Digital retailing means buying a car with more steps done online. Instead of only talking to a salesperson, you can often get payment estimates and trade-in details through a website.
RET1 Fusion is software dealers use to sell cars online. It can show customers estimated monthly payments, take trade-in info, and offer add-on protection products right in the shopping flow.
Tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods, which can raise the cost of vehicles and parts when automakers rely on cross-border supply chains. The segment frames tariffs as a squeeze on automakers and a reason they may cut costs or adjust pricing.
The FTC is a U.S. government agency that helps police misleading or unfair advertising. Here, it’s asking dealers to flag competitors that break the rules for car ads.
Vinart dealerships is the dealership group connected to the guest. The key point is that the dealer chose not to join a big retail partnership, showing not everyone benefits the same way.
The SEC is the U.S. agency that requires public companies to report important information. In this case, it’s the source for the official compensation numbers mentioned for GM’s CEO.
It’s when a dealership advertises something to get you to come in, but then tries to steer you to a different deal after you’re there. The goal is usually to get you to spend more or accept terms you didn’t expect.
Buyers usually care about the final total they pay, not just the sticker price. Rules like this are meant to make the advertised number closer to what you’ll actually pay at the end.
F&I is the part of a dealership deal that covers financing and add-on products. A compliance conference is where dealers learn how to follow the rules so they don’t get in trouble for misleading sales or paperwork.
Dealers can also complain to state authorities, not just federal regulators. That means one dealer’s bad behavior can lead to investigations from different government offices.
Instead of acting on ads alone, regulators also look at what customers report when they feel misled. If enough people complain, it becomes more likely the FTC will investigate.
They’re talking about a deal between a car brand and Amazon to change how people buy cars. The key point is why one dealership decided not to join that program.
Route 1 Fusion is software dealerships pay for to help sell cars online. It’s designed to make the shopping experience quicker and clearer—especially things like estimating your trade-in value and setting up appointments.
This is a tool that estimates what your current car might be worth. The idea is to give you a clearer number sooner so you can plan your next steps and avoid surprises later.
Equity is basically how much value you have in your current car. If your car is worth more than what you owe, you have positive equity that can help with the next purchase.
Appointment scheduling means customers can book a time to visit the dealership online. It helps the dealership move faster because people commit to a visit instead of just browsing.
These are estimated monthly payment numbers based on your credit. The goal is to help you understand what you might be able to afford before you get deep into the process.
Pre-qualification tools help you get an early idea of what kind of monthly payment you might qualify for. It’s meant to speed things up so you’re not waiting until you’re at the dealership to find out.
Hyundai is the car brand in this story. They were the first to work with Amazon to sell cars through Amazon instead of only through traditional dealerships.
F&I is the finance-and-paperwork part of buying a car. It’s where you handle things like the loan details and optional add-ons, and the dealer is worried the online flow doesn’t meet disclosure rules.
Trade-ins are the customer’s current vehicle being used as part of the purchase price for a new car. Here, the speaker says Amazon had specific plans to handle trade-ins through a third party rather than through the dealer, which was a concern.
“100% disclosure” means the buyer should be told everything they need to know before signing the paperwork. The dealer is saying the Amazon process might not allow the dealership to provide all required information.
An “entirely online transaction” describes a sales flow where the customer completes most steps digitally and the dealer’s role is reduced to handing over the keys. The speaker says this approach can work for speed and convenience, but he’s worried about compliance and the ability to complete required F&I disclosures and paperwork.
They’re talking about selling cars through Amazon instead of only through a traditional dealership website or showroom. Amazon brings shoppers to the listing, but the dealer/OEM still has to make money on the deal. The big issue is whether it actually sells enough cars to be worth it.
They’re suggesting this is more about getting attention and leads than making lots of immediate sales. Even if not many cars are sold, the brand might still benefit from being seen by more shoppers. The real question is whether it leads to profitable deals.
They mean car companies want more people to notice their cars online. Since Amazon is where a lot of shoppers already go, it’s a convenient place to show products. The goal is more attention and potential leads.
Dealers who tried this aren’t getting great results overall. The number of actual car sales seems low, and making money on those sales is harder than expected. So it’s not a clear win yet.
