00:00
right, welcome back everybody to the
00:00
podcast. We have all of our normal
00:00
stuff, news, car debates, we've got some
00:00
good cool car conclusions we'll
00:00
hopefully get to this time. Your
00:00
questions, lots of stuff,
00:00
>> but the topic is so good.
00:00
>> The topic is really interesting. Yes,
00:00
>> we're going to talk about cars that
00:01
brand should bring bring back. It's a
00:04
deep deep rabbit hole because we could
00:06
>> we could go crazy
00:07
>> all the fun stuff in the past.
00:09
limiting ourselves to just one car from
00:11
one manufacturer, whether it's a dead
00:13
name plate or whatever the car was, even
00:16
if they still make it. I kind of left
00:18
myself, you know, but this this springs
00:20
out of the conversations we've had in
00:21
the last few podcasts. This has come
00:22
very organically out of the last few
00:24
podcasts because the last couple of
00:25
episodes, if you've seen them or heard
00:27
them, we've talked about brands bringing
00:30
back interesting cars, something between
00:32
the super hypercar and the SUV. Where is
00:35
the stuff in the middle? And then a lot
00:37
of discussions have come up. Be it
00:38
Prelude, be it uh Zcar, be it whatever.
00:40
We've we've caught up those cars that
00:42
are legendary name plates, but we as
00:44
enthusiasts want them to come back and
00:46
be a certain thing. So, you and I are
00:48
going to kind of run the gauntlet here.
00:49
>> Bring them back.
00:50
>> Today is uh car makers A through M. I
00:53
didn't cover all of them, but A through
00:54
M, we're going to kind of each pick a
00:55
car and go, okay, this name plate should
00:58
come back and be like this. It's very
01:00
exciting. I'm I'm very much looking
01:01
forward. It's going to be really good.
01:02
But before we get there, we should do
01:04
news, including people having problems
01:06
getting out of their Model Y.
01:08
>> Switching over here to a actually this
01:10
is a 2025 Model Y, but for the 2021
01:14
Model Y's, a 174,000 cars are being
01:17
recalled at least because parents can't
01:19
get to their children. They're locked in
01:22
the car because of these handles. So,
01:25
like we discussed last time, the light
01:27
bars on the front of EVs kind of
01:29
becoming a thing. Now, recessed flush
01:31
handles have also become a thing.
01:34
>> I mean, from an aerodynamic standpoint,
01:36
designers and aerodynamicists like that.
01:38
They like flush body sides, nothing
01:41
>> It makes for a better coefficient of
01:43
drag. I do understand that. And it looks
01:44
better. It's just a graphic and then the
01:46
handle appears, but
01:48
>> you know what? We've also heard about
01:49
handles that are icing up. Handles can't
01:53
>> Because it's too cold or the motor wears
01:55
out or it's something something gets,
01:57
you know, stuck, jammed. So the more
02:00
stuff that we have on our cars,
02:01
especially door handles that you should
02:03
be able to get in your car.
02:04
>> Well, but what what you're speaking to
02:06
here, what you're speaking to here, and
02:07
it's not just a Tesla problem, even
02:08
though Teslas are being recalled for.
02:10
These are solenoid handles.
02:11
>> So when you do something, electronics
02:14
are getting a signal and the electronics
02:16
are unlatching the door.
02:18
>> Now, you're required by regulations. You
02:19
can see it in a Corvette C8. Yes.
02:22
Exactly. Which is ridiculous. Entry by
02:23
wire. But you can see you're required by
02:26
law to have a mechanical backup to
02:28
release the door from the inside. But
02:31
what's interesting about this is that in
02:33
some cases what apparently is happening
02:34
and I have not seen an official report
02:36
from an actual person has happened to.
02:37
But this is what we're we're hearing
02:39
>> Parents getting out of the car, closing
02:41
their door now not able to get back into
02:44
the car. The child in the car can't get
02:47
to or doesn't know where to get to the
02:49
mechanical backup. So, you're standing
02:51
outside your car and in some cases
02:53
parents have broken the windows. Now,
02:55
it's not like, please don't get me
02:56
wrong, I'm not saying it's happened to
02:57
thousands of parents. This is like a
02:59
handful of people, okay? Saying Tesla's
03:01
with shattered windows all over the
03:02
>> It's really weird. So, it's it's a
03:03
handful of people. So, it's not like but
03:05
but they were calling all of them to try
03:07
to solve this. But I I'm going to ask a
03:09
a weird question. What's wrong with
03:11
doors? Can't they just be a mechanical
03:13
thing? A knob, a latch, you pull it, and
03:16
the lock moves? Is this has existed
03:19
forever? Is this in the same category as
03:21
buttons then? Buttons coming back to the
03:24
interiors and design bosses including
03:26
Mercedes design boss actually admitting
03:28
buttons. Yeah, they're better and
03:30
Volkswagen has tacitly approved buttons
03:33
coming back to the interiors. Does this
03:35
mean it's the C change back to door
03:37
handles? Well, but but I've joked before
03:40
that apparently Elon Musk uh somewhere
03:42
in his past life was was somehow scarred
03:45
by doors because he just keeps wanting
03:47
to reinvent the door so he never has to
03:49
touch a door ever again.
03:50
>> Okay. True. I don't know what the
03:51
problem is, but like you sit in the car
03:53
and it closes the door. You turn off the
03:55
car or you stop the car and the door
03:56
opens. He doesn't want to touch it. He
03:57
doesn't want to have a handle. I don't
03:59
understand what the problem was with I
04:00
turned the knob or I pulled the latch
04:02
and mechanics worked and the door opened
04:05
or closed. I don't see why that was an
04:06
issue. But I I get the recessed thing.
04:09
The recessed thing is cool if it works.
04:12
Now, like on my Amir, that is still an
04:14
it's still an actual handle.
04:15
>> In warm weather, it works.
04:16
>> You you push on one end and the other
04:18
side pops open. But yes, if you are a
04:19
place that gets sheet ice, you're not
04:21
getting your car this morning. You're
04:22
going to be out there with the kettle.
04:24
Your door handle got lake affected.
04:27
>> Yes, it did. That's terrible. Anyway,
04:28
frozen shut. We'll see where this goes.
04:30
I mean, I don't think Tesla's alone on
04:31
these door problems, but they're the
04:33
ones that got recalled for it.
04:34
>> Yeah, for sure. There's more news that
04:36
is a little bit personal for me and it's
04:38
in regards to Nissan because they are
04:41
restructuring as you know they're
04:44
closing their design studios. Well, two
04:45
of them at least. This is design work
04:49
done by Nissan Design fairly recently.
04:53
>> It's polarizing.
04:55
>> Ah, it's a it's a style. It's a choice.
04:58
Let's say it's a choice. Well, this
05:00
snowplow new concept of the GTR
05:04
>> designed for gamers. It was designed it
05:07
does look like it belongs in a video
05:08
game or a movie or something like that.
05:09
And I understand that that is the
05:11
sentiment, but this actually was
05:12
revealed in 2003. And you can already
05:14
see that it looks a little tired and
05:16
old. This style is already a little bit
05:19
played out. And so, even though I
05:21
understand that Nissan is exploring new
05:24
design language, I haven't seen any new
05:27
fresh designs. The Nissan Leaf has just
05:29
come out, but that is a very safe play.
05:31
>> Super safe. Yes.
05:32
>> They haven't really pushed on a new look
05:35
for Nissan, a new corporate look because
05:37
as of the new CEO and finally we're
05:40
restructuring. No, there's not going to
05:42
be any partnerships. We're on our own
05:44
and you know, we've got to reset the bar
05:46
and we need customers back. I haven't
05:48
really seen too much from Nissan. Their
05:51
CEO of design, Alfonso Albza, we have
05:53
invited many times to call into the
05:55
show. We want Nissan to make him
05:57
available because uh I I think it'd be
05:59
interesting to to really understand of
06:01
any design head. I would like to hear
06:04
from Nissan just what do you got for us?
06:07
What's coming? There's so much
06:08
enthusiasm for the Nissan brand. True.
06:11
It's it's just dormant right now. But
06:13
when you put out polarizing designs like
06:17
>> it's hard to really get excited. And so
06:19
>> the Nissan Design Studio in San Diego is
06:21
actually one of the ones that is being
06:23
closed. And I was there so many times as
06:26
I worked for Autodesk because I was a
06:28
subject matter expert in the automotive
06:29
industry. And so I called on Nissan
06:31
quite a bit, visited the San Diego
06:33
studio. Many of my colleagues, I know a
06:35
lot of people at the studio. It's a
06:36
bummer because they'll lose their jobs
06:38
or they're going to have to move. It's
06:40
my understanding the Nissan's largest
06:42
design studios in China and also others
06:44
around the world are more prolific than
06:46
the San Diego studio, which put a
06:48
spotlight on them. It's also very
06:51
specifically built for car design,
06:53
meaning open courtyards to view cars on
06:56
turntables in the light.
06:57
>> It's got an entire color and materials
07:00
library and separate section of the
07:02
building. The middle of the building is
07:04
beautiful and open. So my question is
07:07
somebody who buys that building,
07:09
>> I think a maybe a really cool
07:11
restaurant, but it'd be way too big.
07:13
It'd be like four or five restaurants
07:15
>> or a boutique hotel, something like
07:17
that. But the building doesn't lend
07:19
itself because it's one story low and
07:22
level. The whole thing says go away. We
07:24
don't want prying eyes. Unlike most
07:27
hotel architecture which is look at our
07:29
beautiful building.
07:30
>> So I don't know what company would buy
07:31
that. And because the the entrance is
07:33
hidden, it's small. It's designed to,
07:36
you know, be secure, a secure design
07:40
>> So what do you do with this building?
07:42
They've got to unload real estate now.
07:43
And then people are losing their jobs,
07:45
which is quite a bummer. But I want to
07:47
see beautiful stuff coming from Nissan.
07:49
It almost doesn't matter to me what's
07:51
going on with the studios and what
07:53
buildings are closing and opening and
07:54
where the locations are. Even though San
07:56
Diego and the surf culture and the kind
07:58
of cool, fun California culture should
08:00
spawn great designs. I just don't see
08:04
that reflected in these designs.
08:05
>> Well, these designs you're showing and
08:07
and this whole discussion takes a weird
08:09
turn in my mind. And you're talking
08:10
about design in California. And the
08:12
reality is we notice this anytime we fly
08:14
from Utah to California. California has
08:17
very specific light. It's very pleasing
08:20
>> And so and different places in in the
08:23
world. Like when we shoot in Utah, cars
08:24
look differently in sunlight than they
08:26
do shot in Southern California.
08:28
>> And there's lots of people that love to
08:30
cinematographers that love to shoot in
08:31
the Middle East because there's a
08:33
specific light in the Middle East that
08:35
you can't get elsewhere. So there there
08:37
is an interesting thing about California
08:39
light and design. But the thing I think
08:41
is interesting is this is on the backs
08:42
of Nissan talking about firing. Let's
08:45
just be honest. as many as 20,000
08:47
employees. Now, think about the scale of
08:49
a company that can absorb firing 20,000
08:54
employees. Most of the companies in the
08:56
world don't have 20,000 employees, and
08:59
Nissan's thinking about cutting that
09:01
many. So, of course, design has got to
09:02
be on the chopping block as well. But
09:03
the the most interesting part of the
09:05
article that you and I read about this
09:07
was the comment that Nissan's design
09:09
office in Shanghai is more productive
09:12
than its counterpart around counterparts
09:14
around the world producing designs with
09:17
a 30 to 40% reduction in hours. What
09:21
you've told me right there is we're
09:23
doing it with AI. What you've told me is
09:25
we are cranking out designs with AI with
09:28
no people involved. We are just
09:30
iterating tons and tons of options with
09:32
AI for some executive to go that's good
09:34
enough. And these designs you've shown
09:36
here on pictures. They all have kind of
09:39
an AI iterative look about them that
09:42
doesn't feel like anybody sat down and
09:43
went I've got an idea. Let me actually
09:46
be a human and design something. Yes,
09:49
you can crank out a lot more designs if
09:50
the computer is doing it for you, but
09:52
you're never going to get something. I
09:53
don't think that just stops people in
09:56
their tracks as like that's gorgeous.
09:59
And there's all kinds of arguments and
10:01
opinions with designers in any industry
10:03
about using AI because of what it draws
10:06
on. There's also using it as simply
10:09
another tool like a paintbrush, like a
10:10
pencil. You employing it as a tool.
10:13
You're you're sending it off in a
10:14
direction that you set and do iterations
10:18
>> That's different. But the biggest lesson
10:20
I learned as a designer in my career
10:22
from Richard Hullbrook, and this was
10:24
relating to furniture, is that most CEOs
10:26
when they hire an outside design firm,
10:30
>> you hire the designer for their
10:34
>> And many CEOs, it's up to them to make
10:36
the decision and design managers to make
10:39
the decision in any industry, cars,
10:41
furniture, doesn't matter. But many
10:44
times they've hired the design team and
10:46
sometimes they don't know what they're
10:47
looking at. And so they'll say, "Well, I
10:49
like concept A, but I like a little bit
10:51
from C, and that thing from B is cool.
10:53
So, could you add that plus that?" And
10:55
like, let's kind of make a mish mash,
10:56
which is what AI is already doing.
10:58
>> But Richard always said, I presented the
11:01
CEO with one design.
11:03
>> You've paid me as a professional to
11:06
redesign the object that you want to
11:09
meet a market price, to sell in volume,
11:11
to increase your sales, to make money
11:16
>> Interesting. hired me to design the
11:20
>> This is what I've done for you after all
11:22
of my research and expertise.
11:24
>> This is what I think your solution is.
11:29
>> tons of iteration and a lot of managers
11:31
and everybody has an opinion. Well, I
11:33
like a little bit of that. I like a
11:34
little bit of that and that's kind of
11:35
cool. Could we add that plus that? And
11:38
>> it happens like crazy. Yeah.
11:39
>> In any industry, I'm sure that happens
11:40
in writing when rewrites happen. I like
11:43
a little bit of that part. could we pull
11:45
some of that in and mish mash and well
11:47
that didn't make it better. It's just a
11:49
bunch of opinions alto together. So when
11:52
it comes down to one person
11:55
>> I'm not seeing that in Nissan corporate
11:57
design. I'm not seeing that. We haven't
11:59
really seen bold new stuff from Nissan
12:02
since these designs came out in 2023.
