GP Lambiase’s shock switch from Red Bull to McLaren (confirmed for 2028 at the latest) takes center stage, with the hosts debating why the timing is so unusual and what it means for both teams. They break down how Lambiase’s “chief racing officer” role could reshape McLaren’s race-weekend communication and strategy, plus whether Red Bull’s recovery faith is slipping. The rest covers the Bahrain GP weekend that didn’t happen, disappointment/PR tradeoffs, Ricciardo’s candid reflections on losing his F1 drive, and a detailed top five of Ricciardo’s best races.
Ben and Sam break down Gianpiero Lambiase’s shock move to McLaren and what it means for Red Bull and Max Verstappen. They also explore what might have been had the Bahrain GP gone ahead, before discussing Daniel Ricciardo’s F1 exit in light of recent comments and ranking his Top 5 wins.
"which is Jean-Pierre Lambiassi, Red Bull's head of race engineering, has agreed to join McLaren from 2028. The team said Lambiassi, who is most well known for being Max Verstappen's race engineer, will become McLaren's chief racing officer reporting into team principal Andrea Stella."
Red Bull is the Formula 1 team involved here. They’re known for being very competitive and for having a strong team of engineers working closely with the driver.
Red Bull Racing is one of Formula 1’s top teams, known for its strong driver-engineering culture and performance-focused race operations. The transcript ties Lambiassi’s role and expertise to Red Bull’s internal race engineering leadership.
"has agreed to join McLaren from 2028. The team said Lambiassi, who is most well known for being Max Verstappen's race engineer, will become McLaren's chief racing officer reporting into team principal Andrea Stella."
McLaren is one of the major Formula 1 teams. In this segment, they’re bringing in a top race engineering leader to strengthen their race leadership.
McLaren is a historic Formula 1 constructor and one of the sport’s most recognizable teams. The episode discusses McLaren hiring Jean-Pierre Lambiassi to take on a senior racing leadership role starting in 2028.
"But it is very odd to see an F1 figure, whether it's a driver or just a senior figure in the sport, announce they're leaving 18 to 24 months before it actually goes ahead."
F1 is Formula 1, the highest level of open-wheel racing. Teams and drivers sign contracts that line up with the racing seasons, so when someone announces a move can affect how everyone plans for the next few years.
F1 refers to Formula 1, the top tier of open-wheel racing run under the FIA. In F1, team and driver contracts are tightly scheduled around seasons, so timing of announcements can matter a lot for planning and negotiations.
"There's no, you would maybe expect it to be the conclusion of the 2027 season, but that doesn't appear to be the case."
The “2027 season” is the next year of Formula 1 racing. The point here is that people might expect a change to happen right after that season ends, but the timing doesn’t seem to match that expectation.
The “2027 season” refers to the next full F1 championship year in the sport’s calendar. The speaker notes that you’d normally expect an exit to line up with the end of a season, but the statements suggest it may not.
"He's so integral to how Red Bull work right now, but he's going to a direct rival."
A direct rival is a team that competes closely for the same results. If someone moves there, it can quickly affect how strong they are.
In F1, moving to a direct rival means the person’s knowledge and methods can immediately benefit a competing team. That raises the stakes for both teams and often accelerates negotiations around contract timing.
"Williams, which is rumored at the start at the end of last year, where they are much further down the pecking order and not someone that we expect Red Bull to be competing with long term for the next two or three seasons,"
Williams is an F1 team, but here they’re being described as not strong enough right now to challenge the very top teams for the long run.
Williams is a historic F1 team that, in this context, is being described as lower in performance compared with the championship contenders. The speaker suggests Williams is not expected to be a long-term match for Red Bull over the next few seasons.
"can you talk to Max over the radio, please? We're paying you a lot of money just to talk over the radio and help with some strategy"
The radio is how the pit wall talks to the driver during the race. They use it to give instructions and updates while the car is on track.
The team-driver “radio” is the real-time communication channel used for instructions and feedback during a race. It’s also where teams can control what information is shared, especially when personnel move between rival teams.
"...and it not necessarily gelling with what you've already got going on."
“Gelling” just means people working together smoothly. In racing, if the team isn’t on the same page, it can lead to slower or conflicting decisions.
