00:02
right, welcome back everybody to the
00:03
podcast. We have all of our normal
00:05
stuff, news, car debates, we've got some
00:07
good cool car conclusions we'll
00:09
hopefully get to this time. Your
00:10
questions, lots of stuff,
00:11
>> but the topic is so good.
00:13
>> The topic is really interesting. Yes,
00:15
>> we're going to talk about cars that
00:16
brand should bring bring back. It's a
00:19
deep deep rabbit hole because we could
00:21
>> we could go crazy
00:22
>> all the fun stuff in the past.
00:24
limiting ourselves to just one car from
00:26
one manufacturer, whether it's a dead
00:28
name plate or whatever the car was, even
00:31
if they still make it. I kind of left
00:33
myself, you know, but this this springs
00:35
out of the conversations we've had in
00:36
the last few podcasts. This has come
00:37
very organically out of the last few
00:39
podcasts because the last couple of
00:40
episodes, if you've seen them or heard
00:42
them, we've talked about brands bringing
00:45
back interesting cars, something between
00:47
the super hypercar and the SUV. Where is
00:50
the stuff in the middle? And then a lot
00:52
of discussions have come up. Be it
00:53
Prelude, be it uh Zcar, be it whatever.
00:55
We've we've caught up those cars that
00:57
are legendary name plates, but we as
00:59
enthusiasts want them to come back and
01:01
be a certain thing. So, you and I are
01:03
going to kind of run the gauntlet here.
01:04
>> Bring them back.
01:05
>> Today is uh car makers A through M. I
01:08
didn't cover all of them, but A through
01:09
M, we're going to kind of each pick a
01:10
car and go, okay, this name plate should
01:13
come back and be like this. It's very
01:15
exciting. I'm I'm very much looking
01:16
forward. It's going to be really good.
01:17
But before we get there, we should do
01:19
news, including people having problems
01:21
getting out of their Model Y.
01:23
>> Switching over here to a actually this
01:25
is a 2025 Model Y, but for the 2021
01:29
Model Y's, a 174,000 cars are being
01:32
recalled at least because parents can't
01:34
get to their children. They're locked in
01:37
the car because of these handles. So,
01:40
like we discussed last time, the light
01:42
bars on the front of EVs kind of
01:44
becoming a thing. Now, recessed flush
01:46
handles have also become a thing.
01:49
>> I mean, from an aerodynamic standpoint,
01:51
designers and aerodynamicists like that.
01:53
They like flush body sides, nothing
01:56
>> It makes for a better coefficient of
01:58
drag. I do understand that. And it looks
01:59
better. It's just a graphic and then the
02:01
handle appears, but
02:03
>> you know what? We've also heard about
02:04
handles that are icing up. Handles can't
02:08
>> Because it's too cold or the motor wears
02:10
out or it's something something gets,
02:12
you know, stuck, jammed. So the more
02:15
stuff that we have on our cars,
02:16
especially door handles that you should
02:18
be able to get in your car.
02:19
>> Well, but what what you're speaking to
02:21
here, what you're speaking to here, and
02:22
it's not just a Tesla problem, even
02:23
though Teslas are being recalled for.
02:25
These are solenoid handles.
02:26
>> So when you do something, electronics
02:29
are getting a signal and the electronics
02:31
are unlatching the door.
02:33
>> Now, you're required by regulations. You
02:34
can see it in a Corvette C8. Yes.
02:37
Exactly. Which is ridiculous. Entry by
02:38
wire. But you can see you're required by
02:41
law to have a mechanical backup to
02:43
release the door from the inside. But
02:46
what's interesting about this is that in
02:48
some cases what apparently is happening
02:49
and I have not seen an official report
02:51
from an actual person has happened to.
02:52
But this is what we're we're hearing
02:54
>> Parents getting out of the car, closing
02:56
their door now not able to get back into
02:59
the car. The child in the car can't get
03:02
to or doesn't know where to get to the
03:04
mechanical backup. So, you're standing
03:06
outside your car and in some cases
03:08
parents have broken the windows. Now,
03:10
it's not like, please don't get me
03:11
wrong, I'm not saying it's happened to
03:12
thousands of parents. This is like a
03:14
handful of people, okay? Saying Tesla's
03:16
with shattered windows all over the
03:17
>> It's really weird. So, it's it's a
03:18
handful of people. So, it's not like but
03:20
but they were calling all of them to try
03:22
to solve this. But I I'm going to ask a
03:24
a weird question. What's wrong with
03:26
doors? Can't they just be a mechanical
03:28
thing? A knob, a latch, you pull it, and
03:31
the lock moves? Is this has existed
03:34
forever? Is this in the same category as
03:36
buttons then? Buttons coming back to the
03:39
interiors and design bosses including
03:41
Mercedes design boss actually admitting
03:43
buttons. Yeah, they're better and
03:45
Volkswagen has tacitly approved buttons
03:48
coming back to the interiors. Does this
03:50
mean it's the C change back to door
03:52
handles? Well, but but I've joked before
03:55
that apparently Elon Musk uh somewhere
03:57
in his past life was was somehow scarred
04:00
by doors because he just keeps wanting
04:02
to reinvent the door so he never has to
04:04
touch a door ever again.
04:05
>> Okay. True. I don't know what the
04:06
problem is, but like you sit in the car
04:08
and it closes the door. You turn off the
04:10
car or you stop the car and the door
04:11
opens. He doesn't want to touch it. He
04:12
doesn't want to have a handle. I don't
04:14
understand what the problem was with I
04:15
turned the knob or I pulled the latch
04:17
and mechanics worked and the door opened
04:20
or closed. I don't see why that was an
04:21
issue. But I I get the recessed thing.
04:24
The recessed thing is cool if it works.
04:27
Now, like on my Amir, that is still an
04:29
it's still an actual handle.
04:30
>> In warm weather, it works.
04:31
>> You you push on one end and the other
04:33
side pops open. But yes, if you are a
04:34
place that gets sheet ice, you're not
04:36
getting your car this morning. You're
04:37
going to be out there with the kettle.
04:39
Your door handle got lake affected.
04:42
>> Yes, it did. That's terrible. Anyway,
04:43
frozen shut. We'll see where this goes.
04:45
I mean, I don't think Tesla's alone on
04:46
these door problems, but they're the
04:48
ones that got recalled for it.
04:49
>> Yeah, for sure. There's more news that
04:51
is a little bit personal for me and it's
04:53
in regards to Nissan because they are
04:56
restructuring as you know they're
04:59
closing their design studios. Well, two
05:00
of them at least. This is design work
05:04
done by Nissan Design fairly recently.
05:08
>> It's polarizing.
05:10
>> Ah, it's a it's a style. It's a choice.
05:13
Let's say it's a choice. Well, this
05:15
snowplow new concept of the GTR
05:19
>> designed for gamers. It was designed it
05:22
does look like it belongs in a video
05:23
game or a movie or something like that.
05:24
And I understand that that is the
05:26
sentiment, but this actually was
05:27
revealed in 2003. And you can already
05:29
see that it looks a little tired and
05:31
old. This style is already a little bit
05:34
played out. And so, even though I
05:36
understand that Nissan is exploring new
05:39
design language, I haven't seen any new
05:42
fresh designs. The Nissan Leaf has just
05:44
come out, but that is a very safe play.
05:46
>> Super safe. Yes.
05:47
>> They haven't really pushed on a new look
05:50
for Nissan, a new corporate look because
05:52
as of the new CEO and finally we're
05:55
restructuring. No, there's not going to
05:57
be any partnerships. We're on our own
05:59
and you know, we've got to reset the bar
06:01
and we need customers back. I haven't
06:03
really seen too much from Nissan. Their
06:06
CEO of design, Alfonso Albza, we have
06:08
invited many times to call into the
06:10
show. We want Nissan to make him
06:12
available because uh I I think it'd be
06:14
interesting to to really understand of
06:16
any design head. I would like to hear
06:19
from Nissan just what do you got for us?
06:22
What's coming? There's so much
06:23
enthusiasm for the Nissan brand. True.
06:26
It's it's just dormant right now. But
06:28
when you put out polarizing designs like
06:32
>> it's hard to really get excited. And so
06:34
>> the Nissan Design Studio in San Diego is
06:36
actually one of the ones that is being
06:38
closed. And I was there so many times as
06:41
I worked for Autodesk because I was a
06:43
subject matter expert in the automotive
06:44
industry. And so I called on Nissan
06:46
quite a bit, visited the San Diego
06:48
studio. Many of my colleagues, I know a
06:50
lot of people at the studio. It's a
06:51
bummer because they'll lose their jobs
06:53
or they're going to have to move. It's
06:55
my understanding the Nissan's largest
06:57
design studios in China and also others
06:59
around the world are more prolific than
07:01
the San Diego studio, which put a
07:03
spotlight on them. It's also very
07:06
specifically built for car design,
07:08
meaning open courtyards to view cars on
07:11
turntables in the light.
07:12
>> It's got an entire color and materials
07:15
library and separate section of the
07:17
building. The middle of the building is
07:19
beautiful and open. So my question is
07:22
somebody who buys that building,
07:24
>> I think a maybe a really cool
07:26
restaurant, but it'd be way too big.
07:28
It'd be like four or five restaurants
07:30
>> or a boutique hotel, something like
07:32
that. But the building doesn't lend
07:34
itself because it's one story low and
07:37
level. The whole thing says go away. We
07:39
don't want prying eyes. Unlike most
07:42
hotel architecture which is look at our
07:44
beautiful building.
07:45
>> So I don't know what company would buy
07:46
that. And because the the entrance is
07:48
hidden, it's small. It's designed to,
07:51
you know, be secure, a secure design
07:55
>> So what do you do with this building?
07:57
They've got to unload real estate now.
07:58
And then people are losing their jobs,
08:00
which is quite a bummer. But I want to
08:02
see beautiful stuff coming from Nissan.
08:04
It almost doesn't matter to me what's
08:06
going on with the studios and what
08:08
buildings are closing and opening and
08:09
where the locations are. Even though San
08:11
Diego and the surf culture and the kind
08:13
of cool, fun California culture should
08:15
spawn great designs. I just don't see
08:19
that reflected in these designs.
08:20
>> Well, these designs you're showing and
08:22
and this whole discussion takes a weird
08:24
turn in my mind. And you're talking
08:25
about design in California. And the
08:27
reality is we notice this anytime we fly
08:29
from Utah to California. California has
08:32
very specific light. It's very pleasing
08:35
>> And so and different places in in the
08:38
world. Like when we shoot in Utah, cars
08:39
look differently in sunlight than they
08:41
do shot in Southern California.
08:43
>> And there's lots of people that love to
08:45
cinematographers that love to shoot in
08:46
the Middle East because there's a
08:48
specific light in the Middle East that
08:50
you can't get elsewhere. So there there
08:52
is an interesting thing about California
08:54
light and design. But the thing I think
08:56
is interesting is this is on the backs
08:57
of Nissan talking about firing. Let's
09:00
just be honest. as many as 20,000
09:02
employees. Now, think about the scale of
09:04
a company that can absorb firing 20,000
09:09
employees. Most of the companies in the
09:11
world don't have 20,000 employees, and
09:14
Nissan's thinking about cutting that
09:16
many. So, of course, design has got to
09:17
be on the chopping block as well. But
09:18
the the most interesting part of the
09:20
article that you and I read about this
09:22
was the comment that Nissan's design
09:24
office in Shanghai is more productive
09:27
than its counterpart around counterparts
09:29
around the world producing designs with
09:32
a 30 to 40% reduction in hours. What
09:36
you've told me right there is we're
09:38
doing it with AI. What you've told me is
09:40
we are cranking out designs with AI with
09:43
no people involved. We are just
09:45
iterating tons and tons of options with
09:47
AI for some executive to go that's good
09:49
enough. And these designs you've shown
09:51
here on pictures. They all have kind of
09:54
an AI iterative look about them that
09:57
doesn't feel like anybody sat down and
09:58
went I've got an idea. Let me actually
10:01
be a human and design something. Yes,
10:04
you can crank out a lot more designs if
10:05
the computer is doing it for you, but
10:07
you're never going to get something. I
10:08
don't think that just stops people in
10:11
their tracks as like that's gorgeous.
10:14
And there's all kinds of arguments and
10:16
opinions with designers in any industry
10:18
about using AI because of what it draws
10:21
on. There's also using it as simply
10:24
another tool like a paintbrush, like a
10:25
pencil. You employing it as a tool.
10:28
You're you're sending it off in a
10:29
direction that you set and do iterations
10:33
>> That's different. But the biggest lesson
10:35
I learned as a designer in my career
10:37
from Richard Hullbrook, and this was
10:39
relating to furniture, is that most CEOs
10:41
when they hire an outside design firm,
10:45
>> you hire the designer for their
10:49
>> And many CEOs, it's up to them to make
10:51
the decision and design managers to make
10:54
the decision in any industry, cars,
10:56
furniture, doesn't matter. But many
10:59
times they've hired the design team and
11:01
sometimes they don't know what they're
11:02
looking at. And so they'll say, "Well, I
11:04
like concept A, but I like a little bit
11:06
from C, and that thing from B is cool.
11:08
So, could you add that plus that?" And
11:10
like, let's kind of make a mish mash,
11:11
which is what AI is already doing.
11:13
>> But Richard always said, I presented the
11:16
CEO with one design.
11:18
>> You've paid me as a professional to
11:21
redesign the object that you want to
11:24
meet a market price, to sell in volume,
11:26
to increase your sales, to make money
11:31
>> Interesting. hired me to design the
11:35
>> This is what I've done for you after all
11:37
of my research and expertise.
11:39
>> This is what I think your solution is.
11:44
>> tons of iteration and a lot of managers
11:46
and everybody has an opinion. Well, I
11:48
like a little bit of that. I like a
11:49
little bit of that and that's kind of
11:50
cool. Could we add that plus that? And
11:53
>> it happens like crazy. Yeah.
11:54
>> In any industry, I'm sure that happens
11:55
in writing when rewrites happen. I like
11:58
a little bit of that part. could we pull
12:00
some of that in and mish mash and well
12:02
that didn't make it better. It's just a
12:04
bunch of opinions alto together. So when
12:07
it comes down to one person
12:10
>> I'm not seeing that in Nissan corporate
12:12
design. I'm not seeing that. We haven't
12:14
really seen bold new stuff from Nissan
12:17
since these designs came out in 2023.
