00:09
Hi, I'm Dr. Lance Elliott and welcome to my podcast series about self-driving cars.
00:15
In this episode, I'll be discussing the topic of empty and roaming self-driving cars.
00:21
If you've become interested in learning more about self-driving cars, please see my website
00:24
www.ai-self-driving-cars.guru for further information.
00:31
Okay, let's get started. One of the most challenging aspects of any ride-sharing service involves
00:36
the empty roaming time. Ride-sharing drivers are continually underway in hopes of being in
00:41
the right place at the right time in order to be the car that is most likely chosen for a ride
00:46
request. Since the ride-sharing firms oftentimes aren't on the hook for the effort and costs associated
00:51
with cars that are doing the roaming, the firms don't especially care as much about the idle
00:55
time of those drivers. The primary focus is on making sure that there's a shortest waiting time
01:01
that can be achieved for the riders making requests, else those paying passengers might switch over to
01:06
a competing ride-sharing network. Sure, there is some concern about those drivers due to the
01:12
aspect that a driver that seems to endlessly roam will not be desirous of listing with the ride-sharing
01:16
network that ends up leaving them high and dry. In that sense it behooves both the drivers and
01:22
the ride-sharing operation to try and minimize the empty roaming time and seek to maximize
01:27
the passenger riding time. It's a gigantic logistics issue and one that attracts top-notch data
01:34
scientists and promises handsome rewards for algorithmically trying to find the best fit.
01:41
Let it be said that one of the thorny and problematic aspects that can stymie ride-going
01:46
services is the percentage of time that the passenger hauling car is empty of passengers.
01:52
Presumably no money is being made at those times. Worse too, there is cost involved such as the
01:58
cost of the fuel being consumed, the cost associated with the wear and tear of the vehicle, the cost
02:03
associated with the driver, and so on. You can pretty much assume that when there isn't a passenger
02:08
there isn't any income being derived by the ride-sharing effort. One quasi-exception, of course,
02:13
consists of instances in which the driver might be delivering something, perhaps a pizza or a
02:18
package, and as such there is presumably income covering that delivery action. For purposes
02:24
of simplicity let's assume that delivering something is equivalent to having a passenger.
02:28
Thus when I refer to an empty vehicle it means that the car doesn't have a passenger
02:32
and nor is it in the act of delivery. Another factor to keep in mind about a so-called empty vehicle
02:37
is that there is a human driver sitting in the driver's seat. Sometimes it's confusing to refer
02:42
to an empty car, since it could imply that nobody is in the vehicle at all. In the context of
02:47
ride-sharing an empty vehicle traditionally means that there is a driver and no one else in the
02:52
vehicle. Now can you guess what is the industry-wide average of empty vehicle time for ride-sharing?
02:59
According to industry-rewarded statistics the average time that a ride-sharing vehicle is empty
03:04
comes to about 41% of the time. Most people are surprised at the magnitude of that emptiness.
03:10
One aspect that gets the general public angry about the empty car phenomena
03:15
is that the vehicle is adding to traffic snarls. Cities also have qualms about the
03:20
potential pollution that those empty cars are producing. An often stated downside of roaming
03:25
empty cars is that presumably the risk of getting into a car crash or other incident is also being
03:30
increased. Here's an interesting point then to consider. Will the advent of self-driving cars
03:36
eliminate the emptiness factor? Or will it be the same or perhaps even worse than with today's
03:41
conventional cars? Let's unpack the matter and see. The first big difference is that when a
03:46
true self-driving car is considered empty, it really is empty. Due to the AI driving the car,
03:52
there isn't a human driver in the vehicle. Furthermore, the AI driving system can drive
03:57
whenever and wherever the owner of the self-driving car so indicates. There are no debates about
04:01
whether the driver wants to be out driving the vehicle or not. Many attempted to also say
04:06
that the cost of the driver is removed. Yes, certainly the hourly fee paid to a human driver
04:11
or a commission is no longer pertinent, but you need to impute the cost of the AI driving system
04:16
as a kind of surrogate for the cost of a human driver. All in all, there is still a form of
04:21
cost associated with that driving act. Now nobody knows what the cost of these AI driving systems
04:27
will be. Returning to our focus on the topic of emptiness, there's nothing magical about
04:32
self-driving cars that gets rid of the emptiness factor. You can readily have self-driving cars
04:36
roaming around in cruising streets, doing so without passengers, and the same manner that
04:41
human-driven, empty, ride-sharing cars do so. If that's the case, what do you predict the
04:46
emptiness percentage will be? It's tempting to say that it might be about the same as the today's
04:52
41%. Maybe or maybe not. Some worried that it might be higher, a lot higher. Here's why that
04:58
might happen. Everyone that owns a true self-driving car is going to want to ring every dollar of
05:03
ride-sharing revenue that they can out of that self-driving vehicle. Might as well put the
05:09
self-driving car into service nearly 24x7. Furthermore, punits keep saying that we can
05:14
get rid of parking lots in downtown areas since the advent of self-driving cars will
05:18
make parking lots no longer needed. At least, that's the conventional wisdom about the future.
05:23
Consider then again the emptiness factor. You'll have zillions of self-driving cars
05:27
roaming around the streets of downtown and for some percentage of the time,
05:31
though self-driving cars are empty. Ponder some of the adverse consequences already mentioned
05:36
about emptiness and recast them into a world that includes self-driving cars. For example,
05:42
traffic snarls caused by self-driving cars. And ironically, passengers seeking a ride might
05:48
have lengthier wait times, especially if the predicted induced demand materializes. Induced
05:53
demand means that people today that don't use a car might be induced to do so once we have
05:58
self-driving cars. I'm not trying to paint a doomsday picture concerning the role of
06:03
self-driving cars and their emptiness. My overall point is that some believe that the advent of
06:08
self-driving cars will be a boon for mobility and makes car rides readily accessible to all.
06:13
Though I'm hopeful and optimistic about such an outcome, we need to realize that the real world
06:18
is going to intrude on how things are actually going to play out. Empty cars, whether for human
06:23
drivers or self-driving cars, do not provide a free lunch. Trying to figure out how to best
06:28
manage that resource will be an issue for fleet owners and individual owners, along with being an
06:33
issue for cities and for people that simply want to get a ride. It's going to be a challenge and
06:38
hopefully one that we can all resolve. Well, thanks for listening. Again, I'm Dr. Lancelia. I hope
06:44
that you found today's episode informative. If you're interested in learning more about self-driving
06:48
cars, see my website, www.ai.self-driving-cars.guru, for further information.