The Undercut – Fuelling the feuds in Supercars!
About this episode
A wide-ranging Supercars-focused chat mixes personality, rivalry, and race analysis. Aaron Noon and Jack Perkins kick off with the “swoop” haircut debate, then celebrate Ryan Wood as a standout performer (plus NASCAR first-win stories for Ty Gibbs and Kai Allen). The big on-track talking point is the Chaz Mostert vs Brodie Kostecki incident and what it says about championship pressure, media timing, and driver accountability. They also debate “a-grade” driver depth (Chev vs Toyota), Rua Puna’s suitability for Supercars, parity-trigger concerns, Gen3’s cost vs success, and even commentary production choices—ending with tributes to Terry Sawyer and Barry Sheene.
Chevrolet Equinox
"The 2026 Chevy Equinox is more than an SUV, it's your Sunday tailgate and your parking lot snack bar... It's more than an SUV, it's your Equinox."
The Chevrolet Equinox is a regular SUV model from Chevrolet. They’re basically saying it’s a useful everyday car that can also handle fun stuff like tailgates and carrying gear.
The Chevrolet Equinox is a compact SUV crossover from Chevrolet. In this segment, the hosts frame it as more than just transportation—positioning it as a practical vehicle for tailgating, errands, and road trips.
the undercut
"Great to have you with us, it's time for the undercut. There is so much to talk about... I'm Aaron Noon and the guy across the desk is Jack Perkins."
“The undercut” is the name of the part of the show where they start the main discussion. In racing, it can also mean a pit-stop strategy, but here it’s mainly setting up the segment.
“The undercut” is used here as the show’s segment name—signaling the hosts are about to get into the main discussion. In racing terms, an undercut is also a strategy where a car pits earlier to gain track position, but the transcript is primarily using it as a chapter marker.
motor racing chat
"But before we get into anything, any motor racing chat, any Rua Puna chat, any Topor chat, the hair, it has been the biggest topic out of the first episode of the year."
They’re telling you that before anything else, they’ll talk about racing. It’s basically a heads-up that the show is about motorsport.
The hosts reference “motor racing chat” as a lead-in to the episode’s content. This is a structural cue that the conversation will shift into racing-related topics (series, rivalries, or on-track strategy).
doubleheader in New Zealand for supercars
"We've got heaps to talk about, he's going with a doubleheader in New Zealand for supercars. As always on this show, we'd like to start with our Castro performer of the week..."
A doubleheader is basically two races scheduled close together. Teams have to plan for both races in a row, so tires, car setup, and driver energy all matter over the whole weekend.
A doubleheader means two race events (or rounds) are held back-to-back over a short period. In Supercars, that can affect strategy because teams have to manage setup changes, tire use, and driver fatigue across both rounds.
Jason Richards trophy
"...Brian Wood, who came like that close to winning the Jason Richards trophy, first win for Toyota in top or the previous weekend..."
The Jason Richards Trophy is an award in Supercars based on points. Instead of just winning one race, you earn it by doing well across multiple rounds.
The Jason Richards Trophy is a Supercars season award tied to points performance across a defined set of rounds. When the host says someone came close to winning it, they’re referring to a points race rather than a single-event win.
most points across the two rounds
"...was on target to have the most points across the two rounds to win that trophy."
That phrase means the winner is the driver who scores the most points over two races. It’s not only about winning one race; doing well in both can decide the outcome.
This describes a points-based championship/trophy system where performance is measured by total points accumulated over multiple rounds. It changes how teams approach each race—sometimes consistency can matter as much as outright wins.
on track success
"I think we've got it with him and then you couple that with on track success and capability being perfect."
It just means how well someone performs during the actual races. The hosts are saying he’s doing well not only in interviews, but also when the car is on track.
“On track success” refers to measurable performance during races—lap times, consistency, and finishing results. In motorsport discussions, it’s often contrasted with off-track skills like media presence to describe a well-rounded driver.
race smart people
"But you put them in the car, they are the most race smart people you will ever come across."
It means the driver is good at thinking through the race, not just driving fast. They make smart choices during the race when things get complicated.
“Race smart” describes drivers who understand strategy and decision-making—when to push, when to manage tires/fuel, and how to read traffic. It’s less about raw speed alone and more about making good calls under pressure.
Castrol
"So I feel he's my Castrol performer of the fortnight. Have you got a Castrol performer of the week or from our little chat in WhatsApp in the lead-up to this show, I've got a sense that you've got a bit of a performers of the week going this week."
Castrol is a company that makes engine oils and other car fluids. In this show, they’re using the Castrol name for a “performer” award, like a spotlight on a driver’s week. It’s basically a sponsor-backed way to recognize who stood out.
Castrol is an automotive lubricant brand (oil and related products) that sponsors motorsport coverage and often appears in “performer of the week/fortnight” style segments. When the host calls someone a “Castrol performer,” it’s a branded way of highlighting standout performances or notable stories. It’s common for sponsors to tie their name to recurring fan-facing awards.
first time winners
"Well it's a bit the same in the sense of it's a fortnight thing but what I love in motorsport and obviously all sport as well but particularly motorsport is first time winners."
They’re highlighting when someone wins a race for the first time. In racing, that’s a major milestone because it usually means everything finally clicked—driver, team, and car. Fans and teams often celebrate it in a big way.
The hosts are talking about “first time winners” in motorsport—drivers or teams winning a race for the first time. It’s a big deal because it often signals a breakthrough in performance, strategy, or car setup. The celebration can become part of the sport’s culture and fan identity.
first win
"...you made a T-shirt for your first win didn't you? ...the two performers of the fortnight... picking up his first win..."
A “first win” means the driver finally wins a race for the first time. It’s a big moment because it proves they can compete at that level, and everyone celebrates it.
A “first win” in motorsport is a key psychological and career milestone—often celebrated intensely because it validates a driver’s progress and team strategy. The hosts highlight how the celebrations and reactions are part of the sport’s culture.
NASCAR Cup Series
"...was Ty Gibbs picking up his first win in the NASCAR Cup Series. He'd done 131 Cup Series starts to date so it was coming..."
NASCAR’s Cup Series is the biggest, most important stock-car racing league in the U.S. Winning your first race there is a huge deal because it means you can compete with the best drivers.
The NASCAR Cup Series is the top-level stock-car racing series in the United States. When a driver gets their first win in the Cup Series, it’s a major milestone because the competition is the highest level NASCAR offers.
Xfinity Series races
"...Ty helped me a lot personally prepare for the two Xfinity Series races I did last year."
The Xfinity Series is NASCAR’s “step below” the top Cup Series. It’s where drivers build experience and show they’re ready for bigger races.
The Xfinity Series is NASCAR’s second-tier national series, sitting below the Cup Series. Drivers often use it as a proving ground—strong results can lead to more opportunities at the Cup level.
JGR team
"...I obviously followed the JGR team with serious interest and just to see that kid..."
JGR (Joe Gibbs Racing) is a well-known NASCAR racing team. Having a strong team behind you can help a driver practice, learn, and get better results.
JGR refers to Joe Gibbs Racing, a major NASCAR team. The transcript ties it to Ty Gibbs and the family connection, emphasizing how team support and resources can shape a driver’s development.
Supercars feuds
"to just see what it means to both of them. Just to watch their celebrations, both unique and different in their own respects and to thank the various people that have helped them. That is what it's all about."
They’re discussing rivalries in Supercars racing—basically, how drivers compete against each other and how those battles turn into big career moments. The episode is using race results and personal stories to explain why the rivalry matters.
The hosts are talking about rivalries (“feuds”) in Australian Supercars racing and how those competitive relationships play out through wins, mentorship, and celebrations. It’s framed as a story of two drivers and the moments that shaped their careers.
race boots
"Kai's got those race boots, sneaker things going here. Bush is a well, he's just main game with Erebus full time by that stage."
Race boots are special shoes drivers wear to feel the pedals better and keep their feet steady. They’re designed so you can press the pedals precisely without your foot sliding around.
“Race boots” are specialized footwear designed for motorsport pedal feel and safety. They typically have a stiff sole and grip to help drivers make precise inputs while reducing the risk of foot slippage.
Erebus
"Bush is a well, he's just main game with Erebus full time by that stage. Kai's learning the ropes."
Erebus is a well-known racing team in Australia. Saying a driver is “with Erebus full time” means they’re driving for that team regularly, not just as a one-off.
Erebus is a prominent Australian motorsport team/brand in Supercars. When the hosts say someone is “with Erebus full time,” they’re indicating a major step up to a regular seat with a top-level outfit.
learning the ropes
"Kai's learning the ropes. How is it that it all turns out that he beats Brody to win his first race?"
“Learning the ropes” means getting used to a new, tougher level of racing. It’s the phase where a driver figures out how everything works—car setup, race strategy, and team communication.
“Learning the ropes” describes a driver’s early adjustment period when moving into a higher level of competition. It usually involves adapting to faster cars, stronger competition, and the team’s race-week routines.
Super 3
"I remember watching him in potentially Super 3 and Garth Tannac commentating one of the racers saying at one of the go-kart awards nights,"
Super 3 is a lower-level racing series that helps drivers build skills before moving up. The host is saying they’ve seen the driver compete there before they reached the bigger stage.
“Super 3” refers to a junior Australian racing category that many drivers use as a stepping stone toward top-tier Supercars. It’s mentioned here to give context to the host’s past viewing of the driver’s development.
Garth Tannac
"I remember watching him in potentially Super 3 and Garth Tannac commentating one of the racers saying at one of the go-kart awards nights,"
Garth Tannac is mentioned as someone who commentated on the racing. Commentators help explain what’s happening on track so viewers can follow the action.
Garth Tannac is mentioned as a commentator, which highlights the role of media coverage in motorsport. Commentators often shape how audiences understand racing by explaining driver progress and race context.
go-kart awards nights
"one of the racers saying at one of the go-kart awards nights, just about war at the carpet going up to the stage to get all these awards. So fantastic for him and his whole family."
Go-kart awards nights are part of grassroots motorsport culture where young drivers are recognized for performance and progression. These events often mark early talent development before drivers move into higher categories.
podium
"[488.5s] And I've got a feeling that he's going to get another one not too far away [490.8s] because he just kept finding the podium. [492.9s] He was literally wearing out the podium like he did the cup at that night for the carding."
The podium is where the top three finishers stand after the race. If someone keeps getting on it, they’re consistently finishing near the front.
A “podium” is the top-three finish in a race, typically awarded to the first, second, and third place drivers. When the host says he was “wearing out the podium,” it implies repeated strong results rather than a one-off finish.
closing couple of laps
"[521.2s] Chas Moster, Brody Kostecki, Sunday race. [523.7s] Was that a statement by Chas what unfolded in those closing couple of laps? [531.1s] Well, it's hard to say whether it's a statement or just a bit of blowing off some steam"
“Closing couple of laps” refers to the final stretch of a race, when positions are decided and drivers are most aggressive. In racing analysis, late-race behavior often indicates strategy, tire management, and how drivers respond to frustration or pressure.
Red Cross
"[531.1s] Well, it's hard to say whether it's a statement or just a bit of blowing off some steam [536.4s] from frustration, to be honest with you. [538.4s] I think Chas had had a terrible weekend at Red Cross."