“Gelling” refers to how well new hires and existing staff align in day-to-day collaboration—communication style, decision-making, and priorities. In F1, poor “gelling” can show up as slower feedback loops between the track and the garage, or conflicting views on setup and strategy.
"Just look at Aston Martin. Aston Martin would be the number one example, for sure."
Aston Martin is one of the Formula 1 teams. Here it’s mentioned as an example of a team that has had the right people but still hasn’t been winning as expected.
Aston Martin is an F1 constructor/team brand, and it’s being used as an example of how high-profile hires or leadership changes don’t automatically lead to immediate championship results. For listeners, it signals that the discussion is about organizational effectiveness, not just raw talent.
"It was a key part of that season being so successful for Max Verstappen. With that, I wouldn't be surprised if he takes on a large coaching role"
Max Verstappen is a Red Bull Racing driver and a central figure in the team’s recent success. The episode ties his performance to the broader team context and the importance of engineering and leadership stability.
"went up against Lewis Hamilton in 2021. It was a key part of that season being so successful for Max Verstappen."
Lewis Hamilton is a Mercedes-AMG Petronas driver and one of the most successful F1 racers. The transcript uses his 2021 matchup context to highlight how competitive the season was and why the team’s performance mattered.
Concept
coaching role
"With that, I wouldn't be surprised if he takes on a large coaching role in the terms of how the race engineer department works."
A “coaching role” in F1 typically refers to mentoring and performance guidance rather than direct race-day engineering. The transcript suggests the person could move into a senior development function, influencing how engineers and drivers work together.
"If we do see some structural and cultural changes in that, I was hoping, though, that McLaren won't shift too much culturally. They do have a very unique identity on the grid."
Teams don’t just change parts—they also change how they’re run and how people work together. In F1, that can affect how fast the team fixes issues and how well everyone coordinates.
“Structural and cultural changes” describes how an F1 team reorganizes roles and decision-making processes, and how its internal mindset affects performance. In elite motorsport, losing key personnel can change communication flow, engineering priorities, and how quickly the team adapts to problems.
"Nui, whilst he hasn't ever really properly confirmed why he left might well have been attached to the Christian Horner situation. Christian Horner didn't leave. He was fired..."
Christian Horner is a key leader in the Red Bull F1 world. The speaker is saying his exit was connected to serious issues inside the team.
Christian Horner is a prominent F1 team leader associated with Red Bull Racing. The speaker’s point is that his departure was not a normal “move,” but tied to internal circumstances and results.
"...the competitiveness of the chassis, aero, engine..."
Aero is how the car’s shape interacts with the air. In F1, better aero helps the car stick to the track and go faster, especially in corners.
“Aero” is short for aerodynamics—the wing and body shapes that create downforce and reduce drag. In F1, aero efficiency and balance are major factors in lap time and tire behavior.
"So, you know, there's a chance they were very competitive. But in pre-season testing, I thought McLaren looked good around Bahrain. Really good. And you can't read endless data into what was going on in pre-season testing."
Pre-season testing is the practice period before the season starts. Teams use it to check their car and upgrades, but you can’t always trust the lap times because they may not be pushing as hard as they will in races.
Pre-season testing is when F1 teams run practice sessions before the first race to evaluate upgrades, reliability, and baseline performance. Results can be misleading because teams may hide true pace by changing fuel loads, tire choices, and setup, and by running different programs.
"And you can't read endless data into what was going on in pre-season testing. We don't know fuel loads, tires, set up, whatever it might be."
Fuel load means how much fuel the car has onboard. More fuel usually makes the car slower and changes tire wear, so testing times can be misleading.
Fuel load is how much fuel a car carries at a given time, which directly affects lap times and tire wear. In pre-season testing, teams may run different fuel quantities than in race conditions, so lap times aren’t always comparable.
"Weirdly, this is how I wish I evaluated sprint races. Instead of just creating statistics that no one can access or view..."
A sprint race is a shorter race on a race weekend. It’s used to help decide where cars start for the main race, so teams often push differently.
Sprint races are shorter F1 events that affect grid position for the main Grand Prix. They can also change how teams manage tires, setups, and risk because the weekend has an extra competitive session.
"I have to give credit to Fernando Alonso because you argue that his biggest strength is actually his adaptability in the way that he's able to still get really good raw speed out of these cars era after era after era."