12:20
>> Be very interesting to see how all this
12:21
plays out. It isn't a piece of good
12:23
news, but I'm very curious to know where
12:24
it goes for sure. Maybe we need to
12:26
shutter all these design studios just to
12:28
>> just let AI do it. Just let that That's
12:31
really the answer. I mean, honestly,
12:32
this podcast before long will just be
12:34
you and I and AI and we're done. Yeah,
12:36
that's what we're going to do.
12:36
>> How do you know it's already done?
12:38
>> I mean, exactly true.
12:40
>> We're adding FCP Euro as our partners
12:42
and supporters for both Everyday Driver
12:44
and Hooked on Driving. For nearly 40
12:47
years, FCP Euro has been an
12:48
industry-leading supplier of genuine
12:50
original equipment and OEM parts and
12:53
performance upgrades for European cars.
12:55
That means BMW, Audi, Volkswagen, Mini,
12:57
Mercedes, Volvo, Porsche, and even Saab.
13:01
Paul, you have to call your
13:03
brother-in-law and tell him FCP Euro is
13:05
the place because I, as I just said,
13:06
even Saab, we're putting it in the ad.
13:09
Anyway, they offer a lifetime
13:11
replacement guarantee on everything,
13:13
including consumables like brake pads,
13:15
wiper blades, and even oil filters. Buy
13:18
a replacement, send back the old one,
13:20
and receive a credit for the full amount
13:22
for your sub. Plus, FCP Euro offers free
13:26
economy shipping on orders over $49 and
13:29
a 90-day hassle-free return policy for
13:31
new, unused, and uninstalled parts. So
13:34
visit FCP Euro today for more than
13:36
300,000 parts ready to ship for your
13:39
European car and your Saab. fcpuro.com.
13:45
We'll move on to our topic Tuesday and
13:47
again this is cars that brands should
13:49
bring back and it's those cars that we
13:52
as enthusiasts or we as people that that
13:54
have love for these name plates would
13:55
like to see return. And I I'm on two
14:00
sides of this equation, okay? because
14:02
I'm trying on one level to be a little
14:04
bit realistic. I'm aware of the fact
14:06
that the super small volume internal
14:10
combustion engine car made to be only
14:12
one thing by one manufacturer, that's
14:15
remarkably rare. Now,
14:18
>> cars are coming into existence because
14:21
>> Cars are hybrid because there's emission
14:24
>> I'm aware of the fact that that we can't
14:26
just go, well, here's my perfect version
14:29
from a world of 1990. Sure. Okay. That
14:33
there there's not. Now, some of some of
14:34
mine are more pie in the sky and like
14:37
it'd be awesome if they do this and they
14:38
can't. And some of mine are more
14:39
realistic, but I've got
14:41
>> multiple hybrids in my dreaming. I've
14:44
got multiple collaborations in my
14:45
dreaming because I'm trying to think of
14:47
>> how could this actually come into being
14:52
>> Not just, hey, it was cool. Let's bring
14:54
>> Bring the same thing back and just
14:56
>> Yeah. It's not like I want another uh
14:58
MarkV Supra with a 2JZ. Great. It's not
15:00
happening. It's not happening. So, I'm
15:02
I'm trying to be a little bit realistic,
15:05
even though there's plenty of dreaming
15:06
here. We are theoretically going
15:08
alphabetical from A through M on this
15:10
podcast, which means we'll do the rest
15:11
of them on our next podcast, but we're
15:14
not necessarily covering every brand.
15:15
Did you do Acura? Cuz I did.
15:17
>> I did Acura. And I'm like you. I really
15:20
tried to filter it. You've got a good
15:22
idea about trying to come up with
15:24
collaborations. I was just trying to
15:26
think of the technology available or
15:27
cars that current cars that have a piece
15:30
of technology that could be used to
15:32
bring an old model back, but ultimately
15:35
it's got to go through the filter of
15:36
what I think will sell.
15:40
>> still obviously need to sell cars to
15:42
make a profit, but cars are so
15:44
>> Yep. Yep. They need to fit all of your
15:47
of your needs. But enthusiast fun cars
15:50
still have a lot of the emotional
15:51
component to them that makes people buy
15:53
them even though it's not quite
15:55
practical enough or it's not quite
15:57
>> good for the family or or whatever it
15:59
but it fills an emotional fun to drive
16:01
need that's still very much valid. But
16:04
ultimately it still has to come down to
16:06
>> a company has to make money. If this
16:09
>> we can't just bring a car back just
16:12
>> Well, and also there has to be how do we
16:14
figure out the R&D? How do we figure out
16:16
the building? That's where I see a lot
16:17
of the collaborations happening because
16:19
then we can just amvertise out the cost
16:21
and it's not hurting either one of us. I
16:22
mean, that's something that happens as
16:23
well. Look at that with the Z4 and the
16:26
>> or Toyota's done this a lot obviously
16:28
the GR86 and the BRZ. I mean, that's
16:31
splitting cost, doubling product, and
16:33
making it not hurt anybody as much. And
16:36
then we get those cars.
16:37
>> My list is actually fairly long, but
16:39
>> mine is fairly long, but I'll try to go
16:40
>> I skipped quite a few. Yeah, keep going.
16:42
>> All right, so let's start off with
16:44
Acura. And I did choose the NSX, but
16:47
solely for the reason of being a
16:48
technology showcase. And manufacturers
16:51
in the future will need to have vehicles
16:55
where they're trying things, but they're
16:58
so aspirational that the early adopters
17:00
that want it will still justify sales.
17:03
>> Okay. Okay. for tech showcase, for
17:05
whatever whatever Acura is going to do,
17:07
for all-wheel drive, for hybrid
17:08
technology, for something that still
17:10
says sporty, fun to drive, but high-end
17:13
luxury. I feel like the NSX at some
17:17
>> is still valid to exist.
17:20
>> It's still going to be expensive.
17:22
>> I also struggled with this because of
17:24
the latency between the first and second
17:26
>> and what Acura did to tease everybody,
17:29
tease everybody, tease everybody. Well,
17:30
that one, that prototype burned down by
17:32
the side of the ring, that one didn't
17:33
work. Oh, we had to change everything
17:34
and then 10 years later after you talked
17:37
about it, finally we get one. And I
17:39
think the market had died before it even
17:42
hit the market. I for the second
17:44
>> The other problem is that people
17:46
expected it to be I I don't know another
17:47
way to put it. They expected it to be my
17:50
>> They expected to be roughly 3,000 lb
17:52
rear wheel drive, mid-engine, and manual
17:54
transmission. And it came out much
17:56
closer to the Porsche 918 for a tenth of
17:58
the price than it did the original NSX
18:02
by being all-wheel drive and having
18:04
hybrid tech and all of the things that
18:06
it did that were incredible
18:09
but we were so and and I I'm in the
18:12
group. We were focused on it being
18:14
something that it wasn't.
18:16
>> And I actually wonder about the the NSX
18:19
because I have it on my list, too. I
18:21
actually wonder, we all look fondly on
18:23
the original NSX. Yeah.
18:25
>> When it first dropped,
18:27
>> it wasn't instantly embraced. There were
18:30
those people that bought it. There was
18:31
the Senna stories and all that kind of
18:32
stuff, but it was like, what is this
18:35
now? And I think it took a little while
18:37
and certainly upon reflection now for it
18:40
to become an icon. Originally, it was
18:42
like a you you bought a what Acura's
18:44
doing which why would you do that
18:46
instead of a Ferrari?
18:47
>> You would have to justify it because
18:48
it's not quite the Ferrari. It's not for
18:49
our money, but it runs like a Honda
18:52
>> Exactly. The people that bought it were
18:54
the outliers, and it wasn't instantly
18:56
embraced. I think we look at it as it
18:59
was perfect in its time. It was great,
19:02
but I think people warmed to it. And I
19:04
actually think the second gen is having
19:05
the same experience. I think in five or
19:07
10 years when these would come down in
19:09
price, I think we're going to look at
19:10
back on these second gen NSXs with a lot
19:13
more fondness than when they came out.
19:16
>> And I would be fascinated to see my my
19:18
pitch on the NSX is close to the Amir,
19:22
meaning available with a manual.
19:25
>> But I think it looks like a more modern
19:29
>> All-wheel drive, cuz that's an Acura
19:33
>> Honda's done it before. So, we need to
19:34
have hybrids with a manual. All-wheel
19:36
drive, hybrid, manual. It is kind of
19:40
what the second gen NSX was
19:42
>> with what the R8 is. Mhm.
19:44
>> And I think that as an NSX, especially
19:46
with a manual, could be compelling to
19:50
>> and that would again, it' probably be
19:52
$150 plus thousand car, but that's the
19:56
reality of where the NSX drops. But I
19:58
think they have to come a little bit
20:00
away from cutting edge technology. I
20:01
think they have to back off a little and
20:03
let some other brands be ahead of them
20:05
because I think that's what people want
20:07
from the NSX more than what they got for
20:09
the second gen. A little bit more old
20:12
school, a little bit more known
20:13
quantity. I guess. Yeah. But the wrong
20:15
term, but if it was, but seriously, if
20:16
they if they could crack all-wheel drive
20:20
>> but hybrid and manual,
20:22
>> nobody's really doing that.
20:24
>> That would be and and you know,
20:25
>> in a hyperarish. And the general
20:27
discussion is hybrids can't be manuals.
20:30
But I I point you back right back to the
20:32
Insight and the CRZ, both of which were
20:38
>> So, they've actually sold cars that way.
20:42
cuz I I'm with you 100% because I also
20:45
still see this as Honda doesn't have
20:47
necessarily a flagship and this was also
20:48
known as the Honda NSX and so for
20:51
>> technology showcase as uh we're we're
20:54
trying things we're not working out the
20:56
bugs obviously it's got to be sold with
20:59
>> they're trying to do the trickle down
21:02
effect to other cars whether it's an SUV
21:04
whether it's a truck whe whatever that
21:05
is and use this as sort of the tip of
21:07
the spear much like what I had heard
21:10
from Polestar that I had such high hopes
21:13
for Polestar. They've gone full EV and
21:16
>> I think they're actually really good and
21:18
and a an excellent Tesla competitor.
21:22
>> I just still saw them as a higherend
21:25
rather than more of a something for
21:26
everyone kind of brand because it was
21:29
described to me as tip of the spear for
21:31
technology. And the very very first
21:33
Polestar one was $150,000. And I I saw
21:36
it going in that direction and I
21:37
embraced that. That's where I see this
21:38
kind of fitting in as well. But I do
21:40
take your point. and it still has to
21:41
sell and enthusiasts want to buy them.
21:43
>> That's where the the the legacy is of
21:45
the brand for sure. Yeah.
21:46
>> All right. Moving on to Aston Martin
21:48
>> Oh, good for you.
21:49
>> Aston Martin is doing quite well.
21:52
>> I think they are offering excellent cars
21:54
for what the Aston brand should be.
21:56
>> But what I do like is the DB5 and that
21:59
does hearken back to the continuation
22:01
cars that they're currently building.
22:02
But I think this is a 63 model shown on
22:05
screen here. It's a beautiful shade of
22:07
blue that I haven't seen. Every time I
22:08
see a DB5, it's always silver. Bond
22:11
>> So, I like the DB5, but something maybe
22:14
uh not quite as on edge or as powerful
22:17
as the Vantage has become, but a little
22:18
bit more of a softer GT. Something that
22:21
is just, you know, an enjoyable, fun
22:24
>> Are you envisioning a down market from
22:26
>> Down market place. And I just use this
22:28
as simply for styling purposes. Just a
22:31
classic, beautiful Aston shape.
22:34
>> Kind of the vantage, you know, vantage
22:36
light or something like that. Bring back
22:38
the DB. Everything is vword these days,
22:41
but bring back the DB as a lower lower
22:44
market kind of thing, more accessible.
22:46
And you know, leave the Valkyries and
22:48
the Valhalla to the crazy.
22:52
>> Somebody has just a V, one of those V
22:54
encyclopedias on their desk at Aston and
22:56
just goes, "What word have we used?"
22:59
>> For Audi, moving on here. And this is
23:01
the 2010 Audi Quattro Concept showing on
23:04
screen. It's it's in white. And I got
23:06
really excited when we saw this at the
23:08
LA Auto Show back in 2010, if you can
23:10
believe it's been that long.
23:11
>> Wow. It is amazing.
23:12
>> It's the Audi Quattro. Just bring back
23:14
the Quattro and call it the Quattro and
23:16
that's it. And put all your mojo into
23:18
this. Doesn't have to be the TT. This
23:20
can be 50 60,000 somewhere in there.
23:24
Again, good technology showcase. It's
23:25
not the flagship, but it's just
23:27
something accessible. I was so excited.
23:29
I love the styling.
23:30
>> It doesn't quite look outdated yet, but
23:32
Audi has moved on from this visual
23:33
design language at this point. But I
23:35
thought this was superb. I had high
23:37
hopes. It even looked somewhat
23:39
production ready. And no, they never
23:41
built the Quattro. So, I would highly
23:44
choose Quattro for this one. Uh I I
23:47
still really love the the design
23:49
language. It's just it really suits the
23:50
name Quattro and what we associate it
23:54
>> Moving on to BMW for me. And I've got an
23:56
interesting idea for you.
23:58
>> Showing a Z8 on screen. Okay.
24:00
>> That's because I want more GT cars in
24:02
the market. This might be a personal
24:03
thing that might not sell too well, but
24:04
BMWs are known for building cars that
24:06
are built in small quantities.
24:07
>> Well, and then they make a hyper niche
24:09
of that. It'll be like they'll make a GT
24:11
car, then they make a GT car with a
24:12
one-seater cuz five people want to buy
24:14
them. I don't know what's up.
24:15
>> So, my idea for bringing the Z4 back
24:18
because I really like the Noya class
24:21
design language that we're starting to
24:23
see with all and that's going to go
24:26
across all EVs and gas powered cars from
24:28
BMW. If that were combined with the new
24:33
M5 hybrid V8 powertrain.
24:36
>> Interesting. Okay.