12:05
>> Be very interesting to see how all this
12:06
plays out. It isn't a piece of good
12:08
news, but I'm very curious to know where
12:09
it goes for sure. Maybe we need to
12:11
shutter all these design studios just to
12:13
>> just let AI do it. Just let that That's
12:16
really the answer. I mean, honestly,
12:17
this podcast before long will just be
12:19
you and I and AI and we're done. Yeah,
12:21
that's what we're going to do.
12:21
>> How do you know it's already done?
12:23
>> I mean, exactly true.
12:25
>> We're adding FCP Euro as our partners
12:27
and supporters for both Everyday Driver
12:29
and Hooked on Driving. For nearly 40
12:32
years, FCP Euro has been an
12:33
industry-leading supplier of genuine
12:35
original equipment and OEM parts and
12:38
performance upgrades for European cars.
12:40
That means BMW, Audi, Volkswagen, Mini,
12:42
Mercedes, Volvo, Porsche, and even Saab.
12:46
Paul, you have to call your
12:48
brother-in-law and tell him FCP Euro is
12:50
the place because I, as I just said,
12:51
even Saab, we're putting it in the ad.
12:54
Anyway, they offer a lifetime
12:56
replacement guarantee on everything,
12:58
including consumables like brake pads,
13:00
wiper blades, and even oil filters. Buy
13:03
a replacement, send back the old one,
13:05
and receive a credit for the full amount
13:07
for your sub. Plus, FCP Euro offers free
13:11
economy shipping on orders over $49 and
13:14
a 90-day hassle-free return policy for
13:16
new, unused, and uninstalled parts. So
13:19
visit FCP Euro today for more than
13:21
300,000 parts ready to ship for your
13:24
European car and your Saab. fcpuro.com.
13:30
We'll move on to our topic Tuesday and
13:32
again this is cars that brands should
13:34
bring back and it's those cars that we
13:37
as enthusiasts or we as people that that
13:39
have love for these name plates would
13:40
like to see return. And I I'm on two
13:45
sides of this equation, okay? because
13:47
I'm trying on one level to be a little
13:49
bit realistic. I'm aware of the fact
13:51
that the super small volume internal
13:55
combustion engine car made to be only
13:57
one thing by one manufacturer, that's
14:00
remarkably rare. Now,
14:03
>> cars are coming into existence because
14:06
>> Cars are hybrid because there's emission
14:08
>> I'm aware of the fact that that we can't
14:11
just go, well, here's my perfect version
14:14
from a world of 1990. Sure. Okay. That
14:18
there there's not. Now, some of some of
14:19
mine are more pie in the sky and like
14:22
it'd be awesome if they do this and they
14:23
can't. And some of mine are more
14:24
realistic, but I've got
14:26
>> multiple hybrids in my dreaming. I've
14:29
got multiple collaborations in my
14:30
dreaming because I'm trying to think of
14:32
>> how could this actually come into being
14:36
>> Not just, hey, it was cool. Let's bring
14:39
>> Bring the same thing back and just
14:41
>> Yeah. It's not like I want another uh
14:43
MarkV Supra with a 2JZ. Great. It's not
14:45
happening. It's not happening. So, I'm
14:47
I'm trying to be a little bit realistic,
14:50
even though there's plenty of dreaming
14:51
here. We are theoretically going
14:53
alphabetical from A through M on this
14:55
podcast, which means we'll do the rest
14:56
of them on our next podcast, but we're
14:58
not necessarily covering every brand.
15:00
Did you do Acura? Cuz I did.
15:02
>> I did Acura. And I'm like you. I really
15:04
tried to filter it. You've got a good
15:07
idea about trying to come up with
15:08
collaborations. I was just trying to
15:10
think of the technology available or
15:12
cars that current cars that have a piece
15:15
of technology that could be used to
15:17
bring an old model back, but ultimately
15:20
it's got to go through the filter of
15:21
what I think will sell.
15:25
>> still obviously need to sell cars to
15:27
make a profit, but cars are so
15:29
>> Yep. Yep. They need to fit all of your
15:32
of your needs. But enthusiast fun cars
15:35
still have a lot of the emotional
15:36
component to them that makes people buy
15:38
them even though it's not quite
15:40
practical enough or it's not quite
15:42
>> good for the family or or whatever it
15:44
but it fills an emotional fun to drive
15:46
need that's still very much valid. But
15:49
ultimately it still has to come down to
15:51
>> a company has to make money. If this
15:54
>> we can't just bring a car back just
15:57
>> Well, and also there has to be how do we
15:59
figure out the R&D? How do we figure out
16:00
the building? That's where I see a lot
16:02
of the collaborations happening because
16:04
then we can just amvertise out the cost
16:06
and it's not hurting either one of us. I
16:07
mean, that's something that happens as
16:08
well. Look at that with the Z4 and the
16:11
>> or Toyota's done this a lot obviously
16:13
the GR86 and the BRZ. I mean, that's
16:15
splitting cost, doubling product, and
16:18
making it not hurt anybody as much. And
16:21
then we get those cars.
16:22
>> My list is actually fairly long, but
16:24
>> mine is fairly long, but I'll try to go
16:25
>> I skipped quite a few. Yeah, keep going.
16:27
>> All right, so let's start off with
16:29
Acura. And I did choose the NSX, but
16:32
solely for the reason of being a
16:33
technology showcase. And manufacturers
16:36
in the future will need to have vehicles
16:40
where they're trying things, but they're
16:43
so aspirational that the early adopters
16:45
that want it will still justify sales.
16:48
>> Okay. Okay. for tech showcase, for
16:50
whatever whatever Acura is going to do,
16:52
for all-wheel drive, for hybrid
16:53
technology, for something that still
16:55
says sporty, fun to drive, but high-end
16:58
luxury. I feel like the NSX at some
17:02
>> is still valid to exist.
17:05
>> It's still going to be expensive.
17:07
>> I also struggled with this because of
17:08
the latency between the first and second
17:11
>> and what Acura did to tease everybody,
17:13
tease everybody, tease everybody. Well,
17:15
that one, that prototype burned down by
17:17
the side of the ring, that one didn't
17:18
work. Oh, we had to change everything
17:19
and then 10 years later after you talked
17:21
about it, finally we get one. And I
17:24
think the market had died before it even
17:26
hit the market. I for the second
17:29
>> The other problem is that people
17:30
expected it to be I I don't know another
17:32
way to put it. They expected it to be my
17:35
>> They expected to be roughly 3,000 lb
17:37
rear wheel drive, mid-engine, and manual
17:39
transmission. And it came out much
17:41
closer to the Porsche 918 for a tenth of
17:43
the price than it did the original NSX
17:46
by being all-wheel drive and having
17:49
hybrid tech and all of the things that
17:51
it did that were incredible
17:54
but we were so and and I I'm in the
17:57
group. We were focused on it being
17:59
something that it wasn't.
18:01
>> And I actually wonder about the the NSX
18:03
because I have it on my list, too. I
18:05
actually wonder, we all look fondly on
18:08
the original NSX. Yeah.
18:10
>> When it first dropped,
18:12
>> it wasn't instantly embraced. There were
18:15
those people that bought it. There was
18:16
the Senna stories and all that kind of
18:17
stuff, but it was like, what is this
18:20
now? And I think it took a little while
18:22
and certainly upon reflection now for it
18:25
to become an icon. Originally, it was
18:26
like a you you bought a what Acura's
18:29
doing which why would you do that
18:31
instead of a Ferrari?
18:32
>> You would have to justify it because
18:33
it's not quite the Ferrari. It's not for
18:34
our money, but it runs like a Honda
18:37
>> Exactly. The people that bought it were
18:39
the outliers, and it wasn't instantly
18:41
embraced. I think we look at it as it
18:44
was perfect in its time. It was great,
18:46
but I think people warmed to it. And I
18:48
actually think the second gen is having
18:50
the same experience. I think in five or
18:52
10 years when these would come down in
18:54
price, I think we're going to look at
18:55
back on these second gen NSXs with a lot
18:58
more fondness than when they came out.
19:01
>> And I would be fascinated to see my my
19:03
pitch on the NSX is close to the Amir,
19:07
meaning available with a manual.
19:10
>> But I think it looks like a more modern
19:14
>> All-wheel drive, cuz that's an Acura
19:17
>> Honda's done it before. So, we need to
19:19
have hybrids with a manual. All-wheel
19:21
drive, hybrid, manual. It is kind of
19:24
what the second gen NSX was
19:27
>> with what the R8 is. Mhm.
19:29
>> And I think that as an NSX, especially
19:31
with a manual, could be compelling to
19:35
>> and that would again, it' probably be
19:37
$150 plus thousand car, but that's the
19:40
reality of where the NSX drops. But I
19:43
think they have to come a little bit
19:45
away from cutting edge technology. I
19:46
think they have to back off a little and
19:47
let some other brands be ahead of them
19:50
because I think that's what people want
19:52
from the NSX more than what they got for
19:54
the second gen. A little bit more old
19:56
school, a little bit more known
19:58
quantity. I guess. Yeah. But the wrong
20:00
term, but if it was, but seriously, if
20:01
they if they could crack all-wheel drive
20:04
>> but hybrid and manual,
20:07
>> nobody's really doing that.
20:08
>> That would be and and you know,
20:10
>> in a hyperarish. And the general
20:12
discussion is hybrids can't be manuals.
20:14
But I I point you back right back to the
20:17
Insight and the CRZ, both of which were
20:23
>> So, they've actually sold cars that way.
20:27
cuz I I'm with you 100% because I also
20:30
still see this as Honda doesn't have
20:32
necessarily a flagship and this was also
20:33
known as the Honda NSX and so for
20:36
>> technology showcase as uh we're we're
20:39
trying things we're not working out the
20:41
bugs obviously it's got to be sold with
20:44
>> they're trying to do the trickle down
20:46
effect to other cars whether it's an SUV
20:49
whether it's a truck whe whatever that
20:50
is and use this as sort of the tip of
20:52
the spear much like what I had heard
20:55
from Polestar that I had such high hopes
20:58
for Polestar. They've gone full EV and
21:01
>> I think they're actually really good and
21:03
and a an excellent Tesla competitor.
21:06
>> I just still saw them as a higherend
21:09
rather than more of a something for
21:11
everyone kind of brand because it was
21:14
described to me as tip of the spear for
21:16
technology. And the very very first
21:18
Polestar one was $150,000. And I I saw
21:21
it going in that direction and I
21:22
embraced that. That's where I see this
21:23
kind of fitting in as well. But I do
21:25
take your point. and it still has to
21:26
sell and enthusiasts want to buy them.
21:28
>> That's where the the the legacy is of
21:30
the brand for sure. Yeah.
21:31
>> All right. Moving on to Aston Martin
21:33
>> Oh, good for you.
21:34
>> Aston Martin is doing quite well.
21:36
>> I think they are offering excellent cars
21:39
for what the Aston brand should be.
21:41
>> But what I do like is the DB5 and that
21:44
does hearken back to the continuation
21:46
cars that they're currently building.
21:47
But I think this is a 63 model shown on
21:50
screen here. It's a beautiful shade of
21:52
blue that I haven't seen. Every time I
21:53
see a DB5, it's always silver. Bond
21:56
>> So, I like the DB5, but something maybe
21:59
uh not quite as on edge or as powerful
22:02
as the Vantage has become, but a little
22:03
bit more of a softer GT. Something that
22:06
is just, you know, an enjoyable, fun
22:09
>> Are you envisioning a down market from
22:11
>> Down market place. And I just use this
22:13
as simply for styling purposes. Just a
22:16
classic, beautiful Aston shape.
22:18
>> Kind of the vantage, you know, vantage
22:21
light or something like that. Bring back
22:23
the DB. Everything is vword these days,
22:26
but bring back the DB as a lower lower
22:29
market kind of thing, more accessible.
22:31
And you know, leave the Valkyries and
22:33
the Valhalla to the crazy.
22:36
>> Somebody has just a V, one of those V
22:39
encyclopedias on their desk at Aston and
22:41
just goes, "What word have we used?"
22:43
>> For Audi, moving on here. And this is
22:46
the 2010 Audi Quattro Concept showing on
22:49
screen. It's it's in white. And I got
22:51
really excited when we saw this at the
22:53
LA Auto Show back in 2010, if you can
22:55
believe it's been that long.
22:56
>> Wow. It is amazing.
22:57
>> It's the Audi Quattro. Just bring back
22:59
the Quattro and call it the Quattro and
23:01
that's it. And put all your mojo into
23:03
this. Doesn't have to be the TT. This
23:05
can be 50 60,000 somewhere in there.
23:08
Again, good technology showcase. It's
23:10
not the flagship, but it's just
23:12
something accessible. I was so excited.
23:14
I love the styling.
23:15
>> It doesn't quite look outdated yet, but
23:17
Audi has moved on from this visual
23:18
design language at this point. But I
23:20
thought this was superb. I had high
23:22
hopes. It even looked somewhat
23:24
production ready. And no, they never
23:26
built the Quattro. So, I would highly
23:29
choose Quattro for this one. Uh I I
23:32
still really love the the design
23:33
language. It's just it really suits the
23:35
name Quattro and what we associate it
23:38
>> Moving on to BMW for me. And I've got an
23:41
interesting idea for you.
23:43
>> Showing a Z8 on screen. Okay.
23:45
>> That's because I want more GT cars in
23:46
the market. This might be a personal
23:48
thing that might not sell too well, but
23:49
BMWs are known for building cars that
23:51
are built in small quantities.
23:52
>> Well, and then they make a hyper niche
23:54
of that. It'll be like they'll make a GT
23:56
car, then they make a GT car with a
23:57
one-seater cuz five people want to buy
23:59
them. I don't know what's up.
24:00
>> So, my idea for bringing the Z4 back
24:03
because I really like the Noya class
24:06
design language that we're starting to
24:08
see with all and that's going to go
24:10
across all EVs and gas powered cars from
24:13
BMW. If that were combined with the new
24:18
M5 hybrid V8 powertrain.
24:21
>> Interesting. Okay.
