An electric vehicle complex is a big factory site meant for building EVs. It’s the kind of project that can create jobs and shape how many EVs get produced locally.
It means the company is putting the project on hold with no clear date for when it will restart. That usually indicates a bigger change in plans than a short delay.
This phrase means Honda was aiming to move away from gas or diesel engines. They’re saying they’ll pivot to other powertrains—like hybrids—rather than going fully away from combustion.
Franchise dealers are car dealerships that sell a specific brand’s vehicles under an agreement with that automaker. Auto Canada says it owns many of these locations.
Regulatory delays are slowdowns caused by the time it takes to get approvals, certifications, or compliance sign-offs from government agencies. For automakers, these delays can push back launch dates, inventory, and delivery schedules.
An import quota is a limit on how many cars a country will allow to be imported in a year. If the limit is tight, fewer cars can be sold and the rollout can slow down.
DSMA is an advisory company mentioned as a source for market information. Here, they’re saying some Chinese automakers are changing how they plan to sell cars in Canada.
Safety features are technologies meant to help prevent crashes or reduce injuries. The hosts talk about how Mazda decides when a safety feature is important enough to include on every car.
Field data is information gathered from real cars being driven by real people. Mazda uses it to judge which safety features actually help enough to be standard.
Automatic emergency braking is a safety feature that can sense a crash is about to happen and brake for you. The goal is to slow the car down or help avoid the collision, especially in rear-end situations.
Blind spot monitoring is a system that watches the areas next to your car where you can’t see well. If another car is there, it warns you so you don’t accidentally change lanes into it.
Rear cross traffic alert helps when you’re backing up. It warns you if cars are coming from the left or right, where you might not notice them.
Concept
packaging of these technologies together
They’re talking about putting multiple safety features together so they work as a system. The claim is that the combined effect reduces crashes more than any single feature by itself.
Concept
AI involved in actually making the vehicle decisions
They’re asking whether AI is starting to “decide” when safety features should activate. In simple terms, it’s about whether the car is using smarter software to interpret sensor data and take action.
A front sensing camera is a camera mounted at the front of the car that watches what’s ahead. It helps safety systems “see” hazards so they can react faster.
In modern vehicles, the electrical architecture is the network of computers, wiring, and communication pathways that connects sensors to the vehicle’s decision-making systems. It’s what allows different safety sensors to share data and coordinate actions.
Electronic stability control helps the car stay on its intended path when the road is slippery. If the car starts to slide, it can brake individual wheels to help regain control.
Sensor fusion means the car combines information from different sensors to understand the road better. Instead of relying on just one sensor, it “checks” using multiple sources.
Simplifying safety technology means making safety features easier to use. Instead of making drivers learn lots of menus and settings, the car should handle it in the background.
The Mazda CX-5 is a compact SUV. Here, the hosts use the “all new CX-5” to show how newer safety features can be built in without lots of buttons or complicated setup.
These are radar sensors on the sides of the car. They help the car detect other vehicles or objects next to you, especially when you’re changing lanes.
Standard equipment is stuff that comes with the car by default. It means you don’t have to pay extra or choose a higher trim just to get those safety sensors.
Trim structure is how car models are offered in different versions. Some versions cost more because they include more features, so where safety tech lands affects the final price.
SAE “level two” means the car can do some driving help—like steering assistance and controlling speed—but you still have to watch the road and be ready to take over.
Crash avoidance is technology that tries to prevent accidents by detecting danger early and helping the car react—often with warnings and automatic braking.
This is the car tech that helps you drive in traffic—like keeping a safe distance and helping with speed. It can also warn you if you seem distracted or not ready to drive.
This feature helps prevent the danger of leaving someone in a parked car on a hot day. It can detect a risky situation and alert you so you don’t miss it.
Driver assurance is the idea of using sensors and monitoring to confirm the driver is engaged and following safe behaviors. Instead of only preventing crashes, it focuses on preventing unsafe driving conditions by detecting distraction, seatbelt use, and impairment-related risk.
Algorithms are the software rules that help the car understand what it’s seeing. AI is smarter software that can learn patterns and help decide when to warn you.
Company
insurances to Highway Safety
This refers to a safety organization connected to the insurance industry. They test and rate cars for safety, and automakers use those results as a goal.
These are safety awards given to cars that score well in safety testing. Getting them is a sign the car is doing a lot right for crash protection.
LIVE
At TD Auto Finance, we're reimagining the vehicle shopping and buying experience.
Contact our dedicated support teams today at 1-855-TEDAUTO1 to find out more
about our flexible financing options that will help you meet your customer's auto financing needs.
