The car, the van, or
47:55
the truck. Thank you for watching. Thank
47:57
you for listening. I don't know that
47:58
we've solved it. We made it worse
48:00
actually in this podcast. We've actually
48:03
>> But thanks for being with us. There will
48:05
be more of hopefully making it better
48:07
next time. We'll see.
48:08
>> Okay. So, I'm anti this idea. I totally
48:11
>> new from I want to make the logo. It's a
48:13
C with an A in the middle and then the R
48:16
is like shaped on this side. I can see
48:18
the logo. It's like a variation of what
48:20
the Toyota logo looks like right now.
48:22
>> You'd only have to learn one interface
48:25
>> everything. Yes,
48:26
>> Apple CarPlay is the interface. It is
48:29
the All right, we're going to end it
48:31
there. Thank you guys for watching, for
48:32
listening. Send us your questions.
48:33
Looking forward to next time as always.