Fernando Alonso is a very experienced F1 driver. The podcast is praising him for being able to adjust his driving style when the cars and rules change.
Fernando Alonso is known for adapting across multiple F1 rule eras and car concepts, which the podcast highlights as his key strength. In F1, adaptability can mean extracting speed from different aerodynamic behaviors and changing team/technical environments.
"coming forward in a world where it constantly feels like particularly on social media, like you
[2516.7s] are putting forward or a lot of people are putting forward like the perfect version of
[2520.9s] themselves that don't have any weaknesses or vulnerabilities."
They’re talking about how social media can make people look perfect. In racing, that makes it harder to be honest when things aren’t going well.
The speakers discuss how social media encourages curated, idealized self-presentation, making it harder for drivers to communicate uncertainty or vulnerability. This is especially relevant in F1, where public narratives can influence fan perception and media coverage.
"It's difficult to show that you're not this perfect idolized, especially in
[2562.3s] sport, massively in sport, that you are the greatest, the goat. It is tough."
“GOAT” means “best ever.” They’re saying sports culture pushes people to act like they’re perfect, even when they’re dealing with real problems.
“GOAT” is slang for “greatest of all time,” used here to describe the pressure athletes face to present themselves as flawless. In motorsport, that can clash with the reality of setbacks, team changes, and performance dips.
"It's not linear. Sometimes motivation, confidence, environment, all of these things are more important than they're given credit for."
The speaker is saying that racing isn’t only about raw skill. How confident you feel, what motivates you, and whether your team situation fits you can all affect results.
This phrase summarizes the non-technical factors that can influence performance in F1. Even with similar talent, a driver’s mindset (confidence/motivation) and the team’s setup (environment) can change how consistently they extract performance.
"Right. Number five on my list, I've gone with the 2014 Belgian GP, which one of his first early wins."
The Belgian GP is one of the Formula 1 races. Here it’s used to identify the exact race where the big crash and strategy battles happened.
The Belgian Grand Prix is a specific Formula 1 race on the calendar, referenced here as the 2014 event where the key Hamilton-Rosberg incident occurred. Knowing the venue and race context helps listeners understand why strategy and tire management mattered so much.
"There were a lot of complaints about it online, where Verstappen's car is almost on top of Lewis Hamilton's car. And the, the halo does a lot of work to support"
The halo is a safety bar around the driver’s head area. It’s there to protect the driver from debris and certain crash forces.
The halo is a safety device introduced in Formula 1: a protective titanium structure mounted around the cockpit. It helps shield the driver from debris and, in some incidents, reduces the risk of the car being struck in ways the old cockpit layout couldn’t prevent.
"He does his shooey, of course, on the podium with his teammates. So overall mega race, the door was open for him."
“Shooey” is Daniel Ricciardo’s signature celebration where he drinks from a shoe after a win or podium. It’s a recognizable personality/brand moment in F1 culture and is referenced here to mark the emotional high point.
"...He started to turn the tables on a four-time world champion. And at this point, he's almost a rookie."
Calling Vettel a “four-time world champion” emphasizes his proven championship pedigree and sets context for how impressive it is that Ricciardo is challenging him. In F1 storytelling, these titles help listeners gauge relative experience and performance expectations.
"...because you kicked off with the 2018 Monaco GP and I'm ending it with that same
race. All of your points incredibly valid as to why this is only fifth in that this isn't a win
anywhere else on the calendar."
The Monaco Grand Prix is famous for its tight street circuit, limited overtaking opportunities, and high dependence on qualifying and track position. Because of that, a driver’s ability to capitalize on race incidents (like safety cars) can be especially important.
"not as flashy as the 2018 version, but great race craft that you put in there. Yeah. So there's a lot about Ricardo's career that we can quite comfortably put together a top five list of his best Grand Prix."
“Race craft” means how good a driver is at racing smart, not just fast. It includes things like when to overtake and how to defend without losing position.
“Race craft” is a driver’s skill at managing race situations—timing overtakes, defending positions, choosing when to push, and adapting to tire wear and traffic. It’s often contrasted with pure qualifying speed or flashy moments.
"Because despite our very convincing storytelling, Mika Holgerberg was not on the front row, where it came to the Bahrain Grand Prix."