24:22
>> Now, I want to keep the Z8 small. The M5
24:26
is a large car and it's a big V8 with a
24:28
large battery and a lot of hybrid stuff
24:29
in it. And I'm not saying make it
24:31
all-wheel drive, make it rear wheel
24:32
drive. BMW might build a new Z8 that
24:35
doesn't have actually room for humans in
24:36
it. So, they might be able to pull it
24:38
off. It's a small car. We did it.
24:40
>> It's entirely remote. Yes. We you can't
24:43
drive it, but we did it.
24:45
>> Look at us. Yay.
24:47
>> That's my idea. If BMW could pull this
24:48
off with this amount of power in a new
24:50
Z8, small form factor, rear wheel drive
24:53
only, this 7 what 17 horsepower hybrid
24:56
V8 powertrain twin turboad in a new Z8.
24:59
I think that would be very highly sought
25:02
after in the market.
25:03
>> Moving on to Chevrolet. And I know this
25:05
is not a sports car. I'm showing the K5
25:08
Blazer on screen. This particular build
25:10
was done by Ring Brothers. It is called
25:13
>> And it is an incredible example. I mean,
25:16
they've gone overboard with this as Ring
25:20
>> But my idea for the Chevy K5 Blazer,
25:23
let's bring that back in in it all of
25:26
>> Ford's had a go.
25:28
>> Ram's been doing it for sure.
25:30
>> Everybody's been doing the boxy thing.
25:32
>> Scouts coming back.
25:34
>> I mean, come on.
25:35
>> The Blazer, it needs more respect behind
25:38
the name because just another SUV these
25:40
days. gas or EV, it just doesn't do the
25:44
>> just a you've thought this for a while
25:46
and I totally agree with you. Yeah,
25:47
>> Corvette has the ZR1X.
25:51
>> Mhm. Okay. All right. Yeah.
25:54
>> A new Boxy Blazer.
25:55
>> To take it to the Raptor R.
25:58
>> And the TRX. Anything.
26:00
>> And the Bronco R, too. Yeah.
26:01
>> Yeah. The Bronco R. All of that.
26:04
>> Okay. Maybe that's too far. Maybe that's
26:05
too much power. We could back it off to
26:07
some of their crate motors. So, how
26:09
about the LT4, which is the Camaro ZL1,
26:14
I believe, engine. The LT4 engine that
26:16
is also in the Cadillac Blackwing CT5V.
26:20
>> Let's do that's still 660 plus
26:23
>> It'd be enough to off-road with. Yeah,
26:25
>> you the car would move under its own
26:27
power with that engine. So, let's drop
26:28
the LT4 Cadillac Blackwing engine in
26:31
this. make an awesome boxy new cool
26:35
blazer that maybe just
26:37
>> you don't even have to call it the K5
26:39
Blazer cuz Kia will get upset and send
26:40
you a nasty letter because of the K5,
26:43
>> but they could just call it the Blazer
26:44
cuz they have that. They've just watered
26:47
it down and made it an SUV. Yeah,
26:49
>> this is, in my opinion, still an
26:50
enthusiast vehicle. It's just off-road
26:52
fun, but they've got incredible
26:54
powertrains, incredible engines, crate
26:56
motors. Pick a crate motor and drop it
26:58
in this thing. I don't care. What if it
27:00
had the ultimate? Then Chevy would be on
27:03
top. The ZR1X engine is in the Blazer.
27:08
>> Sure. Minds would melt. Even the Z06
27:11
flat plane in that thing would be
27:13
amazing. Can you imagine the sound of
27:14
that coming out of a Blazer? It' be like
27:16
when they did the uh LM2 for Lamborghini
27:18
where it's like, why does that sound
27:19
that way? And it's a truck.
27:21
>> that kind of thing. I get it. Love it.
27:23
>> This is my idea. My goals for Chevy. And
27:26
moving on to Dodge. You are all going to
27:28
laugh at me because I am showing the
27:31
1984 Dodge Daytona Turbo Z on screen,
27:36
>> but it's actually the Matchbox.
27:37
>> You're showing the Matchbox version.
27:39
>> The reason is is because the Matchbox
27:41
looked better than the actual car.
27:43
>> when the model looks better than the
27:45
real thing, you know you've got a
27:48
>> But this car left such an impression on
27:50
me because I got a ride from a family
27:53
friend who got his new Dodge Daytona
27:55
Turbo and I didn't know what turbos
27:57
>> Sure. And my mind was blown when the
27:59
turbos kicked in, even though it was
28:00
>> it still 110 horsepower, something
28:04
>> anemic and weak.
28:05
>> I'm not saying the Charger Daytona,
28:07
nothing. It's just Dodge Daytona. And by
28:10
doing this, they can lean on a smaller
28:13
form factor. They can use a smaller
28:15
engine. It's not the Charger Challenger
28:17
big bloated whatever they've become.
28:19
It's just the Dodge Daytona. An
28:20
enthusiast fun sports car. Even kind of
28:23
looks like a 928 a little bit, but
28:24
doesn't have to be GT car, but something
28:26
cool, fun, lightweight, turbocharged
28:29
from Dodge, and then they still have the
28:31
bloated Charger Challenger, whatever
28:33
they're going to do.
28:34
>> For them for sure. I like it.
28:35
>> So, this is this is the Matchbox version
28:37
>> Moving on to Ferrari. I am touching
28:41
>> on the 246 Dino. This car is simple and
28:46
>> Oh, yeah. And that would allow them to
28:48
drop a non-hybrid V6 with manual
28:54
>> and make it accessible to to
28:56
enthusiasts. This would still be a
28:58
200,000 plus Ferrari.
29:00
But this would be the full entry
29:02
levelvel lightweight small the tiny and
29:05
truly call it the dino. Yeah. What if
29:07
they could do it at a like 150 grand
29:10
>> That's interesting.
29:11
>> And you know at Ferrari that means the
29:13
minute you put anything on it be 200
29:15
grand. But 150 grand start would be
29:18
>> V6 turbo still have a lot of power,
29:21
manual transmission,
29:23
>> beautiful, clean, styling, lightweight,
29:25
interesting. That's how you make
29:29
>> I thought the 296 GTS and GTB were going
29:32
to be the Dino. Everybody talked about
29:34
the second coming of the Dino,
29:35
>> and it wasn't. Bring the actual Call it
29:40
>> It's a cool car.
29:42
>> All right. Moving on to Honda. Yes.
29:43
S2000. This is the 2008, I believe, CR
29:46
version that you're seeing on screen in
29:48
a lovely shade of yellow.
29:49
>> Yes, these are cool. Yes, Honda needs to
29:51
bring it back. It's got to be a sports
29:53
car. Honda is really good at doing this.
29:56
>> They're good at hybrids. They've got
29:58
some technology, but they're it's not
30:00
like they're Toyota and they're known
30:01
for Wow, we've really got our Prius
30:04
equivalent. I I suppose the CRZ,
30:07
>> you know, hyper mile cars. They've got
30:08
But the CRZ and the Insight were both I
30:10
have to hit it again. They were hybrids
30:12
with manuals. It's doable. It do. They
30:15
could do something like we talked about.
30:17
This is the next step up from Prelude. I
30:19
don't care what you call it anymore, but
30:20
something roadster rear wheel drive.
30:22
It's got to be this.
30:24
>> And the Hyundai Veloster N I've got on
30:26
screen. Even though that was recently
30:27
discontinued, I feel like this still had
30:29
legs in the marketplace. I feel like
30:31
people were just beginning to discover
30:32
it and Hyundai whacked it off at the
30:34
knees. Chopped it. Done. We're good. Add
30:36
the door. So, it's now four doors. So,
30:39
>> "It's only three.
30:41
>> I don't get it. Make it four. Make it so
30:44
people can accept it and relate to it.
30:47
>> And make it a little bit more waggy.
30:49
Just slightly. Not too much bigger, but
30:51
>> People are kind of wanting wagons. Many
30:53
people have written into the show.
30:54
They're wanting wagons. They want kind
30:56
>> some more wagon hatchish. Another option
31:00
>> I love hatchish cuz we do it a lot.
31:03
>> Something in there with you. Yeah.
31:04
>> The Veloster. It's a cool, fun, quirky
31:07
name. Whatever you do, quirky, I I don't
31:09
care. But continue on with the Veloster.
31:11
And moving quickly to Infiniti.
31:15
>> This is the project 9 here that I'm
31:17
showing on screen. It looks like an old
31:21
>> It looks like an open wheel indie car
31:23
from back in the 30s.
31:25
>> And I thought this was the most
31:27
compelling design that I've ever seen
31:29
from Infiniti because I don't want
31:31
actually anything from Infiniti to come
31:33
back except for this concept that they
31:34
explored. But if they did this car, that
31:37
would set Infiniti apart
31:39
>> as a boutique manufacturer. Also, maybe
31:41
a technology showcase for Nissan, that
31:43
would set the brand apart and make
31:45
people want to buy these that aren't the
31:48
supercar hybrid or just crazy hypercar
31:51
kind of stuff. The Bugattis and the Koix
31:53
eggs that exists, but this is
31:55
interesting. A single seat,
31:58
>> beautiful styling, open wheel car.
32:05
>> on a luxury high-end with lots of power
32:08
>> That sounds compelling.
32:10
>> Okay. All right.
32:11
>> And moving on to Jaguar.
32:14
>> The one that I actually really like is
32:17
And I'm showing a 2017 continuation car.
32:20
This is the SS, as you know, was the
32:22
Roadster version or the roadgoing
32:24
version of the type DT type race car.
32:27
>> And those are worth so much money.
32:29
>> So much. So, they've got a few of these,
32:30
handful of these continuation cars,
32:32
which I thought are superbly beautiful,
32:34
lightweight, fun, doesn't have to be too
32:36
expensive. Jaguar is kind of wanting to
32:38
be in more the luxury high-end level.
32:41
It's not what I'm saying here.
32:42
>> Whatever it is like they're doing over
32:44
there, Jaguar. Yeah.
32:45
>> Nobody's sure. Nobody can explain it.
32:47
>> We're all very confused.
32:48
>> So, XKSS needs to return lightweight
32:51
midenine. Beautiful. Something like
32:54
that. I mean, this is pretty much front
32:55
mid engine here, but yeah, something
32:57
really intriguing, compelling. I would
32:59
love to see the XKSS.
33:01
>> That would be very cool.
33:01
>> Jeep, you're doing great. Keep making
33:03
the Wrangler. We're good.
33:06
>> Everybody just thanks Wrangler. We're
33:08
moving on. That's very good.
33:09
>> Uh, you'll notice that I'm going
33:10
straight to Lamborghini because uh
33:12
Lincoln, there's nothing to see here.
33:13
>> There's nothing to see there, sadly.
33:15
>> So, Lamborghini, if you brought the
33:19
>> if Okay. All right. All right. showing.
33:21
Well, this is the SV here from 71 and
33:25
>> Pretty car. This would revolutionize
33:28
Lamborghini styling for the better, I
33:30
think, if they used this as visual
33:31
reference and then brought into the
33:34
>> maybe a few fewer creases of less
33:39
>> possibly. Yes. Uh-huh.
33:41
>> Would be interesting, compelling. If you
33:43
could figure out how to turn that V12
33:44
sideways like this, I would welcome
33:46
that. But it doesn't necessarily have to
33:47
be. But engine behind you, a V8 behind
33:50
you, bring the Mera name back.
33:53
>> I think that would do well for
33:54
Lamborghini and people line up
33:58
>> Lotus I touched on briefly because
34:00
there's many models that we could say
34:02
bring back. Lotus has been doing great
34:04
in my opinion for the lineup of cars
34:07
through history. The fun lightweight
34:09
>> they've had. Yeah, they've stumbled
34:10
along and made great cars in spite of
34:14
>> I mean, I hate to say it, but it's true.
34:15
>> You're right. That's the case now as
34:17
well, unfortunately.
34:18
>> The 340R from the year 2000, though
34:21
intrigues the daylights out of me.
34:23
>> Interesting. Okay.
34:24
>> No doors, F1 inspired rear wing. And the
34:27
wheels, they have little uh little tiny
34:29
fenders, little cycle fenders, but
34:31
they're exterior. They're they're not
34:33
part of the fender flares.
34:34
>> It's almost like the Lotus Aerial Atom.
34:36
>> It really is. This intrigued me. Why
34:39
can't we do more of these? Probably
34:41
>> safety or something.
34:43
>> Probably possibly. Yeah,
34:44
>> whatever. Moving on quickly to Maserati.
34:47
>> we covered Maserati. Look at you. I love
34:50
Maserati needs to bring back the Bora
34:53
that is shown on screen here or the
34:54
Moroc. They were very similar. They did
34:56
share some some components is my
34:58
understanding. But I love the form
35:02
>> It's like a hatchback supercar kind of
35:04
>> It really is. I think that could be
35:06
Maserati's sweet spot here.
35:08
>> So the Morocc something in there and use
35:12
that Nuno V6 again. Yeah, that that
35:15
engine's pretty cool.
35:16
>> We got the MC20. The styling, what this
35:19
could evoke could be really interesting.
35:20
Make it even smaller. You see a theme
35:22
smaller everything we need to do from
35:24
here on out. RX7 with a non-rot. We've
35:28
got a nice inline 6 from Mazda now.
35:31
>> Yes, we do. Yes, we do.
35:33
>> As cool as rotaries are, I think that
35:36
would prevent people from buying the car
35:37
>> in some cases. Yes.
35:38
>> But if it were the new inline 6
35:41
>> or a hybrid of some sort,
35:42
>> Yep. Make the RX7 again. That long hood.
35:45
Make it It's like a threequarter sized
35:48
>> Superb to drive.
35:50
>> And then finally, McLaren, you're good.
35:52
You're doing good. Maybe the F1, but
35:55
you're doing good. You've got so much
35:58
>> they're doing all right. Yeah. McLaren's
36:00
They'll be fine. What else do we not
36:01
worried about McLaren?
36:02
>> F1. I guess bring the F1 back, but I
36:04
maybe, but you don't need to because
36:06
>> they're doing okay. That's very funny. I
36:08
>> And then Mercedes. Very quickly, the
36:10
C1112 concept from the year 1970.
36:14
They've got gullwing doors in a midenine
36:16
car. I thought, could we explore this?