“Red Cross” appears to be a race venue or event name in the Supercars calendar being referenced as where Chas had a terrible weekend. Venue-specific track characteristics can strongly affect car setup and driver performance.
rectus scale
"[553.1s] And I think by the end of the weekend, when he got himself into a reasonable position, [559.0s] yeah, I think, you know, one little interaction with Brody just sent him off the rectus scale [564.9s] and he decided to give him something back and more."
This sounds like a description of a driver getting thrown off their line or getting into trouble after an interaction. In racing, even a small contact can ruin your speed and your chances for the rest of the race.
“Rectus scale” sounds like a mis-transcription of a racing phrase describing going off-course or getting sent wide/into trouble. In Supercars, small interactions late in a race can cause a driver to lose momentum, position, and sometimes the rest of their race.
post-race conversations
"And, you know, you've seen from the post-race conversations. I don't think he meant for what happened to happen."
After a race, drivers and teams talk about what happened. If someone thinks another driver acted unfairly, those comments can turn into a bigger argument.
“Post-race conversations” refers to what drivers and teams say immediately after an event—often about incidents, penalties, or on-track behavior. In supercars, these comments can fuel public feuds and influence how fans and media interpret a controversial move.
frustration
"But certainly it comes from frustration, mate. You know, I think he's just wants to be the number. He's got the number one in his car and he's currently the number two in the team. So he's frustrated."
They’re saying the driver was upset, and that can make people take bigger risks. When you really want a result, emotions can push you into mistakes.
The hosts connect driver frustration to decision-making under pressure. In racing, frustration can lead to riskier moves—especially when a driver is fighting for a specific position or championship/trophy outcome.
Jason Richards Memorial trophies
"...the trophies on the line, the Jason Richards Memorial trophies on the line. And I think at an angle that hasn't been really explored in all of this, that occurred to me the other day."
They’re talking about a special trophy connected to Jason Richards. The point is that the prize made the drivers more motivated to fight hard.
The “Jason Richards Memorial trophies” are a specific award tied to the event being discussed. Mentioning them frames why the drivers’ actions mattered—this wasn’t just racing for position, it was racing for a meaningful prize.
trophies on the line
"And, you know, I was going to say that the move from Brody came from the fact that once Ryan would dropped out, the trophies on the line, the Jason Richards Memorial trophies on the line."
They mean the race matters a lot because it affects who wins an award. When there’s something big to win, drivers often push harder.
“Trophies on the line” describes a high-stakes situation where the outcome of a race directly affects standings or awards. When trophies are at stake, drivers may take more aggressive risks to secure the necessary position.
move at turn two
"...to the lengths that Brody did with that move at turn two, which were very, very forceful to win that trophy. That trophy means something because otherwise he doesn't launch that move..."
They’re describing an action that happened at a particular corner of the track. Moves at specific turns are often judged more harshly because the conditions there make them easier or harder to pull off safely.
A “move at turn two” refers to an overtaking or defensive maneuver executed at a specific corner. Corner-specific aggression matters because the available racing line, traction, and sightlines determine how forceful (and risky) a pass can be.
final series
"So when the finals come around or a bath is wins on the line or anything else that matters, I'll give as good as I get. It could be. And I think we covered a bit of this off in our previous undercut"
“Final series” here refers to the end-of-season championship phase where results in the last races can decide the title. That changes how drivers approach risk: they may defend harder, time moves more carefully, or accept short-term losses to protect points. The episode frames this as the pressure cooker that turns on-track incidents into bigger rivalries.
driving standards
"where we spoke about the drivers finding the limitations of the driving standards, ..."
“Driving standards” in motorsport usually means the expected level of driving behavior—how aggressively drivers can race while still staying within rules and stewards’ interpretations. When drivers “find the limitations,” they’re testing where the boundary is between acceptable contact/defense and penalties. That’s especially relevant when the goal is to set up for a final championship run.
bumper
"So maybe think about next time you go and pass me or use my bumper. Maybe you'll do something different."
In racing talk, “bumper” usually refers to the front or rear of a car used during close racing and contact. The transcript suggests using someone’s bumper as a reference for aggressive passing—i.e., contact or pressure that can lead to off-track outcomes and penalties.
30 second penalty
"OK, 30 second penalty, dumps him down the order. But what it does for the bigger picture, he doesn't lose the championship because of that race."
Sometimes race officials add extra time to a driver’s result. A “30-second penalty” means the driver effectively loses time, so they can fall behind other cars in the race order.
A 30-second penalty is a time penalty added to a driver’s race time (or served via a stop/go procedure), which drops them down the running order. In series like Supercars, these penalties are often used to punish contact or unsafe driving and can have major knock-on effects even if the driver still finishes the race.
dumps him down the order
"OK, 30 second penalty, dumps him down the order. But what it does for the bigger picture, he doesn't lose the championship because of that race."
When you get a penalty, you often fall behind other cars. That’s what they mean by “dumps him down the order”—you’re no longer in the same spot you were running.
“Dumps him down the order” describes how a time penalty immediately changes track position relative to other competitors. Even if the penalized driver doesn’t retire, losing position can affect points, strategy, and the ability to challenge for the championship later.
championship points
"But what it does for the bigger picture, he doesn't lose the championship because of that race. I mean, we saw last year, he did not finish at Bathurst and still won the championship. So coughing up some points at, you know, round four of the championship, the final race is not going to be the end of the world in terms of the championship."
In racing championships, you don’t just race for one win—you earn points across many events. Losing points from one race can hurt, but it might still be recoverable later.
Championship points are the scoring system that determines the season winner across multiple rounds, not just a single race. The transcript frames the penalty as costly in the short term (“coughing up some points”) but not necessarily fatal because the driver still has remaining rounds to recover.
engine issue
"Now, we all know there was an engine issue with the car at Adelaide for Brock Feeney. Ultimately, that's what cost him the championship."
They mean something went wrong with the engine. In racing, engine trouble is a big deal because it can slow the car down or even stop it from finishing, which can cost championship points.
An “engine issue” is a mechanical failure or malfunction that prevents the engine from performing correctly—anything from misfires to overheating or internal damage. In a racing championship, engine problems are especially costly because they can force reduced performance, retirements, or missed qualifying/finishing opportunities.
Adelaide
"Now, we all know there was an engine issue with the car at Adelaide for Brock Feeney. Ultimately, that's what cost him the championship."
They’re talking about a specific race in Adelaide. If a car has a mechanical problem there, it can cost a driver big points and hurt their chances to win the championship.
“Adelaide” refers to the Adelaide race where Brock Feeney’s car had an engine issue. In motorsport, a single technical problem at a key event can swing the championship outcome because it affects points and reliability across the season.
bury that hatchet
"But I think he just he's going to die. I think he probably not prepared to bury that hatchet maybe until he wins a championship."
“Bury that hatchet” is an idiom meaning to end a feud and move on. In the context of the podcast, it’s used to describe how rival drivers/teams may not resolve tensions until a major goal—like winning a championship—is achieved.
organic rivalry
"And it's real. It's organic. [1069.1s] And it comes because of the finals format at the core. [1073.0s] If you wind it all the way back to where did this thing?"
An “organic” rivalry is one that grows naturally from on-track events and repeated competitive interactions, rather than being manufactured by media hype. The hosts argue that the finals format and specific incidents (like Adelaide) are what created the rivalry.
finals format
"And it comes because of the finals format at the core. [1073.0s] If you wind it all the way back to where did this thing? [1076.7s] It starts because of the finals."
They’re saying the way the championship finals are set up affects who ends up racing who. That can lead to more drama because the stakes are higher and the matchups are tighter.
The hosts are talking about how the sport’s finals/knockout-style structure creates pressure and matchups that can spark rivalries. In racing, the format can change who you’re racing directly, when contact happens, and how grudges form.
engine drama
"The way that Adelaide unfolded, the way that the engine drama, [1083.2s] the contact on the first lap, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah."
“Engine drama” is shorthand for problems or failures related to the powertrain during a race weekend—things like misfires, overheating, or mechanical issues that affect performance. In motorsport coverage, these moments often become part of the rivalry narrative because they can change outcomes or lead to contact.
contact on the first lap
"The way that Adelaide unfolded, the way that the engine drama, [1083.2s] the contact on the first lap, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah."
They’re talking about a crash or bump right at the start of the race. Those early incidents often lead to arguments because everyone’s still close together and positions are being fought for.
First-lap contact is a common catalyst for long-running feuds in racing because it happens when the field is bunched up and drivers are fighting for position. Early incidents can also influence later strategy, penalties, and how teams interpret intent vs accident.
Ford
"We have got a great organic one here with two young guys, Ozzy and Kiwi, [1098.3s] Ford and Toyota, Triple Eight and Walcons shores. [1101.0s] It allows really well."
Ford is the car brand involved in this Supercars rivalry. When big brands like Ford and Toyota are competing, it can make rivalries feel bigger and more intense.
Ford is one of the major manufacturers in Supercars, and manufacturer rivalries often add fuel to driver/team feuds. The hosts are framing the rivalry as both personal and brand-based, with Ford vs Toyota as part of the storyline.
Toyota
"Ford and Toyota, Triple Eight and Walcons shores. [1101.0s] It allows really well. [1102.2s] And then you see so many people online say, oh, but the media is fueling all of this."
Toyota is the other brand in the rivalry they’re talking about. When Toyota and Ford are both involved, it often turns a driver feud into a bigger brand storyline.
Toyota is the other manufacturer named in the rivalry setup, paired directly against Ford. In Supercars, manufacturer competition can shape team priorities, driver matchups, and how fans interpret on-track incidents.
Walcons shores
"Ford and Toyota, Triple Eight and Walcons shores. [1101.0s] It allows really well. [1102.2s] And then you see so many people online say, oh, but the media is fueling all of this."
This sounds like a team name, but the transcript may have misheard it. They’re basically saying the rivalry involves specific teams, not just drivers.
“Walcons shores” appears to be a transcription error for a Supercars team name (likely “Walkinshaw”/“Walkinshaw Andretti United” or a related entry). The hosts are listing teams involved in the rivalry, so the exact team name matters for listeners trying to follow the story.
media is fueling all of this
"And then you see so many people online say, oh, but the media is fueling all of this. [1105.8s] This is terrible. [1106.7s] These are the same people who want a rivalry."
They’re talking about whether news coverage makes rivalries worse. The hosts say the people complaining are often the same ones who want rivalries in the first place.
The hosts discuss the idea that media coverage can amplify rivalries, and they push back on that criticism. This is a narrative/coverage topic rather than a technical automotive subject, but it’s central to how they frame the feud.
Rhymewood incident
"...before and after the Rhymewood incident at Adelaide last year. He's always been very good with the media..."
They mention a specific incident that people in the Supercars world recognize by a nickname. It’s basically shorthand for a notable crash/controversy that affected the driver’s reputation and how the media talked about him.
“Rhymewood incident” appears to be a named on-track controversy involving Brock Feeney. In racing coverage, incidents are often labeled by location or shorthand so fans can quickly connect the story to the specific moment and consequences.
villain because you want everything
"And that becomes an issue for someone like Jamie because you win so many races and then you become the villain because you want everything. And then if it was stuff, you're a victim of your own success."
When someone wins a lot in racing, some fans start to dislike them—not because they’re doing something wrong, but because they’re dominating. The “villain” label is basically about how people talk about them, not just their driving.