Hi everyone and welcome to the May 15th,
2026 episode of the Automotive News Canada podcast.
I'm your host Greg Lason, the digital and mobile editor at Automotive News Canada.
Coming to you from just outside Windsor, Ontario, the automotive capital of Canada.
Today on the show we hear from Mazda North America Operations Director of Vehicle Safety,
Jennifer Morrison. She recently spoke with Automotive News Canada publisher Tim Dimopolis.
The two discussed the evolution of vehicle safety features, how and why they become standard
equipment, how AI is integrated into safety features, and the cost of choosing some of those
features. But first, a look at some of the top Canadian automotive stories of the week.
Honda Canada made it official on May 14th. The automaker publicly announced that it had
indefinitely suspended plans for its proposed $15 billion electric vehicle complex in Ontario.
The automaker says shifting consumer demand and changing business conditions forced the pause.
The project announced in 2024 would have created up to 1000 new jobs in Alliston.
Honda says no government funding has been transferred. The company will continue
current production levels and employment levels at its existing Ontario plants.
The news is part of Honda CEO Toshihira Mibe's plan to abandon the company's combustion free
vehicle ambition and pivot to 15 new hybrids through 2030.
In retail news, auto Canada revenue and earnings declined to start 2026. Weaker new vehicle demand
and losses in its used vehicle business weighed on first quarter results. The dealership group
reported revenue of $1.19 billion down from $1.24 billion a year ago. Adjusted earnings fell to
$31 million. CEO Samuel Cochran says recent leadership changes are starting to improve
dealership sales productivity. Auto Canada owns 64 franchise dealers and dozens of
collision centres across Canada. And finally, Chinese automakers expanding into Canada are
slowing their rollout plans as import quotas and regulatory delays cloud the business case.
Advisory firm DSMA says BYD, Cherry and Geely are now focusing on just a handful of dealerships
in major markets. Vehicle deliveries are also expected to slip into 2027. Ottawa currently
limits China built EV imports to 49,000 vehicles annually under its new quota system shared across
all Chinese automakers. And that's a look at some of the top Canadian automotive stories
of the week. You can find more on those and other stories at our website, automotivenews.ca.
Coming up, we hear from Mazda North America Operations Director of Vehicle Safety Jennifer
Morrison. At TD Auto Finance, we pride ourselves on being remarkably human and refreshingly simple
with relationships at the heart of everything we do. In over 30 years in the industry,
we're proud to provide reliable award-winning service in the communities you live and work in.
Our specialized sales, credit and funding teams are committed to cultivating personal connections
and building deeper long-term relationships with you anytime, anywhere. As a true full-spectrum
lender, we're always seeking new ways to enhance and simplify the vehicle buying process for you
and your customers. Our flexible financing solutions and digital service options are designed to
help customers get into their vehicle of choice faster. Contact us today at 1-855-TD-AUTO-1
to find out more about our innovative products and programs. We also offer a full suite of
commercial floor plan financing options that can help you grow your business.
Welcome back to the Automotive News Canada podcast. I'm your host, Greg Lason.
We'll now hear a conversation between Automotive News Canada publisher Tim Dimopolis
and Mazda North America Operations Director of Vehicle Safety, Jennifer Morrison.
Consumers today are expecting more safety features to come standard under vehicles. How does Mazda
decide when a technology has become important enough to move it from kind of an optional
feature to this core feature in the vehicle? It really is through what we're seeing out
in the field data. One of the things that we're really good at and even getting better at is
studying real world crashes and the technologies that we've deployed to address them. And once we
see that proven benefit, that real effectiveness, a great example is an automatic emergency braking.
So we've now studied automatic emergency braking for the better part of a decade.
So there was the voluntary commitment that came out with the auto industry
and IHS and NHTSA around 2016. And now we've had about 10 years to look at that.
And we're saying, oh, it's very effective. And so it's preventing about 50%, creeping up towards
60% of all rear impacts. And we're starting to see that in other technologies now. So another
great example is blind spot monitoring. It's the same sensor suite that you also then get
rear cross traffic alert since those side radars that are doing all that work. And we made that
decision to make that a standard feature across our entire lineup because we saw those same
effectiveness numbers rising that we were equipping and it was reducing instances of crashes. We
just last month published a study with the IHS Highway Laws Data Institute showing that the
more packaging of these technologies together, so really packaging, your front sensing camera,
all of the side radars, getting that automatic emergency braking, getting that blind spot
monitoring, that that was effectively reducing crashes. And there's where we find that linkage.