They’re saying Amazon may offer extra deals or money-off offers to get people to buy through Amazon. That can change how customers decide where to purchase. It also adds complexity because the incentives may not match what the car brand or dealer offers.
They’re talking about incentives that encourage people to actually buy through that online platform. The goal is to get more completed sales there, not just browsing.
They’re saying most people still want to go to a dealership to look at the car, touch it, and drive it before they commit. Even if online shopping exists, the “real” decision often happens face-to-face.
They mean this is a new kind of car-buying setup, so there aren’t clear rules yet for what “good” looks like. It’s hard to judge results because the market is still figuring itself out.
“Subaru Uncharted” doesn’t clearly match a standard car model you’d see listed like a typical sedan or SUV. It likely refers to a special Subaru vehicle or project meant to show off an exploration or off-road idea.
They’re talking about how many people start the buying process online but don’t actually end up purchasing. Success isn’t just views—it’s whether shoppers follow through to a real sale.
A protection package is usually a bundle of extra add-ons the dealer offers along with the car. It can include things meant to protect the vehicle or extend coverage, depending on what the dealer includes.
They’re arguing about what “success” should mean for a car-selling platform. Is it only the number of cars sold, or should it also include how many people are seriously shopping online and taking steps that suggest they might buy?
When you shop online for a car, you usually see a search results page first, then a page for a specific car. The hosts are talking about tracking how many people actually look at those pages and seem ready to buy, not just how many cars end up sold.
“Penciling a deal” means doing the math to see if the purchase works for your budget. It’s basically the point where someone isn’t just looking—they’re trying to figure out if they can actually make the deal happen.
Even though people shop online, the hosts say most buyers still want to finish the purchase at a real dealership. That’s where the final negotiation and paperwork usually happen.
They’re talking about buying a car either completely online or using a mix of online and in-person steps. The big idea is that the “best” process depends on what customers want and how the dealership is set up to deliver it.
OEM partners are the car companies themselves—the brands that build the vehicles. Dealers work with them so the buying and service process matches what the brand wants.
Carvana is a company known for selling cars with a heavy online focus. They’re being used here as an example of how a strong online process can be something customers actually like.
Tesla is being referenced as a company that sells and supports cars in a very streamlined way. The host is saying other retailers can learn from that approach to make the process smoother for customers.
LIVE
Consider RET1 Fusion for your dealership's digital retailing.
Customers can build vehicle financing options online with estimated payments,
trade-ins, and you can even showcase optional protection products.
Faster process, elevated sales, more satisfied customers.
Visit RET1.com slash Fusion to connect for a demo today.
Welcome to Daily Drive for Tuesday, April 21st, 2026.
I'm Kallen Walker in Las Vegas today on the show.
Hyundai's CEO says tariffs are squeezing the automaker.
GM discloses CEO Mary Barra's compensation last year a cool $30 million,
and the FTC wants dealers to report competitors who break advertising rules.
Plus, Andrew Wright of Vinart dealerships talks about why he chose not to participate
in Hyundai's Amazon Auto's partnership, despite helping establish the program.
Let's run through all the news you need to know to keep up in the auto industry.
Hyundai's CEO Jose Munoz has a blunt message. Tariffs are hurting the company.
The South Korean automaker is feeling the squeeze in its biggest market, the US,
where a 15% tariff hits about half the vehicles it sells here.
Munoz says the fix is ramping up American production, but that takes years.
In the meantime, Hyundai is cutting costs wherever it can and adjusting prices to cushion the blow.
Mary Barra of General Motors took home just under $30 million last year,
making her once again the highest paid CEO in Detroit.
According to a filing with the SEC, GM bumped Barra's total comp up about 1.4% from 2024.
And here's a number. Over her 12 years running the company,
she's now earned more than $300 million.
And the Federal Trade Commission wants dealers to report competitors who violate
vehicle advertising rules. The Agency's Bureau of Consumer Protection said during a webinar last
week that dishonest advertising, like bait-and-switch tactics, diverts traffic from honest dealers.
The FTC clarified that document fees must be included in advertised vehicle prices.
Here to talk more about it is our own Paige Hodder, who covers retail for us at Automotive News.
Paige, welcome back to Daily Drive. Thanks for having me.