In motorsport, a driver can become a “villain” in the fan narrative when they dominate and appear to demand more—wins, control, or favorable treatment. It’s a social dynamic: success changes how rivals and fans interpret a driver’s actions.
victim of your own success
"And then if it was stuff, you're a victim of your own success. I can kind of see that potentially Brock could end up in a similar situation."
It means the driver’s success makes life harder for them. The more they win, the more people judge them and look for reasons to criticize them.
“Victim of your own success” is a common motorsport storyline where a driver’s achievements raise expectations and scrutiny. The better they do, the more every controversy or perceived slight gets amplified.
A-grade drivers
"So my question, Jack, who are the A-grade drivers of supercars? ... And we talked about this. ... what is an A-grader?"
“A-grade drivers” is just a way of saying the best, most proven drivers in the series. The hosts argue about what counts as “best,” usually based on wins and top results.
The hosts are using “A-grade drivers” as a way to rank driver quality in supercars, tied to results and perceived competitiveness. It’s essentially a subjective label, but they’re debating it using concrete performance context (like race-winning drivers).
Chevy
"... the Chevy side doesn't have a lot of Gen 3 race winning drivers, fact."
“Chevy” here means Chevrolet, the car brand that competes in Supercars. They’re debating whether Chevrolet has produced as many of the very best, race-winning drivers as other brands.
“Chevy” is shorthand for Chevrolet, one of the manufacturer brands competing in Supercars. The hosts are discussing how Chevrolet’s driver roster compares to other brands in terms of top-tier, race-winning talent.
Triple 8 car
"[1331.9s] He's never been out of a Triple 8 car. [1333.6s] Correct."
Triple Eight is a well-known Supercars racing team in Australia. If someone’s “never been out of a Triple 8 car,” it means they’ve mostly raced for that same team.
“Triple Eight” refers to Triple Eight Race Engineering, a major Australian Supercars team. Saying someone has “never been out of a Triple 8 car” means they’ve spent their career driving for that team, which often correlates with strong engineering support and competitive equipment.
best car for all of your career
"[1334.0s] But the aim of the game is to be in the best car for all of your career or as much of it as you can. [1338.5s] He's A, absolutely."
The hosts are discussing a career strategy in Supercars: staying in the best-performing car/team for as much of your career as possible. In racing, “best car” usually reflects the whole package—car setup, engineering, reliability, and driver support—not just raw power.
A-minus / A-elect / A's / bees and seas
"I've got two that I would say are A-minus... I had Kai Allen as an A-elect... There's guys who are bees and seas. Guys who are seas who could become bees..."
They’re ranking drivers into different “levels” based on how good they are and how likely they are to move up. It’s basically a way to talk about who’s expected to become a top star.
The hosts use a tiering system (A-minus, A-elect, A’s, bees, seas) to categorize drivers by perceived potential and likelihood of reaching top seats. It’s a shorthand for how teams and fans rate drivers’ career trajectories.
driver market
"...on who are the guys who are going to control the driver market for the next 5, 6, 7, 8 years? That if one moves, or if Matt Paine's going to leave Groves, or if Cam Waters ever left Tickford..."
They mean which drivers are likely to get the best seats in the future. If a driver leaves a team or a team changes its lineup, other drivers move up to fill those spots.
They’re talking about the “driver market” in Supercars—how teams and sponsors recruit and trade top drivers. The idea is that a small group of drivers can shape who gets seats over the next several years, depending on contract moves and team changes.
Groves
"...That if one moves, or if Matt Paine's going to leave Groves, or if Cam Waters ever left Tickford..."
Groves is a Supercars team/operation. If key people move on, it can create openings for drivers and shake up who ends up where.
Groves is referenced as a team/operation in the Supercars ecosystem. The discussion implies that if someone like Matt Paine were to leave Groves, it could open up a seat and change the driver market.
Red Bull
"...or if Red Bull dispensed one of their drivers for whatever reason, who are they looking for to change that up..."
Red Bull is a major motorsport brand that supports drivers. If they stop backing a driver or move them elsewhere, it can change which drivers get seats.
Red Bull is mentioned as a driver-supplying brand that can influence Supercars lineups. The hosts are suggesting that if Red Bull “dispensed” a driver, it could trigger contract changes and create opportunities for other drivers.
Paul Morris Motorsports
"I'm still in a group text message with a bunch of people that I work with at Paul Morris Motorsports back in 2010."
They mention Paul Morris Motorsports as where the speaker works. In racing, the team you’re with can affect how the car is set up and who you work with.
Paul Morris Motorsports is referenced as the speaker’s workplace/team context. In Australian motorsport, team affiliations matter because they influence driver lineups, car preparation, and race strategy.
Bathurst top 10 shootout predictions
"But every year we come up with our Bathurst top 10 shootout predictions. Of who's going to get in? The top 10 that are going to get in from Qualifying..."
They’re discussing a Bathurst event format where the quickest cars from qualifying get invited into a special top-10 session. The group is making predictions about which drivers/cars will make that cut.
The hosts are talking about a “Bathurst top 10 shootout,” which is a qualifying-based cut where only the fastest cars make it into a final top-10 session. They’re using predictions and a group chat to guess who will qualify into that shootout.
Qualifying
"The top 10 that are going to get in from Qualifying, and to what we would call Jarrod Ruffys... When do you have to choose? Before Qualifying."
Qualifying is when drivers try to set their fastest lap to earn a better starting spot. At Bathurst, qualifying also decides which cars get into the top-10 shootout.
Qualifying is the session where each car tries to set the fastest lap time to determine starting positions and—at Bathurst—who advances into the top-10 shootout. It’s a key performance indicator because it reflects outright pace over a short run.
Jarrod Ruffys
"and to what we would call Jarrod Ruffys. Jarrod Ruffys, there's a hook, man, I like that... When do you have to choose? Before Qualifying."
“Jarrod Ruffys” sounds like a fun prediction category the group uses alongside the main top-10 shootout picks. It’s meant to guess who could surprise and make the cut.
“Jarrod Ruffys” appears to be a nickname or internal game term for a prediction list separate from the official top-10 shootout cut. The hosts treat it as a way to measure who might “rise to the occasion” and get into the shootout.
Bathurst shootout
"They're all in my Bathurst shootout. All of us, right? And then my Ruffys are David Reynolds... And the Bathurst shootout is typically the fastest 10 guys in that session."
The “Bathurst shootout” refers to the final top-10 session where the fastest qualifiers compete again. The hosts describe it as typically featuring the fastest 10 cars from that session, making it a strong snapshot of pace.
tiebreaker
"There was kind of this, hang on a minute, we've got an equal point situation going into the last few laps... whoever got the best result in the last race was going to break the tiebreaker"
A tiebreaker is what you use when two people end up with the same points. It’s the extra rule that decides who gets the win or the trophy when the normal points don’t separate them.
A tiebreaker is the rule used to decide standings or awards when two competitors have equal points. The hosts are describing how the Jason Richards trophy situation required a procedure for an equal-point scenario late in the race.
stewards
"So it actually got to the point where the stewards were tapped to go, hey, what do you think about all this?"
Stewards are the officials who watch the race and make decisions when something is unclear. If there’s a rules dispute or an incident, they decide what the outcome should be.
In motorsport, stewards are officials who review incidents and apply the sporting rules. They can make calls on penalties, race results, and how tie-breakers or regulations should be handled.
Enduro Cup
"that yes, there's rules in place for Enduro Cup and Sprint Cup."
Enduro Cup is a racing category that’s built around longer races. Because it’s longer, the rules are often more detailed—especially for points and how results are decided.
Enduro Cup refers to an endurance-style competition format within the series, where rules and points are structured around longer race events. The discussion contrasts it with Sprint Cup to highlight that some formats already have tie-handling rules.
Sprint Cup
"that yes, there's rules in place for Enduro Cup and Sprint Cup."
Sprint Cup is the shorter-race version of the competition. Since it’s a different race length, it usually has its own rules for how points and results are handled.
Sprint Cup is the shorter-race counterpart to endurance formats, with its own rules for points and outcomes. The hosts are pointing out that tie-breaking procedures exist for these established categories.
JR trophy
"Obviously, the Peter Brock trophy, the Larry Perkins trophy, the JR trophy. And then there's the Jim Richards medal, Barry Sheen medal. ... Brody Kostecki had two wins and Brock had none, but Brock, by being virtually finishing higher than Brody, would have got the trophy."
The JR trophy is an award given at the end of the event. The discussion is about how the rules decide who earns it, and how that can change depending on the tie-break method.
The “JR trophy” is one of the named awards discussed, tied to how championship merit is interpreted. The hosts use an example involving Brody Kostecki and Peter Brock to show how different tie-break logic could change who “should” receive the trophy.
Larry Perkins trophy
"Obviously, the Peter Brock trophy, the Larry Perkins trophy, the JR trophy. And then there's the Jim Richards medal, Barry Sheen medal."
The Larry Perkins trophy is another named award given at the end of the event. The hosts are talking about making sure the rules are clear so nobody is confused about how trophies are awarded.
The “Larry Perkins trophy” is listed among the awards presented at the end-of-gala. It’s part of the broader discussion about ensuring there’s a clear rule set so teams understand which results map to each trophy.
Peter Brock trophy
"Obviously, the Peter Brock trophy, the Larry Perkins trophy, the JR trophy. ... Brody Kostecki had two wins and Brock had none, but Brock, by being virtually finishing higher than Brody, would have got the trophy."
The Peter Brock trophy is one of the special awards handed out after the season. In this episode, they use Brock’s race results to show how the trophy could go to someone else depending on how the rules are applied.
The “Peter Brock trophy” is mentioned as one of multiple awards presented at the gala. The hosts later reference Peter Brock’s results in a specific example to illustrate how trophy eligibility can hinge on the tie-break rules.
Barry Sheen medal
"And then there's the Jim Richards medal, Barry Sheen medal. So there's not like we've got one for every race."
The Barry Sheen medal is another named award given out at the end. The hosts are pointing out that there are several different awards, so the criteria need to be clear.
The “Barry Sheen medal” is listed alongside other named awards. It appears in the context of explaining that the event has multiple trophies/medals, not one for every race, which can create confusion if rules aren’t clearly communicated.
Jim Richards medal
"And then there's the Jim Richards medal, Barry Sheen medal. So there's not like we've got one for every race."
The Jim Richards medal is one of the awards handed out at the end. The episode is about making sure everyone understands the award rules so there’s no confusion.
The “Jim Richards medal” is mentioned as one of several medals presented, reinforcing that there are multiple award categories beyond just the main championship. The hosts emphasize avoiding confusion about which award is tied to which criteria.
deadlock breaker (tie-breaking rules)
"It was who won the most races, most seconds, most thirds, before you could break the deadlock. So it's how the polar wards worked over the years too."
A deadlock is when the points don’t separate two people. The tie-breaker rules decide who wins by using a priority list like more wins first, then more second places, and so on.
A “deadlock” here means two competitors are level under the championship scoring system. The hosts explain that the rules can “break the deadlock” using a hierarchy of results (wins, then seconds, then thirds) rather than a single-race finishing position.
merit-based trophy awarding
"So that's a whole new series of questions over who actually should win the trophy in merit. ... Well, let's just make sure there's a rule. We don't have to have that question ever again."