24:37
>> Now, I want to keep the Z8 small. The M5
24:41
is a large car and it's a big V8 with a
24:43
large battery and a lot of hybrid stuff
24:45
in it. And I'm not saying make it
24:46
all-wheel drive, make it rear wheel
24:47
drive. BMW might build a new Z8 that
24:50
doesn't have actually room for humans in
24:52
it. So, they might be able to pull it
24:53
off. It's a small car. We did it.
24:55
>> It's entirely remote. Yes. We you can't
24:58
drive it, but we did it.
25:00
>> Look at us. Yay.
25:02
>> That's my idea. If BMW could pull this
25:04
off with this amount of power in a new
25:06
Z8, small form factor, rear wheel drive
25:08
only, this 7 what 17 horsepower hybrid
25:11
V8 powertrain twin turboad in a new Z8.
25:14
I think that would be very highly sought
25:17
after in the market.
25:19
>> Moving on to Chevrolet. And I know this
25:20
is not a sports car. I'm showing the K5
25:23
Blazer on screen. This particular build
25:26
was done by Ring Brothers. It is called
25:29
>> And it is an incredible example. I mean,
25:31
they've gone overboard with this as Ring
25:35
>> But my idea for the Chevy K5 Blazer,
25:38
let's bring that back in in it all of
25:41
>> Ford's had a go.
25:43
>> Ram's been doing it for sure.
25:45
>> Everybody's been doing the boxy thing.
25:47
>> Scouts coming back.
25:49
>> I mean, come on.
25:50
>> The Blazer, it needs more respect behind
25:53
the name because just another SUV these
25:56
days. gas or EV, it just doesn't do the
25:59
>> just a you've thought this for a while
26:01
and I totally agree with you. Yeah,
26:02
>> Corvette has the ZR1X.
26:06
>> Mhm. Okay. All right. Yeah.
26:09
>> A new Boxy Blazer.
26:11
>> To take it to the Raptor R.
26:13
>> And the TRX. Anything.
26:15
>> And the Bronco R, too. Yeah.
26:16
>> Yeah. The Bronco R. All of that.
26:19
>> Okay. Maybe that's too far. Maybe that's
26:21
too much power. We could back it off to
26:22
some of their crate motors. So, how
26:24
about the LT4, which is the Camaro ZL1,
26:29
I believe, engine. The LT4 engine that
26:32
is also in the Cadillac Blackwing CT5V.
26:35
>> Let's do that's still 660 plus
26:38
>> It'd be enough to off-road with. Yeah,
26:40
>> you the car would move under its own
26:42
power with that engine. So, let's drop
26:44
the LT4 Cadillac Blackwing engine in
26:46
this. make an awesome boxy new cool
26:50
blazer that maybe just
26:52
>> you don't even have to call it the K5
26:54
Blazer cuz Kia will get upset and send
26:55
you a nasty letter because of the K5,
26:58
>> but they could just call it the Blazer
27:00
cuz they have that. They've just watered
27:02
it down and made it an SUV. Yeah,
27:04
>> this is, in my opinion, still an
27:05
enthusiast vehicle. It's just off-road
27:07
fun, but they've got incredible
27:10
powertrains, incredible engines, crate
27:11
motors. Pick a crate motor and drop it
27:13
in this thing. I don't care. What if it
27:15
had the ultimate? Then Chevy would be on
27:18
top. The ZR1X engine is in the Blazer.
27:23
>> Sure. Minds would melt. Even the Z06
27:27
flat plane in that thing would be
27:28
amazing. Can you imagine the sound of
27:29
that coming out of a Blazer? It' be like
27:31
when they did the uh LM2 for Lamborghini
27:34
where it's like, why does that sound
27:35
that way? And it's a truck.
27:36
>> that kind of thing. I get it. Love it.
27:38
>> This is my idea. My goals for Chevy. And
27:41
moving on to Dodge. You are all going to
27:43
laugh at me because I am showing the
27:46
1984 Dodge Daytona Turbo Z on screen,
27:51
>> but it's actually the Matchbox.
27:53
>> You're showing the Matchbox version.
27:54
>> The reason is is because the Matchbox
27:56
looked better than the actual car.
27:59
>> when the model looks better than the
28:00
real thing, you know you've got a
28:04
>> But this car left such an impression on
28:06
me because I got a ride from a family
28:08
friend who got his new Dodge Daytona
28:10
Turbo and I didn't know what turbos
28:12
>> Sure. And my mind was blown when the
28:14
turbos kicked in, even though it was
28:15
>> it still 110 horsepower, something
28:19
>> anemic and weak.
28:20
>> I'm not saying the Charger Daytona,
28:22
nothing. It's just Dodge Daytona. And by
28:26
doing this, they can lean on a smaller
28:28
form factor. They can use a smaller
28:30
engine. It's not the Charger Challenger
28:32
big bloated whatever they've become.
28:34
It's just the Dodge Daytona. An
28:35
enthusiast fun sports car. Even kind of
28:38
looks like a 928 a little bit, but
28:39
doesn't have to be GT car, but something
28:41
cool, fun, lightweight, turbocharged
28:44
from Dodge, and then they still have the
28:46
bloated Charger Challenger, whatever
28:48
they're going to do.
28:49
>> For them for sure. I like it.
28:50
>> So, this is this is the Matchbox version
28:53
>> Moving on to Ferrari. I am touching
28:56
>> on the 246 Dino. This car is simple and
29:01
>> Oh, yeah. And that would allow them to
29:03
drop a non-hybrid V6 with manual
29:09
>> and make it accessible to to
29:11
enthusiasts. This would still be a
29:13
200,000 plus Ferrari.
29:16
But this would be the full entry
29:17
levelvel lightweight small the tiny and
29:20
truly call it the dino. Yeah. What if
29:22
they could do it at a like 150 grand
29:25
>> That's interesting.
29:26
>> And you know at Ferrari that means the
29:28
minute you put anything on it be 200
29:30
grand. But 150 grand start would be
29:33
>> V6 turbo still have a lot of power,
29:36
manual transmission,
29:38
>> beautiful, clean, styling, lightweight,
29:40
interesting. That's how you make
29:44
>> I thought the 296 GTS and GTB were going
29:47
to be the Dino. Everybody talked about
29:49
the second coming of the Dino,
29:50
>> and it wasn't. Bring the actual Call it
29:55
>> It's a cool car.
29:57
>> All right. Moving on to Honda. Yes.
29:58
S2000. This is the 2008, I believe, CR
30:02
version that you're seeing on screen in
30:03
a lovely shade of yellow.
30:05
>> Yes, these are cool. Yes, Honda needs to
30:06
bring it back. It's got to be a sports
30:08
car. Honda is really good at doing this.
30:11
>> They're good at hybrids. They've got
30:13
some technology, but they're it's not
30:15
like they're Toyota and they're known
30:16
for Wow, we've really got our Prius
30:19
equivalent. I I suppose the CRZ,
30:22
>> you know, hyper mile cars. They've got
30:23
But the CRZ and the Insight were both I
30:25
have to hit it again. They were hybrids
30:27
with manuals. It's doable. It do. They
30:30
could do something like we talked about.
30:32
This is the next step up from Prelude. I
30:34
don't care what you call it anymore, but
30:35
something roadster rear wheel drive.
30:38
It's got to be this.
30:39
>> And the Hyundai Veloster N I've got on
30:41
screen. Even though that was recently
30:42
discontinued, I feel like this still had
30:44
legs in the marketplace. I feel like
30:46
people were just beginning to discover
30:47
it and Hyundai whacked it off at the
30:49
knees. Chopped it. Done. We're good. Add
30:52
the door. So, it's now four doors. So,
30:54
>> "It's only three.
30:56
>> I don't get it. Make it four. Make it so
30:59
people can accept it and relate to it.
31:02
>> And make it a little bit more waggy.
31:04
Just slightly. Not too much bigger, but
31:06
>> People are kind of wanting wagons. Many
31:08
people have written into the show.
31:09
They're wanting wagons. They want kind
31:12
>> some more wagon hatchish. Another option
31:15
>> I love hatchish cuz we do it a lot.
31:18
>> Something in there with you. Yeah.
31:19
>> The Veloster. It's a cool, fun, quirky
31:22
name. Whatever you do, quirky, I I don't
31:24
care. But continue on with the Veloster.
31:26
And moving quickly to Infiniti.
31:30
>> This is the project 9 here that I'm
31:32
showing on screen. It looks like an old
31:36
>> It looks like an open wheel indie car
31:38
from back in the 30s.
31:40
>> And I thought this was the most
31:42
compelling design that I've ever seen
31:44
from Infiniti because I don't want
31:46
actually anything from Infiniti to come
31:48
back except for this concept that they
31:49
explored. But if they did this car, that
31:52
would set Infiniti apart
31:54
>> as a boutique manufacturer. Also, maybe
31:56
a technology showcase for Nissan, that
31:58
would set the brand apart and make
32:00
people want to buy these that aren't the
32:03
supercar hybrid or just crazy hypercar
32:06
kind of stuff. The Bugattis and the Koix
32:08
eggs that exists, but this is
32:10
interesting. A single seat,
32:13
>> beautiful styling, open wheel car.
32:20
>> on a luxury high-end with lots of power
32:23
>> That sounds compelling.
32:25
>> Okay. All right.
32:26
>> And moving on to Jaguar.
32:29
>> The one that I actually really like is
32:32
And I'm showing a 2017 continuation car.
32:35
This is the SS, as you know, was the
32:38
Roadster version or the roadgoing
32:39
version of the type DT type race car.
32:42
>> And those are worth so much money.
32:44
>> So much. So, they've got a few of these,
32:45
handful of these continuation cars,
32:47
which I thought are superbly beautiful,
32:49
lightweight, fun, doesn't have to be too
32:51
expensive. Jaguar is kind of wanting to
32:53
be in more the luxury high-end level.
32:56
It's not what I'm saying here.
32:58
>> Whatever it is like they're doing over
32:59
there, Jaguar. Yeah.
33:00
>> Nobody's sure. Nobody can explain it.
33:02
>> We're all very confused.
33:03
>> So, XKSS needs to return lightweight
33:06
midenine. Beautiful. Something like
33:09
that. I mean, this is pretty much front
33:10
mid engine here, but yeah, something
33:12
really intriguing, compelling. I would
33:14
love to see the XKSS.
33:16
>> That would be very cool.
33:17
>> Jeep, you're doing great. Keep making
33:18
the Wrangler. We're good.
33:21
>> Everybody just thanks Wrangler. We're
33:23
moving on. That's very good.
33:24
>> Uh, you'll notice that I'm going
33:25
straight to Lamborghini because uh
33:27
Lincoln, there's nothing to see here.
33:28
>> There's nothing to see there, sadly.
33:30
>> So, Lamborghini, if you brought the
33:34
>> if Okay. All right. All right. showing.
33:36
Well, this is the SV here from 71 and
33:40
>> Pretty car. This would revolutionize
33:43
Lamborghini styling for the better, I
33:45
think, if they used this as visual
33:46
reference and then brought into the
33:49
>> maybe a few fewer creases of less
33:54
>> possibly. Yes. Uh-huh.
33:56
>> Would be interesting, compelling. If you
33:58
could figure out how to turn that V12
34:00
sideways like this, I would welcome
34:01
that. But it doesn't necessarily have to
34:02
be. But engine behind you, a V8 behind
34:05
you, bring the Mera name back.
34:08
>> I think that would do well for
34:09
Lamborghini and people line up
34:13
>> Lotus I touched on briefly because
34:15
there's many models that we could say
34:17
bring back. Lotus has been doing great
34:19
in my opinion for the lineup of cars
34:22
through history. The fun lightweight
34:24
>> they've had. Yeah, they've stumbled
34:25
along and made great cars in spite of
34:29
>> I mean, I hate to say it, but it's true.
34:31
>> You're right. That's the case now as
34:32
well, unfortunately.
34:33
>> The 340R from the year 2000, though
34:36
intrigues the daylights out of me.
34:38
>> Interesting. Okay.
34:39
>> No doors, F1 inspired rear wing. And the
34:42
wheels, they have little uh little tiny
34:44
fenders, little cycle fenders, but
34:46
they're exterior. They're they're not
34:48
part of the fender flares.
34:49
>> It's almost like the Lotus Aerial Atom.
34:51
>> It really is. This intrigued me. Why
34:54
can't we do more of these? Probably
34:56
>> safety or something.
34:58
>> Probably possibly. Yeah,
34:59
>> whatever. Moving on quickly to Maserati.
35:02
>> we covered Maserati. Look at you. I love
35:05
Maserati needs to bring back the Bora
35:08
that is shown on screen here or the
35:10
Moroc. They were very similar. They did
35:11
share some some components is my
35:13
understanding. But I love the form
35:17
>> It's like a hatchback supercar kind of
35:19
>> It really is. I think that could be
35:21
Maserati's sweet spot here.
35:23
>> So the Morocc something in there and use
35:27
that Nuno V6 again. Yeah, that that
35:30
engine's pretty cool.
35:31
>> We got the MC20. The styling, what this
35:34
could evoke could be really interesting.
35:35
Make it even smaller. You see a theme
35:37
smaller everything we need to do from
35:40
here on out. RX7 with a non-rot. We've
35:43
got a nice inline 6 from Mazda now.
35:46
>> Yes, we do. Yes, we do.
35:48
>> As cool as rotaries are, I think that
35:51
would prevent people from buying the car
35:52
>> in some cases. Yes.
35:54
>> But if it were the new inline 6
35:56
>> or a hybrid of some sort,
35:57
>> Yep. Make the RX7 again. That long hood.
36:00
Make it It's like a threequarter sized
36:03
>> Superb to drive.
36:05
>> And then finally, McLaren, you're good.
36:08
You're doing good. Maybe the F1, but
36:10
you're doing good. You've got so much
36:13
>> they're doing all right. Yeah. McLaren's
36:15
They'll be fine. What else do we not
36:16
worried about McLaren?
36:17
>> F1. I guess bring the F1 back, but I
36:19
maybe, but you don't need to because
36:21
>> they're doing okay. That's very funny. I
36:23
>> And then Mercedes. Very quickly, the
36:25
C1112 concept from the year 1970.
36:29
They've got gullwing doors in a midenine
36:31
car. I thought, could we explore this?