That's when we make that decision. When we can see a real world impact and get that technology
out there onto new vehicles because it's even more important as those new vehicles then penetrate
the used vehicle market because these cars that we're putting out on the road today are going to
be the used vehicles of tomorrow. So that's really important. That's what's making us put that
equipment in there knowing that these are actually going to change these crash rates, all those
charts we saw this morning. So speaking about decisions, how much is AI involved in actually
making the vehicle decisions when it comes to safety? So sensors can only do so much and onboard
computing can only do so much. Is there a point now where AI is kind of taking over the
decisioning when it comes to activating safer features? Sometimes we have to layer down that
buzzword of AI to just start talking about automation and systems that are helping us make
decisions for ourselves. Like you said, a lot of sensors on a vehicle, the front sensing camera
is doing a lot of work in cars today. Most vehicles have a front sensing camera now because it's part
of their automatic emergency braking system. The front radar, the side radars, those are all
then integrated into an electrical architecture. And that electrical architecture in that sensing
system, it's the brains and it's going to be able to make those decisions. But we've had vehicles
help us make decisions and do some of the processing for us and that those versions of
automation since the advent of ABS and electronic stability control. So really it's just an iteration
and improvement of that over time consistently getting better and smarter and the system's
able to make more decisions based on all of the sensor fusion too. So now we're having more sensors,
more thinking, more intelligence inside the vehicles. I don't know if I really want to call it AI
necessarily yet, but is the vehicle able to make decisions and support the driver better? Yes.
Now vehicles are becoming much more complex and safety systems are becoming much more complex and
some drivers and some vehicle owners are maybe getting a little bit fatigued with the amount of
technology they're assaulted with when they get into the vehicle. So does there come a point where
safety technologies and added features like we see here on the screen in front of us might even become
a safety liability if they're too complex or there's just too much going on and is there a move
towards simplifying safety technology not having it getting away? That's essentially what we're
trying to do here is simplify things. And we're sitting in the all new CX-5 where you see a far
less buttons. We have our touchscreen that does have some elements and menus that you can drill
down and see your safety systems. But a lot of that should really be transparent to the average
customer. They don't need to know that they have automatic emergency braking that can work in
12 different scenarios. We don't need to go down that list with them. And I think it's important
that they also don't need to buy that on a different trim package. You don't have to go up to this
trim or that trim to get that. It comes built into the vehicle. It's simplified. You don't ever have
to change the settings or learn about the technology. If that is the customer's perspective,
it's already baked in. It's there to support them. What they know about it, it doesn't matter.
It's just all part of the vehicle that they've just purchased. So absolutely agree that we
need to simplify things. Every customer doesn't want to have a 20 to 30 system-long list of all
the things that come in their vehicle. We have those lists because it's true. You're right,
there are a lot of complexities. These systems are building in now with all the different sensors.
We can do a lot more. But to the average customer, that's too complicated. We just want them to be
able to drive, pay attention, be able to support them, not replace them, support them on their
drive seamlessly. Let's talk about affordability. We can't have a discussion about anything today
without affordability popping up specifically in the automotive industry. So with so many consumers
feeling the economic pinch right now, how does Mazda balance the push for advanced safety features
with the need to keep vehicles affordable, especially at a time when a lot of manufacturers
are actually decontenting vehicles to get them to a level where people can actually afford them?
How do you balance that? It really is a combination of efficiency. We've talked about
these sensors that are doing a lot of work for us. When you add a sensor into a vehicle,
that sensor needs to be able to do exponential number of things. If you're adding in a camera,
it can't just do one thing. It's got to be able to work really hard for you. That's a good example
of our front sensing camera, our side radars, our front radar. Those are coming into the vehicle
as standard equipment, so they're not going to be adding additional cost in the trim structure.
We're not going to be having customers pay more money for those. So that does affect the overall
base price of the vehicle. But we're able to still keep our vehicles well below $30,000 in many cases,
and they're still top safety pick plus rated vehicles. We truly believe that safety and
affordability can go hand in hand. They're not opposing forces. The fact of the matter is a
lot of the cost in vehicles today is being driven up by the size of vehicles and by the customer
convenience features that people want on their cars. It's not the safety systems that are really
driving up that cost. We need to be thoughtful and efficient about the systems that we're putting in,
prioritizing safety over some of those frills of driver convenience, things like large SUVs or
ventilated seats. There's those features that are outside of the range of safety. Those aren't
always the priority. So when you're really thinking about safety, you want to build in the systems
that are those proven systems, and that's what Mazda has done. So speaking about priorities,
Mazda has always developed vehicles with their driver-centric, and that's been a big priority
for Mazda. So how do you design safety systems and keep that sort of DNA of being driver-centric
and having the driver connected to the road through these vehicles you produce?