The hosts question “who actually should win the trophy in merit,” highlighting a common motorsport governance issue: whether awards reflect race-by-race finishing merit, cumulative performance, or a specific tie-break hierarchy. They conclude by emphasizing the need for clear rules to prevent the same confusion from happening again.
tyres
"Those who remember Jason, his dad always did his tyres for him, [1688.9s] no matter what team he was a popular figure in the paddock. [1691.6s] I think he missed maybe one or two rounds in JRs in tyre supercar career across,"
Tyres are a critical consumable in Supercars because grip and wear directly affect lap times and race strategy. The transcript highlights a “tyres” routine—Jason’s dad doing them—showing how hands-on tyre preparation and timing can influence performance and reliability over a weekend.
paddock
"no matter what team he was a popular figure in the paddock. [1691.6s] I think he missed maybe one or two rounds in JRs in tyre supercar career across,"
The paddock is the busy area near the track where racing teams hang out and do their work. It’s not the race itself—it’s where cars get prepared and team people interact.
In motorsport, the paddock is the off-track area where teams park, work on cars, and handle logistics between sessions. It’s where relationships, team dynamics, and day-to-day operations happen—so “a popular figure in the paddock” signals someone well-known within the racing community.
FPR
"I remember giving Jason a bit of stick one time because he was essentially going to do a deal. [1711.1s] I think it was with FPR or Tickford, whatever they were called that week."
FPR is the name of a racing team/operation. When they mention it in a “deal” context, they mean Jason was considering driving with or for that team.
FPR is a Supercars team/operation referenced here as a potential deal partner for Jason Richards. In Supercars discussions, team names like this matter because they’re tied to car programs, engineering support, and sponsorship relationships.
Mark Porter trophy in Hamilton
"And I guess then the other thing I did want to quickly mention is, [1725.9s] because it was over two weekends, we used to have the Mark Porter trophy in Hamilton."
They’re talking about a specific award called the Mark Porter trophy. It was being presented during the Hamilton event(s), and they mention it to give context to what happened over those weekends.
The Mark Porter trophy is a named award associated with events held in Hamilton, referenced as happening over two weekends. Named trophies like this are common in series support races and event weekends, and they help frame the significance of the weekend beyond just the main championship.
Denny Holm
"And maybe we could bring back the Mark Porter trophy for another one, or pay tribute to Denny Holm or other guys that have been notorious with New Zealand motorsport."
Denny Holm is mentioned as someone worth paying tribute to within New Zealand motorsport. The hosts are discussing how memorial trophies can recognize influential figures in the local racing community.
trophy at a particular round
"I do like the situation that we have where to race for a trophy at a particular round, it might help make some of those smaller rounds mean a little bit more."
They’re saying you can make certain races more special by having a trophy that’s only on the line at that event. That helps even smaller races feel like they matter.
The hosts are talking about using trophies tied to specific race rounds to add meaning and stakes to the calendar. This is a common way to keep smaller events feeling important to teams and fans.
Australian touring car era
"In its Australian touring car, era, early V8 supercars, I think it's great."
They’re referring to a time when touring-car racing was a major part of Australian motorsport. The idea is that trophies should match the history and identity of that era.
“Australian touring car era” is shorthand for the period when touring-car racing dominated Australia’s motorsport scene, including the rise of V8-powered categories. The hosts use it to justify why certain trophies and tributes belong to that historical context.
Bathurst in 06
"And obviously he passed away, Bathurst in 06. Hamilton came on the calendar in 08."
“Bathurst in 06” refers to the year 2006 at Mount Panorama (Bathurst), a cornerstone event in Australian motorsport. The hosts connect Mark Porter’s timeline to Bathurst, emphasizing the significance of major Australian race weekends.
Hamilton came on the calendar in 08
"Hamilton came on the calendar in 08. So it was a logical, nice tie up."
They’re saying Hamilton started hosting races in 2008. The trophy makes sense there because it matches the timing and location of the event.
This refers to the race calendar adding Hamilton in 2008, tying the trophy’s location to when the event became part of the schedule. It’s an example of how organizers align tributes with where and when races are held.
Garth Hannah
"I remember seeing Mark's wife, 80, present Garth Hannah with that the first time. And it was like the biggest, huge trophy you've ever seen."
Garth Hannah is referenced in the context of Mark Porter’s trophy presentation, indicating he was the recipient at that moment. This is a human-interest detail that helps listeners understand how these trophies are actually awarded.
Super 2 series
"And when I think about it, he spent more time in the Super 2 series than sort of, he was a co-driver in the main game for a couple of years there"
Super 2 is like a stepping-stone racing series. Drivers use it to gain experience and then try to move up to the main Supercars championship.
The Super 2 series is a feeder/support category in Australian touring car/supercar racing that helps drivers build experience before moving up to the main Supercars championship. When the host says someone spent more time in Super 2 than co-driving in the main game, they’re talking about a typical career path within the Supercars ladder.
Rua Puna
"New Zealand, is Rua Puna good enough for Super Cars? Jack, yes or no?"
Rua Puna is the race track/location they’re talking about for Supercars in New Zealand. They’re arguing whether it works well for racing and for fans watching.
Rua Puna is the New Zealand venue being discussed as a potential Supercars event location. The hosts debate whether it’s “good enough,” citing practical factors like pit lane size, pit exit placement, traffic, and the overall viewing experience at home.
pit lane wasn't big enough
"So you're okay with the fact that the pit lane wasn't big enough for pit stops."
If the pit lane is too small, teams can’t get cars in and out as smoothly. That can slow down tyre changes and other pit work during the race.
When a pit lane isn’t large enough, it can constrain how many cars can enter/exit the pits at once, potentially causing delays and making pit stops less efficient. In a series where pit strategy matters, this can influence race outcomes and team planning.
Highlands
"You're okay with the fact that there's not more rounds in Australia. You're okay with it, that it's not at Highlands, that the traffic was no good"
Highlands is another track/location mentioned as a place they’re not using. The point is that different venues have different problems and trade-offs.
Highlands is referenced as an alternative venue that isn’t being used (“it’s not at Highlands”). In motorsport discussions, venue choice affects race logistics (traffic, pit access, exits) and can change how the event feels for drivers and viewers.
pit exit placement
"that the pit exit placement is ordinary, that the internet was no good."
Pit exit placement is where cars come back onto the track after leaving the pits. If it’s awkward, it can make it harder to rejoin safely and smoothly.
Pit exit placement is where the pit lane rejoins the track, which can affect safety and race flow—especially when traffic is heavy or when cars are exiting the pits at speed. The host lists it as one of the complaints about the venue.
tyre walls
"There was earthfield tyre walls that..."
Tyre walls are safety barriers made of tyres. They help slow and absorb energy if a car hits the wall, making crashes less severe.
Tyre walls are safety barriers made from stacked tyres designed to absorb impact energy and reduce crash severity. The transcript suggests the track has tyre-wall arrangements that some people criticize or comment on.
Super Series
"And I raced down there in the Super Series. I'll say you drove there, didn't you?"
The “Super Series” is mentioned in the context of racing at Rua Puna, suggesting a racing event/category the speaker participated in. It’s used to justify their opinion about whether the venue works, based on personal experience.
pit stops
"It didn't really hurt anyone the pit stops. No, and I think even the fans, it was a sell out from what they were saying on the TV,"
A pit stop is when the race car pulls into the pit lane during the race to get help from the team. Usually that means things like tire changes, and it’s done strategically so the car can keep going fast.
“Pit stops” are scheduled stops during a race where teams service the car—typically changing tires and sometimes refueling or making adjustments. The key idea is that pit stops are part of race strategy, so they can be planned even when conditions or logistics are imperfect.
Malala
"we have tracks that we could be racing in Australia. Winton, Malala, one raceway. Now, they've all copped a beating over time"
Malala is a race track mentioned as part of the speaker’s list of places Australia could race. Tracks affect how the car drives, so teams would adjust their setup for that circuit.
Malala is another racing venue mentioned alongside Winton and “one raceway,” in the context of Australia needing more events. Like any circuit, its specific characteristics would influence how teams prepare cars for braking, cornering, and tire management.
Winton
"There's not around in Winton because there's not government money to help the regional side of the situation. So I think that that's the next focus. We've got to get around back at Winton."
They’re talking about the race track at Winton and why it makes sense to hold an event there. The point is that some tracks get more support than others, which affects where races can happen.
The hosts discuss Winton as a “logical” venue for the next event. In Australian motorsport, Winton is known as a purpose-built circuit where racing can be staged even when other regions lack funding.
Phillip Island
"Phillip Island is a stretch too far, but Winton is the logical. I love that Rua Puna in the fact that it's an old school race track that they just found a way to make it happen."
Phillip Island is mentioned as a venue that’s “a stretch too far,” implying travel or logistical cost makes it less feasible for the planned event. It’s a well-known Australian circuit, so the comment is about practicality rather than track quality.
infield focus
"because it's got a very infield focus that you can't go out and put the cameras in the middle of the track kind of like you can."
They’re describing how the track is laid out so that the racing and viewing are centered around the infield. Because of that layout, it’s harder to place cameras right in the middle of the track.
The hosts say the track has a “very infield focus,” meaning the action and sightlines are oriented toward the central infield area. That affects broadcast setup because camera placement in the middle of the track may be restricted compared with other circuits.
Queensland Raceway
"They're like Queensland Raceway. Yeah, yeah, correct, correct."
Queensland Raceway is a race track in Australia. The hosts mention it to compare how much of the action you can see while standing near the track.
Queensland Raceway is an Australian motorsport circuit. The hosts use it as a reference point for how much you can see from the trackside, which affects the viewing experience.
Townsville
"[2098.3s] but you do get that fatigue at events. [2100.4s] And we've seen it in Townsville, [2102.4s] where the first three, four, five years are booming and great. [2105.8s] And after a while, the casual viewer falls away."
Townsville is used as an example of a race event that started strong and then got harder to keep going. It’s basically about how fan interest can rise and fall.
Townsville is mentioned as an example of how event popularity can change over time. In motorsport, early years can draw big crowds, but later attendance can drop if casual viewers lose interest.
championship standings
"but the thing is with all this, he's still fourth in the championship. Yeah, it's crazy looking at those stats."
The championship is the season-long points table. You can struggle in qualifying sometimes but still be high overall if you score points consistently.
Championship standings track a driver’s cumulative points over the season, not just single-race results. It’s possible to have poor qualifying or form in one area while still remaining high in the overall championship.
car setup
"I don't think it's because he's forgotten how to qualify, mate. They're missing something with the setup of the car."
“Car setup” refers to how the team configures the car for performance—things like suspension settings, aero balance, tire pressures, and brake/traction behavior. If a driver is strong historically but suddenly qualifies worse, it often points to a setup mismatch for that track or conditions.
teammate effect
"Is it that he doesn't have a teammate that's pushing him along with all due respect to Tom Randall?"
In many racing series, teammates can indirectly improve performance by sharing data, comparing setups, and pushing each other in testing and race weekends. The discussion suggests the driver may be missing that extra feedback or competitive pressure.
new chassis
"He's going to get a new chassis very soon. I think for the next round is the plan for Tassie, but he's been driving the old wildcard chassis that Austin Sindrich drove in Adelaide last year."