“Front row” means starting right at the front of the grid, in the first two spots. That usually gives a driver a better chance because they’re ahead of everyone else.
The “front row” means the two cars that qualify fastest and start the race from the first row of the grid. Starting on the front row typically improves track position and reduces the risk of getting stuck in traffic.
Select text to request an explanation
Thank you for listening to the Late Breaking F1 podcast.
Make sure to check out new episodes every Wednesday and every Sunday.
Hello and a very warm welcome to the Late Breaking F1 podcast presented by Sam Sage
and me, Ben Hawking, on this wonderful Sunday.
I hope you're having a wonderful Sunday wherever you are in the world.
Sam, I hope you're having a wonderful Sunday,
but equally, I know it can't be as wonderful as the Saturday you had because you spent it in Wix.
I did spend it in Wix, yes.
That is being a 30-year-old plus man now where DIY becomes your every day.
Yeah, I had to.
I'm redoing my lounge.
I bought a house last year for the first time and I had spent the whole thing
in what felt like a dust song.
Like I was in June because essentially, I bought a sander
and it causes my whole home to be covered in dust.
So if anyone goes any large worms, I can write a work next week.
Give me up.
Thank you for your update, Samuel Chalamet.
Very much appreciated.
Yeah, man loves weights.
It's one of my underrated things about the Late Breaking podcast is that when
things that aren't ads really sound like ads, we ain't going paid.
I wish Wix paid for that.
We are just giving them free advertisement, which is great stuff from us.
Good work, Elby.
Well, that brave podcast is venturing into the no payments future.
We've got plenty coming up on today's show.
We've got comments from Daniel Ricciardo and a bit of a top five list about his top drives
in his F1 career.
The Bahrain Grand Prix was obviously supposed to take place today,
so our thoughts on what might have happened if it had gone ahead.
But let's start with news that was broken on Thursday.
You are in the bad books.
You are in the bad books.
You don't break news on Thursday.
That doesn't align with our podcasting schedule, but we will cover it anyway,
which is Jean-Pierre Lambiassi, Red Bull's head of race engineering,
has agreed to join McLaren from 2028.
The team said Lambiassi, who is most well known for being Max Verstappen's race engineer,
will become McLaren's chief racing officer reporting into team principal Andrea Stella.
The statement said,
the role of the chief racing officer already exists within the team's structure with
overall leadership of the race team.
These duties are currently managed by Andrea Stella,
in addition to his role as team principal.
The statement said Lambiassi would join McLaren when his contract ends,
no later than 2028.
Red Bull also put out a statement confirming that Lambiassi would leave the team in 2028,
when his current contract expires.
Um, firstly, Sam, your reaction to the news?
But it was a joke.
You thought it was a joke?
Thought it was fake news.
Wow.
Yeah, didn't think this was actually happening, and it took me by such surprise
that I think that besides Hamilton to Ferrari,
Nui to Aston Martin, this might be the biggest move of Personnel
that I've seen in a long time.
He's so Red Bull, so Max Verstappen, through and through.
You know, those two are maybe the most famous pairing at the moment in Formula One.
You know, we used to have Hamilton and Bono, for example.
That was always the pair that you'd always think about.
Um, maybe McLaren, Ricky.
Oh, sorry, science for Ricky.
Ricky!
For other reasons.
But these two are, you know, they're like bread and butter.
They go together.
They're the first thing that you think of.
And so when the news broke that GP was leaving Red Bull and going to McLaren,
obviously initially it was, oh, he's just leaving Red Bull.
About an hour later, it was also announced that he'll be joining McLaren.
Shortest unemployment in history.
It felt like it wasn't real.
It felt like it didn't actually make sense to me.
So, yeah, completely taken by shock with the news.
I really wasn't expecting it.
Yeah, there was certainly an element of surprise about it.
I'm less surprised about the move itself and more about the timing of it,
because it felt like whilst there was some speculation towards the end of 2025
about would he stay at Red Bull?
Would he look to go elsewhere?
It felt like that had mostly died down.
But it is very odd to see an F1 figure,
whether it's a driver or just a senior figure in the sport,
announce they're leaving 18 to 24 months before it actually goes ahead.
It's pretty rare for that to be the case.
I have no doubt McLaren will want to organize that to happen sooner.
I think their statement, Zach Brown's comments, indicate that,
that it will be 2028 at the latest.