36:19
Maybe there's a business case. But if
36:21
there's not a small, fun, lightweight
36:23
roster from Mercedes, make cool fun
36:25
things for Mercedes.
36:26
>> Bring the SLK back. Yeah.
36:27
>> That's light because Mercedes-Benzes are
36:29
gotten really heavy.
36:30
>> Very heavy. Very heavy. Yes.
36:31
>> Finally, Mini R53.
36:34
>> This is a 2004 that I'm showing on
36:36
screen. I love the Mini.
36:37
>> Yeah. This is the size.
36:39
>> I care what it looks like, but this is
36:41
the size you need to make. They've
36:42
>> They've all just gotten big. The minis
36:47
>> R53 is the size. I love the styling on
36:51
>> I'm not saying make this forever, but
36:53
bring the size back. Make it.
36:55
>> I think at this point they are still
36:57
trading on that styling and the the all
37:00
of the goodwill that was created by it.
37:03
They're kind of on the back end of that.
37:05
I feel like anyway,
37:06
>> like where do we go from here?
37:07
>> Yes, I'm showing you. I'm
37:10
>> here's where we go. Yes.
37:11
>> And finally, Mitsubishi Evo 10. You've
37:13
got so much room to run with bringing
37:17
the Mitsubishi brand back. The
37:19
Outlanders and I I don't even know what
37:21
they are anymore. They're just nameless,
37:24
>> They look like anything and nothing.
37:26
>> The Eclipse has wound up back on on some
37:28
of their stuff with the Eclipse Cross.
37:30
Mitsubishi is lost in the wilderness. It
37:32
is so bizarre. Yeah, I hear you. Since
37:34
you're listening to us, you'll end up
37:36
shopping for your next car very soon.
37:38
And when you do, you need
37:41
Any car anywhere at any price,
37:43
AutoTempus searches all the major car
37:45
listing sites on the web, local or
37:47
nationwide. And AutoTempest has recently
37:49
added price history for every car listed
37:51
so you can see how prices are trending
37:53
and know if you found a good deal. You
37:54
can also create search alerts and lists
37:56
of saved searches so you can find your
37:58
perfect spec even easier next time.
38:00
Search on any device in your browser or
38:02
as an app for Apple iOS and Android.
38:05
New, used, or unexpected, AutoTempest is
38:08
how we search for cars. Go to
38:10
autotempest.com/ everyday so they know
38:13
>> Autotempest. All the cars. One search.
38:17
That was a great list. We might not get
38:19
through everything on our list on our
38:20
our whole intention here. We might not
38:22
do car conclusions again because this is
38:24
this is really cool. I like this. I've
38:26
covered some of the ones you covered,
38:27
but I'm what I'm pleased about is I
38:30
covered some brands differently than you
38:31
did and some other brands you covered I
38:32
didn't even cover. So, I'm excited
38:34
through this. So, here we go. Let's see.
38:35
I've got I'm going to start, of course,
38:37
same place you started. The Acura NSX.
38:40
>> Nobody's surprised, but yes. Okay. So, I
38:43
have the old one and the new one back to
38:45
back here on screen.
38:46
>> I like that you're showing them both.
38:47
>> They're gorgeous cars. They are gorgeous
38:49
cars. I still love the original so very
38:52
much. people needed the second one to be
38:54
the Amira and it isn't. But I really
38:56
feel like people are going to start
38:58
coming around on this second gen. I
39:00
>> it's it's headed that way.
39:02
>> The other thing that was funny about
39:03
making these lists is I started to think
39:05
up cars I wanted them to bring back and
39:07
I started to be like what would a modern
39:09
version of that be be? And so I would
39:11
look up the old versions of some of
39:12
these cars and the next one I'm coming
39:14
to Alfa Romeo is this way. I'd look up
39:15
the old version of a car and realize
39:17
that somebody's already an AI created
39:19
what I was thinking. I'm not saying it's
39:21
right, but in some cases these old
39:23
marks, somebody has thrown it at AI and
39:26
made a new variation. And I want to go
39:28
to the Alpha Romeo Spider, which should
39:32
>> Somebody has made an AI version of the
39:34
Alfa Romeo Spider essentially on the ND
39:38
>> And this is exactly what Alpha should
39:40
do. They should partner with Mazda. They
39:42
should have I mean I realize Fiat did it
39:44
with the 124. Yeah. But I'm thinking the
39:46
same kind of thing but it's now a Mazda
39:49
Miata and then above it because the
39:51
other thing is the Fiat 124 was kind of
39:53
stepping on the Mazda as far as price
39:55
was concerned and that kind of stuff.
39:56
This needs to be 5 to$10,000 above the
40:00
Miata. It needs to have Alfa Romeo
40:02
styling and it needs to have an Alfa
40:05
Romeo interior. But in its core it's the
40:09
next gen Mazda Miata. the Mazda MX5, the
40:13
next gen, whatever the NDE, the fifth
40:15
generation is going to be, there should
40:17
be an Alpha Spider version of that.
40:20
Since many people use the Miata RF or
40:23
MX5 RF or any MX5 as the GT car,
40:28
>> could this would this need to grow in
40:30
size maybe 10%, 20% to be slightly
40:32
larger, slightly more powerful, and
40:34
therefore a bit more luxurious in a
40:36
higher price point as well?
40:37
>> Here's the thing. instead of keeping it
40:39
>> The reality is it has to be something
40:41
they can build side by side on the same
40:44
uh assembly line. That's the problem.
40:45
Otherwise, it doesn't make sense from a
40:47
from a profit sharing, you know, effort
40:50
>> but but the reality is I as much as I
40:53
don't want the Mazda to get bigger, and
40:54
I really genuinely don't,
40:56
>> the passenger space in the current one
41:00
>> And I and I do mean passenger, not
41:01
driver. So, I kind of feel like there
41:03
has to be some new thinking on packaging
41:05
anyway, but it still needs to be
41:07
mid2,000 lb. It still needs to be small.
41:09
It can't be a big car.
41:11
>> So, but but the Alfa Romeo Spider is a
41:16
>> Let's get Alfa Romeo styling on a Miata.
41:20
>> If it gave a Boxster a run for its money
41:23
in the marketplace, that's interesting.
41:24
>> Yeah. And, you know, again, 10 grand.
41:27
It's a 10 grand delta between buying the
41:29
MX5 and buying the Spider.
41:31
and make it accordingly up market like
41:33
that. That's the other one I thought of.
41:35
Uh in in Audi world, I found a purpose
41:40
for the new EV Cayman. You remember when
41:44
Audi was making what became the Porsche
41:47
924 and then Audi scrapped the project
41:50
and became a Porsche? This is going the
41:53
>> Porsche doesn't know what to do
41:57
>> with their potential EV Cayman. Uh-huh.
42:00
>> This is your new Audi TT
42:03
EV. Try to keep it as close to 3,000 lb
42:06
as possible. All-wheel drive ED EV.
42:09
Change the styling to be more Audi. Make
42:10
it the brand new TT with a cool interior
42:14
>> because the TT name is storied.
42:16
>> People like it. It's a Cayman
42:18
alternative anyway. But anytime,
42:21
including on this podcast, when the TT
42:22
goes up against the Cayman, we pick
42:24
Cayman because it's more dynamic. Let
42:26
the TT be its own thing. This is where
42:29
your electric efforts for the came and
42:32
go. It's an Audi TT now. Although that
42:36
concept C that we just covered a couple
42:39
>> That I think is slated to be on top of
42:43
>> who knows? It's trying to be like
42:44
combination TT R8. We don't know. But
42:47
>> that strikes me as a larger vehicle.
42:48
>> I think so too. I think that the TT
42:51
needs to be smaller and more accessible.
42:52
And there's an opportunity here for Audi
42:54
to have that as a kind of standalone
42:57
outlier on their lineup and you build it
43:00
on the back of the Cayman EV and then
43:02
the Cayman can be other things.
43:06
>> That's that's on their leaving.
43:08
>> Moving on. I'm going to BMW and BMW
43:10
needs to bring back the one series. The
43:13
one Series. I'm actually showing the
43:15
twodoor hatchback we didn't get in the
43:17
US. And I'm not look the one series
43:19
right now in 2025 still exists, but it's
43:24
>> It's frontwheel drive architecture. I'm
43:26
talking about a generation plus back.
43:29
The one we didn't even get in the US in
43:30
the mid2010s. This is a 2015 I have that
43:33
I'm showing right now in a great blue.
43:35
This was a rearwheel drive two-door
43:38
hatchback. No one else on the planet's
43:43
And two-door hatchbacks are awesome.
43:44
Now, I don't know BMW can justify it
43:47
>> Seriously, I don't know what business
43:49
case regulations exist because I I feel
43:51
like we've watched over the last 15
43:53
years, pretty much every dedicated
43:56
twodoor hatchback has died.
43:58
>> I think the Mini might be the only one
44:01
>> Okay. So, it's not a common thing. But
44:03
what I'd really like BMW to do is BMW
44:06
are they are the king of parts cars.
44:08
>> Love it. Take a small four-cylinder.
44:11
Shoot for 3,000 lbs on this tops. Make
44:14
it rearwheel drive hatchback two-door,
44:17
maybe four-door, but hopefully twodoor
44:19
and available with a manual. This is
44:21
your new entrylevel car. BMW has the
44:24
history and the knowhow to do this at a
44:26
level nobody else can. Don't even need
44:29
to go above a four-cylinder. Just make
44:30
it the four-cylinder. It's going to have
44:32
roughly 300 horsepower anyway.
44:34
>> Throw it as a B48. Drop that out of the
44:35
Supra. Drop that in. Yes. So, this is
44:38
what BMW needs. They need a a bottom of
44:41
the market little hatchback that says
44:43
this is what BMW does. And the 1 Series
44:47
is waiting to be that. And it shouldn't
44:49
be another front-wheel drive almost SUV
44:51
variant of the Mini. It needs to be
44:53
rearwheel drive, manual driver's car.
44:56
Hopefully, two-door hatch. That's for
44:58
BMW. Moving on to Cadillac, who really
45:02
ought to bring back the XLR.
45:05
>> I think they do. When when Chevrolet
45:08
does the next Corvette, the C9.
45:12
>> Yes. When they do that,
45:13
>> Cadillac needs a variant of the C9 that
45:17
is aiming directly at the LC500 crowd.
45:22
>> Little bit of a price bump,
45:24
>> leaning toward luxury. You can't get a
45:26
track variant. It's not what we're doing
45:28
anymore. It's the Cadillac. It's the
45:30
XLR. It comes in convertible because
45:33
these did. It comes in convertible. It's
45:35
based on the C9 architecture. I'm I'm
45:38
leaning forward to the next Corvette.
45:39
Comes in the C9 architecture. It's
45:41
automatic only. Maybe it's even
45:43
all-wheel drive, but this is this is a
45:45
luxury variant of the Corvette, and it
45:47
is leaning fully toward being a luxury
45:49
variant. It is trying to be the Lexus
45:54
>> So, there there's no high perform. It'll
45:56
be plenty high performance because it's
45:58
going to be based on the the base C9,
46:00
which will be powerful and drive well
46:02
and have Magnaride,
46:03
>> of course. Yes. So, let the Corvette
46:06
lean into being hardcore. And also, I
46:08
think there's a possibility here of
46:10
possibly freeing up the architecture. If
46:12
you really want the golf bags, Cadillac.
46:15
>> If you don't need the golf bags,
46:18
>> I like that a lot.
46:19
>> But I think there's an opportunity here
46:21
for let's actually make under those two
46:24
brands that they have the car for the
46:25
people that want it.
46:27
>> That's okay. You're making a case
46:29
and make it really highend luxury. Very
46:32
>> Yes. Very classy car.
46:34
>> Absolutely. With a Cadillac badge on it.
46:36
The XLR was essentially the C6 Corvette.
46:41
>> Rebodied convertible, made under
46:43
Cadillac, very boxy styling. There's one
46:45
that actually drives around my
46:46
neighborhood every now and then. I see
46:47
it. I go, "Oh my gosh, there it is. Oh
46:48
my gosh, there it is."
46:49
>> I think the styling was the Achilles
46:51
>> Well, and I and I never fell in love
46:53
with it. It was their thing at the time.
46:55
>> Yes, it was their very when we had
46:56
aren't super boxy escalate. It's that
46:59
same era. Yeah, it's
47:00
>> that same era where everything was just
47:01
they only had rulers at at Cadillac. So
47:04
anyway, so the XLR would be very very
47:06
cool. I think that should come back.
47:08
Moving on to Chevrolet. Who needs to
47:11
bring back the Solstice? I know it was a
47:13
>> but the Solstice. And here's why. Take
47:17
that name. They already have that name.
47:18
That name means small sports car from
47:20
GM. It's a good name. It's a great name.
47:23
Sell it underneath Chevrolet. And here's
47:25
what you do. I'm showing a Solstice
47:27
Coupe on screen right now. But
47:30
>> I've never seen one of these in person.
47:31
>> I haven't either. I've only seen one at
47:33
like an auto show and they're very cool.
47:35
Part of me, this is like the weird The
47:37
only part of me that has any kind of
47:39
collector car interest wants a Solstice.
47:41
>> Coming soon to an auction near you.
47:43
>> Wants a Solstice Coupe. They're not
47:44
worth buying. But anyway,
47:46
>> here's the reason I I brought it up.
47:47
This was Bob Lutz and GM attempting to
47:51
make make a Miata competitor. And for
47:53
first blush, they got pretty close.
47:55
Yeah, they got pretty close. It's not
47:57
great, but it was surprisingly good.
47:59
They sold very few of the coups. The
48:01
coups were all target removable top.
48:04
>> The turbo version of this was like 250
48:07
horsepower and torque. Drove pretty
48:09
well. The base models drove pretty well.
48:11
Here's what I'm thinking. This is the
48:13
car you position below the Corvette.
48:17
For the people that still like the
48:18
Corvette, this needs to be 80% the size
48:24
>> Roughly the size of a G8 GR86. Roughly.
48:27
Maybe actually because it's GM, probably
48:29
a little bit bigger than the GRD6, but
48:31
>> Almost like supersized
48:33
>> somewhere in that in that area.
48:34
Superized it. Somewhere in that area.