A chassis is basically the car’s main frame. If a driver gets a new one, it can help because the old car may be worn out or not behaving as well anymore.
In racing, a chassis is the car’s core structure that everything else mounts to. Getting a new chassis can mean a fresh setup baseline, updated parts, and sometimes a change in how the car behaves on track due to wear or prior damage on the old one.
wildcard chassis
"but he's been driving the old wildcard chassis that Austin Sindrich drove in Adelaide last year. So maybe some fresh metal helps change things there."
A wildcard chassis is a race car that’s being used for a particular event, not necessarily the driver’s usual one. It can be different in feel and performance because it may have been set up or prepared for someone else.
A wildcard chassis refers to a car/vehicle setup that’s used by a driver for a specific event or entry, rather than being their usual permanent race car. In this context, the speaker says the driver has been using a chassis previously driven by Austin Sindrich.
Topol race one
"but outside of Topol race one, all those finishes he's had inside the 10."
“Race one” is the first race at that event. The host is saying his best finishes have been tied to that particular race, rather than happening consistently every time.
“Race one” indicates the first race of an event weekend, and “Topol” appears to be the event/location name referenced by the host. The speaker is using it to highlight that the driver’s best result outside of that specific race has been less frequent.
DNF
"but he's not finishing 20th and 18th and DNFing and having a crashed car. He's staying in the game."
DNF means the driver didn’t finish the race. It’s important because it shows whether the car and driver can reliably complete events, not just go fast.
DNF stands for “Did Not Finish,” meaning the driver didn’t complete the race due to mechanical issues, crashes, or other problems. Comparing DNF frequency to finishing positions helps evaluate consistency and reliability, not just speed.
race performance rankings
"[2259.4s] He's dubbed this the race performance rankings. [2262.0s] And this is more a question of 100 score"
This is a way to judge drivers that considers where they started on the grid. If you start further back and still do well, you get more credit than if you just start up front and finish where you were expected.
The hosts describe a “race performance rankings” method that scores how well a driver did relative to their starting position. Instead of only looking at where you qualified, it rewards making up ground in the race and penalizes poor outcomes from any grid spot.
100 score / zero means worst
"[2262.0s] And this is more a question of 100 score [2265.2s] is the best you could have done in that race [2266.8s] from where he started. [2268.2s] And a zero means the worst you could have gone in that race."
They’re using a simple scale where 100 is the best you could’ve done from your starting spot, and 0 is the worst. That way, you can compare performances fairly even if drivers started in different places.
The scoring system is normalized: a “100” represents the best possible result given where the driver started, while “zero” represents the worst possible outcome. This makes different races and starting positions comparable on the same scale.
performance game in the racing
"…is that performance game in the racing from a poor qualifying position kind of matching or getting close to the winning all the rest?"
They’re talking about how well someone drives during the actual race, not just how they do in qualifying. The question is whether good race results can “make up for” a bad starting spot.
This refers to how well a driver performs in-race compared with their qualifying results. The idea is to see whether strong race pace can offset starting disadvantages and still produce top results.
ranked above Feeney who's leading the championship
"…Waters on that data set is ranked above Feeney who's leading the championship. So it shows that he is doing a mighty job in the races."
The championship is decided by points across many races. So someone might look better in one kind of ranking (like race results) even if another driver is ahead overall in the championship.
Championship standings are based on points accumulated over the season, not just single-race speed. A driver can be ranked above another in a specific dataset (like race results) even if the other is leading the overall championship.
parody tweak
"Is that parody trigger going to continue to keep going off? ... So supercars retain the right to repeal a parody tweak or to do more or do less or do nothing."
A “parody tweak” is a rule or technical adjustment intended to reduce performance gaps between teams/cars. The goal is to keep competition close by changing factors like aerodynamics, power, or other balance parameters.
balance
"So I wanted to ask you as a driver though, we're talking about these little changes in balance. As a driver, how can you feel these? What do they do?"
In racing, “balance” refers to how the car’s handling characteristics are distributed—how it responds to steering, throttle, and braking. Small balance changes can affect grip, rotation, and stability, which drivers feel immediately in corner entry and mid-corner behavior.
downforce
"So to give you some round numbers, let's just say that the kind of the downforce, if you like, is 100 kilos front and rear."
Downforce is the “suction” from the air that presses the car onto the road. More downforce usually means more tire grip. If it’s stronger at the front than the rear (or vice versa), the car will feel like it wants to rotate differently in turns.
Downforce is the aerodynamic force that pushes a race car toward the track. In Supercars, it’s typically generated by wings and body aero, and it affects how much grip the tires have. When downforce changes front-to-rear, it can shift the car’s balance and how it feels in corners.
front and rear to going 95 on the front and 105 on the back
"So you might go from having 100 on each axle, let's say, so front and rear to going 95 on the front and 105 on the back."
They’re giving an example of changing how much “pressing force” the car gets at the front versus the rear. If the rear gets more, the car may feel different in corners compared to when the front and rear are equal. It’s a way to explain why setup and aero balance matter.
The speaker is illustrating aerodynamic load transfer by shifting downforce from an even split (100/100) to an imbalanced split (95 front / 105 rear). That kind of change can meaningfully alter handling balance, even if the absolute numbers sound small. It’s essentially a simplified example of how aero balance affects feel.
cross weight distribution
"but there's probably enough variance between driver's body weights, cross weight distribution, team preparing cars, fuel levels."
Cross weight distribution is a way teams check how weight is spread across the car, especially diagonally. It matters because it can change how the car grips and turns. If the setup isn’t consistent, it can be hard to tell whether the aero change is really the cause of the feel you notice.
Cross weight distribution is a chassis setup measurement used in racing to describe how weight is shared diagonally (front-left to rear-right, and vice versa). It helps teams fine-tune handling balance and tire loading. The speaker includes it as a factor that can mask or outweigh small aerodynamic balance changes.
fuel levels
"but there's probably enough variance between driver's body weights, cross weight distribution, team preparing cars, fuel levels."
Fuel levels change how heavy the car is and where the weight is. As the tank empties, the car can handle a little differently. So if you’re comparing runs, you want to know whether the fuel load was the same.
Fuel level affects vehicle weight and, importantly, where that weight sits in the chassis. As fuel burns off during a session, the car’s balance can change, altering grip and steering feel. That’s why teams track fuel state when comparing practice runs or setup changes.
parity system
"But there certainly is obviously an element of parity that has to be considered... you don't want anyone to be trying to work the parity system to their advantage for the back end of the season."
In some racing series, the rules try to make cars more evenly matched. That way, one team or brand can’t just be faster all the time, and the championship stays interesting.
A parity system in racing is a set of rules designed to keep different teams and cars competitive. It often uses performance balancing so one manufacturer can’t dominate purely through raw advantage.
grid
"...because there's quite a variation in the cars on the grid of each manufacturer, it's going to be challenging..."
The grid is basically the starting lineup for the race. Saying the cars vary on the grid means different types of cars are competing against each other.
The grid refers to the lineup of cars at the start of a race, based on qualifying or series rules. When the hosts say there’s variation in the cars on the grid, they mean different cars/manufacturers are competing under the same event conditions.
data
"...it's going to be challenging because there's more data for the forwards, more data arguably with the chefs..."
Racing teams collect lots of numbers from each event—like speed, tire behavior, and how the car performs. Those numbers can influence how the series decides who gets what advantage or adjustment.
In modern motorsport, teams and series organizers use performance data to evaluate competitiveness and apply balancing measures. The discussion here contrasts how much information is available for different aspects of the field.
rookie drivers
"There's some rookie drivers in there learning their way, just in the championship full stop, let alone race to race and round to round."
A rookie driver is someone in their first season or early seasons of that series. They may not yet know all the tricks to be consistent, so results can be different than with experienced drivers.
Rookie drivers are less experienced competitors, often still learning racecraft, tire management, and how to operate within a championship. The hosts argue that rookies can affect results and therefore the perceived balance between teams.
parity trigger
"But the beauty of it is just because a parity trigger goes off for a certain car, doesn't mean they will do anything about it, or have to do anything about it."
In some racing series, there are rules meant to keep cars performing similarly. A “parity trigger” is like an alarm that goes off when data suggests one car is getting an unfair advantage. Even then, it still has to be verified before anything changes.
A “parity trigger” is a rule-based threshold used in racing to identify when a car is performing too far above or below the expected balance. When it triggers, teams/officials may review or adjust regulations, but it doesn’t automatically guarantee immediate changes or penalties.
stopwatch
"It might be accurate to the stopwatch and the letter of the rule, but how that's applied to who grabs the trophy, just make sure what's happening there is kind of right."
A stopwatch is the simple way of measuring how fast a car is. But racing officials usually want more than just one timing result—they want proof that the difference is consistent.
The “stopwatch” refers to basic timing measurements used to evaluate performance against the rules. In modern racing, stopwatch results are often supplemented by more detailed datasets to confirm whether a performance gap is real and repeatable.
wind tunnels
"but as you know now, they've got a hell of a lot of more data from the wind tunnels and all the testing they've done"
Wind tunnels are like giant indoor “airflow tests” for cars. They help measure how the car’s shape affects grip and speed, especially through downforce. That data can be used to make fairer decisions in racing.
Wind tunnels are used to measure aerodynamic forces like downforce and drag under controlled conditions. In high-level racing, wind-tunnel data helps teams and regulators understand why cars behave differently and whether performance changes are justified.
100 kilos
"So if you look at that, me talking about 100 kilos, if it's a bigger shift and you've got 150 kilos now on the front"
The mention of “100 kilos” is an example of how ballast or weight distribution changes can be used to alter a car’s balance. Even relatively small weight shifts can meaningfully change traction and cornering behavior, which is why officials and teams treat these adjustments seriously.
re-grip
"It's going to have less re-grip. Then you've got to mechanically try and adjust that to get the drivers confident to race these cars into the corners."
Re-grip is how well the tires get traction again after the car is loaded up in a corner. If the car doesn’t have the right balance, the tires may not grip as well when you need them most. That’s why setup changes matter for driver confidence.
“Re-grip” describes how quickly and effectively the tires regain traction after a load transfer or during a change in direction through a corner. If the car’s balance is off, re-grip can drop, making it harder to accelerate confidently and consistently.
confidence window
"and you get out of that window, it's like skipping on a tightrope. You change shoes, you're going to feel a difference in what's under your feet."
They’re describing a “sweet spot” where the car feels stable and easy to drive. Once you go outside that range, the car can feel scary or unpredictable very quickly.
The “window” refers to the range where a driver feels the car is predictable and controllable—often tied to grip, tire temperature, and setup balance. When you “get out of that window,” the car can suddenly feel unstable, like it’s no longer responding the way the driver expects.
skipping on a tightrope
"and you get out of that window, it's like skipping on a tightrope. You change shoes, you're going to feel a difference in what's under your feet."
They’re saying that when you’re pushing hard, tiny changes can make the car feel like it’s about to lose control. It’s a way to explain how “on the edge” racing feels.
This is a metaphor for how small changes can dramatically affect traction and control when you’re near the limit. It reinforces the idea that driver confidence and grip margins are thin in high-performance racing.
2026 Supercars Championship Series
"So congratulations on winning the 2026 Supercars Championship Series by virtue of how it looked. Now I would back up that it looks like a hell of a race car."