36:34
Maybe there's a business case. But if
36:36
there's not a small, fun, lightweight
36:38
roster from Mercedes, make cool fun
36:40
things for Mercedes.
36:41
>> Bring the SLK back. Yeah.
36:42
>> That's light because Mercedes-Benzes are
36:44
gotten really heavy.
36:45
>> Very heavy. Very heavy. Yes.
36:46
>> Finally, Mini R53.
36:49
>> This is a 2004 that I'm showing on
36:51
screen. I love the Mini.
36:52
>> Yeah. This is the size.
36:54
>> I care what it looks like, but this is
36:56
the size you need to make. They've
36:57
>> They've all just gotten big. The minis
37:02
>> R53 is the size. I love the styling on
37:06
>> I'm not saying make this forever, but
37:08
bring the size back. Make it.
37:10
>> I think at this point they are still
37:12
trading on that styling and the the all
37:15
of the goodwill that was created by it.
37:18
They're kind of on the back end of that.
37:20
I feel like anyway,
37:21
>> like where do we go from here?
37:22
>> Yes, I'm showing you. I'm
37:25
>> here's where we go. Yes.
37:26
>> And finally, Mitsubishi Evo 10. You've
37:29
got so much room to run with bringing
37:32
the Mitsubishi brand back. The
37:34
Outlanders and I I don't even know what
37:36
they are anymore. They're just nameless,
37:39
>> They look like anything and nothing.
37:41
>> The Eclipse has wound up back on on some
37:43
of their stuff with the Eclipse Cross.
37:45
Mitsubishi is lost in the wilderness. It
37:47
is so bizarre. Yeah, I hear you. Since
37:50
you're listening to us, you'll end up
37:51
shopping for your next car very soon.
37:53
And when you do, you need
37:56
Any car anywhere at any price,
37:58
AutoTempus searches all the major car
38:00
listing sites on the web, local or
38:02
nationwide. And AutoTempest has recently
38:04
added price history for every car listed
38:06
so you can see how prices are trending
38:08
and know if you found a good deal. You
38:10
can also create search alerts and lists
38:11
of saved searches so you can find your
38:13
perfect spec even easier next time.
38:15
Search on any device in your browser or
38:17
as an app for Apple iOS and Android.
38:20
New, used, or unexpected, AutoTempest is
38:23
how we search for cars. Go to
38:25
autotempest.com/ everyday so they know
38:28
>> Autotempest. All the cars. One search.
38:32
That was a great list. We might not get
38:34
through everything on our list on our
38:35
our whole intention here. We might not
38:37
do car conclusions again because this is
38:39
this is really cool. I like this. I've
38:41
covered some of the ones you covered,
38:42
but I'm what I'm pleased about is I
38:45
covered some brands differently than you
38:46
did and some other brands you covered I
38:47
didn't even cover. So, I'm excited
38:49
through this. So, here we go. Let's see.
38:50
I've got I'm going to start, of course,
38:52
same place you started. The Acura NSX.
38:55
>> Nobody's surprised, but yes. Okay. So, I
38:58
have the old one and the new one back to
39:00
back here on screen.
39:01
>> I like that you're showing them both.
39:03
>> They're gorgeous cars. They are gorgeous
39:04
cars. I still love the original so very
39:07
much. people needed the second one to be
39:09
the Amira and it isn't. But I really
39:12
feel like people are going to start
39:13
coming around on this second gen. I
39:15
>> it's it's headed that way.
39:17
>> The other thing that was funny about
39:18
making these lists is I started to think
39:20
up cars I wanted them to bring back and
39:22
I started to be like what would a modern
39:24
version of that be be? And so I would
39:26
look up the old versions of some of
39:27
these cars and the next one I'm coming
39:29
to Alfa Romeo is this way. I'd look up
39:30
the old version of a car and realize
39:32
that somebody's already an AI created
39:34
what I was thinking. I'm not saying it's
39:36
right, but in some cases these old
39:38
marks, somebody has thrown it at AI and
39:41
made a new variation. And I want to go
39:43
to the Alpha Romeo Spider, which should
39:47
>> Somebody has made an AI version of the
39:49
Alfa Romeo Spider essentially on the ND
39:53
>> And this is exactly what Alpha should
39:55
do. They should partner with Mazda. They
39:57
should have I mean I realize Fiat did it
39:59
with the 124. Yeah. But I'm thinking the
40:01
same kind of thing but it's now a Mazda
40:04
Miata and then above it because the
40:06
other thing is the Fiat 124 was kind of
40:08
stepping on the Mazda as far as price
40:10
was concerned and that kind of stuff.
40:11
This needs to be 5 to$10,000 above the
40:15
Miata. It needs to have Alfa Romeo
40:17
styling and it needs to have an Alfa
40:20
Romeo interior. But in its core it's the
40:24
next gen Mazda Miata. the Mazda MX5, the
40:28
next gen, whatever the NDE, the fifth
40:30
generation is going to be, there should
40:32
be an Alpha Spider version of that.
40:35
Since many people use the Miata RF or
40:38
MX5 RF or any MX5 as the GT car,
40:43
>> could this would this need to grow in
40:45
size maybe 10%, 20% to be slightly
40:47
larger, slightly more powerful, and
40:49
therefore a bit more luxurious in a
40:51
higher price point as well?
40:52
>> Here's the thing. instead of keeping it
40:54
>> The reality is it has to be something
40:56
they can build side by side on the same
40:59
uh assembly line. That's the problem.
41:00
Otherwise, it doesn't make sense from a
41:02
from a profit sharing, you know, effort
41:05
>> but but the reality is I as much as I
41:08
don't want the Mazda to get bigger, and
41:09
I really genuinely don't,
41:11
>> the passenger space in the current one
41:15
>> And I and I do mean passenger, not
41:16
driver. So, I kind of feel like there
41:18
has to be some new thinking on packaging
41:20
anyway, but it still needs to be
41:22
mid2,000 lb. It still needs to be small.
41:24
It can't be a big car.
41:26
>> So, but but the Alfa Romeo Spider is a
41:31
>> Let's get Alfa Romeo styling on a Miata.
41:35
>> If it gave a Boxster a run for its money
41:38
in the marketplace, that's interesting.
41:39
>> Yeah. And, you know, again, 10 grand.
41:42
It's a 10 grand delta between buying the
41:44
MX5 and buying the Spider.
41:46
and make it accordingly up market like
41:48
that. That's the other one I thought of.
41:50
Uh in in Audi world, I found a purpose
41:55
for the new EV Cayman. You remember when
41:59
Audi was making what became the Porsche
42:02
924 and then Audi scrapped the project
42:05
and became a Porsche? This is going the
42:08
>> Porsche doesn't know what to do
42:12
>> with their potential EV Cayman. Uh-huh.
42:15
>> This is your new Audi TT
42:18
EV. Try to keep it as close to 3,000 lb
42:21
as possible. All-wheel drive ED EV.
42:24
Change the styling to be more Audi. Make
42:25
it the brand new TT with a cool interior
42:29
>> because the TT name is storied.
42:31
>> People like it. It's a Cayman
42:33
alternative anyway. But anytime,
42:36
including on this podcast, when the TT
42:37
goes up against the Cayman, we pick
42:39
Cayman because it's more dynamic. Let
42:41
the TT be its own thing. This is where
42:44
your electric efforts for the came and
42:47
go. It's an Audi TT now. Although that
42:51
concept C that we just covered a couple
42:54
>> That I think is slated to be on top of
42:58
>> who knows? It's trying to be like
42:59
combination TT R8. We don't know. But
43:02
>> that strikes me as a larger vehicle.
43:03
>> I think so too. I think that the TT
43:06
needs to be smaller and more accessible.
43:07
And there's an opportunity here for Audi
43:09
to have that as a kind of standalone
43:12
outlier on their lineup and you build it
43:15
on the back of the Cayman EV and then
43:17
the Cayman can be other things.
43:21
>> That's that's on their leaving.
43:23
>> Moving on. I'm going to BMW and BMW
43:25
needs to bring back the one series. The
43:28
one Series. I'm actually showing the
43:30
twodoor hatchback we didn't get in the
43:32
US. And I'm not look the one series
43:34
right now in 2025 still exists, but it's
43:39
>> It's frontwheel drive architecture. I'm
43:41
talking about a generation plus back.
43:44
The one we didn't even get in the US in
43:45
the mid2010s. This is a 2015 I have that
43:48
I'm showing right now in a great blue.
43:50
This was a rearwheel drive two-door
43:53
hatchback. No one else on the planet's
43:58
And two-door hatchbacks are awesome.
43:59
Now, I don't know BMW can justify it
44:02
>> Seriously, I don't know what business
44:04
case regulations exist because I I feel
44:06
like we've watched over the last 15
44:08
years, pretty much every dedicated
44:11
twodoor hatchback has died.
44:13
>> I think the Mini might be the only one
44:16
>> Okay. So, it's not a common thing. But
44:18
what I'd really like BMW to do is BMW
44:21
are they are the king of parts cars.
44:23
>> Love it. Take a small four-cylinder.
44:26
Shoot for 3,000 lbs on this tops. Make
44:29
it rearwheel drive hatchback two-door,
44:32
maybe four-door, but hopefully twodoor
44:34
and available with a manual. This is
44:36
your new entrylevel car. BMW has the
44:39
history and the knowhow to do this at a
44:41
level nobody else can. Don't even need
44:44
to go above a four-cylinder. Just make
44:45
it the four-cylinder. It's going to have
44:47
roughly 300 horsepower anyway.
44:49
>> Throw it as a B48. Drop that out of the
44:50
Supra. Drop that in. Yes. So, this is
44:53
what BMW needs. They need a a bottom of
44:56
the market little hatchback that says
44:58
this is what BMW does. And the 1 Series
45:02
is waiting to be that. And it shouldn't
45:04
be another front-wheel drive almost SUV
45:06
variant of the Mini. It needs to be
45:08
rearwheel drive, manual driver's car.
45:11
Hopefully, two-door hatch. That's for
45:13
BMW. Moving on to Cadillac, who really
45:17
ought to bring back the XLR.
45:20
>> I think they do. When when Chevrolet
45:23
does the next Corvette, the C9.
45:27
>> Yes. When they do that,
45:28
>> Cadillac needs a variant of the C9 that
45:32
is aiming directly at the LC500 crowd.
45:37
>> Little bit of a price bump,
45:39
>> leaning toward luxury. You can't get a
45:41
track variant. It's not what we're doing
45:43
anymore. It's the Cadillac. It's the
45:45
XLR. It comes in convertible because
45:48
these did. It comes in convertible. It's
45:50
based on the C9 architecture. I'm I'm
45:53
leaning forward to the next Corvette.
45:54
Comes in the C9 architecture. It's
45:56
automatic only. Maybe it's even
45:58
all-wheel drive, but this is this is a
46:00
luxury variant of the Corvette, and it
46:02
is leaning fully toward being a luxury
46:04
variant. It is trying to be the Lexus
46:09
>> So, there there's no high perform. It'll
46:11
be plenty high performance because it's
46:13
going to be based on the the base C9,
46:15
which will be powerful and drive well
46:17
and have Magnaride,
46:18
>> of course. Yes. So, let the Corvette
46:21
lean into being hardcore. And also, I
46:23
think there's a possibility here of
46:25
possibly freeing up the architecture. If
46:27
you really want the golf bags, Cadillac.
46:30
>> If you don't need the golf bags,
46:33
>> I like that a lot.
46:34
>> But I think there's an opportunity here
46:36
for let's actually make under those two
46:39
brands that they have the car for the
46:40
people that want it.
46:42
>> That's okay. You're making a case
46:44
and make it really highend luxury. Very
46:47
>> Yes. Very classy car.
46:49
>> Absolutely. With a Cadillac badge on it.
46:51
The XLR was essentially the C6 Corvette.
46:56
>> Rebodied convertible, made under
46:58
Cadillac, very boxy styling. There's one
47:00
that actually drives around my
47:01
neighborhood every now and then. I see
47:02
it. I go, "Oh my gosh, there it is. Oh
47:03
my gosh, there it is."
47:04
>> I think the styling was the Achilles
47:06
>> Well, and I and I never fell in love
47:08
with it. It was their thing at the time.
47:10
>> Yes, it was their very when we had
47:11
aren't super boxy escalate. It's that
47:14
same era. Yeah, it's
47:15
>> that same era where everything was just
47:16
they only had rulers at at Cadillac. So
47:19
anyway, so the XLR would be very very
47:21
cool. I think that should come back.
47:23
Moving on to Chevrolet. Who needs to
47:26
bring back the Solstice? I know it was a
47:28
>> but the Solstice. And here's why. Take
47:32
that name. They already have that name.
47:33
That name means small sports car from
47:35
GM. It's a good name. It's a great name.
47:38
Sell it underneath Chevrolet. And here's
47:40
what you do. I'm showing a Solstice
47:42
Coupe on screen right now. But
47:45
>> I've never seen one of these in person.
47:46
>> I haven't either. I've only seen one at
47:48
like an auto show and they're very cool.
47:50
Part of me, this is like the weird The
47:52
only part of me that has any kind of
47:54
collector car interest wants a Solstice.
47:56
>> Coming soon to an auction near you.
47:58
>> Wants a Solstice Coupe. They're not
47:59
worth buying. But anyway,
48:01
>> here's the reason I I brought it up.
48:02
This was Bob Lutz and GM attempting to
48:06
make make a Miata competitor. And for
48:08
first blush, they got pretty close.
48:10
Yeah, they got pretty close. It's not
48:12
great, but it was surprisingly good.
48:14
They sold very few of the coups. The
48:16
coups were all target removable top.
48:19
>> The turbo version of this was like 250
48:22
horsepower and torque. Drove pretty
48:24
well. The base models drove pretty well.
48:26
Here's what I'm thinking. This is the
48:28
car you position below the Corvette.
48:32
For the people that still like the
48:33
Corvette, this needs to be 80% the size
48:39
>> Roughly the size of a G8 GR86. Roughly.
48:42
Maybe actually because it's GM, probably
48:44
a little bit bigger than the GRD6, but
48:46
>> Almost like supersized
48:48
>> somewhere in that in that area.
48:49
Superized it. Somewhere in that area.