Now, Paige, are dealers receptive to reporting competitors or is their pushback?
I think it kind of depends on the dealer. I actually spent last week a couple days
in Vegas at a dealership F&I compliance conference, essentially. And we heard stories of,
in the past, some of these cases or little things get started because it's actually a dealer that
reports another dealer, not necessarily to the FTC, but sometimes to state attorney generals.
And so it's definitely something dealers do. I think some dealers don't want the government
involved in the business. And so there's an attitude that way. But one of the biggest
pushbacks against the whole FTC's warning about advertising is, if I don't do advertising this
way, then my competitor down the street is doing it and then I can't compete with them.
So this really came out as a, that's not a good enough excuse. Just because your competitor
is breaking law does not give you a good enough reason to break the law. And so if that person
is impeding your business, you may be the best path forward is actually reporting them so that
they stopped up. Now, how does this enforcement approach compare to what the FTC has done in the
past? And what makes them think dealer reporting will be more effective?
I think the FTC really relies a lot on consumer complaints. Someone who comes into the dealership
maybe has a bad experience and reports it. And I think sometimes it can take time for those to
bubble up enough to warrant action. The letters the FTC sent out about these advertising practices
made it really clear that they're paying attention to this. And clearly they've already identified
some dealership groups that were breaking the rules and need to change their practices. And
I think really making the dealership groups across the country, even the ones who weren't sent a letter,
aware of these problems and the very specific ways they expect to follow them,
is a step forward to more consistent enforcement and then getting dealers involved in the
conversation is another step. If you're concerned that your competitors are harming your business
by breaking these rules, let's have a conversation about that. Let's get NADA involved in that
conversation. And I think that's a really kind of a different tone rather than the relying solely
on consumer complaints. Paige, thank you so much for joining me. Thanks for having me.
And those are today's headlines. You can find more details on all those stories at AutoNews.com.
Coming up, Andrew Wright of Vinart dealerships discusses why he opted out of Hyundai's Amazon
Auto's partnership despite being the first dealer to partner with the venture to get it started.
That's next on Daily Drive.
Route 1 Fusion is an expanded digital retail solution built to enhance your dealership's
customer engagement and improve the results of your online efforts. Many customers expect a fast,
online-friendly experience and prefer clarity early in the process, especially if they have
a vehicle to trade. So ask yourself, are your current digital retailing tools helping shoppers
understand their trade and value and helping your team move deals forward faster? With a
subscription to Fusion, you can benefit from its trade and valuation feature that empowers customers
to estimate the value of their current vehicle early in the process. This helps customers arrive
in store better prepared, make expectations around payments and equity more realistic,
and move conversations and decisions faster. The result is higher quality leads, more productive
interactions, and a smoother transition from online to in store. And trade and valuation
is just one example of how Route 1 Fusion can expand your digital retail experience. Fusion also
supports other features that include appointment scheduling so customers can view your availability
and book a time. Pre-qualification tools with subscription provide quick, credit-based payment
options and production product presentations allow you to present products earlier to help
customers explore their options. Schedule a personalized demo to see how Fusion can help
generate more opportunities from your online traffic. Visit route1.com slash fusion to connect with
one today. Welcome back to Daily Drive. I'm Kellyn Walker. Hyundai was the first auto maker to
partner with Amazon to sell vehicles on its platform. Andrew Wright helped establish the
program for Hyundai dealers but ultimately chose not to participate. Andrew Wright is managing
partner at Venart dealerships. He spoke with automotive news retail tech reporter Mark Homer
about his concerns with the Amazon autos platform and what he's seeing 18 months into the partnership.
Well, Andrew, thank you for joining me. It's interesting to me that you chose as a Hyundai
dealer not to participate in that. How come? Yeah, so I have a unique perspective on the whole
thing. I was actually involved at the inception of this program in helping to get it established
for Hyundai dealers on behalf of Hyundai dealers with the folks in Amazon autos. And ultimately
the decision that I made not to participate in the pilot really revolved around some concerns
that I had with respect to the F&I portion of the process and how trade-ins were going to be handled.
The folks at Amazon had specific ideas that they were set on implementing regarding how
trade-ins were going to be handled specifically by a third party as opposed to by the dealer.