48:36
Very funny. But it needs to have the
48:38
same target roof as you see on the
48:39
Solstice Coupe or the C7 Corvette. So
48:43
>> And it needs to have a a turbo
48:45
four-cylinder in it. It needs roughly
48:49
>> Come in at about $40,000. Call it a
48:51
solstice. Make it available with a
48:53
manual and an automatic. Doesn't even
48:55
need a DCT. like manual and automatic.
48:57
You're competing with the GR86, maybe
49:00
just below the Super, right in that
49:01
area. Like $40,000 is the target here.
49:04
This is an 80% scale C7. Take the C7
49:08
design and thinking, bring it forward in
49:10
in in design, make it 80% scale, four
49:14
cylinder, $40,000. Call it the Solstice.
49:17
Hello GM, come on Chevy. Because that's
49:21
the car below the Corvette. What do you
49:24
>> Nothing. The Camaro's gone and was
49:26
getting too big and was always a two
49:27
plus2 muscle car. Anyway, there's a
49:29
sports car opportunity here from
49:30
Chevrolet. It's a parts bin idea. You
49:33
use they've got 2.5s and 2.7 turbos that
49:35
are running 300 horsepower that they put
49:38
>> Well, what I like the most about this is
49:40
because this would have to be its own
49:42
platform. And the cars that we love to
49:44
drive the most are their own platform.
49:48
And I don't know how you advertise that
49:49
and make it make sense, but I think
49:50
there's an opportunity below the
49:52
Corvette at GM and I'm thinking the
49:56
Camaro is so connected to muscle cars,
49:58
even though it'll probably be re
50:00
resurrected as an SUV, but it's so
50:01
connected to muscle cars. The Solstice
50:03
is a small lightweight, fun car, sports
50:07
car. Solstice for Chevrolet, for GM,
50:11
>> Ford. Ford. Oh, Ford folks at Ford, the
50:16
Fiesta ST was brilliant. It was
50:17
brilliant. It was great. The Fiesta,
50:20
here's the thing. The Fiesta was based
50:22
on was even okay. Wasn't great, but it
50:25
was okay. It had a weird transmission in
50:27
the automatic. That's a separate thing.
50:29
>> We didn't get the second gen Fiesta ST.
50:31
And everyone I know that I trust as a
50:33
journalist in Europe that drove it said
50:34
it was better than the one we got. And
50:36
the one we got was brilliant.
50:38
>> Okay. Ford, like GM, they don't sell
50:41
cars anymore. They certainly don't sell
50:42
entry-level cars. And the problem with
50:45
the Fiesta when it was out prior, the
50:47
one we got here, is that the interior
50:51
But I'm thinking about the current, I
50:53
know this is weird, but I'm thinking
50:54
about the current Nissan Sentra, which
50:56
we drove recently. That car was
50:58
surprisingly inexpensive and didn't feel
51:01
cheap inside. My theory here is that you
51:04
can actually at the low $20,000 thing,
51:07
if you do it right, you can do a low
51:09
$20,000 entry-le car that no longer
51:11
feels cheap. It feels inexpensive. You
51:15
know, you didn't get luxury, but it
51:16
doesn't feel like army man plastic
51:18
cheap, which was the problem with the
51:19
Fiesta ST. It was just just army man
51:21
plastic everywhere and like the worst
51:23
quality piano black over the stereo, but
51:28
>> So, what's the version of the Fiesta
51:29
that Ford could come out with that's
51:31
just in the low 20,000s, like the bottom
51:33
of the car market, and then the Fiesta
51:35
ST is just under 30.
51:41
>> Yes. They have proven they know how to
51:42
do it and to kill it. I cannot believe
51:45
the Fiesta ST no longer exists. Ford
51:47
Fiesta ST is the play. It needs to come
51:50
back. I Here's the thing. I don't want
51:51
to focus. I don't want to focus RS. I
51:53
don't care about other variants of the
51:54
Mustang. Let's make the good variants of
51:56
the Mustang and below that Fiesta ST and
51:58
>> I mean, I think the Mustang needs to be
52:00
completely rethought from here on out
52:01
for the rest of time.
52:03
>> That's a whole topic Tuesday of its own.
52:04
>> GTD. Cool. Want to drive it?
52:07
>> Whole topic Tuesday of its own. Yes, I
52:08
hear you. I love this idea. Moving on.
52:11
Honda S2000. You mentioned it already
52:14
there. What is the new S2000? Just
52:15
Honda. What is it? Is it the S3000? The
52:17
S2200? I don't care what you call.
52:19
>> Clearly, they're working on something.
52:20
>> You would like to think so, wouldn't
52:22
you? I mean, what what here? Here here's
52:24
the other thing I think is happening.
52:25
The the blowback on the Prelude, the
52:27
discussions that happen around the uh
52:29
current Civic Type R, which is
52:31
brilliant, the current uh Civic SI,
52:33
which is very good. I feel like all the
52:35
enthusiasts are are hoping and buying
52:39
around the the S2000, hoping at some
52:42
point there'll be an S2000 they can
52:45
>> We're all hoping for this for Honda. So
52:47
>> I know there's a lot of enthusiasts that
52:48
work for Honda a ton.
52:50
>> Pretty much everybody who works there is
52:51
an enthusiast who probably wants 2000.
52:54
Here's the thing. This could be and I'm
52:55
I'm going to hit it again because
52:56
Honda's done it before. This could be
52:58
G86 sized whether it's convertible or
53:00
not. G86 size. You could make it 2
53:02
plus2. This could be hybrid manual
53:06
>> I think Honda could do a hybrid manual
53:11
>> and it would work.
53:12
>> The thing they can't do is offer it
53:14
without a manual cuz this is one of the
53:15
cars that is the most iconic cars for
53:17
having a manual transmission. But I
53:18
think they could totally get away with
53:20
hybrid tech manual transmission S3000.
53:23
It's a little bit heavier. It's low
53:26
3,000 pounds. It's the size of a GR86.
53:29
And I think that would be lauded and
53:31
people would snatch them up. And here's
53:34
the thing, the S2000 introduced the
53:36
start button to the basses. Can we
53:37
introduce a key again with the new one?
53:39
Just straight back to a key in the
53:41
ignition. Anyway, sorry, I'm dreaming
53:44
>> Yeah, the Honda now has a key. Moving
53:48
>> Follow me. The Hyundai Tibberon. Huh. It
53:53
was a front-wheel drive, questionable
53:55
styling two generation first blush at a
53:58
sports car from Hyundai. But hear me
54:01
>> Okay, this is where Hyundai does a GR86
54:07
>> A rearwheel drive cuz the only one they
54:09
had was the Genesis Coupe, which is the
54:11
worst name ever. It's just brand name
54:14
>> They had a phase.
54:16
>> They had a phase. They went through a
54:17
phase. They were trying to get Genesis
54:18
off the ground. But Tibberon, you
54:20
remember the commercials? Tibberon. The
54:23
>> Okay. It was kind of a goofy commercial.
54:25
They actually now mention it. They
54:26
actually dragged the shell of a first
54:29
generation Tibberon behind a boat and
54:30
had it come up jaws style behind the
54:32
boat. And it was Tibberon. The name
54:36
but terrible. Okay,
54:38
>> people. We've got some money to spend.
54:39
>> But the point I'm making here is that's
54:41
a cool name. It's a cool idea for a name
54:44
for a car. For a sports car, it's named
54:46
Shark. That's cool.
54:48
Let's make a rear wheel. They have rear
54:50
wheel drive experience doing the Genesis
54:53
>> Okay. Let's do a rearwheel drive G86
54:55
competitor from Hyundai and call it the
54:59
>> And absolutely like like the mood board
55:02
is just GR86's just that's your target.
55:05
Doesn't need to be convertible. It's a
55:07
small 2 plus two. They've got their 2.5
55:11
L engine with 300 horsepower.
55:13
>> Yes. That's in the engine 70. You're
55:17
>> It's all the same related platform
55:19
stuff. We're all talking about the same
55:21
>> powerful engine.
55:22
>> My point is Hyundai Genesis are related
55:25
already anyway. Let's make the Hyundai
55:27
Tibberon. And then what you can do now
55:29
that I'm here, I jump back in the
55:30
alphabet to Genesis. You make a more
55:32
luxurious version and you call it the
55:35
>> and you start here at 30 30,000 to
55:39
40,000 and you make the Tibberon over at
55:41
Hyundai. And then you make the slightly
55:43
more luxurious version, the lexified
55:45
version for Genesis and you call it the
55:46
G50. It's a two plus two, not a
55:48
four-door uh four seat.
55:50
>> Well, see, the SUVs are GV, the sedans
55:52
are G. So, maybe the GC for the coupe or
55:55
>> No, but but it could just be the whole
55:57
>> Well, maybe, but it could just be the
55:59
G70 cuz that suggests car versus truck.
56:01
>> So, the G50 would be below the G70.
56:05
>> We're back to No, no, no, no, no coups.
56:08
No coops. Anyway, this is where I'm
56:10
going. My strange Hyundai thinking as I
56:16
Infiniti. Where is your G37?
56:19
I know after the G37 it became the Q
56:22
whatever. No, nobody cares. Nobody
56:24
remembers the Q lineup of Infiniti.
56:27
Don't shut the design studios. Make the
56:28
Infiniti version of the new Z. The the
56:30
the the reality is this helped justify
56:36
>> From a parts perspective, from
56:37
amortization of the budget, this helped
56:39
justify it. And it was the luxury alt.
56:42
And in some cases, some years, I got to
56:44
be honest, I I vacasillated. Some years
56:45
I was like, the G uh the 350Z is really
56:49
cool. Other years, I was like, you know
56:50
what? I'd rather have a a G37 or a G35.
56:54
>> Use what you've built on the base Nissan
56:56
Z, which means you can have 400
56:59
horsepower, that great engine, manual
57:01
transmission or automatic, but now a 2
57:04
plus2 Infiniti styled body. And go back,
57:07
go backwards and call it the G35 or G37.
57:10
This is what people know it to be.
57:12
Called it the G40 since it's now four a
57:14
different engine with 400 horsepower.
57:16
>> That's Genesis G50.
57:18
>> Now G50. I'm I'm I'm cutting cutting it
57:20
tight here. But my point is Infiniti.
57:22
People know your good sedans and coupe
57:25
as being the G something. Yeah. So we go
57:27
backwards. New G37 based on the current
57:30
uh Nissan Z. This should come back.
57:33
>> And they have I think they have the
57:35
brand equity. I think people would
57:37
>> rearwheel drive, good-looking luxury
57:42
>> there. That nobody makes that in the
57:44
mid- $50,000 range. It just doesn't
57:45
exist anymore. There was the uh this and
57:48
the the Lexus RC and they both just
57:51
vanished. Okay, so Infiniti G37 exists.
57:55
>> I'm going to go someplace crazy for
57:57
Lexus. I'm showing a G86 on screen.
58:01
>> Follow me for a second. I'm showing the
58:02
G86, but I'm going to go two places at
58:04
once because after Lexus comes Lotus, so
58:10
>> For the next gen GR86,
58:13
we have the current gen.
58:15
>> Theoretically, based on what we
58:16
understand, there will probably be a
58:18
nextG. We don't know when. We don't know
58:20
>> I'm ready to drive it already.
58:22
>> But Toyota has we we believe there'll be
58:26
>> The G86 has been well refined in this
58:28
second gen. under 30,000 horsepower
58:31
rearwheel drive chassis.
58:33
>> Here's what you do with the nextG
58:36
>> Maybe if it gets bigger, it gets tiny
58:39
bit bigger, like fractionally bigger
58:41
because it still has to be under 3,000
58:43
>> You make the 2 plus2 GR86 nextG,
58:47
>> but you build the chassis in such a way
58:49
that you can make a four-door version
58:52
that is now sold as the base Lexus. And
58:55
your target for the Lexus is essentially
58:58
making a modern version of the BMW E36
59:01
because it's going to be roughly that
59:02
size. Roughly 2900 to 3,000 lbs. Small
59:06
rearwheel drive biased four-door. It's a
59:09
four-door. You make Lexus styling on it.
59:11
It's based on the same chassis as the
59:13
new GR86. It's a four-door.
59:17
>> But here's what you do.
59:19
You have that four-door means a small
59:22
back seats, but it still now is the car
59:24
that people ask us about almost every
59:26
podcast. Essentially, they say, "I'd
59:29
like a G86, but I'd like four seats and
59:31
>> or sometimes a four-door Miata." What is
59:33
a four-door Miata? Could it
59:35
>> doesn't exist? There's nothing on the
59:37
>> A G86 chassis. If thought about from the
59:40
beginning, you have the Lexus four-door
59:41
version and you have the G86. Now, it
59:45
relates because you help this get made
59:49
by getting handling help and chassis
59:52
help from Lotus, who now sells
59:56
a four-door version with Lotus badging
59:59
and Lotus tweak styling over at Lotus.
00:02
And they have a new four-door rearwheel
00:05
drive Lotus product as well. Because the
00:09
Lotus customer, you can sell one that is
00:13
tuned closer to the handling first
00:16
aesthetic of the G86, but is four-door.
00:18
>> At Lotus, it's going to be $20,000 more
00:21
than the G86, so it won't bother that
00:22
market. But the Lexus one is the softer
00:26
>> So, the softer suspension buyers go to
00:29
>> The people that want reliability, was
00:31
built with Lexus, but also want more
00:34
focused handling, go buy the Lotus
00:36
product. And those might step on each
00:38
other, but it's a different buyer. So,
00:39
I've taken the GR86 and I've made a
00:41
four-door Lexus product and a four-door
00:43
Lotus product, all from one car from the
00:46
>> I love product planning for cars. I love
00:48
>> We're We're insane, but we're having
00:49
fun. So, there's what I did with the GD6
00:51
for two brands at once. Moving on.
00:53
Mazda, just make the Ionic already.
00:56
>> Just make the Ionic and put the straight
00:59
six in it and call it a product. It
01:02
needs to be above the MX5. Basically,
01:04
Mazda just needs a product above the MX5
01:06
with the straight six in it with a long
01:08
nose and a great gorgeous styling. Mazda
01:09
knows how to do styling. Well, this
01:12
Ionic is fantastic. We get away from the
01:14
RX, which you already mentioned. We get
01:16
away from that. It doesn't need to be a
01:18
>> Why did Mazda make a straight six
01:20
engine? I have to hit on this one last
01:22
time. Toyota, when they decided to bring
01:24
back the Supra, Toyota is one of the
01:26
largest car makers on the planet. Yeah.