48:51
Very funny. But it needs to have the
48:53
same target roof as you see on the
48:54
Solstice Coupe or the C7 Corvette. So
48:58
>> And it needs to have a a turbo
49:00
four-cylinder in it. It needs roughly
49:04
>> Come in at about $40,000. Call it a
49:06
solstice. Make it available with a
49:08
manual and an automatic. Doesn't even
49:10
need a DCT. like manual and automatic.
49:12
You're competing with the GR86, maybe
49:15
just below the Super, right in that
49:16
area. Like $40,000 is the target here.
49:19
This is an 80% scale C7. Take the C7
49:23
design and thinking, bring it forward in
49:25
in in design, make it 80% scale, four
49:29
cylinder, $40,000. Call it the Solstice.
49:32
Hello GM, come on Chevy. Because that's
49:36
the car below the Corvette. What do you
49:39
>> Nothing. The Camaro's gone and was
49:41
getting too big and was always a two
49:42
plus2 muscle car. Anyway, there's a
49:44
sports car opportunity here from
49:45
Chevrolet. It's a parts bin idea. You
49:48
use they've got 2.5s and 2.7 turbos that
49:50
are running 300 horsepower that they put
49:53
>> Well, what I like the most about this is
49:55
because this would have to be its own
49:57
platform. And the cars that we love to
49:59
drive the most are their own platform.
50:03
And I don't know how you advertise that
50:04
and make it make sense, but I think
50:05
there's an opportunity below the
50:07
Corvette at GM and I'm thinking the
50:11
Camaro is so connected to muscle cars,
50:13
even though it'll probably be re
50:15
resurrected as an SUV, but it's so
50:16
connected to muscle cars. The Solstice
50:18
is a small lightweight, fun car, sports
50:22
car. Solstice for Chevrolet, for GM,
50:26
>> Ford. Ford. Oh, Ford folks at Ford, the
50:31
Fiesta ST was brilliant. It was
50:32
brilliant. It was great. The Fiesta,
50:35
here's the thing. The Fiesta was based
50:37
on was even okay. Wasn't great, but it
50:40
was okay. It had a weird transmission in
50:42
the automatic. That's a separate thing.
50:44
>> We didn't get the second gen Fiesta ST.
50:46
And everyone I know that I trust as a
50:48
journalist in Europe that drove it said
50:49
it was better than the one we got. And
50:51
the one we got was brilliant.
50:53
>> Okay. Ford, like GM, they don't sell
50:56
cars anymore. They certainly don't sell
50:57
entry-level cars. And the problem with
51:00
the Fiesta when it was out prior, the
51:02
one we got here, is that the interior
51:06
But I'm thinking about the current, I
51:08
know this is weird, but I'm thinking
51:09
about the current Nissan Sentra, which
51:11
we drove recently. That car was
51:13
surprisingly inexpensive and didn't feel
51:16
cheap inside. My theory here is that you
51:19
can actually at the low $20,000 thing,
51:22
if you do it right, you can do a low
51:24
$20,000 entry-le car that no longer
51:26
feels cheap. It feels inexpensive. You
51:30
know, you didn't get luxury, but it
51:31
doesn't feel like army man plastic
51:33
cheap, which was the problem with the
51:34
Fiesta ST. It was just just army man
51:36
plastic everywhere and like the worst
51:38
quality piano black over the stereo, but
51:43
>> So, what's the version of the Fiesta
51:44
that Ford could come out with that's
51:46
just in the low 20,000s, like the bottom
51:48
of the car market, and then the Fiesta
51:50
ST is just under 30.
51:56
>> Yes. They have proven they know how to
51:57
do it and to kill it. I cannot believe
52:00
the Fiesta ST no longer exists. Ford
52:02
Fiesta ST is the play. It needs to come
52:05
back. I Here's the thing. I don't want
52:06
to focus. I don't want to focus RS. I
52:08
don't care about other variants of the
52:09
Mustang. Let's make the good variants of
52:11
the Mustang and below that Fiesta ST and
52:13
>> I mean, I think the Mustang needs to be
52:15
completely rethought from here on out
52:16
for the rest of time.
52:18
>> That's a whole topic Tuesday of its own.
52:19
>> GTD. Cool. Want to drive it?
52:22
>> Whole topic Tuesday of its own. Yes, I
52:23
hear you. I love this idea. Moving on.
52:26
Honda S2000. You mentioned it already
52:29
there. What is the new S2000? Just
52:30
Honda. What is it? Is it the S3000? The
52:32
S2200? I don't care what you call.
52:34
>> Clearly, they're working on something.
52:35
>> You would like to think so, wouldn't
52:37
you? I mean, what what here? Here here's
52:39
the other thing I think is happening.
52:40
The the blowback on the Prelude, the
52:42
discussions that happen around the uh
52:44
current Civic Type R, which is
52:46
brilliant, the current uh Civic SI,
52:48
which is very good. I feel like all the
52:50
enthusiasts are are hoping and buying
52:54
around the the S2000, hoping at some
52:57
point there'll be an S2000 they can
53:00
>> We're all hoping for this for Honda. So
53:02
>> I know there's a lot of enthusiasts that
53:03
work for Honda a ton.
53:05
>> Pretty much everybody who works there is
53:06
an enthusiast who probably wants 2000.
53:09
Here's the thing. This could be and I'm
53:10
I'm going to hit it again because
53:11
Honda's done it before. This could be
53:13
G86 sized whether it's convertible or
53:15
not. G86 size. You could make it 2
53:17
plus2. This could be hybrid manual
53:21
>> I think Honda could do a hybrid manual
53:26
>> and it would work.
53:27
>> The thing they can't do is offer it
53:29
without a manual cuz this is one of the
53:30
cars that is the most iconic cars for
53:32
having a manual transmission. But I
53:33
think they could totally get away with
53:35
hybrid tech manual transmission S3000.
53:38
It's a little bit heavier. It's low
53:41
3,000 pounds. It's the size of a GR86.
53:44
And I think that would be lauded and
53:46
people would snatch them up. And here's
53:49
the thing, the S2000 introduced the
53:51
start button to the basses. Can we
53:52
introduce a key again with the new one?
53:54
Just straight back to a key in the
53:56
ignition. Anyway, sorry, I'm dreaming
53:59
>> Yeah, the Honda now has a key. Moving
54:03
>> Follow me. The Hyundai Tibberon. Huh. It
54:08
was a front-wheel drive, questionable
54:10
styling two generation first blush at a
54:13
sports car from Hyundai. But hear me
54:16
>> Okay, this is where Hyundai does a GR86
54:22
>> A rearwheel drive cuz the only one they
54:24
had was the Genesis Coupe, which is the
54:26
worst name ever. It's just brand name
54:29
>> They had a phase.
54:31
>> They had a phase. They went through a
54:32
phase. They were trying to get Genesis
54:33
off the ground. But Tibberon, you
54:35
remember the commercials? Tibberon. The
54:38
>> Okay. It was kind of a goofy commercial.
54:40
They actually now mention it. They
54:41
actually dragged the shell of a first
54:44
generation Tibberon behind a boat and
54:45
had it come up jaws style behind the
54:47
boat. And it was Tibberon. The name
54:51
but terrible. Okay,
54:53
>> people. We've got some money to spend.
54:54
>> But the point I'm making here is that's
54:56
a cool name. It's a cool idea for a name
54:59
for a car. For a sports car, it's named
55:01
Shark. That's cool.
55:03
Let's make a rear wheel. They have rear
55:05
wheel drive experience doing the Genesis
55:08
>> Okay. Let's do a rearwheel drive G86
55:10
competitor from Hyundai and call it the
55:14
>> And absolutely like like the mood board
55:17
is just GR86's just that's your target.
55:20
Doesn't need to be convertible. It's a
55:22
small 2 plus two. They've got their 2.5
55:26
L engine with 300 horsepower.
55:28
>> Yes. That's in the engine 70. You're
55:32
>> It's all the same related platform
55:34
stuff. We're all talking about the same
55:36
>> powerful engine.
55:37
>> My point is Hyundai Genesis are related
55:40
already anyway. Let's make the Hyundai
55:42
Tibberon. And then what you can do now
55:44
that I'm here, I jump back in the
55:45
alphabet to Genesis. You make a more
55:47
luxurious version and you call it the
55:50
>> and you start here at 30 30,000 to
55:54
40,000 and you make the Tibberon over at
55:56
Hyundai. And then you make the slightly
55:58
more luxurious version, the lexified
56:00
version for Genesis and you call it the
56:01
G50. It's a two plus two, not a
56:03
four-door uh four seat.
56:05
>> Well, see, the SUVs are GV, the sedans
56:07
are G. So, maybe the GC for the coupe or
56:10
>> No, but but it could just be the whole
56:12
>> Well, maybe, but it could just be the
56:14
G70 cuz that suggests car versus truck.
56:16
>> So, the G50 would be below the G70.
56:20
>> We're back to No, no, no, no, no coups.
56:23
No coops. Anyway, this is where I'm
56:25
going. My strange Hyundai thinking as I
56:31
Infiniti. Where is your G37?
56:34
I know after the G37 it became the Q
56:37
whatever. No, nobody cares. Nobody
56:39
remembers the Q lineup of Infiniti.
56:42
Don't shut the design studios. Make the
56:43
Infiniti version of the new Z. The the
56:45
the the reality is this helped justify
56:51
>> From a parts perspective, from
56:52
amortization of the budget, this helped
56:54
justify it. And it was the luxury alt.
56:57
And in some cases, some years, I got to
56:59
be honest, I I vacasillated. Some years
57:00
I was like, the G uh the 350Z is really
57:04
cool. Other years, I was like, you know
57:05
what? I'd rather have a a G37 or a G35.
57:09
>> Use what you've built on the base Nissan
57:11
Z, which means you can have 400
57:14
horsepower, that great engine, manual
57:16
transmission or automatic, but now a 2
57:19
plus2 Infiniti styled body. And go back,
57:22
go backwards and call it the G35 or G37.
57:25
This is what people know it to be.
57:27
Called it the G40 since it's now four a
57:29
different engine with 400 horsepower.
57:31
>> That's Genesis G50.
57:33
>> Now G50. I'm I'm I'm cutting cutting it
57:35
tight here. But my point is Infiniti.
57:37
People know your good sedans and coupe
57:40
as being the G something. Yeah. So we go
57:42
backwards. New G37 based on the current
57:45
uh Nissan Z. This should come back.
57:48
>> And they have I think they have the
57:50
brand equity. I think people would
57:52
>> rearwheel drive, good-looking luxury
57:57
>> there. That nobody makes that in the
57:59
mid- $50,000 range. It just doesn't
58:00
exist anymore. There was the uh this and
58:03
the the Lexus RC and they both just
58:06
vanished. Okay, so Infiniti G37 exists.
58:10
>> I'm going to go someplace crazy for
58:12
Lexus. I'm showing a G86 on screen.
58:16
>> Follow me for a second. I'm showing the
58:17
G86, but I'm going to go two places at
58:19
once because after Lexus comes Lotus, so
58:25
>> For the next gen GR86,
58:28
we have the current gen.
58:30
>> Theoretically, based on what we
58:31
understand, there will probably be a
58:33
nextG. We don't know when. We don't know
58:35
>> I'm ready to drive it already.
58:37
>> But Toyota has we we believe there'll be
58:41
>> The G86 has been well refined in this
58:43
second gen. under 30,000 horsepower
58:46
rearwheel drive chassis.
58:48
>> Here's what you do with the nextG
58:51
>> Maybe if it gets bigger, it gets tiny
58:54
bit bigger, like fractionally bigger
58:56
because it still has to be under 3,000
58:58
>> You make the 2 plus2 GR86 nextG,
59:02
>> but you build the chassis in such a way
59:04
that you can make a four-door version
59:07
that is now sold as the base Lexus. And
59:10
your target for the Lexus is essentially
59:13
making a modern version of the BMW E36
59:16
because it's going to be roughly that
59:17
size. Roughly 2900 to 3,000 lbs. Small
59:21
rearwheel drive biased four-door. It's a
59:24
four-door. You make Lexus styling on it.
59:26
It's based on the same chassis as the
59:28
new GR86. It's a four-door.
59:32
>> But here's what you do.
59:34
You have that four-door means a small
59:37
back seats, but it still now is the car
59:39
that people ask us about almost every
59:41
podcast. Essentially, they say, "I'd
59:44
like a G86, but I'd like four seats and
59:46
>> or sometimes a four-door Miata." What is
59:48
a four-door Miata? Could it
59:50
>> doesn't exist? There's nothing on the
59:52
>> A G86 chassis. If thought about from the
59:55
beginning, you have the Lexus four-door
59:56
version and you have the G86. Now, it
00:00
relates because you help this get made
00:04
by getting handling help and chassis
00:07
help from Lotus, who now sells
00:11
a four-door version with Lotus badging
00:14
and Lotus tweak styling over at Lotus.
00:17
And they have a new four-door rearwheel
00:20
drive Lotus product as well. Because the
00:24
Lotus customer, you can sell one that is
00:28
tuned closer to the handling first
00:31
aesthetic of the G86, but is four-door.
00:33
>> At Lotus, it's going to be $20,000 more
00:36
than the G86, so it won't bother that
00:37
market. But the Lexus one is the softer
00:41
>> So, the softer suspension buyers go to
00:44
>> The people that want reliability, was
00:46
built with Lexus, but also want more
00:49
focused handling, go buy the Lotus
00:51
product. And those might step on each
00:53
other, but it's a different buyer. So,
00:54
I've taken the GR86 and I've made a
00:56
four-door Lexus product and a four-door
00:58
Lotus product, all from one car from the
01:01
>> I love product planning for cars. I love
01:03
>> We're We're insane, but we're having
01:04
fun. So, there's what I did with the GD6
01:06
for two brands at once. Moving on.
01:08
Mazda, just make the Ionic already.
01:11
>> Just make the Ionic and put the straight
01:14
six in it and call it a product. It
01:17
needs to be above the MX5. Basically,
01:19
Mazda just needs a product above the MX5
01:21
with the straight six in it with a long
01:23
nose and a great gorgeous styling. Mazda
01:24
knows how to do styling. Well, this
01:27
Ionic is fantastic. We get away from the
01:29
RX, which you already mentioned. We get
01:31
away from that. It doesn't need to be a
01:33
>> Why did Mazda make a straight six
01:35
engine? I have to hit on this one last
01:37
time. Toyota, when they decided to bring
01:39
back the Supra, Toyota is one of the
01:41
largest car makers on the planet. Yeah.