That is when the contract expires.
Red Bull, though, pretty clear in the statement to say
it will be in 2028 and not sooner.
I think that firstly, the interesting thing there is that there's no comment
about it being the end of 2027.
There's no, you would maybe expect it to be the conclusion of the 2027 season,
but that doesn't appear to be the case.
So for those thinking that when they say 28,
he'll be there ready to go at the beginning of the year,
that might not be the case.
We don't know when his contract does expire in that year.
It could be similar to Adrian Newey when he left.
I think his contract was up in April.
It was, yeah.
So it might be a case where they aren't getting ready for the season
in January and February with him, and he comes a bit later on.
But if I had to guess, McLaren and Red Bull will come to some sort of arrangement
to get this done sooner.
It just doesn't benefit anyone by dragging it out.
That's what I think.
I've got visions of December 31st, 1155.
Woo, Happy New Year.
We love you, GP.
And then literally one big past midnight,
is there outside the Red Bull factory?
You are Satan's.
Get out.
Get out.
You know, doors shut behind him.
They carry on party without him as he stood out in the cold.
It doesn't benefit either party to drag out this contract for as long as possible.
He's so integral to how Red Bull work right now,
but he's going to a direct rival.
If he was maybe going to Cadillac, for example,
if he was maybe going to Audi or something like that,
Williams, which is rumored at the start at the end of last year,
where they are much further down the pecking order and not someone that we
expect Red Bull to be competing with long term for the next two or three seasons,
you can almost sit there and be like,
well, it doesn't matter if he brings over a little bit of information,
because there's so many other things that they need to sort out
to make themselves properly competitive with where Red Bull expect to be
over the next season and a half.
But McLaren are already in front of them.
And if the development cycle continues in the way that we're seeing it already
at the start of these new regulations,
then McLaren might stay in front of Red Bull for the next two or three seasons.
So going to a direct competitor who are already on a level playing field,
if not better, you don't want to give them new stuff
that they're going to be working towards over the next two years.
But equally, you don't want to ice out someone like GP for the next 18 months
because he might harbor information that is important from McLaren.
So you've just got this weight on the side of you,
someone who was so important, who is now just kind of like,
can you talk to Max over the radio, please?
We're paying you a lot of money just to talk over the radio
and help with some strategy because we can't tell you much more
because we don't want you to take it to a direct rival.
So I do think once they saw a suitable lineage, a suitable replacement
and work out probably what Max's dapper is going to do,
I think that realistically, that'll be when GP actually gets the move.
I think start at 27, that's when we'll see GP actually go.
It wouldn't surprise me and they need to, if you're Red Bull,
think about the future because I agree with what you say,
that there isn't much point in dragging this out from Red Bull's perspective.
I don't actually think that benefits them.
So they need to start to think about who is that replacement regardless
of whether Verstappen is there or not, they're going to need someone in the role.
And if that person is ready and trained or whatever word you want to use,
if that's the case by the start of 27, then I feel like you just
pull the plug and go for it because if you can then use 27
as a bit of an adjustment period or at least the first few months of that,
then suddenly whoever it is, both engineer and driver,
have got a much better relationship at the end of 27 than going into 2028.
Putting it off might not benefit anyone at this point.
I am surprised a little bit by McLaren on this, not about the move itself
because Lambiase is highly regarded in the F1 paddock and rightly so.
And I think having him in your team is an obvious benefit.
But a lot can change in 18 months, two years,
that we might be looking at before Lambiase is going there.
McLaren's recovery has relied heavily on structure
and ensuring that they have these pillars of three pillars.
They've relied quite heavily on that beforehand.
It was a bit of a mess at the team in terms of the organization, the structure.
They're fitting him into a role that does exist,
but they don't know what the rest of the team is going to look like in two years.
I hope from their side, they haven't just hired the individual
without thinking too heavily about the role and the fit.
I would assume they haven't done that, but I think that's worth thinking about at least.
It makes sense that it's such a high-profile role opening, so to speak.
You would be a high-profile figure, someone who is highly experienced.
Look, there's only going to be a handful of candidates
that actually make sense to fit into that role anyway.
With the conversation that Stellar has been doing this role
alongside his team principal role, it's a really interesting dynamic.
And a technical director as well, I should add.