But the real big one was F&I. And F&I was a challenge for me because they were limiting
the products that we could offer on the platform. And I had concerns about requirements for 100%
disclosure with our customers. So my fear and the advice I was given by my legal counsel was that
the Amazon process was not compliant with the 100% disclosure rules that largely govern
the F&I portion of the automobile transaction. What was happening was we were limited in which
products we were able to offer. And I wanted a customer going through the Amazon process
to sign an additional piece of paper when they took delivery that said that we did in fact offer
them all the available products that we had available in our F&I department. And Amazon was
not willing to allow us to do that. So they wanted it basically to be an entirely online
transaction. The customer came in, we gave them the keys and they left. And that's fine. I respect
that that was their wish, that was their desire, that was how they wanted the sales process to
play out. I just had concerns about compliance. And I wasn't comfortable with moving forward.
Understood. Well, 18 months or so later since this has started, the goal here is to look back at
how it's been going so far. And I know that you're not participating, but I'm fairly certain you
have colleagues that are and you're certainly watching as a part of this. How do you think it's
been going? Well, first and foremost, I applaud Hyundai for trying to be innovative and progressive
and sort of the first ones in the pool, if you will, from the standpoint of offering Hyundai
products and services via the dealers on the Amazon platform. I think it started as a marketing
play and I think it remains a marketing play. And I think it remains an area where a lot of OEMs
are starting to feel that they can get eyeballs on their products on the Amazon platform because
let's face it, it is the nation's and arguably the world's leading e-commerce platform. So why
wouldn't you want your products to be there? So some of my dealer colleagues have opted to
say in the program, the ones that have are, to my knowledge, reporting mixed results at best in
terms of actual sales and transactions that are occurring. I don't think the volume is necessarily
tremendous. I don't really think anybody thought the volume was going to be tremendous. So I think
it's important to view it with proper context and through the appropriate lens. Again,
I think Amazon is serving as a platform to garner some additional attention for products that
deal or sell. But how many transactions are actually occurring and the quality of those
transactions, the profitability of those transactions, I think that those are the big
question marks right now that still remain 18 months into this. Why are they question marks?
Is the information not forthcoming? I haven't seen specific numbers nor have specific numbers
been shared with the dealer network regarding how many cars have actually been sold. I do know
anecdotally from the dealers I know that are on the platform, the numbers are small and profitability
is challenging. But Amazon is also taking it upon themselves to offer additional incentives to induce
customers to transact on the platform. Ostensibly, I can only imagine so they can at least have something
to learn from, which is smart. But that's another added layer of complexity from an incentive standpoint
if a customer can get an additional incentive from Amazon versus from HMA or whatever it is.
I don't know what that's necessarily doing to promote transparency, but it's definitely an
inducement to transact on the platform. So I'm sure that's why they're doing it.
Are some happy or all disappointed? Is there a perspective on this that's somewhere else?
I would say the prevailing sentiment at this point, Mark, is probably indifferent. I think it's way too
early to tell because of the low volume of transactions. I think that there's just a lot
of dealers out there that are kind of like, I could go either way on it. It's not really
costing me much by being on there, but at the same time, I'm not really gaining much by being on there.
And I think that speaks to two things. I think it speaks to the immature nature of the platform,
of the Amazon platform as a place to transact and retail automotive. I think that's number one.
And number two, the vast majority of consumers still want to transact in person in the dealership.
They want to see it, feel it, touch it, smell it, drive it before they buy it. And I think they
see the value in having their hand held for all intents and purposes by a sales professional
that's well trained, that can give them all the options they need and all the information they
need to make informed decisions. And I think that's where the majority are still gravitating
and to transact. And there's nothing wrong with that. But having said that, I want to be clear.
I don't think that that means that dealers shouldn't be on Amazon. I think that
dealers need to make their own decisions about being in places where consumers want to transact.
And it needs to make sense for all parties involved, right? And I think that's what's
still trying to shake out here. Sure. Well, if expectations were that the initial year,
18 months, would have a lot of vehicles sold, then how do you gauge success?
I'm not really sure how you gauge success in an endeavor of this nature. I think it's
uncharted territory, right? We have to figure out if it is more of an advertising or a marketing
play, I think it really boils down to how many eyeballs are you getting on your products?