01:44
And Toyota came to the conclusion with a
01:46
lot of accounting, I'm sure, we cannot
01:48
afford to make a straight six engine.
01:51
Mazda, one of the smallest car makers on
01:53
the planet, some day after a bad lunch,
01:56
decided, you know what we should do?
01:57
Straight six engine. And they made a
01:59
straight six engine for their SUV. Who
02:01
knows? Yes. But my point is, what is
02:03
Mazda doing that Toyota hasn't figured
02:04
out? They have that great straight six
02:06
engine. It's it's dying to be in a
02:09
rearwheel drive biased vehicle. make
02:11
this fantastic looking car above the
02:15
MX5. The MX5 maxes out at roughly 40 45.
02:18
This starts at 40 and goes to 60.
02:22
>> Well, luxurious. I mean, you and I are
02:23
in alignment. This is what I envision
02:25
>> Exactly what needs to happen with it's
02:28
>> It's It's going to be a little bit
02:30
bigger than a GR86. It's going to have
02:32
that long straight six in the front. I
02:34
This is where Mazda needs to
02:35
>> figure out a way to buy one.
02:38
>> I am all about this. I totally agree.
02:41
to our friends at mini.
02:44
They need to remember
02:45
>> what is that thing?
02:46
>> That is a uh that is an AI creation
02:51
>> Mini needs to remember that their name
02:53
is small. They make small cars.
02:57
>> As they continue to blend with BMW, the
02:59
cars are getting worse. Okay. They're
03:02
just getting worse. Mini needs to make a
03:04
twodoor smaller than they're making so
03:07
far. Now they are holding the line with
03:09
the Cooper as a twodoor.
03:12
>> But they need to actually move back to a
03:15
small car. This needs to be on the same
03:18
chassis as the new Ford Fiesta. This is
03:21
how you make them both justified. And
03:23
again, the Fiesta is the low model
03:25
price-wise and the Mini is the higher
03:27
model. The Fiesta goes from the 20s to
03:30
the 30s. The Mini goes from the mid-30s
03:35
That's a way both brands can bring back
03:37
a brand new smaller chassis that's
03:39
front-wheel drive, two-door hatch. It's
03:41
the Fiesta on the low end. It's the Mini
03:44
on the high end. Combine their thinking.
03:47
Small car. Genuinely small. I'm talking
03:50
like 2700 lb is the tops.
03:53
>> It's in the name.
03:54
>> It's in the name. There should be no
03:57
large car called mini
04:00
there. No, it shouldn't happen. It
04:01
should be It should be outlawed somehow.
04:03
>> Mini XL. No, no, stop it. If you've seen
04:05
a new Countryman, they're just they're
04:07
just an SUV now. It's just that's an
04:09
SUV. I don't care what the brand says
04:12
brand and they forgot what the name
04:13
>> So, get with Ford. New Fiesta ST for
04:17
Ford, new Mini Cooper for Mini that is
04:19
genuinely small, frontwheel drive, and
04:21
fun. That's where I'm going for Mini.
04:24
And my last one, of course, we reached
04:25
Mitsubishi. We got to bring the Lancer
04:28
>> The Lancer needs to come out again. And
04:30
I'm going to say the same kind of things
04:31
that were going on over in Centralland
04:33
where you can make a mid20s car now that
04:35
doesn't feel really low rent and then
04:38
you make a an actual Evo. Now this needs
04:42
to be for the for the Evolution the
04:45
Evolution 11. I guess it needs to be
04:47
all-wheel drive hybrid DCT because as
04:50
much as I love the Evo and I do it's one
04:52
of my all-time favorites. The reason you
04:54
drive an Evo is not because it's manual.
04:57
you drive an Evo because you cannot
04:59
believe the tiny little package and how
05:01
well it handles and scrabbles through
05:02
everything and it's just it's fun going
05:05
>> So, that has to do with the way the
05:07
all-wheel drive works. It has to do with
05:09
how the steering works. It has to do
05:10
with the the wheelbase.
05:12
Anytime I drove an Evo with the
05:15
five-speed manual, I like a manual, but
05:18
there was nothing about that manual I
05:19
was like, "Thank God this has a manual."
05:21
Anytime I drove the DCT, I was like,
05:23
"This is every bit as fun." And in fact,
05:25
I sometimes argued that the DCT was more
05:27
fun because it had a sixth gear, which
05:29
meant it quieted down on the highway.
05:31
You weren't running like 4500 RPM.
05:34
>> So, the the the brilliance of the Evo is
05:37
not the manual. It's everything it does
05:39
in the running gear. So, let's make an
05:42
all-wheel drive hybridized
05:45
>> new Lancer Evo. And that brings people
05:48
back to that brand. And I'm done. I'm
05:50
out. Screenwriters are turning to old
05:53
scripts again and they rename the movie
05:55
the same thing with the new date after
05:58
>> If you really want the thing,
06:00
>> if you really want to freak yourself
06:01
out, look up the recent movie that
06:02
Bradley Cooper did called A Star Is Born
06:04
and figure out they've done it about
06:07
>> They just keep redoing it's the same
06:08
premise. We're just going to do it again
06:09
because this generation hasn't seen it.
06:11
>> This version, the Thomas Crown Affair,
06:14
>> 1960s and early 2000s. Yes. Steve
06:17
McQueen. Very good. Very good. Yes.
06:18
Pierce Broen in the, you know, they just
06:20
put the new date after. It's the same.
06:23
>> We just remade it to make more money.
06:26
>> But this is justified. Absolutely. But
06:29
we have a pact to make as enthusiasts.
06:34
>> we have to buy them.
06:36
>> We have to spend the money.
06:37
>> If they were to do any of these, we have
06:39
to buy them. We have to stop buying
06:41
silver egg 5seat SUVs.
06:43
>> We're going to keep buying those, but we
06:44
have to buy the sports car in addition
06:45
here. Here's the thing. Next time we'll
06:47
do N through the end of the alphabet.
06:48
We'll do a bunch more. So, this will
06:50
probably go over time then as well. But,
06:51
we're having fun with it. We're just
06:53
we're dreaming here, but we're trying to
06:55
dream and product plan, which is one of
06:57
the things that we simultaneously are
06:58
great at and terrible at. So, we love
07:00
doing it. We'll keep doing it. That's
07:04
Grio's Garage is our official car care
07:06
partner and one of our very first
07:08
sponsors for the show. They don't just
07:10
make great car care products, they want
07:11
you to get out and drive your car. Go is
07:14
a family-owned company, and they've been
07:16
a part of every one of our road trips.
07:18
We always take Speed Shine on every
07:20
shoot, helping us spot clean cars at a
07:22
moment's notice. Their foaming glass
07:24
cleaner is the quickest and best way
07:26
we've ever found to get windows clean
07:27
before a big day of driving. And they're
07:29
always releasing new and improved
07:31
products, like their updated Wash
07:32
Bucket, too. Plus, all of Grio's liquid
07:35
products are 100% guaranteed and made
07:37
right here in the USA. The Grio's people
07:39
are always happy to answer any questions
07:42
to make sure you get the right product
07:44
and the right results. So, get the best
07:46
quality car care products out there from
07:47
a company that has always supported this
07:49
show. Our audience can always get at
07:52
least 10% off by using the code driver10
07:57
Hooked on driving updates for late
07:59
September, early October 2025. Reminder
08:02
for Friday, September 26th at Soma
08:04
Raceway. We've got Motor Motorsport Park
08:07
Hastings, Nebraska coming up Friday,
08:09
September 26th through Sunday, September
08:12
28th. Then moving on to Ridge
08:13
Motorsports Park Friday, September 26th,
08:15
Saturday, September 27th. Wherever you
08:17
are in the country,
08:19
>> you can get to one of these tracks
08:22
>> This coming weekend, welcome. This
08:24
coming Friday and weekend, that's those
08:26
three tracks are all running. It's
08:27
great. Moving into some early dates for
08:29
October, so you got them on your radar
08:31
so you can put them on your calendar.
08:33
Portland International Raceway is
08:34
Saturday, October 4. The Northeast
08:39
event at Watkins Glenn is coming up
08:42
Friday, October 10th through Sunday,
08:44
October 12th. This is going to be a
08:46
fantastic event. We were there last year
08:48
for this event and we're going again. We
08:51
are planning on being there. So, if you
08:52
are coming, come out and see us.
08:54
>> Yeah, come say hi. It'd be really cool.
08:55
It's going to be a huge event. it. Look,
08:57
it's not just a track day. They're doing
08:59
drifting. They've got a band coming. I
09:02
mean, they're making it very family
09:04
familyfriendly and broader than just a
09:05
track day. Watkins Glenn is involved in
09:07
it. I think they're doing a car show as
09:08
well, if memory serves big event. We're
09:10
excited to be there. That is a huge
09:11
blowout for the fall event for our
09:13
Northeast franchise of Hooked on
09:14
Driving. You have to be there. October
09:16
10th through 12th. Here's the thing.
09:18
>> If you're considering running Watkins
09:21
>> this is your event.
09:22
>> This event. Come on out. We'll introduce
09:23
you to Santi and Cody. They run the the
09:24
Northeast region. They're doing an
09:26
incredible job and they've got even more
09:28
plans for 2026. But come out and meet
09:30
these guys. See what's going on at
09:32
Hooked OnDriving event. Get your car in
09:33
track. Hooked ondriving.com for a track
09:37
>> So here on the car debate, we cover
09:39
everything we can think of as far as
09:41
kinds of cars, kinds of budgets and
09:43
situations. And Sal's writing in with
09:46
one that doesn't happen often, but is
09:47
super fun. And that is the fourth car.
09:49
Doesn't need a commute car. Doesn't need
09:51
it to really do much but be the fourth
09:54
car. Who says that? I need a fourth car.
09:56
>> Sal S Sal does. Apparently. He has a
09:59
2024 Honda Civic Type R. So, the current
10:02
Type R that we all love.
10:04
>> So, he can do track day. He can do
10:06
dropping off his two oldest girls. I
10:08
mean, this car does everything. He loves
10:10
it. One of his favorite cars ever. He
10:12
says it's the greatest driver's car he's
10:14
owned in his history. And it can do so
10:15
many things. And it's fun at the limit.
10:17
Back roads, track days. He loves the
10:20
thing. He's getting winter tires for it.
10:22
Bravo, man. to run it in Minnesota
10:24
winters. So, I am so excited for you
10:26
that you have this car. But they do have
10:28
an SUV because of course they do. The
10:30
2022 Toyota Highlander Platinum. They
10:33
have that as well. That is one of their
10:36
cars. But wait, where does the third car
10:38
come from? That is his wife. I I cannot
10:41
believe the sentence I read here. That
10:43
is his wife's 2020 Porsche 718 Cayman S
10:49
with PDK and all of the options. Nice.
10:54
>> I can only I'm envisioning this. The
10:56
writer in me is envisioning this. This
10:58
was her hear me now. her push present
11:01
for their third child.
11:04
Are you really telling me, S, you and
11:06
your wife, who is now listening, are you
11:08
really telling me she's uncomfortable in
11:11
a hospital gown with a bunch of people
11:12
standing around her, probably hates you
11:14
in this moment, in a lot of pain, trying
11:16
to give birth to your third child, and
11:18
you said to her, "I'll get you a push
11:20
present of a Porsche." in that moment
11:22
when did that happen then? Because I'm
11:24
not sure that's the right time to do
11:29
>> They got kid number three.
11:30
>> They had kid number three and Porsche
11:34
the Cayman. Oh my gosh. Fantastic. Well
11:36
done. Well, he says he's got two amazing
11:39
cars and this has spoiled him in ways as
11:41
you may imagine with modern sports cars.
11:43
But he says this has got him feeling a
11:45
sense of lacking in terms of feel. M
11:47
>> he wouldn't say sterile but both cars he
11:50
writes hide certain feelings from you in
11:52
different ways in from a driving
11:54
>> I actually agree with that you've bought
11:56
fant look at think about it the Civic
11:58
Type R and the current 718 Cayman are
12:02
>> but if you compare them to analog cars
12:04
of just the 80s let's just go there 80s
12:05
early 90s there is some stuff lost some
12:08
stuff that you're not getting even
12:09
though both of those cars are brilliant
12:11
>> well S also writes that he's driven many
12:13
top- end Porsche cars so he's sure
12:15
that's ruined him as well like a 992
12:19
>> and a 981 GT4. The current plan is to
12:22
keep all of the current lineup because
12:24
they work and they're in love with all
12:28
>> Now, Salah's history includes his first
12:29
car being a 2013 Subaru BRZ, his first
12:32
cool car out of college. He only drove
12:33
on cool road cool curvy roads and taught
12:36
him what a driver's car should feel
12:37
like. He moved to a bigger city, got a
12:39
2012 Honda Civic SI, which made him fall
12:41
in love with Honda and naturally
12:43
aspirated engines with a K24. After CO,
12:46
he had too much time on our hands. So,
12:47
he sold the Civic SI, bought a 2011 WRX.
12:50
This was his co project. Yes.
12:51
>> And spent a bunch of money. We'll just
12:55
>> Modifications, big turbo, all the stuff.
12:58
>> But what this all brings him to, they
13:00
love their car lineup, the the three car
13:04
>> They need a fourth car. They're looking
13:05
for the fourth car that that S can leave
13:08
in the driveway that he doesn't have to
13:10
worry about or care about or be precious
13:12
with during the summers that has more
13:14
the raw feeling that he's missing.
13:16
>> The concept here is he's actually
13:18
looking for a car to play with. The
13:20
concept here is buy it,
13:22
>> have it for the whole summer, park it in
13:24
the driveway, take it to anywhere and
13:26
park it and not worry about it, and then
13:28
maybe even sell it at the end of the
13:30
summer. This is a play car to try to do
13:33
the thing that other cars can't do,
13:35
which is be brilliant, be modern, be
13:37
well cared for. Now, not that he wants
13:39
to trash this car, but the concept is
13:41
where's that raw feeling I don't have?
13:44
And he's aware enough that he's going to
13:46
spend a little bit of money on it,
13:47
hopefully get rid of it down the line
13:49
because it's just an experiential play.