Well, I'll give you a good example. We have our level two, SAE level two driver assistance feature
called cruising and traffic support. It is a hands-on driver assistance system. So it is
Mazda radar cruise control. So it's giving you your adaptive cruise control, your acceleration,
and your braking. And it's also doing lane-centering at the same time. So this vehicle is equipped
with that, but it is importantly a hands-on feature. It allows you to do cooperative steering.
So it's still that human-centric putting the driver first. You can deviate the lane. It'll
give you, of course, your lane, keep assist alerts for that. But it's not a hands-off system. We really
want to keep the driver engaged. Give them the heads-up display. Allow those automation features
to come in with their hands on the wheel and make sure that the driver is still part of the
overall safety system. We're not taking away control. We are supplementing the driver.
So looking ahead over the next five to 10 years, what do you think is going to be the biggest
safety innovation that will make an impact on ultimately saving lives and getting people on
the road and to the destinations in a safer way? I'm really excited about what we can do
with driver monitoring and cameras. We've done a lot with cameras on the outside of the car.
We've talked a lot about that here today with our sensor suite and crash avoidance.
And now we are introducing cameras into the vehicle. Now we have to be quite careful with
how we use those and protect the privacy and the data that those cameras are collecting and using.
But the vehicle that we're sitting in today has a driver monitoring camera here on the steering
column. That's really only to function with our cruising and traffic support system. In the case
that the driver becomes unresponsive or is looking away, that system can provide alerts for drowsiness
and attention. But in the future, that same type of technology can do things like
seatbelt alerts, be able to see if the driver is wearing their seatbelt, be able to see if the
driver is using their cell phone, be able to integrate it with our hot car alert system for
the trial passengers that are left behind. I see so much potential in the further implementation
of cameras in the vehicle, not to invade people's privacy, but to create a more intelligent system
for driver assurance that those behaviors and the things that are going on inside the vehicle
are also in the effort of safety. Impairment is a big piece of that too. These cameras,
as those algorithms and that AI that you asked me about, as those things get more intelligent,
there's an opportunity for these same camera systems and their logic behind them to be able
to help us address some of those real-world problems. You lead a very complex portfolio with
a lot of technology inputs and a lot of stuff you need to be on top of. But ultimately, when you
look at all the stuff you manage, what are your goals or benchmarks to know that whatever you're
doing from a safety standpoint is working? There's got to be one way to distill it down and say,
this is job one when it comes to what we're doing. There are a couple different benchmarks we're
looking at. That is our vision. We would like no one to be injured or killed inside of one of our
new vehicles. That is what we're going for. The incremental steps to get there, going to conferences
like this one, the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference in Toronto has been fantastic because
we can also look at our industry partners, groups like the insurances to Highway Safety.
What are they looking at to do next? They're also studying that real-world data. Earning
their top safety pick and plus awards. We know that if we are tracking with what
they're saying and it also makes sense to us as we incrementally improve safety in our vehicles
and earn those rewards, which is also great for our customers and our sales, that those are the
right steps in the right direction to not only improve safety for our vehicles, but for everyone
on the road. We want to really evolve as an entire industry. Jennifer, thank you very much.
Yes, thank you. I'd like to thank Jennifer for her time and Tim for conducting the interview.
If you'd like to be a guest on the show, have a suggestion or simply want to comment,
email me at glason.autonews.com. And remember, you can listen to all our previous podcasts on
Spotify, iTunes, Google Play, or on our website, automotivenews.ca. Just scroll to the podcast
of in the middle of our homepage. And don't forget, you can follow Automotive News Canada on X,
where we're at Auto News Canada. You can find me there too under at glason, A and C.
Finally, look for us on LinkedIn. Just search Automotive News Canada. That does it for this
episode of the Automotive News Canada podcast. We hope you'll join us next time. So long, everybody.
About this episode
Hosts kick off with major Canadian auto-industry updates, including Honda Canada indefinitely suspending its proposed $15 billion Ontario EV complex and Auto Canada’s early-2026 revenue and earnings decline. The conversation then shifts to Mazda’s Jennifer Morrison on vehicle safety: how real-world field data guides standardizing tech, why sensor fusion matters, and how Level 2 systems keep drivers engaged. She also discusses keeping safety tech standard to manage cost, plus future driver-monitoring cameras with privacy considerations.
Honda’s cancelled EV plans; AutoCanada earnings dip; Chinese automakers’ market entry. Plus, Mazda North American Operations Director of Vehicle Safety Jennifer Morrison on safety features, how they become standard equipment, and at what cost, and how AI is integrated into safety development.