01:29
And Toyota came to the conclusion with a
01:31
lot of accounting, I'm sure, we cannot
01:33
afford to make a straight six engine.
01:36
Mazda, one of the smallest car makers on
01:38
the planet, some day after a bad lunch,
01:41
decided, you know what we should do?
01:42
Straight six engine. And they made a
01:44
straight six engine for their SUV. Who
01:46
knows? Yes. But my point is, what is
01:48
Mazda doing that Toyota hasn't figured
01:49
out? They have that great straight six
01:51
engine. It's it's dying to be in a
01:54
rearwheel drive biased vehicle. make
01:56
this fantastic looking car above the
02:00
MX5. The MX5 maxes out at roughly 40 45.
02:03
This starts at 40 and goes to 60.
02:07
>> Well, luxurious. I mean, you and I are
02:08
in alignment. This is what I envision
02:10
>> Exactly what needs to happen with it's
02:13
>> It's It's going to be a little bit
02:15
bigger than a GR86. It's going to have
02:17
that long straight six in the front. I
02:19
This is where Mazda needs to
02:20
>> figure out a way to buy one.
02:23
>> I am all about this. I totally agree.
02:26
to our friends at mini.
02:29
They need to remember
02:30
>> what is that thing?
02:31
>> That is a uh that is an AI creation
02:36
>> Mini needs to remember that their name
02:38
is small. They make small cars.
02:42
>> As they continue to blend with BMW, the
02:44
cars are getting worse. Okay. They're
02:47
just getting worse. Mini needs to make a
02:49
twodoor smaller than they're making so
02:52
far. Now they are holding the line with
02:54
the Cooper as a twodoor.
02:57
>> But they need to actually move back to a
03:00
small car. This needs to be on the same
03:03
chassis as the new Ford Fiesta. This is
03:06
how you make them both justified. And
03:08
again, the Fiesta is the low model
03:10
price-wise and the Mini is the higher
03:12
model. The Fiesta goes from the 20s to
03:15
the 30s. The Mini goes from the mid-30s
03:20
That's a way both brands can bring back
03:22
a brand new smaller chassis that's
03:24
front-wheel drive, two-door hatch. It's
03:26
the Fiesta on the low end. It's the Mini
03:29
on the high end. Combine their thinking.
03:32
Small car. Genuinely small. I'm talking
03:35
like 2700 lb is the tops.
03:38
>> It's in the name.
03:39
>> It's in the name. There should be no
03:42
large car called mini
03:45
there. No, it shouldn't happen. It
03:46
should be It should be outlawed somehow.
03:48
>> Mini XL. No, no, stop it. If you've seen
03:50
a new Countryman, they're just they're
03:52
just an SUV now. It's just that's an
03:54
SUV. I don't care what the brand says
03:57
brand and they forgot what the name
03:58
>> So, get with Ford. New Fiesta ST for
04:02
Ford, new Mini Cooper for Mini that is
04:04
genuinely small, frontwheel drive, and
04:06
fun. That's where I'm going for Mini.
04:09
And my last one, of course, we reached
04:10
Mitsubishi. We got to bring the Lancer
04:13
>> The Lancer needs to come out again. And
04:15
I'm going to say the same kind of things
04:16
that were going on over in Centralland
04:18
where you can make a mid20s car now that
04:20
doesn't feel really low rent and then
04:23
you make a an actual Evo. Now this needs
04:27
to be for the for the Evolution the
04:30
Evolution 11. I guess it needs to be
04:32
all-wheel drive hybrid DCT because as
04:35
much as I love the Evo and I do it's one
04:37
of my all-time favorites. The reason you
04:39
drive an Evo is not because it's manual.
04:42
you drive an Evo because you cannot
04:44
believe the tiny little package and how
04:46
well it handles and scrabbles through
04:47
everything and it's just it's fun going
04:50
>> So, that has to do with the way the
04:52
all-wheel drive works. It has to do with
04:54
how the steering works. It has to do
04:55
with the the wheelbase.
04:57
Anytime I drove an Evo with the
05:00
five-speed manual, I like a manual, but
05:03
there was nothing about that manual I
05:04
was like, "Thank God this has a manual."
05:06
Anytime I drove the DCT, I was like,
05:08
"This is every bit as fun." And in fact,
05:10
I sometimes argued that the DCT was more
05:12
fun because it had a sixth gear, which
05:14
meant it quieted down on the highway.
05:16
You weren't running like 4500 RPM.
05:19
>> So, the the the brilliance of the Evo is
05:22
not the manual. It's everything it does
05:24
in the running gear. So, let's make an
05:27
all-wheel drive hybridized
05:30
>> new Lancer Evo. And that brings people
05:33
back to that brand. And I'm done. I'm
05:35
out. Screenwriters are turning to old
05:38
scripts again and they rename the movie
05:40
the same thing with the new date after
05:43
>> If you really want the thing,
05:45
>> if you really want to freak yourself
05:46
out, look up the recent movie that
05:47
Bradley Cooper did called A Star Is Born
05:49
and figure out they've done it about
05:52
>> They just keep redoing it's the same
05:53
premise. We're just going to do it again
05:54
because this generation hasn't seen it.
05:56
>> This version, the Thomas Crown Affair,
05:59
>> 1960s and early 2000s. Yes. Steve
06:02
McQueen. Very good. Very good. Yes.
06:03
Pierce Broen in the, you know, they just
06:05
put the new date after. It's the same.
06:08
>> We just remade it to make more money.
06:11
>> But this is justified. Absolutely. But
06:14
we have a pact to make as enthusiasts.
06:19
>> we have to buy them.
06:21
>> We have to spend the money.
06:22
>> If they were to do any of these, we have
06:24
to buy them. We have to stop buying
06:26
silver egg 5seat SUVs.
06:28
>> We're going to keep buying those, but we
06:29
have to buy the sports car in addition
06:30
here. Here's the thing. Next time we'll
06:32
do N through the end of the alphabet.
06:33
We'll do a bunch more. So, this will
06:35
probably go over time then as well. But,
06:36
we're having fun with it. We're just
06:38
we're dreaming here, but we're trying to
06:40
dream and product plan, which is one of
06:42
the things that we simultaneously are
06:43
great at and terrible at. So, we love
06:45
doing it. We'll keep doing it. That's
06:49
Grio's Garage is our official car care
06:51
partner and one of our very first
06:53
sponsors for the show. They don't just
06:55
make great car care products, they want
06:56
you to get out and drive your car. Go is
06:59
a family-owned company, and they've been
07:01
a part of every one of our road trips.
07:03
We always take Speed Shine on every
07:05
shoot, helping us spot clean cars at a
07:07
moment's notice. Their foaming glass
07:09
cleaner is the quickest and best way
07:11
we've ever found to get windows clean
07:12
before a big day of driving. And they're
07:14
always releasing new and improved
07:16
products, like their updated Wash
07:17
Bucket, too. Plus, all of Grio's liquid
07:20
products are 100% guaranteed and made
07:22
right here in the USA. The Grio's people
07:24
are always happy to answer any questions
07:27
to make sure you get the right product
07:29
and the right results. So, get the best
07:31
quality car care products out there from
07:32
a company that has always supported this
07:34
show. Our audience can always get at
07:37
least 10% off by using the code driver10
07:42
Hooked on driving updates for late
07:44
September, early October 2025. Reminder
07:47
for Friday, September 26th at Soma
07:49
Raceway. We've got Motor Motorsport Park
07:52
Hastings, Nebraska coming up Friday,
07:54
September 26th through Sunday, September
07:57
28th. Then moving on to Ridge
07:58
Motorsports Park Friday, September 26th,
08:00
Saturday, September 27th. Wherever you
08:02
are in the country,
08:04
>> you can get to one of these tracks
08:07
>> This coming weekend, welcome. This
08:09
coming Friday and weekend, that's those
08:11
three tracks are all running. It's
08:12
great. Moving into some early dates for
08:14
October, so you got them on your radar
08:16
so you can put them on your calendar.
08:18
Portland International Raceway is
08:19
Saturday, October 4. The Northeast
08:24
event at Watkins Glenn is coming up
08:27
Friday, October 10th through Sunday,
08:29
October 12th. This is going to be a
08:31
fantastic event. We were there last year
08:33
for this event and we're going again. We
08:36
are planning on being there. So, if you
08:37
are coming, come out and see us.
08:39
>> Yeah, come say hi. It'd be really cool.
08:40
It's going to be a huge event. it. Look,
08:42
it's not just a track day. They're doing
08:44
drifting. They've got a band coming. I
08:47
mean, they're making it very family
08:49
familyfriendly and broader than just a
08:51
track day. Watkins Glenn is involved in
08:52
it. I think they're doing a car show as
08:54
well, if memory serves big event. We're
08:55
excited to be there. That is a huge
08:57
blowout for the fall event for our
08:58
Northeast franchise of Hooked on
08:59
Driving. You have to be there. October
09:01
10th through 12th. Here's the thing.
09:03
>> If you're considering running Watkins
09:06
>> this is your event.
09:07
>> This event. Come on out. We'll introduce
09:08
you to Santi and Cody. They run the the
09:09
Northeast region. They're doing an
09:11
incredible job and they've got even more
09:13
plans for 2026. But come out and meet
09:15
these guys. See what's going on at
09:17
Hooked OnDriving event. Get your car in
09:18
track. Hooked ondriving.com for a track
09:22
>> So here on the car debate, we cover
09:24
everything we can think of as far as
09:26
kinds of cars, kinds of budgets and
09:28
situations. And Sal's writing in with
09:31
one that doesn't happen often, but is
09:32
super fun. And that is the fourth car.
09:34
Doesn't need a commute car. Doesn't need
09:36
it to really do much but be the fourth
09:39
car. Who says that? I need a fourth car.
09:41
>> Sal S Sal does. Apparently. He has a
09:44
2024 Honda Civic Type R. So, the current
09:47
Type R that we all love.
09:49
>> So, he can do track day. He can do
09:51
dropping off his two oldest girls. I
09:53
mean, this car does everything. He loves
09:55
it. One of his favorite cars ever. He
09:57
says it's the greatest driver's car he's
09:59
owned in his history. And it can do so
10:00
many things. And it's fun at the limit.
10:02
Back roads, track days. He loves the
10:05
thing. He's getting winter tires for it.
10:07
Bravo, man. to run it in Minnesota
10:10
winters. So, I am so excited for you
10:11
that you have this car. But they do have
10:13
an SUV because of course they do. The
10:15
2022 Toyota Highlander Platinum. They
10:18
have that as well. That is one of their
10:21
cars. But wait, where does the third car
10:23
come from? That is his wife. I I cannot
10:26
believe the sentence I read here. That
10:28
is his wife's 2020 Porsche 718 Cayman S
10:34
with PDK and all of the options. Nice.
10:39
>> I can only I'm envisioning this. The
10:41
writer in me is envisioning this. This
10:43
was her hear me now. her push present
10:46
for their third child.
10:49
Are you really telling me, S, you and
10:51
your wife, who is now listening, are you
10:53
really telling me she's uncomfortable in
10:56
a hospital gown with a bunch of people
10:58
standing around her, probably hates you
10:59
in this moment, in a lot of pain, trying
11:01
to give birth to your third child, and
11:03
you said to her, "I'll get you a push
11:05
present of a Porsche." in that moment
11:07
when did that happen then? Because I'm
11:10
not sure that's the right time to do
11:14
>> They got kid number three.
11:15
>> They had kid number three and Porsche
11:19
the Cayman. Oh my gosh. Fantastic. Well
11:22
done. Well, he says he's got two amazing
11:24
cars and this has spoiled him in ways as
11:26
you may imagine with modern sports cars.
11:29
But he says this has got him feeling a
11:30
sense of lacking in terms of feel. M
11:32
>> he wouldn't say sterile but both cars he
11:35
writes hide certain feelings from you in
11:37
different ways in from a driving
11:39
>> I actually agree with that you've bought
11:41
fant look at think about it the Civic
11:43
Type R and the current 718 Cayman are
11:47
>> but if you compare them to analog cars
11:49
of just the 80s let's just go there 80s
11:50
early 90s there is some stuff lost some
11:53
stuff that you're not getting even
11:54
though both of those cars are brilliant
11:56
>> well S also writes that he's driven many
11:58
top- end Porsche cars so he's sure
12:00
that's ruined him as well like a 992
12:04
>> and a 981 GT4. The current plan is to
12:07
keep all of the current lineup because
12:09
they work and they're in love with all
12:13
>> Now, Salah's history includes his first
12:14
car being a 2013 Subaru BRZ, his first
12:17
cool car out of college. He only drove
12:18
on cool road cool curvy roads and taught
12:21
him what a driver's car should feel
12:22
like. He moved to a bigger city, got a
12:24
2012 Honda Civic SI, which made him fall
12:26
in love with Honda and naturally
12:28
aspirated engines with a K24. After CO,
12:31
he had too much time on our hands. So,
12:32
he sold the Civic SI, bought a 2011 WRX.
12:35
This was his co project. Yes.
12:36
>> And spent a bunch of money. We'll just
12:40
>> Modifications, big turbo, all the stuff.
12:43
>> But what this all brings him to, they
12:45
love their car lineup, the the three car
12:49
>> They need a fourth car. They're looking
12:50
for the fourth car that that S can leave
12:53
in the driveway that he doesn't have to
12:55
worry about or care about or be precious
12:57
with during the summers that has more
12:59
the raw feeling that he's missing.
13:01
>> The concept here is he's actually
13:03
looking for a car to play with. The
13:05
concept here is buy it,
13:07
>> have it for the whole summer, park it in
13:09
the driveway, take it to anywhere and
13:11
park it and not worry about it, and then
13:13
maybe even sell it at the end of the
13:15
summer. This is a play car to try to do
13:18
the thing that other cars can't do,
13:20
which is be brilliant, be modern, be
13:22
well cared for. Now, not that he wants
13:24
to trash this car, but the concept is
13:26
where's that raw feeling I don't have?
13:29
And he's aware enough that he's going to
13:31
spend a little bit of money on it,
13:32
hopefully get rid of it down the line
13:34
because it's just an experiential play.