They’re talking about the main championship for 2026 in Supercars, and how one team/manufacturer is already looking like a winner. It’s the big-picture context for the race results they’re discussing.
This segment references the “2026 Supercars Championship Series” as the season goal, with Toyota’s success framed around winning the championship. It’s a structural marker for the episode’s discussion of current-season performance and rivalries.
rear wing
"It had a massive rear wing on it, big end plates, but the quarter panels were half the size of a Commodore or a Ford Falcon at the time."
A rear wing is a spoiler on a race car. It helps push the car down onto the track so the tires can grip better in turns.
A rear wing is an aerodynamic device mounted at the back of a race car to generate downforce. More downforce improves tire grip and stability, especially through corners, which is why the host calls out the car’s “massive” wing and end plates.
engine performance question mark
"The biggest question mark for me and has been with any of these new manufacturers has been the engine. How's the engine going to perform?"
When a new brand joins racing, the big unknown is usually the engine. If the engine isn’t strong and reliable, the car can’t compete no matter how good the rest of the car is.
The host frames engine performance as the key uncertainty when new manufacturers enter a racing series. Even with good aero and chassis work, a competitive engine (power, reliability, and drivability) is often what determines whether a team can fight at the front immediately.
Nissan
"We've seen over time, Nissan was probably a downfall in their engine department."
The host is talking about Nissan’s racing engines not being as strong as others. In racing, if the engine isn’t competitive, the whole car usually struggles.
Nissan is referenced as having struggled “in their engine department,” implying that their powerplant development lagged behind competitors. In a racing context, that kind of engine shortfall can translate to slower lap times and/or reliability issues.
Volvo
"Volvo's engine was fantastic, and that was coupled with the good body and aero."
The host says Volvo’s engine was really good, and it worked well with the car’s shape and aero. That combination is what helps a race car perform.
Volvo is described as having an engine that was “fantastic,” and the host links it to good body and aero. This highlights how racing success often comes from a package: powertrain plus aerodynamic efficiency working together.
Rimewood factor
"But what I will also say, without Rimewood, the best Toyota is 11th in the championship. So there's a Rimewood factor in Toyota's performance."
The host is saying Toyota’s performance might be boosted by something specific—called the “Rimewood factor.” In other words, the car’s success may depend on who’s doing the work, not just the brand name.
The host suggests Toyota’s results are influenced by a “Rimewood factor,” implying team/engineering support or a specific operational advantage. The idea is that the best-performing example of a manufacturer may not reflect the manufacturer’s baseline capability alone.
Taupo
"It was third, sorry, when at Taupo behind Woody in that race"
Taupo is where the race happened. The speaker is using that event to explain where the car finished, which helps put their performance comments in context.
Taupo is referenced as the location of a race where the speaker says the car finished third. For listeners, this matters because track characteristics can strongly affect results and how well a given engine/aero package performs.
engine unreliability
"So there's a wood factor. But then equally, there's some engine unreliability going on. We've seen Cameron Hill's car parked up."
“Engine unreliability” means the engine isn’t lasting or working consistently. Even if it’s fast, if it breaks during a race, you can’t finish.
The hosts are talking about engines failing or not lasting as expected during racing. In motorsport, reliability matters as much as outright performance because a failure ends the race and can cost points, trophies, and credibility.
throw a rod
"We saw Heimgartner's throw a rod out of bed at Sydney. We saw Rimewood lose the JR trophy because the engine's gone amiss."
“Throw a rod” is when the engine’s internal parts fail badly—usually the connecting rod breaks and punches through the engine. It typically means the engine is done for the day.
“Throw a rod” means an internal engine failure where a connecting rod breaks and damages the engine block/crankcase, often instantly ending the run. It’s a severe reliability issue and usually points to lubrication, oil pressure, or catastrophic mechanical stress problems.
engine's gone amiss
"We saw Rimewood lose the JR trophy because the engine's gone amiss. So engine performance is one thing."
“Gone amiss” is a general phrase for the engine not behaving correctly—often implying a mechanical fault, misfire, or failure mode that removes the car from contention. In context, it’s tied to losing a trophy due to engine problems.
engine reliability vs engine performance
"So engine performance is one thing. Engine reliability is another. So at that moment, they've got performance by the look of it. Reliability, they need to get on top of that."
Performance is how fast the car can go. Reliability is how likely the engine is to keep running without breaking, especially when it’s pushed hard.
They separate two different goals: performance (how strong the engine feels) and reliability (how long it keeps working under stress). Racing exposes engines to extreme heat, load, and vibration, so reliability becomes a measurable target rather than a hope.
racing as a development tool
"And the only way you get on top of that is by racing. It's called mileage. And they need to make sure those engines are going to do"
They’re saying racing isn’t just for winning—it’s also how teams learn what breaks. By pushing the car hard, they can fix problems faster.
The hosts argue that the only way to improve reliability is to race—because racing provides real-world stress testing. That feedback loop helps teams identify weak components and refine setups and maintenance intervals.
mileage
"And the only way you get on top of that is by racing. It's called mileage. And they need to make sure those engines are going to do"
“Mileage” here means how far the engine has to go before it’s expected to fail. Teams use it to plan maintenance and keep the engine running long enough to finish.
Here, “mileage” is shorthand for how many kilometers the engines must survive before the next service or rebuild. In racing, teams track mileage to predict failures and schedule maintenance so components last the required distance.
distance-based durability targets (e.g., 1,000 kilometers)
"And they need to make sure those engines are going to do 1,000 kilometers come October, because if they're failing components at 950 km an hour, 950 kilometers."
They’re talking about how long the engine must last in real race conditions—measured in kilometers. The goal is to avoid breakdowns before the event is over.
The hosts describe a durability requirement: engines must complete a set distance (about 1,000 km by October) without failing critical components. This is a motorsport engineering reality—teams design, test, and manage parts to survive a specific race calendar and stint length.
bathers twice
"But yeah, and that's where the business has always had to have engines that will do in excess of 2,000 kilometers because you've got to do bathers twice. So watch that space."
They’re saying the car has to run long enough to cover the event more than once. That means the engine needs to last through repeated hard use.
The transcript likely refers to completing the event distance multiple times (the audio reads like “bathers twice”). The key idea is that race schedules require repeated long-distance operation, so engines must survive more than a single stint.
Bob Jane's Calder Park Thunderdome
"who Jaco was a superstar at Bob Jane's Calder Park Thunderdome. She passed away recently after a four-year battle with cancer."
This is a well-known race track in Australia. The hosts are talking about it because it’s where the driver made history early on.
Bob Jane's Calder Park Thunderdome was a famous Australian motorsport venue, known for hosting major touring-car and oval-style racing events. In this segment, it’s used as a historical anchor for where the driver’s early success happened.
Oscar race held on the Dome in 88
"But she won the very first Oscar race held on the Dome in 88. And then she won in NASCAR a couple of years later"
They’re referencing a particular race event from 1988 at that track. The point is that it was her first big win there.
The “Oscar race” refers to a specific event held at the Calder Park Thunderdome in 1988. It’s notable here because the speaker frames it as the earliest major win for the driver at that venue.
first female driver in the world to win at that level of NASCAR
"And then she won in NASCAR a couple of years later And became the first female driver in the world to win at that level of NASCAR."
They’re talking about a major barrier being broken—she was the first woman to win at the highest level of NASCAR. It’s important because it changed what people thought was possible in racing.
This is a “first-of-its-kind” milestone describing breakthrough representation in a top-tier racing category. It’s worth explaining because it contextualizes why the driver’s achievements mattered beyond just race results.
Melinda Price
"I first was aware of Terry's passing as Melinda Price shared something on her Facebook page. And I decided to have a look through the comments."
Melinda Price is mentioned as the person who posted about Terry Sawyer online. The host then used that post to find more people talking about her.
Melinda Price is referenced as sharing news about Terry Sawyer on Facebook, which then prompted the host to look into tributes and comments. This matters because it shows how motorsport community updates circulate and shape public remembrance.
Castro-Cougars program
"I wonder why she may or may not have been considered for the Castro-Cougars program. Yeah, well, she very much left the sport"
This sounds like a driver-development program. It’s basically a way for racing teams or sponsors to spot talented people and help them move up to bigger races.
The “Castro-Cougars” program sounds like a motorsport talent pathway—an initiative meant to identify and develop drivers for higher-level racing opportunities. In Australian racing history, these kinds of programs often acted as feeders into professional series.
Supercars Australian Touring Car Championship
"She also still holds a record in the Supercars Australian Touring Car Championship Records. We spoke of Toyota."
They’re talking about a major Australian racing series for touring cars. The point is that the driver still has a record in that top-level competition.
This is the Australian touring-car/supercar racing championship context the hosts are referencing when they say a driver still holds a record. It helps listeners understand the level of competition and the significance of the record being mentioned.
Toyota Corolla
"We spoke of Toyota. They ran a star search program in 1989. Their second Corolla at every round had a different driver in it."
They’re talking about a Toyota Corolla used in racing. The key idea is that Toyota kept the same car model but swapped in different drivers for different events.
The Toyota Corolla is being discussed as the basis for a touring-car style entry in the Australian Supercars environment. The hosts mention Toyota running a “star search” program where different drivers were placed into the Corolla at each round, highlighting how teams used the same model platform while rotating talent.
Tasmania
"Michael Douse and the Superbike Rider and Neil Bates, the rally star, the guys who got put together in the car for Bathurst. Terry did the round in Tasmania."
Tasmania is where one of the races took place. They’re just adding detail about which rounds happened where.
Tasmania is mentioned as a location for a racing round, reinforcing that the championship traveled across different venues. It’s part of the timeline of events tied to the driver’s participation.
Bathurst Great Race
"and Barry seat and 65 Armstrong 500 winner at Bathurst, [2928.4s] long time part of the Australian motor racing community,"
Bathurst is one of the most famous endurance races in Australia. People talk about it like a career-defining event, especially when they mention how many times someone started the race.
The Bathurst Great Race refers to the main endurance event at Mount Panorama in Bathurst, commonly known as the Bathurst 1000. It’s a cornerstone of Australian motorsport, and “starts” and “campaigns” there are a big deal in driver and team legacies.
Ford Cortina
"[2970.2s] It was that winning. [2970.5s] The winning Cortina. [2971.4s] Yeah, the winning Cortina."
The Cortina is a Ford model that was raced in big Australian events. Here, they’re talking about a Cortina that won at Bathurst, which is a big part of racing history.
The Ford Cortina is a classic Australian touring car that competed in major events like Bathurst. In this segment, “the winning Cortina” refers to a specific Bathurst-winning campaign tied to the host’s mentioned legacy, highlighting how influential that model was in the sport’s history.
engine failed
"And then as you know, dad went on to win the race because Glenn's engine failed. And Bo was the builder of the engines."
When they say the engine failed, it means the engine broke or stopped working properly. In a long race, that usually ends your chances even if you were doing well.
“Engine failed” means the engine stopped working reliably enough to end the car’s competitive run—often due to mechanical breakdown, overheating, or lubrication issues. In endurance racing, engine reliability is as critical as speed because a single failure can erase a strong result.
engine builder
"And Bo was the builder of the engines. And just the highlights of Bo with his hand in his head, just memories I remember as a kid."
An engine builder is the person who builds and sets up the race engine. Their work affects both how fast the engine is and whether it can survive the race.
