Felix Rosenquist
Felix Rosenquist is the driver the hosts say won the Indy 500. They explain that he was strong all day—fast in qualifying and making smart strategy decisions—so the win wasn’t luck.
Felix Rosenquist is credited with winning the Indy 500, and the hosts emphasize that his win wasn’t just a last-lap moment. They describe him as leading on merit, making the right call with his team on strategy, and being fast through qualifying and the race itself.
Hear It Discussed
"The onboard of the, like this dude, Felix Rosenquist has, Felix Rosenquist has the best motorsport moment that a fucking person can have."
Ferrari Luce; My Indy500 Trip; '27 Aston DB12S Review The Smoking Tire
"⁓ sixth place, a very tired ⁓ allegedly, ⁓ Felix Rosenquist started 16th and and ⁓ ran his way up to sixth in a really strong race."
Indycar News in 10 Minutes - Detroit Recap & Gateway Preview - Ep. 32 The Indycar Dad Podcast
"My choice, shock, Felix Rosenquist, of course. And honestly, it could have been Malukas. ... He won the Indy 500 because he was on the front foot from the second they started practicing to the..."
Rosenqvist's Historic Indy 500 Win, Antonelli wins 4th straight & Kyle Busch's Lasting Legacy SPEED with Harvick and Buxton
Episodes Mentioning "Felix Rosenquist"
Indycar News in 10 Minutes - Detroit Recap & Gateway Preview - Ep. 32
The Indycar Dad Podcast
351 - Monaco GP Prerace 2026
Shift+F1: A Formula 1 Podcast
The Pit Straight: Post-Indy Motown Momentum
Frontstretch Podcast Network
The Pits Are Open | Indy 500 Recap, McLaren Hospitality & Kevin Krauss
The Pits Are Open Podcast
Bringing the Heat: Eric Brennan Broadcasting Up the Racing Tiers
Frontstretch Podcast Network
Midweek Motorsport s21 e20
Midweek Motorsport
Ferrari Luce; My Indy500 Trip; '27 Aston DB12S Review
The Smoking Tire
Happy Hour: Remembering Kyle Busch With Holly Cain
Frontstretch Podcast Network
Rosenqvist's Historic Indy 500 Win, Antonelli wins 4th straight & Kyle Busch's Lasting Legacy
SPEED with Harvick and Buxton
Help Improve This Entry
Spot an error or have a better explanation? Let us know.