13:36
It's not a fourth long-term car. It's a
13:39
car that does what I don't have. Very
13:41
interesting. He has things listed right
13:43
here. He's got a 987 Porsche Boxster
13:45
base manual. He said he wonders if this
13:48
might actually step on the toes of his
13:49
wife's Cayman and be too similar, but he
13:51
knows that's the more analog version.
13:53
What about old BMWs? E36 coupe, E46
13:57
convertible. He's always kind of loved
13:59
these in in the MC car form. So maybe
14:02
that's the right answer, but he's
14:03
worried about maintenance and
14:04
modification history on the one he'd buy
14:06
or the one he'd try to keep. That's
14:08
concerning. Or he goes old school with
14:10
his Honda love and goes Acura Integra
14:13
GSR. He says it's a throwback, but he
14:16
has that Acura Honda love. What about
14:19
some old school naturally aspirated
14:21
VTEC? What about that in the driveway?
14:24
What are our suggestions for
14:26
essentially? This is how I titled it.
14:27
His raw summer only car. S I have an
14:31
>> Okay, good. This is your cheap summer
14:34
>> Yep. Your your summer vacation cottage
14:38
>> There you I like it.
14:39
>> You don't have to worry if bird crap
14:40
gets on it. You don't have to worry
14:41
about even washing it the entire time. I
14:43
can't believe I just said that.
14:44
>> Please don't do that. That Paul would
14:45
not justify that at all.
14:46
>> I would not justify that. But if you own
14:48
>> get charged extra for that.
14:51
>> If you own this Z3 cheap to run, they
14:55
just run well under your $20,000 budget.
14:58
>> Yeah, true. Easy true.
15:00
>> Easy money for this. Go get yourself a
15:04
>> Sorry, I said Z3. I meant to say Z4,
15:08
>> you identified these on a couple podcast
15:09
episodes ago. These Z4s were slept on
15:12
and they're all under 20 grand and
15:14
they're goodlooking, fun to drive.
15:17
Interesting, fun, great sports cars.
15:20
>> I think you should go get a Z3 or a Z4.
15:23
What are you looking for? Z3 is a little
15:25
bit smaller. Think out of size, but fun,
15:27
chuckable, great. Z4 is a little bit
15:29
more luxurious. You can park them on the
15:30
street. You can leave the keys in them
15:36
>> don't just park it on the street. Leave
15:37
the keys in it and see if anybody wants
15:39
it because they probably won't. That's
15:40
really funny. Yeah,
15:41
>> of course. GT86 is on my list as is
15:46
Maybe be pushing on your budget a little
15:48
bit for a GR86, but absolutely worth it.
15:51
I think you should definitely consider
15:53
>> And my outlier since it's so completely
15:56
>> the Abart version of the Fiat 124
15:58
Spider. Okay. So, the the Italian Miata,
16:02
>> because I think these are cheaper.
16:04
>> Nobody Nobody really wanted these.
16:06
>> Nobody thinks about them. Yeah. Yeah.
16:07
>> Go get one of these. It's actually a
16:09
different engine, turboed. Great fun to
16:11
drive. Miata, but different styling. And
16:14
like I said, I bet you could pick one of
16:16
these up a little bit cheaper because
16:17
everybody seems to want the Miata, the
16:20
>> Go get yourself one of these. It's cool.
16:22
Interesting styling. It's just It's just
16:25
>> That's the key right now car. It's it's
16:27
it's buy it, have it for maybe a year.
16:30
>> And and it's the fourth car to get a
16:32
different experience. That's the key
16:33
thing that I really settled on here, S,
16:35
is that you're looking for that raw
16:37
summer car. And and I I don't want to
16:39
say disposable car, but the concept here
16:41
is there's no reason to be precious.
16:43
>> You just you want to have it for a time
16:45
period, get a different experience out
16:46
of it. I decided on the perfect car for
16:48
you, except that I really blew the
16:50
budget. That was the problem with me.
16:51
And that is to really really do this
16:53
correctly. The answer is a caterum.
16:58
He wants a raw car unlike anything he's
17:00
got. And the answer is a caterum. Now
17:02
the problem is there's not very many
17:04
caterums in the US.
17:06
>> So when I looked on AutoTempus today,
17:07
they were all over 50 grand.
17:10
>> You can get cater in all kinds of
17:12
different engine choices. What I find
17:14
fascinating, because we don't get them
17:15
all here in the US, but what I find
17:16
fascinating is any time that all of the
17:20
automotive journalists in Europe drive a
17:22
caterer, the British especially, they
17:24
always end up driving multiple on the
17:26
same day. They drive the super high
17:27
power one and they drive the one with
17:29
like the average amount of horsepower of
17:31
an iron. I mean, nothing.
17:32
>> It's got like bicycle tires.
17:33
>> Seriously, bicycle tires and like
17:35
couldn't even run your generator kind of
17:37
engine. Okay. And almost across the
17:40
board, they like the low power one more
17:42
because they're foot to the floor,
17:43
sliding around corners. You and I have
17:45
driven one of the very high power ones.
17:47
It was like 350 horsepower, whatever.
17:49
>> Cool. Frightening. Didn't need that much
17:52
power. Still very cool. But my point is,
17:54
this is your answer. You want raw summer
17:57
car. Don't have to worry about catering.
18:00
>> Well, if you want to park it on the
18:01
street, just take the steering wheel
18:02
with you. Security defeat device.
18:04
>> That's perfect. The problem is it's
18:05
above your budget. So that's I can't go
18:07
here. But this is really the one I think
18:08
is perfect. So I went here, the MR2
18:15
>> These are cheap chuckable.
18:16
>> 10 grand for the nicest one in the
18:19
country. Okay, it drives totally
18:23
different than what you've got, but it's
18:24
still related. This is proper mid-enine
18:26
handling. This is going to run. They
18:29
they there's nothing precious about this
18:32
>> And they're all out there well under
18:34
your budget. Get the manual
18:35
transmission. The automatic is terrible.
18:37
The interior is not that great. But this
18:39
is also one of those cars that nobody's
18:41
offended by this and nobody wants to do
18:42
anything aggressive. It's just car. It's
18:44
super fun. This is absolutely
18:47
fundamental fun car. You don't need to
18:49
worry about the MR2 Spider. They're out
18:51
there. Look at one very seriously. The
18:52
later models are a little bit better if
18:54
you can get one, but you can with your
18:55
budget 20 grand. You can get the nicest
18:56
one in the planet. But I gave it a lot
19:00
of thought and I went looking s
19:02
considering your backstory because you
19:04
are a Honda guy. You're a Honda fanboy.
19:07
You want a different experience. And
19:08
let's review it. Your Civic Type R,
19:11
>> your Boxster, and your Highlander. You
19:15
want a different experience that's more
19:17
raw. I can't believe it. But with
19:20
$20,000, especially since you want to
19:22
actually buy it and then sell it again
19:24
later, you need a Honda S2000 first gen,
19:27
the AP1, before they revised it. I
19:29
looked it up on Autotapist right now.
19:31
Can you get them under 20? Here's the
19:33
crazy thing. The AP1s
19:35
between 75 and 150,000 miles are on
19:39
either side of 20 grand all day long.
19:42
>> Are they really?
19:43
>> So since you're buying a car you're
19:45
going to have for maybe a year, you
19:47
don't want to be precious. You want to
19:48
buy it, drive it for a little while, and
19:51
sell it again. This is going to resell,
19:54
>> People are going to want these. The
19:56
eight-month car. Seriously.
19:59
So, I think this is where I was
20:01
surprised, but it's AP1's with high
20:03
miles. That's the key.
20:05
>> So, roughly, but you're going to buy,
20:07
look, you're going to buy a 100,000 mi
20:09
S2000 and at the end of the summer, it's
20:10
going to have what? 120,000 on it.
20:13
>> How much are you going to really drive
20:15
>> You buy it at 90,000 and you break a 100
20:18
while you own it. Who cares?
20:20
Okay. S2000 gives you your natural feel,
20:24
your VTEC, your different experience of
20:26
manual transmission. I mean, it's still
20:28
electronic power steering, so you don't
20:29
gain anything there. But this is a much
20:31
more classic feel than the stuff you
20:33
own. And it gets you that Honda VTEC
20:34
stuff that you want. Civ. Imagine the
20:37
driveway. Civic Type R,
20:40
Honda S2000, and brand new Cayman. That
20:44
is a fantastic garage. And S, I'm out
20:47
there because I think I'm done.
20:48
>> You did really well, S. Thank you for
20:50
writing to us. If you've got a debate
20:52
like salves and you need a fourth car,
20:56
>> by the way, if you need a first car, we
20:57
do that, too. Yeah, we do a lot.
20:59
>> We could just replace the car you have.
21:00
>> We can for sure. Yeah.
21:02
>> But if you need a seventh car or
21:08
>> we're having another long podcast cuz
21:10
we're just enjoying ourselves. We hope
21:11
you guys are as well. That means we're
21:13
probably not going to do car conclusions
21:14
again, but we will create we'll come
21:15
back to them when we have a shorter
21:17
topic Tuesday. I swear that's going to
21:19
happen. But EJ is writing to us from
21:21
Sacramento. He's feeling pressure for a
21:25
>> He tweeted to us back in 2021 when his
21:27
son Teddy was born. They were watching
21:29
the Evora versus M2 video a few hours
21:33
after his son was born.
21:34
>> I do remember that. If memory serves, I
21:36
remember asking you, "Does your wife
21:38
need anything?" Because it was like
21:40
she'd just given birth. He's like,
21:41
"We're watching this right now. My son's
21:43
been born like 15 minutes." I said,
21:44
"What? Where's your wife?
21:45
>> Don't know what else does. She needs
21:46
something right now, but make sure she's
21:48
taken care of." Anyway. Yeah.
21:49
>> Well, his son is three and a half now.
21:51
Their fleet includes a paidoff Mark 7.5
21:53
GTI with the DSG 2017 Outback and a
21:57
manual ND3 Miata with the BBR package.
22:00
That's fantastic. ND3.
22:02
>> All of their friends have a second kid
22:05
or one on the way. Second on the way.
22:09
>> Two of them have a Sienna
22:11
and they're feeling pressured to buy a
22:16
What EJ wants is a wagon with a third
22:20
>> But it doesn't look like the new V60
22:22
Polestar, V90, RS6 Avant, M5 Touring,
22:24
and the new E-Class E-Class wagons have
22:26
an optional third row. Like none of
22:28
them, he says, with the grandparents in
22:30
town often, seating five in the GTI and
22:32
and the Outback is a little snug for
22:33
trips longer than 60 to 90 minutes. I'm
22:35
surprised you last 10.
22:37
>> I'm surprised that 60 to 90 minutes was
22:38
the end of that sentence as well. I
22:40
agree. Yeah. He says he could go back
22:42
five years and have a budget of up to
22:46
Technically up to 120 or 130 if they're
22:49
looking at an RS6 Avant. I'm so glad we
22:52
pushed on the budget. I mean, you you
22:53
already knew I was going to and of
22:55
>> you did it for me, so that's great.
22:56
>> He enjoys tinkering tinkering on cars.
22:59
He'll probably have to sell the GTI or
23:00
the Outback because a new wagon would
23:03
make one, if not both, redundant.
23:05
>> But he do wants to have a third car when
23:07
the family visits. He is also acutely
23:10
aware that what they could do is just
23:12
rent a minivan as needed for those five
23:14
or more people family visits.
23:16
>> But he's really interested in the third
23:20
>> Okay, I've got some stuff here for sure.
23:22
I have many things as well. Let's go
23:24
ahead and dive right in. Most of these
23:29
very few manufacturers make current
23:32
modern wagons with a third row, just
23:34
like you just named all of those.
23:35
>> Yeah, he he identified the problem for
23:37
sure. Yes. don't exist. So, I'm going to
23:39
get you as close as close as I possibly
23:41
can and I think I have your winner and I
23:44
think you're going to not mind. I I
23:46
think be really excited.
23:47
>> Really? All right. Good. Starting with
23:49
the Kia Tellide. They're not $100,000
23:51
even new. You could buy two Tellides for
23:54
>> You could actually. Yes.
23:56
>> Moving on to the new Palisade or sorry,
23:59
>> Palisade was on my list, but I chose
24:00
Santa Fe mainly because you get those
24:02
cool Vanigan rear lights. It's an
24:04
acquired taste. actually defending the
24:05
Santa Fe cuz I just can't justify it for
24:09
>> only because of its usefulness and
24:12
>> It is useful and it comes in your eyes.
24:15
It's just Uh-huh. It is a It is what a
24:18
>> Let's just say I'm acknowledging its
24:20
>> Okay. That there. I like that. That's
24:22
>> it's on the market because I didn't want
24:23
you to say, "Well, did you know the
24:24
Santa Fe has three rows?"
24:25
>> And it's hybrid and Yes. Uhhuh.
24:26
>> I know. It gets good gas mileage.
24:29
>> And it's useful.
24:30
>> And I talked about it before. It's It's
24:31
the car that doesn't bother you. It's
24:33
just you're just driving. Yeah.
24:34
>> Moving right along to the Genesis GV80.
24:37
This is a cool car. It is beautiful.
24:41
>> Easy under your budget. Easy. You could
24:43
almost get two of these for your budget.
24:45
But Genesis GV80, find it in that nice
24:48
green. The beautiful green. And I think
24:50
you would really like these. The back
24:51
seats, the third row is not huge.
24:55
So maybe 40 minutes, 45 minutes they'll
24:57
last. People will last back there. Maybe
25:00
>> They're doing 60 to 90 in the back of a
25:01
GTI. I think they could go cross country
25:03
in the Genesis bike.
25:04
>> Shut up and we'll be there soon.
25:06
>> What we're doing. Yeah, there's some
25:07
conversation going on there.
25:09
>> You know, if we're going to spend
25:12
>> If we're going to spend 120 or 130.
25:16
>> Let's get something with space. Let's
25:18
get something with power. Let's get
25:19
something with presence.
25:21
>> An Escalade V. It starts in sport mode.
25:25
>> It's angry. It's fast. You will giggle
25:28
because of the exhaust cackle. You'll
25:30
turn into a child. It's fantastically
25:31
unnecessary is really what it is.