And how many people are going down the path towards a transaction, but end up not consummating
that transaction, right? So they're going in there, they're putting a vehicle in their shopping cart,
things like that. But maybe they're just not comfortable transacting on the platform. So
they're bouncing out and then they're still going to the dealer. So is that the worst thing in the
world? No, I don't think it is. I think that's totally fine. Let's flesh that out a little.
If success isn't gauged in numbers, does Amazon Auto's work and that it just brings more eyeballs
to dealerships, even if they're not a huge amount? Well, I mean, I still think there is the success
lies in the numbers. I think it still needs to be quantifiable and I'm sure that it is. I just
think that, you know, what are we quantifying? If we're purely quantifying success based on the
number of vehicles that are sold, then I think it would be hard to gauge this as a success at this
point. If we're gauging it off the numbers of people that are visiting the site that are shopping
for vehicles that are clicking around that are looking at the equivalent of a of a VDP or an
SRP page that are actually penciling a deal or are submitting information that is commensurate with
intent to transact, then I think, you know, those those numbers might paint a different picture,
but I don't I haven't been privy to those numbers. I'm not sure what they look like. And even if I
had them, I don't know as though I have the proper context to really interpret them effectively. I
think it's it's again, it's one of those things that has to mature over time. And then at some point,
the people that are making the decisions about whether or not to partake in the program and
participate on the platform, they need to decide if it's worth it.
I know that you helped consult and putting this thing together, but initially, yes, you chose
not ultimately not to be part of it. But what are your hopes then for this partnership?
My hopes really are that, you know, we start to we start to learn more about the desire of our
customers to transact in all alternative places and platforms, right? I mean, I still think that
this is undeniable, the vast majority of consumers still want to transact in a physical
dealership in their local market. That's that's what the data says, right? However, there are
incrementally more and more customers day after day, month after month, year over year, that are
choosing to go down the path of 100% online transactions or partial online transactions.
So we need to learn from that. We need to make sure we have the tools and the resources to
be there for our customers where they want to transact and make the process as
smooth and transparent as possible. And so as a retailer, that's where my focus is.
And I look forward to the opportunity to work with all of my OEM partners to develop processes
and solutions that are going to meet the customer where they want to be met and service them how
they want to be serviced. That's what it's all about here. And I just think we need to resist
the temptation as an industry to sort of put everybody in the same pool or in the same box
that they, you know, that everybody wants to transact in the same fashion. And that's just
not the case. I don't care what Carvana is doing. I don't care what Tesla does.
We can learn from those organizations because they've built robust platforms that deliver an
experience that more and more customers do like, enjoy and pursue. We can do the same thing,
we can absolutely do it and we can compete. Yes, indeed.
Andrew, thank you for your time. I appreciate it very much. My pleasure.
Another dealer who has a very different perspective on the Amazon Auto's platform.
You know, we always like to wait, vet stuff out, make sure it's a right fit for our organization
before we bring it to market. And now after several meetings that we had with Jess Morrow
at Amazon, it just made total sense to join this program.
We'd love to hear from you. Let us know what you think of the show and the topics we cover today.
Send us an email at dailydriveatautonews.com or leave us a voicemail at 313-444-2774.
And if you enjoy the podcast, remember to like,
leave a review and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
About this episode
Tariffs are squeezing Hyundai, GM reveals Mary Barra’s ~$30M pay, and the FTC is pushing dealers to report competitors over deceptive advertising—especially bait-and-switch and missing required fees. Retail coverage turns to digital retailing: Route 1 Fusion promotes faster online trade/valuation and F&I product presentation. The standout segment is a conversation with Venart’s Andrew Wright, who helped launch Hyundai’s Amazon Autos but opted out, citing F&I disclosure/compliance concerns, limited product offerings, and unclear results after 18 months. He sees the platform more as marketing than a proven sales engine.
Andrew Wright, managing partner at Vinart Dealerships, explains why he chose not to participate in Hyundai’s Amazon Autos partnership despite helping establish the program. The FTC wants dealers to report competitors who violate advertising rules. Plus, Hyundai’s CEO says tariffs are hurting the company.