An engine builder is a specialist who assembles, prepares, and often tunes race engines for performance and durability. In Australian motorsport, engine builders can be as influential as the driver because they determine reliability under race conditions.
100th Gen 3 race
"The next round is the 100th Gen 3 race since the introduction of the rule era in 2023. So let's take a look at some numbers of how it's all unfolded, of who's done what."
They’re talking about a big milestone race number—this is the 100th race in the Gen 3 era. “Gen 3” is the current generation of Supercars rules and cars.
The hosts reference a milestone “100th Gen 3 race,” tying it to the Gen 3 era of Australian supercars. It’s essentially a count of how many races have happened since the Gen 3 rules were introduced.
rule era in 2023
"The next round is the 100th Gen 3 race since the introduction of the rule era in 2023. So let's take a look at some numbers of how it's all unfolded, of who's done what."
They’re saying that in 2023, Supercars started a new set of rules. New rules can change how teams build and tune their cars, so results can look very different afterward.
“Rule era in 2023” refers to when Supercars introduced a new set of regulations that define how Gen 3 cars are built and raced. When the rules change, teams’ performance can shift quickly because car design, aero, and setup priorities evolve.
Winds by driver
"Winds by driver has to be kind of where we start. And no surprise here. Brock Feeney's the man on top, 28 wins."
“Wins by driver” is a stats-driven way to summarize who has been most successful across races. In motorsport, win counts help compare drivers’ performance over a season or era, especially when rules are consistent.
Brock Feeney
"And no surprise here. Brock Feeney's the man on top, 28 wins. Lots of those coming last year, but he is headed in shoulders above the opposition there."
They’re talking about Brock Feeney as the leading driver in their standings. The show is using his race wins as evidence that he’s been the most successful.
Brock Feeney is highlighted as the top driver in the stats being discussed, with the hosts citing his win total. In a Supercars context, driver win counts are often used to judge form across a rules era.
deadlock of eight
"but Ryan Woods probably going to emerge from that deadlock of eight to start to move his way up."
They’re describing a situation where the standings are really close, so it’s hard for anyone to jump ahead. A small difference—like points or results—keeps the order stuck.
A “deadlock” here refers to a tight points/position situation where multiple drivers are effectively tied in the championship fight. The “eight” likely refers to a small gap or equal number of results that keeps the order from changing.
sabbatical
"But you look at Brodie Kosteke there, he missed eight of those races in 2024 when he was off on the sabbatical."
A sabbatical just means the driver took time off for a while. In racing, skipping events usually hurts your championship position because you can’t score points.
A sabbatical is a planned break from competition. In motorsport standings, missing races can dramatically affect points and momentum, even if a driver is otherwise fast.
triple eight
"So if we look at how it's gone though by the team, no surprises, triple eight are on top with 40."
Triple Eight is a top Supercars team. They’re being called out because they’re currently leading the team competition.
Triple Eight Race Engineering is one of the most successful teams in the Supercars Championship. The discussion highlights them as leading the team standings with a high points total.
Albert Park
"By the way, there's been 99 races, but there's only 98 wins because Albert Park, remember, last year, the Sunday race started."
Albert Park is a famous race track in Melbourne. They’re talking about a weird race weekend where one of the races didn’t finish, so the total wins don’t line up normally.
Albert Park is a circuit in Melbourne that hosts major motorsport events, including Supercars races. The hosts are referencing a schedule anomaly where the Sunday race started but didn’t finish, affecting the win count.
tallying stat
"So that's a tallying stat that triple eight are definitely the pick of the teams. You're right. I think groves in particular and Wolken shores are the ones that are going to go up and DJR."
They’re talking about a simple numbers-based summary of results. The idea is: if the win/points totals keep adding up, that’s a sign the team is really performing well.
A “tallying stat” here means a results-based count (like total wins or points) used to judge team performance. The hosts treat these numbers as evidence of which teams are the strongest at the moment.
by manufacturer
"Let's look by manufacturer though, unsurprisingly, the volume of wins for Erebus and triple eight, particularly over the journey at 56. Ford, if I didn't know the numbers beforehand, I'm sort of surprised a bit by that"
“By manufacturer” indicates the hosts are breaking performance down not just by team, but by brand (e.g., Ford vs others) across the season. This helps listeners see which car brands are winning more often, regardless of team.
shootouts
"Not surprising when we look at shootouts as well by drivers that brocks at the top there, but Chaz gets in a lot to them, but doesn't do anything with them."
A “shootout” is a special, intense session where drivers try to set the best time and lock in a strong starting spot. Doing well there usually means you’re quick when it really matters.
In Supercars, a “shootout” is a short, high-pressure qualifying-style session where drivers fight for top grid positions. It’s often used to separate the fastest cars when conditions are tight, so consistent performance there can strongly correlate with race results.
poll
"He hasn't had a poll in a shootout, I don't think since Bathurst 2021, which is back in the Gen 2 days, but Anton Di Pasquale is on a great shootout streak at the moment."
They mean “pole,” which is when a driver qualifies first and starts at the very front of the grid. Starting first can make the race easier because you avoid getting stuck in traffic.
In this context, “poll” is almost certainly a transcription of “pole,” meaning the driver qualified first and starts from the front of the grid. Pole position is a big deal in Supercars because it can reduce traffic risk and improve race strategy.
Gen 2 days
"He hasn't had a poll in a shootout, I don't think since Bathurst 2021, which is back in the Gen 2 days, but Anton Di Pasquale is on a great shootout streak at the moment."
“Gen 2 days” means the Supercars were built under the Gen 2 rules at that time. When the rules change, the cars can drive differently, so results from that era aren’t always directly comparable to newer cars.
“Gen 2” refers to the Supercars generation that used the Gen 2-era technical regulations (a specific set of body, aero, and chassis rules). When the series moves between generations, the cars’ balance and performance characteristics can change, which affects how drivers score in things like shootouts.
aerodynamics
"It just didn't look any good, but that was by virtue of the technical rules and people taking advantage of the aerodynamics and whatnot."
Aerodynamics is how the car cuts through the air. In racing, small changes can make the car stick to the track better or go faster. The episode suggests teams can spend a lot of effort to optimize that within the rules.
Aerodynamics is the study of how air flows around a race car, strongly affecting downforce, drag, and stability. The hosts mention teams taking advantage of aerodynamic rules “and whatnot,” implying that subtle aero exploitation can create performance differences. In modern touring-car racing, aero development is often a major cost driver.
curb costs
"The main reason for Gen 3 was to curb costs, and it hasn't. I can't say anything different, because if I was to say that it was cheaper, unfortunately, I'd be lying and that's, I can't lie."
“Curb costs” means the sport tried to make racing cheaper. The problem is that teams still look for ways to go faster, so spending can move around instead of disappearing. The hosts are saying the plan didn’t reduce costs as much as hoped.
“Curb costs” describes a regulatory intent to reduce the overall expense of competing. In motorsport, cost-control measures often target expensive development areas, but teams may still spend heavily to find performance gains within the allowed rules. The episode frames Gen 3 as a cost-control attempt that didn’t fully succeed.
technical displacement
"And because they're so even in their technical displacement, the only varying aspects, brand to brand engine and aerodynamics, which is the bodywork, it really drives the price up of engineers and drivers."
“Technical displacement” is basically the engine-size category the rules allow. If everyone is equal in that category, teams can’t just win by having a bigger engine. Then the fight moves to other details like tuning and body shape.
“Technical displacement” refers to the regulated engine capacity class used by the rules. The episode claims the cars are “even in their technical displacement,” meaning the engine-size category is standardized so teams can’t gain an advantage purely by using a bigger engine. That shifts the competitive battle toward other areas like brand-specific engine characteristics and aero/bodywork.
bodywork
"the only varying aspects, brand to brand engine and aerodynamics, which is the bodywork, it really drives the price up of engineers and drivers."
Bodywork is the car’s outer shape—its panels and contours. In racing, the shape can change how air flows, which affects grip and speed. The episode suggests teams spend money refining that because it matters.
Bodywork is the car’s exterior panels and shapes that influence airflow and aerodynamic performance. The hosts connect bodywork to aerodynamics, implying that differences in external design can affect downforce and efficiency. In regulated series, bodywork becomes a key development area because it’s one of the few places teams can still differentiate.
Commodore
"we had to leave Commodore and Falcon and Mustang, Gen 2."
“Commodore” is shorthand for the Holden Commodore, a popular Australian car used in racing. The hosts are talking about which generation of race cars they moved away from.
“Commodore” refers to the Holden Commodore, a long-running Australian performance sedan that’s been a major part of local touring-car and supercar culture. In this segment it’s mentioned alongside other Gen 2-era rivals, implying a specific generation of competition cars.
Falcon
"we had to leave Commodore and Falcon and Mustang, Gen 2."
“Falcon” means the Ford Falcon, a famous Australian car that’s also been used in racing. They’re comparing different generations of race cars.
“Falcon” here is shorthand for the Ford Falcon, another key Australian racing platform. The mention in the “Gen 2” context suggests the discussion is about which car families were used in an earlier supercar rule set.
Mustang
"we had to leave Commodore and Falcon and Mustang, Gen 2."
“Mustang” is the Ford Mustang, a well-known performance car. In this conversation it’s one of the headline race cars from the earlier generation they’re moving on from.
“Mustang” refers to the Ford Mustang as a marquee supercar competitor in this era. The hosts group it with other Gen 2 cars, then later talk about marquee cars with racing pedigree, tying it to the series’ evolution.
Camaro
"Their marquee cars, a Camaro, a Mustang and a Supra,"
“Camaro” is the Chevrolet Camaro. The hosts are saying it’s a well-known racing car with a strong motorsport background.
“Camaro” refers to the Chevrolet Camaro, called out here as a marquee car with racing pedigree and history. The segment is discussing how the series’ “Gen 3” era changed the lineup and what that means for competition.
Toyota Supra
"Their marquee cars, a Camaro, a Mustang and a Supra,"
The Toyota Supra is a famous sports car from Toyota. Here it’s mentioned as one of the headline cars in the racing series, with a strong motorsport background.
“Toyota Supra” is the specific Japanese sports car named as one of the marquee Gen 3-era competitors. The hosts emphasize that it has racing pedigree and history, framing it as part of the series’ modern lineup.
100th race at Simmons Plains
"So that is Gen 3, having its 100th race at Simmons Plains when we kick off down there."
They’re talking about a big milestone: Gen 3 reaching its 100th race at Simmons Plains. It’s basically the “next big event” they’re looking forward to.
This marks a milestone event: Gen 3’s 100th race at Simmons Plains. It’s a structural “what’s coming up” moment in the episode, tying the discussion of Gen 3’s evolution to a specific upcoming race venue.
Super 440
"The tire power Tasmania Super 440. It's a little bit of a mouthful, but I managed to get it all out."
“Super 440” appears to be the event name/format for the race weekend being referenced. The hosts mention it alongside the venue and a sponsor-like phrase, indicating a specific championship round or race meeting.
workbench
"Now it's time for the workbench. Righto, it's time for the workbench. Jack got a couple of topics I want to dive into this week."
They’re starting a section where they slow down and talk through a specific question. Think of it like the show’s “let’s dig into this” part.