25:33
>> Which is the whole reason I'm suggesting
25:35
>> I understand. I get that. Yeah.
25:36
>> But what is necessary
25:39
is the GLS63 because third row it's an
25:45
>> They drive very well.
25:47
>> It doesn't drive like an SUV and that's
25:49
>> I agree with that. Yep.
25:50
>> So you could consider even slightly used
25:55
These are superb. Fully loaded. You
25:57
won't believe that this does the things
25:59
that it does. Okay. But the final car,
26:02
this is the one, EJ. This is it. I don't
26:05
think you're ready.
26:06
>> MDX Type S. MDX Type S. It's not a van.
26:11
It's got an excellent third row. The
26:13
engine, the 3 L is superb. Lots of
26:15
power. Brand new. They were $73,000.
26:18
Again, you could almost buy two of these
26:20
used for what your budget is, but you
26:22
will still feel like you're getting your
26:24
money's worth. So, I'm saving you money.
26:26
Awesome to drive. Gobs of power. third
26:29
row, not a minivan, and your neighbors
26:32
will be like, "Huh, maybe we need to get
26:36
>> Not only do I agree with you, I agree
26:38
with you so much it's on my list as
26:41
>> It was actually the place that I landed.
26:42
So So you've already landed in the right
26:44
place. That I want to say this to you as
26:46
>> EJ. This is surprisingly good to drive.
26:49
We We talked about it on our review.
26:51
It's almost as good to drive as some of
26:53
the performance versions of the Cayenne,
26:55
but the difference here is it does have
26:58
>> So, this is a genuinely good to drive
27:01
SUV. Again, below your budget. I think
27:03
you nailed it with the Type S.
27:05
>> I think that's the car. That's
27:06
>> I think if you're going to break into
27:08
SUVs, I think this is the way to go. But
27:09
I have a couple other things I do want
27:10
to talk to you about. And that is I do
27:12
want to show you, believe it or not, I I
27:15
had to see the photo for myself. The
27:19
used has a third row seat that's halfway
27:23
>> or wagon. E-class wagon, right?
27:24
>> Yes. The wagon, sorry. The wagon has
27:26
actually has a halfway decent looking
27:28
childrenly rear seat. That's not bad,
27:30
>> So, you could do that. Just get a a used
27:34
>> I I do want to acknowledge the elephant
27:36
of the room for a moment, and that is
27:37
you could just rent the van. I mean, if
27:40
look, how often are the in-laws or your
27:43
parents coming? If it's twice a year,
27:46
rent the van. If you like your current,
27:48
here's the question. I don't know how
27:49
much you like your current stable. If
27:50
you like your current st, I'm fine with
27:52
this. Then the reality is the financial
27:54
reality is you rent the van you don't
27:56
have to worry about.
27:57
>> You rent it from the rental counter, not
28:00
Turo, rental counter. Yeah. Rental
28:02
counter van. Drive it for a week. You
28:03
don't have to like it. You don't have to
28:05
return it. Nice. It's just van. If you
28:08
really are looking for a bangaround for
28:10
the family for the time that they come
28:11
in, that is the answer. You don't have
28:14
to own a minivan. You rented it and you
28:16
don't have to worry about it. Your
28:17
neighbors with the Siennas, they got to
28:19
pay insurance. They got to put gas in
28:20
it. They got to make sure that it runs.
28:21
Take it to the dealer and oh my gosh,
28:23
the kids threw up in it again. None of
28:24
that matters for you. You rented a van,
28:27
you turned it back in. What's that
28:29
>> I guarantee you it's going to be a
28:30
Pacifica, though. It's just going to be
28:33
Pacifica. That's where they all got.
28:36
van is still the like financial and
28:38
stress decision is still rent the van
28:42
>> this is what the E-Class look like which
28:44
is pretty cool but you know what I think
28:46
might be the answer because you can
28:48
probably get them cheap and for your
28:50
usage it might be perfect and that is an
28:52
early Tesla Model S.
28:57
>> They have a rearfacing childonly
29:01
third row that folds up out of the back.
29:03
The first one we ever drove had this. I
29:05
have a picture of you squishing yourself
29:07
into the back of this trying to film
29:09
>> Well, and we have a whole joke in our
29:11
original Model S piece where we actually
29:13
closed it with me sitting in it and I
29:15
had to hunker because it was not
29:16
designed for me. You were not happy.
29:17
Yes. True. But we we actually when we
29:20
first ever drove one of these, it was
29:23
owned by a family of seven.
29:25
>> That's right. And we have a shot of the
29:27
entire family getting out of this
29:29
vehicle and watching all the doors close
29:31
automatically behind it. My thinking
29:35
>> you could get one of these used
29:38
>> and it becomes the third car you only
29:40
use in specific situations. The chest
29:43
Tesla charging network is excellent.
29:46
>> Places you're going to go with people
29:47
are probably going to be fine for
29:49
>> Yeah, use these are still great. Yeah,
29:51
the way this works, I think, is perfect
29:54
for you. And I think you can find a much
29:56
better deal on one of these than you
30:00
>> and it becomes it it'll be good at
30:02
exactly what you need it to be good for.
30:05
So, that is kind of my wild card, but
30:07
also kind of my favorite if you don't go
30:09
where you went, Paul, and that is the
30:11
answer might just be MDX Type S.
30:13
>> It's an SUV. Whereas, I like this cuz
30:14
it's not. It's deliberately not.
30:16
>> This really gets it done. I can't
30:18
believe it. And I have to say, go watch
30:20
our original, it's like 10 years old
30:22
now. Watch our original Model S review.
30:24
We were genuinely impressed with the
30:26
fact that they did this at all. And it
30:27
does work. So, I think used Tesla Model
30:32
S, which is probably going to be not
30:33
even half your budget for a used one.
30:36
>> With the third row seat, and call it a
30:39
>> Everyday driver TV atgmail.com. Topic
30:42
Tuesdays, car conclusions, fourth car
30:44
>> fifth car debates,
30:45
>> first car debates, fourth car debates,
30:47
>> filling your garage. We will get back to
30:49
car conclusions, but we have run long
30:51
yet again, and we're loving it. We We
30:52
should run some audience questions,
30:54
though. One of these is a topic Tuesday.
30:56
You see Kyle's question, lightning
30:57
round, most fun car under 5K, 10K, 20K,
31:01
50K, and 100K. Oh my gosh. But then he
31:03
says, "No Miatas, no G86s, no Porsches."
31:07
>> That's a topic Tuesday right there.
31:09
We'll have to come back on that. I like
31:11
that a lot. Jared says, "Were there any
31:14
cars on Tale of the Dragon that in
31:16
hindsight we wish we could have driven
31:18
or done a piece on?" There was a 1980s,
31:23
early 90s that white Thunderbird. He one
31:25
of our Discord people on Discord had it.
31:28
It's an '90s Thunderbird
31:31
that has been retrofit with all Mustang
31:34
>> And he kept rumbling up and down the
31:35
Dragon. And I was kind of intrigued by
31:37
that car. I was enjoying driving my own
31:39
car on the Dragon, but I kind of kept
31:41
thinking if we had more time, I would
31:42
have loved to driven that because it
31:43
sounded awesome. It was atypical. That
31:46
would have been very fun to actually
31:48
hoon up and down the dragon. That was
31:49
actually one for sure. And then
31:52
the folks with Miatas, that would have
31:54
been cool. I would have done a Miata up
31:56
and down the dragon with the top down.
31:57
That would have been actually really
31:58
cool. Yeah, you're right. The Bruce B on
32:01
Instagram says, "For SoCal traffic,
32:02
which cars have the best interiors,
32:04
comfortable seats, and easy to use
32:08
I just want to be in a Mercedes AMG. I
32:09
mean, you didn't give me a budget in
32:11
here. There was just point
32:12
>> which cars have the best interiors.
32:14
Mercedes AMG, whatever. I don't care.
32:16
And the interior is easy to use and it's
32:18
just comfortable and the
32:19
>> scent with the stuff and the cooling and
32:22
the stuff and you just want to be there.
32:25
Lovely, lovely place to be.
32:27
>> You know what? Another one in that
32:28
category, depending upon are you being
32:30
driven, what's going on. You know what?
32:31
The Genesis G90, we really like the
32:35
>> That's great. Yes. Genesis G90.
32:36
fantastic place to be and you can
32:38
actually save some money off the
32:39
Mercedes. Also really good.
32:40
>> Bella B1029 says, "Hey guys, uh
32:43
submitting uh for the have you seen this
32:45
car section few few days ago, Bella saw
32:48
an early 2000 Subaru Outback sedan."
32:52
Whoa. I'm a little Yeah. Okay. Now that
32:54
I think about it, I I remember what that
32:56
looked like. And it looked a little high
32:58
riding. It was like the Subarus really
32:59
looked high riding. Yeah.
33:01
>> That's right. Little ways ways back.
33:02
Those were always ungainainely because
33:04
they felt like they were up on their
33:06
>> And then they took that for inspiration
33:09
>> Of course they did. Yeah. That works
33:10
well as well. Dami actually asked last
33:12
time, he said, "In our discussion of the
33:13
$50,000 GT cars, is there a reason we
33:16
passed over the Jaguar XKR and picked
33:18
the Type F instead?" He thinks the XKR
33:21
is much more of a GT car. What Dami
33:23
doesn't say, and if my memory serves, is
33:25
I'm pretty sure Dami owns a Jaguar XKR.
33:29
I think you're right.
33:30
>> Which is why he brought it up.
33:31
>> So, first off, Dami, I'm really glad you
33:33
like your car and that's very cool. The
33:35
reason I didn't pick the XKR instead is
33:37
because I personally prefer the look,
33:40
the dynamic and weight, and the interior
33:42
of the F-Type over the XKR. But the
33:46
F-Type is actually more expensive than
33:47
the FKR in many cases used. And the XKR
33:51
is a steal of a used buy. If you have
33:53
one that's running well and you like it,
33:55
and I'm pretty sure you do, I think it's
33:56
a great car. I just prefer the F-Type.
33:59
On Instagram, Mystic Negro George has
34:01
said, "No one has disagreed that the
34:03
Camaro V61LE is the best E46 M3 that you
34:05
can buy. The Miata is univers
34:08
universally considered the best British
34:09
roadster, unless you're tall, and the
34:11
Chevy SS makes a strong case as the best
34:17
>> What are other cars that are the best
34:18
version of completely unrelated cars?
34:21
You've always said the Supra is the best
34:23
car BMW builds, which I've always found
34:25
hilarious. I think right now it's the
34:27
best BMW on the market is the Supra.
34:30
>> I fully agree with that.
34:31
>> Well, George, you could also make a case
34:33
for say a Veloster N being the poor man
34:36
Civic Type R. I mean, I I think that's
34:39
interesting. Possibly the Elantra N
34:41
definitely sorry, the Elantra N. Yeah.
34:42
Yeah. Elantra definitely
34:46
possible. Travis asks, "What's the best
34:48
next car after the GR86? Needs to be
34:51
light and playful with a manual
34:52
transmission. He loves the GR86.
34:55
favorite car he's ever owned. But of
34:57
course, we all have the disease. What's
34:58
next, Travis? If you're going to go from
35:00
GR86, I think where you have to go next
35:03
is probably C7 or C6 Corvette.
35:09
>> writ large. You've got similar dynamics,
35:12
similar actual space, etc., just a
35:14
little bit larger. And the idea of all
35:17
all of your learning in the GR86, all
35:19
that translates to those Corvettes. I
35:21
think that's the next step up. Last
35:24
question for me on Facebook. Gregory
35:25
Tullson says he's curious our thoughts
35:27
on the six-pack Charger Daytona. Do we
35:29
think this car will ever be a steal in
35:31
the used market? I think it already is,
35:33
isn't it? When Hemi enthusiasts crater
35:35
the resale value, do we believe the car
35:37
will be an amazing value since it's got
35:39
420 horsepower in the lower output 550
35:41
in the Scat Pack and a straight six. M
35:44
>> will this be an amazing value in
35:46
comparison to say a BMW 340 or 440i or
35:49
S4S S5 Audi or will the weight of the
35:52
Charger Daytona be a significant
35:54
problem? I think you've hit on that
35:55
Gregory. I think the weight I it's so
35:58
big the form factor itself just the
36:00
proportions of the car the footprint is
36:02
so much bigger than the other cars you
36:04
just you said they are large
36:06
>> and that will absolutely affect it. It's
36:09
almost unrelated to power output.
36:12
>> And I Yeah, the market has
36:14
>> really not embraced these cars. I feel
36:17
like Dodge just went too far. They
36:19
>> the new platform and trying to do both
36:22
and now they're trying to resurrect it
36:23
and hey, we put the six-cylinder in and
36:25
please don't go. Please come back.
36:27
>> Yeah, I'm really curious to see what
36:28
people's take is on that and if they
36:29
like it better and if it if people start
36:31
circling back or not. I'm fascinated to
36:33
drive one for sure. I think because they
36:36
had plans, Stalantis had plans for this
36:38
platform for Alpha and others and buyers
36:41
did not line up for this. That's why we
36:43
haven't seen anything new like a new
36:45
Giulia from Alpha anytime soon, but that
36:48
would be way too big.
36:50
>> Any other cars? I think
36:52
>> they were trying things and it didn't
36:54
really work out for them and they're
36:55
trying to resurrect it, but I don't
36:57
think that's a good thing because it's
36:58
not just a parts car. It's just we
37:00
started in the wrong. started going down
37:02
the road. It is it's that it's that you
37:04
started the huge floor of dominoes and
37:06
one that's one of the starter ones just
37:08
fails and the whole rest thing sitting
37:10
there in anticipation it isn't going to
37:13
>> it's the domino that didn't fall and now
37:15
what do we do? Yeah. Anyway
37:17
>> guys, thank you for all your questions.
37:18
We really appreciate it. Thank you for
37:20
being with us. We are on Spotify audio,
37:22
Spotify video and hopefully you're also
37:24
watching this on YouTube, our main
37:25
YouTube channel. Really appreciate you
37:27
watching. Thank you for your questions.
37:29
keep bringing your excellent ideas for
37:31
topics. We're uh we're going to
37:37
>> A lot more coming. Yep. And we're
37:38
looking forward to next time, too.