13:51
It's not a fourth long-term car. It's a
13:54
car that does what I don't have. Very
13:56
interesting. He has things listed right
13:58
here. He's got a 987 Porsche Boxster
14:00
base manual. He said he wonders if this
14:03
might actually step on the toes of his
14:04
wife's Cayman and be too similar, but he
14:06
knows that's the more analog version.
14:08
What about old BMWs? E36 coupe, E46
14:12
convertible. He's always kind of loved
14:14
these in in the MC car form. So maybe
14:17
that's the right answer, but he's
14:18
worried about maintenance and
14:19
modification history on the one he'd buy
14:21
or the one he'd try to keep. That's
14:23
concerning. Or he goes old school with
14:25
his Honda love and goes Acura Integra
14:28
GSR. He says it's a throwback, but he
14:31
has that Acura Honda love. What about
14:34
some old school naturally aspirated
14:36
VTEC? What about that in the driveway?
14:39
What are our suggestions for
14:41
essentially? This is how I titled it.
14:42
His raw summer only car. S I have an
14:46
>> Okay, good. This is your cheap summer
14:49
>> Yep. Your your summer vacation cottage
14:53
>> There you I like it.
14:54
>> You don't have to worry if bird crap
14:55
gets on it. You don't have to worry
14:56
about even washing it the entire time. I
14:58
can't believe I just said that.
14:59
>> Please don't do that. That Paul would
15:00
not justify that at all.
15:01
>> I would not justify that. But if you own
15:03
>> get charged extra for that.
15:06
>> If you own this Z3 cheap to run, they
15:10
just run well under your $20,000 budget.
15:13
>> Yeah, true. Easy true.
15:15
>> Easy money for this. Go get yourself a
15:19
>> Sorry, I said Z3. I meant to say Z4,
15:23
>> you identified these on a couple podcast
15:24
episodes ago. These Z4s were slept on
15:27
and they're all under 20 grand and
15:29
they're goodlooking, fun to drive.
15:32
Interesting, fun, great sports cars.
15:35
>> I think you should go get a Z3 or a Z4.
15:38
What are you looking for? Z3 is a little
15:40
bit smaller. Think out of size, but fun,
15:42
chuckable, great. Z4 is a little bit
15:44
more luxurious. You can park them on the
15:45
street. You can leave the keys in them
15:51
>> don't just park it on the street. Leave
15:52
the keys in it and see if anybody wants
15:54
it because they probably won't. That's
15:55
really funny. Yeah,
15:56
>> of course. GT86 is on my list as is
16:01
Maybe be pushing on your budget a little
16:03
bit for a GR86, but absolutely worth it.
16:06
I think you should definitely consider
16:08
>> And my outlier since it's so completely
16:11
>> the Abart version of the Fiat 124
16:13
Spider. Okay. So, the the Italian Miata,
16:17
>> because I think these are cheaper.
16:19
>> Nobody Nobody really wanted these.
16:21
>> Nobody thinks about them. Yeah. Yeah.
16:22
>> Go get one of these. It's actually a
16:24
different engine, turboed. Great fun to
16:26
drive. Miata, but different styling. And
16:29
like I said, I bet you could pick one of
16:31
these up a little bit cheaper because
16:32
everybody seems to want the Miata, the
16:35
>> Go get yourself one of these. It's cool.
16:37
Interesting styling. It's just It's just
16:40
>> That's the key right now car. It's it's
16:42
it's buy it, have it for maybe a year.
16:45
>> And and it's the fourth car to get a
16:47
different experience. That's the key
16:48
thing that I really settled on here, S,
16:50
is that you're looking for that raw
16:52
summer car. And and I I don't want to
16:54
say disposable car, but the concept here
16:56
is there's no reason to be precious.
16:58
>> You just you want to have it for a time
17:00
period, get a different experience out
17:01
of it. I decided on the perfect car for
17:03
you, except that I really blew the
17:05
budget. That was the problem with me.
17:06
And that is to really really do this
17:08
correctly. The answer is a caterum.
17:13
He wants a raw car unlike anything he's
17:15
got. And the answer is a caterum. Now
17:17
the problem is there's not very many
17:19
caterums in the US.
17:21
>> So when I looked on AutoTempus today,
17:22
they were all over 50 grand.
17:25
>> You can get cater in all kinds of
17:27
different engine choices. What I find
17:29
fascinating, because we don't get them
17:30
all here in the US, but what I find
17:31
fascinating is any time that all of the
17:35
automotive journalists in Europe drive a
17:37
caterer, the British especially, they
17:39
always end up driving multiple on the
17:41
same day. They drive the super high
17:42
power one and they drive the one with
17:44
like the average amount of horsepower of
17:46
an iron. I mean, nothing.
17:47
>> It's got like bicycle tires.
17:48
>> Seriously, bicycle tires and like
17:50
couldn't even run your generator kind of
17:52
engine. Okay. And almost across the
17:55
board, they like the low power one more
17:57
because they're foot to the floor,
17:58
sliding around corners. You and I have
18:00
driven one of the very high power ones.
18:02
It was like 350 horsepower, whatever.
18:04
>> Cool. Frightening. Didn't need that much
18:07
power. Still very cool. But my point is,
18:09
this is your answer. You want raw summer
18:12
car. Don't have to worry about catering.
18:15
>> Well, if you want to park it on the
18:16
street, just take the steering wheel
18:17
with you. Security defeat device.
18:19
>> That's perfect. The problem is it's
18:20
above your budget. So that's I can't go
18:22
here. But this is really the one I think
18:23
is perfect. So I went here, the MR2
18:30
>> These are cheap chuckable.
18:31
>> 10 grand for the nicest one in the
18:34
country. Okay, it drives totally
18:38
different than what you've got, but it's
18:39
still related. This is proper mid-enine
18:41
handling. This is going to run. They
18:44
they there's nothing precious about this
18:47
>> And they're all out there well under
18:49
your budget. Get the manual
18:50
transmission. The automatic is terrible.
18:52
The interior is not that great. But this
18:54
is also one of those cars that nobody's
18:56
offended by this and nobody wants to do
18:57
anything aggressive. It's just car. It's
18:59
super fun. This is absolutely
19:02
fundamental fun car. You don't need to
19:04
worry about the MR2 Spider. They're out
19:06
there. Look at one very seriously. The
19:07
later models are a little bit better if
19:09
you can get one, but you can with your
19:10
budget 20 grand. You can get the nicest
19:11
one in the planet. But I gave it a lot
19:15
of thought and I went looking s
19:17
considering your backstory because you
19:19
are a Honda guy. You're a Honda fanboy.
19:22
You want a different experience. And
19:23
let's review it. Your Civic Type R,
19:26
>> your Boxster, and your Highlander. You
19:30
want a different experience that's more
19:32
raw. I can't believe it. But with
19:35
$20,000, especially since you want to
19:37
actually buy it and then sell it again
19:39
later, you need a Honda S2000 first gen,
19:42
the AP1, before they revised it. I
19:44
looked it up on Autotapist right now.
19:46
Can you get them under 20? Here's the
19:48
crazy thing. The AP1s
19:50
between 75 and 150,000 miles are on
19:54
either side of 20 grand all day long.
19:57
>> Are they really?
19:58
>> So since you're buying a car you're
20:00
going to have for maybe a year, you
20:02
don't want to be precious. You want to
20:03
buy it, drive it for a little while, and
20:06
sell it again. This is going to resell,
20:09
>> People are going to want these. The
20:11
eight-month car. Seriously.
20:14
So, I think this is where I was
20:16
surprised, but it's AP1's with high
20:18
miles. That's the key.
20:20
>> So, roughly, but you're going to buy,
20:22
look, you're going to buy a 100,000 mi
20:24
S2000 and at the end of the summer, it's
20:25
going to have what? 120,000 on it.
20:28
>> How much are you going to really drive
20:30
>> You buy it at 90,000 and you break a 100
20:33
while you own it. Who cares?
20:35
Okay. S2000 gives you your natural feel,
20:39
your VTEC, your different experience of
20:41
manual transmission. I mean, it's still
20:43
electronic power steering, so you don't
20:44
gain anything there. But this is a much
20:46
more classic feel than the stuff you
20:48
own. And it gets you that Honda VTEC
20:49
stuff that you want. Civ. Imagine the
20:52
driveway. Civic Type R,
20:55
Honda S2000, and brand new Cayman. That
20:59
is a fantastic garage. And S, I'm out
21:02
there because I think I'm done.
21:03
>> You did really well, S. Thank you for
21:05
writing to us. If you've got a debate
21:07
like salves and you need a fourth car,
21:11
>> by the way, if you need a first car, we
21:12
do that, too. Yeah, we do a lot.
21:14
>> We could just replace the car you have.
21:15
>> We can for sure. Yeah.
21:17
>> But if you need a seventh car or
21:23
>> we're having another long podcast cuz
21:25
we're just enjoying ourselves. We hope
21:26
you guys are as well. That means we're
21:28
probably not going to do car conclusions
21:29
again, but we will create we'll come
21:30
back to them when we have a shorter
21:32
topic Tuesday. I swear that's going to
21:34
happen. But EJ is writing to us from
21:36
Sacramento. He's feeling pressure for a
21:40
>> He tweeted to us back in 2021 when his
21:42
son Teddy was born. They were watching
21:44
the Evora versus M2 video a few hours
21:48
after his son was born.
21:49
>> I do remember that. If memory serves, I
21:51
remember asking you, "Does your wife
21:53
need anything?" Because it was like
21:55
she'd just given birth. He's like,
21:56
"We're watching this right now. My son's
21:58
been born like 15 minutes." I said,
21:59
"What? Where's your wife?
22:00
>> Don't know what else does. She needs
22:01
something right now, but make sure she's
22:03
taken care of." Anyway. Yeah.
22:04
>> Well, his son is three and a half now.
22:06
Their fleet includes a paidoff Mark 7.5
22:08
GTI with the DSG 2017 Outback and a
22:12
manual ND3 Miata with the BBR package.
22:15
That's fantastic. ND3.
22:17
>> All of their friends have a second kid
22:20
or one on the way. Second on the way.
22:24
>> Two of them have a Sienna
22:26
and they're feeling pressured to buy a
22:31
What EJ wants is a wagon with a third
22:35
>> But it doesn't look like the new V60
22:37
Polestar, V90, RS6 Avant, M5 Touring,
22:39
and the new E-Class E-Class wagons have
22:41
an optional third row. Like none of
22:43
them, he says, with the grandparents in
22:45
town often, seating five in the GTI and
22:47
and the Outback is a little snug for
22:48
trips longer than 60 to 90 minutes. I'm
22:50
surprised you last 10.
22:52
>> I'm surprised that 60 to 90 minutes was
22:53
the end of that sentence as well. I
22:55
agree. Yeah. He says he could go back
22:57
five years and have a budget of up to
23:01
Technically up to 120 or 130 if they're
23:04
looking at an RS6 Avant. I'm so glad we
23:07
pushed on the budget. I mean, you you
23:08
already knew I was going to and of
23:10
>> you did it for me, so that's great.
23:11
>> He enjoys tinkering tinkering on cars.
23:14
He'll probably have to sell the GTI or
23:15
the Outback because a new wagon would
23:18
make one, if not both, redundant.
23:20
>> But he do wants to have a third car when
23:22
the family visits. He is also acutely
23:25
aware that what they could do is just
23:27
rent a minivan as needed for those five
23:29
or more people family visits.
23:31
>> But he's really interested in the third
23:35
>> Okay, I've got some stuff here for sure.
23:37
I have many things as well. Let's go
23:39
ahead and dive right in. Most of these
23:44
very few manufacturers make current
23:47
modern wagons with a third row, just
23:49
like you just named all of those.
23:50
>> Yeah, he he identified the problem for
23:52
sure. Yes. don't exist. So, I'm going to
23:54
get you as close as close as I possibly
23:56
can and I think I have your winner and I
23:59
think you're going to not mind. I I
24:01
think be really excited.
24:02
>> Really? All right. Good. Starting with
24:04
the Kia Tellide. They're not $100,000
24:06
even new. You could buy two Tellides for
24:09
>> You could actually. Yes.
24:11
>> Moving on to the new Palisade or sorry,
24:14
>> Palisade was on my list, but I chose
24:15
Santa Fe mainly because you get those
24:17
cool Vanigan rear lights. It's an
24:19
acquired taste. actually defending the
24:20
Santa Fe cuz I just can't justify it for
24:24
>> only because of its usefulness and
24:27
>> It is useful and it comes in your eyes.
24:30
It's just Uh-huh. It is a It is what a
24:33
>> Let's just say I'm acknowledging its
24:35
>> Okay. That there. I like that. That's
24:37
>> it's on the market because I didn't want
24:38
you to say, "Well, did you know the
24:39
Santa Fe has three rows?"
24:40
>> And it's hybrid and Yes. Uhhuh.
24:41
>> I know. It gets good gas mileage.
24:44
>> And it's useful.
24:45
>> And I talked about it before. It's It's
24:46
the car that doesn't bother you. It's
24:48
just you're just driving. Yeah.
24:49
>> Moving right along to the Genesis GV80.
24:52
This is a cool car. It is beautiful.
24:56
>> Easy under your budget. Easy. You could
24:58
almost get two of these for your budget.
25:00
But Genesis GV80, find it in that nice
25:03
green. The beautiful green. And I think
25:05
you would really like these. The back
25:06
seats, the third row is not huge.
25:10
So maybe 40 minutes, 45 minutes they'll
25:12
last. People will last back there. Maybe
25:15
>> They're doing 60 to 90 in the back of a
25:16
GTI. I think they could go cross country
25:18
in the Genesis bike.
25:19
>> Shut up and we'll be there soon.
25:21
>> What we're doing. Yeah, there's some
25:22
conversation going on there.
25:24
>> You know, if we're going to spend
25:27
>> If we're going to spend 120 or 130.
25:31
>> Let's get something with space. Let's
25:33
get something with power. Let's get
25:34
something with presence.
25:36
>> An Escalade V. It starts in sport mode.
25:40
>> It's angry. It's fast. You will giggle
25:43
because of the exhaust cackle. You'll
25:45
turn into a child. It's fantastically
25:46
unnecessary is really what it is.