The hosts switch into a structured segment they call the “workbench,” where they break down a current automotive/supercars business question. It’s essentially the episode’s discussion forum for analysis rather than news delivery.
supercar CEO
"James Warburton's departure from supercars has opened up a void for who might become the new CEO there. Barclay Netifold is kind of interim CEO."
They’re debating what kind of background the top boss of a Supercars series should have. The core idea is whether racing knowledge helps, or whether business experience is enough.
This segment is about what skill set a Supercars organization’s CEO should have—specifically whether motorsport experience matters versus coming from outside racing. It’s a leadership/strategy concept: balancing commercial needs (sponsorship, funding) with technical credibility and stakeholder management in motorsport.
race team needs to be commercial
"And this is actually a question that most teams face to noons. Because I remember chatting with my dad about this years ago, because a race team needs to be commercial."
Even if a team is fast, it still has to make money to keep running. That usually comes from sponsors and other funding sources.
The hosts highlight a key motorsport reality: teams must be commercially viable to survive. That means securing sponsorships and funding to cover operating costs, not just performing on track.
Holden Racing team
"And he would speak to John Cranon, who ran the Holden Racing team. [3663.3s] And John Cranon was very good on this side."
Holden Racing Team was a well-known racing team in Australia. The discussion here is about the team’s leadership and how they manage the business side of racing, not just the cars.
The Holden Racing Team (HRT) was a major Australian motorsport team closely associated with the Supercars scene. In this segment, the host mentions John Cranon running the team, highlighting the business/operations side of racing.
CEO role in motorsport
"So my point of that is the CEO role is probably a very similar thing. [3680.2s] Because you've got a product of car racing, [3682.9s] which is arguably nuts and bolts."
The host is saying a motorsport CEO can’t just think about the business—they also need to understand the technical side. The job is balancing what makes the racing work with what makes the whole show and company succeed.
The segment frames the CEO role in racing as needing both “nuts and bolts” technical understanding and the ability to run entertainment/business operations. It’s essentially about balancing engineering decisions with commercial realities in a motorsport product.
DJR
"Of course, he moved from Shell to go work for Dick Johnson... And then he was grabbed out of DJR to become the CEO."
DJR (Dick Johnson Racing) is a well-known racing team in Australia. The speaker is saying a key person moved from the team into a top leadership role for the whole sport.
DJR is Dick Johnson Racing, one of the most historically significant teams in Australian Supercars. The transcript says Wayne Caddick moved from Shell to work for DJR, then was taken from DJR to become CEO—highlighting the close ties between teams and the sport’s leadership.
Shell
"Of course, he moved from Shell to go work for Dick Johnson... And then he was grabbed out of DJR to become the CEO."
Shell is a big fuel and energy company. In racing, companies like Shell often sponsor teams and provide support, and the transcript is using that career move to explain how people flow between business and motorsport.
Shell is an energy company that has long supported motorsport through sponsorship and fuel/lubricant programs. Here, the speaker notes Wayne Caddick moved from Shell into the racing world by joining Dick Johnson Racing.
unique business structure
"So I think the thing that occurs to me is that this is such a unique business, a unique sport... It's a very unique business structure, method, model."
They’re saying this sport isn’t run like a typical sports league. Because there are lots of different investors and groups involved, it’s harder to keep everyone aligned.
The hosts are describing Supercars as a “unique business structure” compared with other Australian sports. The idea is that motorsport involves multiple stakeholders—investors, boards, and competing interests—so governance and decision-making are more complex than in many mainstream leagues.
race tracks
"So he's got connections with all of the governments and the organizations, [3903.3s] the race tracks, the teams. [3905.0s] So he's kind of the guy there that knows what's going on."
Race tracks are the specific circuits where races happen. Different tracks can make the cars behave differently, so teams and organizers care a lot about them.
Race tracks are the circuits where motorsport events are held, and they strongly affect car setup and driving style. Track relationships can also matter for scheduling, facility access, and event execution.
steering wheel
"And then you've got someone like Shane Howard there to steer him. [3953.1s] Yeah, just grab the steering wheel if we're heading a bit off course here, [3955.7s] like trying to put a race on the moon or something that's not going to happen."
They’re using “steering wheel” as a figure of speech for control and direction. It’s like saying someone should be the one guiding where things go.
The “steering wheel” is used here as a metaphor for taking control of direction and decision-making. In motorsport, it also evokes the idea of guiding a car through a course—mirroring how leadership “steers” a sport.
television commentary situation
"We didn't talk on the first episode of the undercut this year about the television commentary situation and there's been so much written and so much said."
They’re talking about the TV broadcast commentary—who’s commentating and how that situation played out. In racing, the way it’s covered on TV can shape how fans see what’s happening.
This is a discussion about how broadcast/TV commentary roles and coverage decisions can influence public perception and the “feuds” around a racing series. In motorsport, commentary changes can affect fan narratives, driver/team branding, and even sponsor visibility.
Matt Nolte
"I want to focus on these guys, on Matt Nolte, on Richard Crier, on Chad Nailon. These guys have done nothing wrong here."
They’re talking about Matt Nolte as a person who, in their view, has been treated unfairly. The episode is basically arguing that he and others have worked hard and deserve better.
Matt Nolte is mentioned as one of the people the hosts believe have been unfairly targeted. In a supercars context, this kind of discussion is usually about team/crew roles and how support work is recognized.
Richard Crier
"I want to focus on these guys, on Matt Nolte, on Richard Crier, on Chad Nailon. These guys have done nothing wrong here."
They mention Richard Crier as part of the group they feel is being unfairly criticized. The point is that he’s been working hard behind the scenes and deserves respect.
Richard Crier is named alongside other individuals the speaker says have done nothing wrong. The surrounding talk suggests they’ve been doing long-term support work and are being criticized despite that.
Chad Nailon
"I want to focus on these guys, on Matt Nolte, on Richard Crier, on Chad Nailon. ... But I think it's been so unfair and I want to focus on these guys..."
They’re talking about Chad Nailon and how people online have been hard on him. The host’s argument is that he’s been doing a great job for years and deserves better.
Chad Nailon is discussed as someone the hosts believe has received unfair treatment online. The segment frames him as a long-time contributor who’s “damn good” at what he does, implying a support/operations role in supercars.
Speedway
"They have been toiling away for years, calling supports, calling Speedway, calling Speedway, calling all the stuff that there can be to call."
They mention “Speedway” in the context of calling for help. That usually means race-event logistics—getting the right approvals, access, or support for an event.
“Speedway” is referenced as a place/organization the crew members have been calling for support. In motorsport coverage, this typically points to event venues, race operations, or sanctioning/event infrastructure needed to get cars and teams set up.
gradual shift
"So a more gradual shift would have been the appropriate way... maybe it would have been, okay, for the next couple of years... use those smaller rounds... to blood these other guys and give them a bit of opportunity..."
A gradual shift means you don’t change everything at once. You introduce changes slowly so fans can get used to them, and new people get time to prove themselves.
A “gradual shift” is a change-management approach: instead of replacing key figures or formats abruptly, you phase them in over time. In motorsport broadcasting, this helps viewers adjust and maintains continuity while new talent gains exposure.
commentary box
"[4216.9s] Yeah. And look, I will take this opportunity to congratulate Richard Crowe. [4221.0s] I thought he did a phenomenal job in his first crack in the commentary box for the New Zealand. [4227.2s] He's officially a key lean now."
The “commentary box” is where the people on TV/radio talk through the race. If someone hasn’t had much practice or testing, they may be learning in real time, which can affect how they call the action.
The “commentary box” is where broadcasters provide live race narration and analysis. In motorsport, the quality of commentary often depends on how much recent track time and testing the commentators have, which can shape credibility.
test laps
"[4245.9s] And I feel that the word unfair is a little bit there too that these guys have been throwing in. [4251.7s] They haven't had many test laps here. [4253.6s] They have been put in the race car in a high level of the role, particularly James,"
“Test laps” are practice runs used to learn a circuit, refine car setup, and build confidence before race conditions. Limited test time can make it harder for drivers or new commentators to interpret what’s happening on track, especially when they’re “learning on the fly.”
learning on the fly
"[4253.6s] They have been put in the race car in a high level of the role, particularly James, [4257.9s] without much run up. [4259.3s] And he's learning on the fly. [4261.1s] You can see it."
“Learning on the fly” means figuring things out as you go, not after lots of practice. In racing, that can be tough because you’re dealing with speed, track conditions, and pressure all at once.
“Learning on the fly” describes adapting in real time without the usual preparation. In racing, that can mean adjusting driving style, understanding grip changes, and managing pace while still under competitive pressure.
Tassie and Darwin
"So Nolt's gets his go for Tassie and Darwin. Yes."
They’re talking about events in Tasmania and Darwin. Those are different places with different tracks and conditions, so getting a chance there is a big deal for a driver.
“Tassie” is shorthand for Tasmania, and Darwin is in Australia’s Northern Territory—both are major locations on the Supercars calendar. The transcript indicates Matt Nolt has “his go” at these events, which is relevant because track characteristics and local conditions can differ widely.
Hidden Valley racetrack
"you've already heard Matt because he did the on track for many years up on the Hidden Valley racetrack at Darwin. So he's not completely unfamiliar to the Darwin race fans, but he's done plenty of speedway up there as well."
Hidden Valley is a race track in Darwin. If a driver has raced there before, they usually know the layout and what the track is like, which can help them perform better.
Hidden Valley is a well-known circuit in Darwin, Northern Territory, used for major motorsport events. The transcript ties Matt Nolt’s experience to “on track” work there, which matters because local familiarity can influence driver confidence and racecraft.
Darwin race fans
"So he's not completely unfamiliar to the Darwin race fans, but he's done plenty of speedway up there as well."
They’re talking about the people who follow racing in Darwin. Since Matt has been involved there before, the local crowd already knows who he is.
The hosts reference Darwin’s local fanbase, emphasizing that Matt Nolt is already known to the audience through prior on-track involvement. In motorsport, local recognition can affect media attention and how quickly a driver’s story catches on.
bitumen racing
"[4347.2s] I know. [4352.8s] bitumen racing. [4353.7s] And I think she's she adds a great dimension to it and has been improving her knowledge and doing a"
Bitumen is basically asphalt. When people say “bitumen racing,” they mean racing on paved roads, and the tires and driving feel can be different because the surface grips in a particular way.
“Bitumen racing” refers to racing on asphalt roads, where the surface is typically made from bitumen (asphalt binder). It matters because grip, tire wear, and braking behavior can differ from other surfaces like gravel or tarmac with different textures.
pit line
"[4371.6s] By the way, Chad now has done a great job in the pit line the last couple of rounds too. [4374.7s] So I'm not trying to individualize anybody or whatever, but it's it's a change period."
The pit line is the lane where race cars pull in to get serviced. How quickly and smoothly the team works there can change where the car ends up on the track.
The “pit line” is the pit lane area where teams service cars during races. It’s a key part of race operations—timing, communication, and execution in the pit lane can directly affect track position.
Request an Explanation
Heard something you'd like explained? We'll add it to this episode.
Sign in to request explanations for terms you heard.
Want to learn more?
Browse our glossary for plain-English explanations of automotive terms, jargon, and concepts.
Help improve this episode
See something that's not quite right? Our annotations are AI-generated and can sometimes miss the mark. Click the flag icon on any annotation to suggest a correction.