He's doing three roles.
My guy is maybe underpaid.
I'm joking. I would take 10% of that.
But my point here is Stellar is incredibly qualified.
He's brilliant at what he does, but there's a very odd dynamic at McLaren
where he runs his TD role, he has the team principal role,
he's head of racing and on-track racing.
Then you've got Zach Brown, who of course is such an involved CEO role,
who almost acts as like a vocal team principal.
You've got brilliant members like Rob Marshall,
who are also very much involved in the overall building of the team
and the way that the car is developed.
It's a very multifaceted team.
I'm really intrigued to see what happens to Stellar once GP joins,
because I think we might see a lot less of him.
If GP is planning to run the racing side of the team,
which is actually the on-track organisation and how that might manifest,
I don't think he'll be a singular engineer.
I don't think we'll see him speaking directly to one driver.
I think that will remain. I think he'll be above that.
So, I wonder how Stellar will intertwine now into the day-to-day running of the race weekend.
Yeah. If you're Andrea Stellar as well, and you are doing three roles at the same time,
and you've had a big part to play in the hiring of Lambi Assi, of course,
and that will be a large part of Lambi Assi's role as communication with Stellar.
But if you are Andrea Stellar and you're overworked in,
it's like, well, we've got a solution in place to take something off your plate.
Cool. When are we activating that? 2028.
God, great. Two more years.
Right. Yeah. I mean, there is something to that as well.
I just think we've fit and roll, and you look at other teams, and there's just
precautionary tales, I think, from other teams about how this doesn't necessarily always go the
way you want when it comes to hiring very effective individuals into your team,
and it not necessarily gelling with what you've already got going on.
Just look at Aston Martin.
Aston Martin would be the number one example, for sure.
Nui and Cowell, you put those together, and immediately you think
they can't do anything but win a championship. They can, apparently.
They've not been winning it.
They've not been winning right now. And look at maybe Aldi as well with Wheatley and Bonotto.
Two guys that can fulfill a pretty similar role,
but the idea there was that they'd play to each other's strengths.
Instead, it just didn't really work.
And I know Wheatley might be leaving for other reasons as well, but there were a lot of reports
that two of them aren't necessarily working as well as they could have done.
So that is something to watch out for when it comes to McLaren.
The next thing I wanted to ask you, and I think you've just kind of answered this,
was what role he would play exactly. We know he's going into this sort of,
off track role, but away from being an engineer and sort of sitting above that.
So you don't think he will become one of the race engineers here?
No, I think McLaren have redefined what a lot of the team definitions are.
We've seen Zac Brown very much involved. We've seen Stella be a very different
side of team principal, usually away from the cameras.
He'll do some of the interviews, but very much involved in the team development.
I think he will essentially sit between Stella and the everyday race situation.
So he will speak to the direct race engineers.
He'll speak to strategists. He'll work out the data for the track
and work out what the best method moving forward for success is.
I think he will be that liaison between their headquarters and what's going on on the racetrack.
I think he will essentially run everything on the road.
And then I think it will allow Stella to be a little bit more technical in his development
of the car whilst also managing the overarching running of the team.
And I actually wouldn't be surprised if we see Zac Brown step away slightly
to govern the wider McLaren portfolio, of course, as CEO.
So I think that might open that up a little bit.
That would make sense. And my instinct is that he won't become one of the two race
engineers because whilst he's doing that right now with Max Verstappen,
it's almost like that's a relationship Red Bull can't really afford to lose.
It works that well. It is quite rare for a race engineer to have such a senior position
away from that job. It's only really himself and Peter Bonnington.
Those are really the only two guys that hold those quite senior roles outside
of what they do for the driver. But I get the sense that McLaren would rather him focus on
his role outside. The role that they've hired him to do, I think you're right on that one.
I also think as well, like in terms of the value that he could bring to McLaren and
particularly if you think of Tom Stallard and Will Joseph, obviously overseeing
Piastri and Norris, respectively, he is vastly experienced as Lambiassi.
He's done that job. He's straightforward. He's quite an honest figure.
He garners quite a lot of respect. I think he could help the two of them in terms of their comms.
I don't want that sound patronising at all because they could do their jobs. But equally,
we know that in the last year or so that McLaren haven't been perfect when it comes to
strategy communications between driver and engineer. Lambiassi, I think, could help there.