25:48
>> Which is the whole reason I'm suggesting
25:50
>> I understand. I get that. Yeah.
25:51
>> But what is necessary
25:54
is the GLS63 because third row it's an
26:00
>> They drive very well.
26:02
>> It doesn't drive like an SUV and that's
26:04
>> I agree with that. Yep.
26:05
>> So you could consider even slightly used
26:10
These are superb. Fully loaded. You
26:12
won't believe that this does the things
26:14
that it does. Okay. But the final car,
26:17
this is the one, EJ. This is it. I don't
26:20
think you're ready.
26:21
>> MDX Type S. MDX Type S. It's not a van.
26:26
It's got an excellent third row. The
26:28
engine, the 3 L is superb. Lots of
26:30
power. Brand new. They were $73,000.
26:33
Again, you could almost buy two of these
26:35
used for what your budget is, but you
26:37
will still feel like you're getting your
26:39
money's worth. So, I'm saving you money.
26:41
Awesome to drive. Gobs of power. third
26:44
row, not a minivan, and your neighbors
26:47
will be like, "Huh, maybe we need to get
26:51
>> Not only do I agree with you, I agree
26:53
with you so much it's on my list as
26:56
>> It was actually the place that I landed.
26:57
So So you've already landed in the right
26:59
place. That I want to say this to you as
27:01
>> EJ. This is surprisingly good to drive.
27:04
We We talked about it on our review.
27:06
It's almost as good to drive as some of
27:08
the performance versions of the Cayenne,
27:10
but the difference here is it does have
27:13
>> So, this is a genuinely good to drive
27:16
SUV. Again, below your budget. I think
27:18
you nailed it with the Type S.
27:20
>> I think that's the car. That's
27:21
>> I think if you're going to break into
27:23
SUVs, I think this is the way to go. But
27:24
I have a couple other things I do want
27:25
to talk to you about. And that is I do
27:27
want to show you, believe it or not, I I
27:30
had to see the photo for myself. The
27:34
used has a third row seat that's halfway
27:38
>> or wagon. E-class wagon, right?
27:39
>> Yes. The wagon, sorry. The wagon has
27:41
actually has a halfway decent looking
27:43
childrenly rear seat. That's not bad,
27:45
>> So, you could do that. Just get a a used
27:49
>> I I do want to acknowledge the elephant
27:51
of the room for a moment, and that is
27:52
you could just rent the van. I mean, if
27:55
look, how often are the in-laws or your
27:58
parents coming? If it's twice a year,
28:01
rent the van. If you like your current,
28:03
here's the question. I don't know how
28:04
much you like your current stable. If
28:05
you like your current st, I'm fine with
28:07
this. Then the reality is the financial
28:09
reality is you rent the van you don't
28:11
have to worry about.
28:12
>> You rent it from the rental counter, not
28:15
Turo, rental counter. Yeah. Rental
28:17
counter van. Drive it for a week. You
28:18
don't have to like it. You don't have to
28:20
return it. Nice. It's just van. If you
28:23
really are looking for a bangaround for
28:25
the family for the time that they come
28:26
in, that is the answer. You don't have
28:29
to own a minivan. You rented it and you
28:31
don't have to worry about it. Your
28:32
neighbors with the Siennas, they got to
28:34
pay insurance. They got to put gas in
28:35
it. They got to make sure that it runs.
28:36
Take it to the dealer and oh my gosh,
28:38
the kids threw up in it again. None of
28:39
that matters for you. You rented a van,
28:42
you turned it back in. What's that
28:44
>> I guarantee you it's going to be a
28:45
Pacifica, though. It's just going to be
28:48
Pacifica. That's where they all got.
28:51
van is still the like financial and
28:53
stress decision is still rent the van
28:57
>> this is what the E-Class look like which
28:59
is pretty cool but you know what I think
29:01
might be the answer because you can
29:03
probably get them cheap and for your
29:05
usage it might be perfect and that is an
29:07
early Tesla Model S.
29:12
>> They have a rearfacing childonly
29:16
third row that folds up out of the back.
29:18
The first one we ever drove had this. I
29:20
have a picture of you squishing yourself
29:22
into the back of this trying to film
29:24
>> Well, and we have a whole joke in our
29:26
original Model S piece where we actually
29:28
closed it with me sitting in it and I
29:30
had to hunker because it was not
29:31
designed for me. You were not happy.
29:32
Yes. True. But we we actually when we
29:35
first ever drove one of these, it was
29:38
owned by a family of seven.
29:40
>> That's right. And we have a shot of the
29:42
entire family getting out of this
29:44
vehicle and watching all the doors close
29:46
automatically behind it. My thinking
29:50
>> you could get one of these used
29:53
>> and it becomes the third car you only
29:55
use in specific situations. The chest
29:58
Tesla charging network is excellent.
30:01
>> Places you're going to go with people
30:02
are probably going to be fine for
30:04
>> Yeah, use these are still great. Yeah,
30:06
the way this works, I think, is perfect
30:09
for you. And I think you can find a much
30:11
better deal on one of these than you
30:15
>> and it becomes it it'll be good at
30:17
exactly what you need it to be good for.
30:20
So, that is kind of my wild card, but
30:22
also kind of my favorite if you don't go
30:24
where you went, Paul, and that is the
30:26
answer might just be MDX Type S.
30:28
>> It's an SUV. Whereas, I like this cuz
30:29
it's not. It's deliberately not.
30:31
>> This really gets it done. I can't
30:33
believe it. And I have to say, go watch
30:35
our original, it's like 10 years old
30:37
now. Watch our original Model S review.
30:39
We were genuinely impressed with the
30:41
fact that they did this at all. And it
30:42
does work. So, I think used Tesla Model
30:47
S, which is probably going to be not
30:48
even half your budget for a used one.
30:51
>> With the third row seat, and call it a
30:54
>> Everyday driver TV atgmail.com. Topic
30:57
Tuesdays, car conclusions, fourth car
30:59
>> fifth car debates,
31:00
>> first car debates, fourth car debates,
31:02
>> filling your garage. We will get back to
31:04
car conclusions, but we have run long
31:06
yet again, and we're loving it. We We
31:07
should run some audience questions,
31:09
though. One of these is a topic Tuesday.
31:11
You see Kyle's question, lightning
31:12
round, most fun car under 5K, 10K, 20K,
31:16
50K, and 100K. Oh my gosh. But then he
31:18
says, "No Miatas, no G86s, no Porsches."
31:22
>> That's a topic Tuesday right there.
31:24
We'll have to come back on that. I like
31:26
that a lot. Jared says, "Were there any
31:29
cars on Tale of the Dragon that in
31:31
hindsight we wish we could have driven
31:33
or done a piece on?" There was a 1980s,
31:38
early 90s that white Thunderbird. He one
31:40
of our Discord people on Discord had it.
31:43
It's an '90s Thunderbird
31:46
that has been retrofit with all Mustang
31:49
>> And he kept rumbling up and down the
31:50
Dragon. And I was kind of intrigued by
31:52
that car. I was enjoying driving my own
31:54
car on the Dragon, but I kind of kept
31:56
thinking if we had more time, I would
31:57
have loved to driven that because it
31:58
sounded awesome. It was atypical. That
32:01
would have been very fun to actually
32:03
hoon up and down the dragon. That was
32:04
actually one for sure. And then
32:07
the folks with Miatas, that would have
32:09
been cool. I would have done a Miata up
32:11
and down the dragon with the top down.
32:12
That would have been actually really
32:13
cool. Yeah, you're right. The Bruce B on
32:16
Instagram says, "For SoCal traffic,
32:17
which cars have the best interiors,
32:19
comfortable seats, and easy to use
32:23
I just want to be in a Mercedes AMG. I
32:24
mean, you didn't give me a budget in
32:26
here. There was just point
32:27
>> which cars have the best interiors.
32:29
Mercedes AMG, whatever. I don't care.
32:31
And the interior is easy to use and it's
32:33
just comfortable and the
32:34
>> scent with the stuff and the cooling and
32:37
the stuff and you just want to be there.
32:40
Lovely, lovely place to be.
32:42
>> You know what? Another one in that
32:43
category, depending upon are you being
32:45
driven, what's going on. You know what?
32:46
The Genesis G90, we really like the
32:50
>> That's great. Yes. Genesis G90.
32:51
fantastic place to be and you can
32:53
actually save some money off the
32:54
Mercedes. Also really good.
32:55
>> Bella B1029 says, "Hey guys, uh
32:58
submitting uh for the have you seen this
33:00
car section few few days ago, Bella saw
33:03
an early 2000 Subaru Outback sedan."
33:07
Whoa. I'm a little Yeah. Okay. Now that
33:09
I think about it, I I remember what that
33:11
looked like. And it looked a little high
33:13
riding. It was like the Subarus really
33:14
looked high riding. Yeah.
33:16
>> That's right. Little ways ways back.
33:17
Those were always ungainainely because
33:19
they felt like they were up on their
33:21
>> And then they took that for inspiration
33:24
>> Of course they did. Yeah. That works
33:25
well as well. Dami actually asked last
33:27
time, he said, "In our discussion of the
33:28
$50,000 GT cars, is there a reason we
33:31
passed over the Jaguar XKR and picked
33:33
the Type F instead?" He thinks the XKR
33:36
is much more of a GT car. What Dami
33:38
doesn't say, and if my memory serves, is
33:40
I'm pretty sure Dami owns a Jaguar XKR.
33:44
I think you're right.
33:45
>> Which is why he brought it up.
33:46
>> So, first off, Dami, I'm really glad you
33:48
like your car and that's very cool. The
33:50
reason I didn't pick the XKR instead is
33:52
because I personally prefer the look,
33:55
the dynamic and weight, and the interior
33:57
of the F-Type over the XKR. But the
34:01
F-Type is actually more expensive than
34:02
the FKR in many cases used. And the XKR
34:06
is a steal of a used buy. If you have
34:08
one that's running well and you like it,
34:10
and I'm pretty sure you do, I think it's
34:11
a great car. I just prefer the F-Type.
34:14
On Instagram, Mystic Negro George has
34:16
said, "No one has disagreed that the
34:18
Camaro V61LE is the best E46 M3 that you
34:20
can buy. The Miata is univers
34:23
universally considered the best British
34:24
roadster, unless you're tall, and the
34:26
Chevy SS makes a strong case as the best
34:32
>> What are other cars that are the best
34:33
version of completely unrelated cars?
34:36
You've always said the Supra is the best
34:38
car BMW builds, which I've always found
34:40
hilarious. I think right now it's the
34:42
best BMW on the market is the Supra.
34:45
>> I fully agree with that.
34:46
>> Well, George, you could also make a case
34:48
for say a Veloster N being the poor man
34:51
Civic Type R. I mean, I I think that's
34:54
interesting. Possibly the Elantra N
34:56
definitely sorry, the Elantra N. Yeah.
34:57
Yeah. Elantra definitely
35:01
possible. Travis asks, "What's the best
35:03
next car after the GR86? Needs to be
35:06
light and playful with a manual
35:07
transmission. He loves the GR86.
35:10
favorite car he's ever owned. But of
35:12
course, we all have the disease. What's
35:13
next, Travis? If you're going to go from
35:15
GR86, I think where you have to go next
35:18
is probably C7 or C6 Corvette.
35:24
>> writ large. You've got similar dynamics,
35:27
similar actual space, etc., just a
35:29
little bit larger. And the idea of all
35:32
all of your learning in the GR86, all
35:34
that translates to those Corvettes. I
35:36
think that's the next step up. Last
35:39
question for me on Facebook. Gregory
35:40
Tullson says he's curious our thoughts
35:42
on the six-pack Charger Daytona. Do we
35:44
think this car will ever be a steal in
35:46
the used market? I think it already is,
35:48
isn't it? When Hemi enthusiasts crater
35:50
the resale value, do we believe the car
35:52
will be an amazing value since it's got
35:54
420 horsepower in the lower output 550
35:56
in the Scat Pack and a straight six. M
35:59
>> will this be an amazing value in
36:01
comparison to say a BMW 340 or 440i or
36:04
S4S S5 Audi or will the weight of the
36:07
Charger Daytona be a significant
36:09
problem? I think you've hit on that
36:10
Gregory. I think the weight I it's so
36:13
big the form factor itself just the
36:15
proportions of the car the footprint is
36:17
so much bigger than the other cars you
36:19
just you said they are large
36:21
>> and that will absolutely affect it. It's
36:24
almost unrelated to power output.
36:27
>> And I Yeah, the market has
36:29
>> really not embraced these cars. I feel
36:32
like Dodge just went too far. They
36:34
>> the new platform and trying to do both
36:37
and now they're trying to resurrect it
36:38
and hey, we put the six-cylinder in and
36:40
please don't go. Please come back.
36:42
>> Yeah, I'm really curious to see what
36:43
people's take is on that and if they
36:44
like it better and if it if people start
36:46
circling back or not. I'm fascinated to
36:48
drive one for sure. I think because they
36:51
had plans, Stalantis had plans for this
36:53
platform for Alpha and others and buyers
36:56
did not line up for this. That's why we
36:58
haven't seen anything new like a new
37:00
Giulia from Alpha anytime soon, but that
37:03
would be way too big.
37:05
>> Any other cars? I think
37:07
>> they were trying things and it didn't
37:09
really work out for them and they're
37:10
trying to resurrect it, but I don't
37:12
think that's a good thing because it's
37:13
not just a parts car. It's just we
37:15
started in the wrong. started going down
37:17
the road. It is it's that it's that you
37:19
started the huge floor of dominoes and
37:21
one that's one of the starter ones just
37:23
fails and the whole rest thing sitting
37:25
there in anticipation it isn't going to
37:28
>> it's the domino that didn't fall and now
37:30
what do we do? Yeah. Anyway
37:32
>> guys, thank you for all your questions.
37:33
We really appreciate it. Thank you for
37:35
being with us. We are on Spotify audio,
37:37
Spotify video and hopefully you're also
37:39
watching this on YouTube, our main
37:40
YouTube channel. Really appreciate you
37:42
watching. Thank you for your questions.
37:44
keep bringing your excellent ideas for
37:46
topics. We're uh we're going to
37:52
>> A lot more coming. Yep. And we're
37:53
looking forward to next time, too.