I fully agree. There's a reason that a meme emerged from McLaren's 2025 season in that
papaya rules or papa rules, if you're a long-term listener at the show, in the sense that
they couldn't communicate anything clearly, efficiently. It felt like a bit of a mess.
We had drivers complaining over radios. The strategy wasn't always clearing what was going on.
Let him pass. Do I let him pass? When do I let them pass? It was all a bit of a mess many times.
And when you're in a title fight, when you're in that hunt for both the drivers and constructors,
these are constructions you don't want. You want total efficiency, clarity,
in how you're going to be successful. The GP has been in that situation many, many times,
arguably in more stressful versions of a title fight. He was there with Max Verstappen when he
went up against Lewis Hamilton in 2021. It was a key part of that season being so successful
for Max Verstappen. With that, I wouldn't be surprised if he takes on a large coaching role
in the terms of how the race engineer department works. If we do see some structural and cultural
changes in that, I was hoping, though, that McLaren won't shift too much culturally.
They do have a very unique identity on the grid. They are very much like a
one-on-all community. We do it together. That's been their mindset now for a few seasons.
GP coming from Red Bull, it is a very different world. I do wonder how he will integrate into
this kind of McLaren altogether or one for all rather than a cutthroat, get the job done,
worry to upset the apple cart, be the bad guys of racing, which I think Red Bull quite enjoyed
that kind of monitor. No doubt. We'll take a quick break at this point. On the other side,
we'll wrap up this conversation thinking about what, if anything, it says about Red Bull. Also,
is there any chance for Staffen joins GP on the way to McLaren?
Welcome back, everyone. We've looked at this GP lambiasi move to McLaren more from
McLaren's perspective and also GP's perspective. We haven't really yet touched too much on what
this means, if anything, for Red Bull. He's a very senior figure there, and it's not exactly the
first big-time move from the team in the last couple of years. Is this actually a case, Sam,
of someone not being fully committed behind, not fully committed, but not being fully invested
in this Red Bull recovery as they're in right now? I think a season ago, he would have been
invested. I think when all these changes happened, you've got to remember they've lost so many key
personnel. The structural change at Red Bull is almost unfounding in Formula One.
It doesn't look like the same team from a few years ago.
It literally isn't. I've got a list here. Of course, we've lost Helmut Marco, Chief Mechanic
for Max Verstappen, Matt Cullerwent, Jonathan Wheatley has already gone, Front End Mechanic
on his shacks also gone. Now, of course, we previously lost Christian Horner, and now GP
is off as well. All these leading faces of the last couple of years from Red Bull are gone.
They're a whole different team. When you're Red Bull and you think, well, what do we do here?
How do we pull this together? What does this look like for us? I can see why he was maybe thinking
this isn't the team I was with. Everyone else has moved on. There's a whole new load of people
here that maybe I'm not as close to, I don't work as well with. Nui, the guy that was building the
cars that my drivers were winging with, isn't here anymore either. What do I do now? I'm not
surprised that we've seen a shift from GP, but when it comes to Red Bull, they've got to really
make sure that their foundations are cemented and they've got some good names coming through.
Whether they're homegrown or whether they go and poach from elsewhere, that's a very
different question. I don't know what your thoughts are on them picking up new talent to
replace what they're missing. Well, I think they have to. If you look at the guys that have left
Red Bull in the last few years, and you've just listed most of them there, I actually think this
one could be the most concerning of all for Red Bull. Not because he's the most senior or the most
important one of that bunch, but because if you look at Rob Marshall when he left, big up Rob Marshall,
felt like a bit of a promotion for him. Same with Jonathan Wheatley, definitely when he became
team principal at Audi. I know he hasn't stayed there, but he moved away from Red Bull for that
sort of a reason that you can understand that. Nui, whilst he hasn't ever really properly confirmed
why he left might well have been attached to the Christian Horner situation. Christian Horner
didn't leave. He was fired as a result of poor performance. All of these other exits, I think,
have some sort of clear reason attached to it. I can't really do the same thing with this one,
because it's not a promotion, I don't think. It feels like a sideways move. He's currently the
third most senior member at Red Bull from a trackside perspective. He'll be pretty much the
same thing when he goes to McLaren. It's not really a change in role, because even if it was
to say, well, McLaren won't have me as a race engineer and I don't want to do that anymore,
I feel like Red Bull would have compromised to say, to keep you, if that's what it takes,
we will do that. I'm pretty sure that would have taken place. I don't think it's money, because
again, if McLaren offered him a lot more money than what Red Bull are paying him at the moment,
I'm pretty sure Red Bull would have turned around and said, we'll match it. We can't afford
another loss, because we've had so many in the last couple of years. I don't think it's any of those
things. In which case, I do think it is maybe a lack of faith in this Red Bull recovery.
And the most damning thing about it is not, I don't think this is a, I don't like where we are at
the moment kind of move, because he's not moving now. He's moving in two years. This is a, I don't
trust where this is going move. And that is way worse in my view.
It's clearly outside what Max Verstappen views Formula One, where he's vocally said,
I don't like Formula One at the moment, because GP didn't like Formula One. He wouldn't go to
another team, right? You may as well say with the team you're at, if you're willing to see it
through the regulation, but he's not. He's going to a rival that currently are beating them.
Yeah. And it's fairly close right now in the, McLaren are definitely the better of the two,
but maybe you'd expect that with the Mercedes power unit early on in this, in this set of
regulations. By the time 2028 comes around, the Red Bull could be better. No reason to believe
that that's impossible. And yet Lambiasi, Lambiasi's not saying, I don't want to work here now.
Lambiasi's saying, I don't think I'm going to want to work here in two years time.
I don't think that's a great message. That is not good. Imagine me saying,
like, yeah, I don't want to be on this podcast in two years time. Just so you're aware.
I mean, mark that down 12th of April, 2028. Sam Leves. Right. We need to work on a replacement
in the next two years. Don't worry. The podcast will just be better. We'll get GP in.
Final question. Any chance Max Verstappen joins him?
I don't think it's zero percent. That's for sure. I don't think it's, you know,
how when Lewis went to Ferrari, we had the conversation of if Bono would go with him.
I don't think it's the same way, the opposite way. I agree. I don't think it's, oh,
I'm going there for, do we get Max as well as like a little plus one as a little bonus?
I don't think it's that simple. I think Max is very much a man of his own mind,
and I think he will happily make his decision whether GP is in racing or not.
I don't think he needs to be glued to GP to feel successful or like he can
wing in a race car. It's definitely possible for him either way. Would he go to McLaren?
Sort of no. It's whether he believes in the project, I think. It's whether he sees that
the wider sport is going to be enjoyable for him, because I actually think that is more important
to him than winging Grand Prix. Is he enjoying the race car itself? And if it was anyone,
would it be McLaren? It's more their current driver lineup. You know, I know that we always say
that, hey, if Max Verstappen was going to turn up at your team, would he replace pretty much
everyone? I think maybe barring one or two drivers on the green. It's a yes. And those one or two
drivers aren't at McLaren in my mind. So yeah, like 5-10% chance. What do you think?
I don't think it's impossible, but equally, I don't think GP being there is the reason
why. Because as good as their relationship has been over the last 10 years, and it really has,
this will go down as one of the best combinations of driver and engineer in a very long time in the
sport. But as good as that relationship has been, if Verstappen was forming a top 25 reasons to go
to McLaren in 2028, I don't think GP makes the list. Really? You don't think he's top 25?
That might be an exaggeration. But if he will look at the competitiveness of the chassis,
aero, engine, is he enjoying the sport? Will he get on with the team principle at McLaren?
Does he want to be an F1 for reasons of being away from his family? All of these things are
going to rank higher than is GP at the team. I don't think that's going to be much of a factor.
Yeah, that's fair. I'm not saying he'll get on with another engineer as well as he has with GP,
but I'm just trying to visualise the situation. I really want to be in a team where GP is.
Yeah, GP forever. MaxTV and my mate GP. I think as long as an engineer is able to
deal with his bluntness and give him clear and concise information when he needs it,
I don't think Max will snap him cares. I don't think he cares.
No, but if he was considering McLaren, would it be a nice, oh, that would be good. Sure.
Sure. Yeah, you know, it's like turning up to the pub and someone's when we bought you a pint.
See something that's not quite right? Our annotations are AI-generated and can sometimes miss the mark.
Click the flag icon on any annotation to suggest a correction.